| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "MATRIX PLATO CAVE ALLEGORY": |
|
|
"The Matrix" and Plato's "Cave Allegory", 2002.
A comparative analysis of the themes of light and darkness in the film "The Matrix" and Plato's "Cave Allegory".
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 2 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will discuss the relation of Plato's "Cave Allegory" with the movie "The Matrix". By understanding the relationships between light and darkness within the movie, we can understand the relationship that both these stories share in their scope. The movie will be examined to show the light and darkness relationship, as will the "Cave Allegory" in comparison to make clear how the two stories are interconnected in their scope of knowledge verses ignorance.
| |
|
'The Binds of Love' vs 'Cave Allegory', 2006.
An analysis of childhood development in Jessica Benjamin's 'The Binds of Love' and Plato's 'Cave Allegory' in modern psychology.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 2 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents Benjamin's model for childhood developmental stages, showing a sense of self (as learned from the mother) in relation to the other (the individual objective identity). Plato comparably defines these aspects of self in relation to his prisoners in the cave, as they clearly are mimicking what the shadows are teaching them on the wall after birth. However, according to the paper, identity in Benjamin's view can also come from outside sources that reveal the other that denies the immediate lessons one is taught as a new born.
From the Paper
"This study will compare Jessica Benjamin's theory of 'self' and the 'other' within the scope of Plato's Cave Allegory. By analyzing the slow maternal sense of identity a child learns within a developmental mode, one can realize how Plato's Cave Allegory reveals a similar pattern within an evolving sense of self. Benjamin reveals the idea of self as being a series of illusions brought about by a maternal influence, but not without the basis of self being dissolved by refusing the 'other'. In this way, Benjamin's freedom or imprisonment of the infant mind is readily comparable to Plato's Cave Allegory as a symbolic representation of the discovery of self and the other. The Cave Allegory is a lesson in the fundamental principles of perception and knowledge that Plato imparts on the reader. "
| |
|
Cave Allegory, 2006.
An analysis of the Cave Allegory and the Trial of Socrates.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 2 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this paper, the three stages of the Cave Allegory and the Trial of Socrates help to define how knowledge and perceptions create the forms through the five senses. In many ways, Plato defines the error of the five senses and does not trust what they teach us about the truth.The paper further discusses how only reasoning and the human soul provide adequate tools to understand higher truths, which the Cave Allegory clearly defines.
From the Paper
" This philosophical analysis will examine the premise of the Cave Allegory and the three parts of the journey of human perception and knowledge that this symbolic analogy entails. Through the wisdom of the Cave Allegory the Trial of Socrates can also help identify the significant factors that surround the charges placed against him by the Athenian court. In this manner, the works of Plato and Socrates can help understand and analyze the foundations of classical Greek philosophy through the premise of perception, forms, and knowledge. The Apology by Plato is the trial that was created by the Athenian Council to incriminate Socrates for his belief systems. Socrates was charged with corrupting the youth of Athens with his ideas and application of the ideas in his dialogues."
| |
|
Understanding the Cave Allegory, 2005.
Examines whether Plato?s image of the cave as a purported illustration of a philosophical quest is actually understandable.
4,156 words (approx. 16.6 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 111.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In the Seventh Book of Plato?s "Republic", the famous cave allegory depicts the difference between illusion and knowledge. It is also a call to go beyond appearances and seek the light of reality. After closely looking at Plato?s story, the paper seeks to understand this philosophical quest, including a detailed consideration of the film, "Rashomon". The paper argues that perhaps this philosophical project may actually not be understandable.
From the Paper
"But Plato?s description of the cave allegory wants to do more. The story concerns notions of ?virtue,? ?justice,? ?truth,? and so forth. Plato asks us to deal with ?ultimate? matters, in which appearances only obscure ?reality? and that one needs to be ?illuminated? to be able to adequately contemplate that ultimate reality. One must make this journey towards truth and return to my everyday world with this truth. Otherwise one will be lost in a fog of mere opinions in which an account of a particular shadow simply amounts to an interpretation that finds company with other people?s interpretations, so none of us sees the actual reality that is the cause of the perceived world of shadows."
| |
|
Plato?s Cave Analogy, 2002.
This paper examines Plato?s Cave Analogy from Book 7 of the "Republic".
815 words (approx. 3.3 pages), 1 source, $ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper describes Plato's presentation of the kind knowledge that is necessary for a philosopher king. This paper states that the Cave Analogy is used to compare the effect and the lack of knowledge on human nature and the responsibility, which accompanies education. The author feels that there is a distinct parallel between Plato?s Cave Analogy and the modern world particularly the many individuals who live in poverty and ignorance and the subjugation of women in certain countries.
From the Paper
"Plato describes the cave as an underground dwelling with an entrance up at a distance. The men that live there are chained. They can only see in front of them. (They represent the uneducated). A fire that provides them light, but it is above and behind them. Between the light and them is a path that has a low wall alongside it. Men carry all sorts of things along the wall. But, the chained men only see the shadows casted by the fire and believe the shadows to be the real objects. (This is the world of shadows)."
| |
|
Plato's Cave and Individualism, 2008.
This paper discusses Plato's allegory of the cave and the group think mentality common in organizations today.
1,468 words (approx. 5.9 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper analyzes the dangers inherent in blind obedience and group think as illustrated in Plato's allegory of the cave. The paper discusses the relevance of the allegory to contemporary organizational law by drawing upon the author's experiences as a member of law enforcement. The paper then looks at the mechanisms that we use to avoid or subvert ideas that appear different from our own and challenge the status quo. The paper concludes that we must embrace different ideas and nurture a respect for different cultures and world views.
From the Paper
"Plato's allegory of the cave captures the essence of organizational culture. Obviously, the ideology of sameness and normative thinking has transcended from Plato's time to today. Thus, the allegory is relevant to contemporary organizational life. Organizations are known for fostering a culture of group think. The dangers inherent in group think is the object lesson that Plato tries to convey. When we refuse to engage in critical thinking, we are goaded into a false sense of security, and create our own prison. The allegory of the cave is particularly relevant to corporate culture, and the blind obedience that is encouraged and often rewarded. There is an insidious force in organizational culture, which subsumes individualism for the corporate good. Like prisoners chained in a cave, employees have been trained to see through the lenses of the corporate image."
| |
|
Plato's Cave vs. Lao-tzu's Way, 2002.
A critical analysis comparing Plato's "Allegory of the Cave," a section taken from "The Republic" and Lao-tzu's "Tao-te Ching."
860 words (approx. 3.4 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this paper, the writer shows how Plato and Lao-tzu both display similarities within their theme of enlightenment and political success and the modern day influence of their works. However, the methods of dialogue and poetry to present their writings helps to maintain their philosophical uniqueness.
From the Paper
"Philosophy is the rational investigation of the truths and principles of being, knowledge, or conduct . Plato, a Greek writer and teacher, is thought to be one of the most influential thinkers in Western philosophy. In his work, "The Allegory of the Cave," he discusses politics and perception within a symbolic narrative. Lao-tzu's "Thoughts from the Tao-te Ching," is another document containing philosophical ideology, focusing on government and moral behavior. Both Plato and Lao-tzu display similarities within their theme and their influence in the modern world; however, one distinct variation they possess is the method in which their material is presented."
| |
|
Plato?s Cave and Me.
This paper is a personal essay based on the writings of Plato's "Republic".
2,010 words (approx. 8.0 pages), 0 sources, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses, based on the writer's perception of Plato's Cave, the problems of living in a purgatory, between unreal and real, thus losing his or her very being. The author points out that people now live in an international world where global events significantly affect their country and community; however, unfortunately, too many of them are stuck in the confines of the cave, glued to the TV, video games or VCR. The paper concludes that, when the author made it out of the cave, like Plato and Aristotle, he or she re-examined his or her life to see what things in life were most important, what things were just illusions and what are realities that should be pursued. Illustration.
From the Paper
"Going a step further, I believe that Plato is saying that we cannot be content with the trivialities and mundane aspects of life. We are unaware that we are living with illusion, superficial knowledge. We are also unaware that those aspects that we hold in highest esteem-money, power, and prestige-and their physical outcome-large houses (those wonderful 8,000-square-foot McMansions), luxury automobiles, high-status jobs or the covetousness and materialism in life are not the answer to becoming a just and happy person."
| |
|
Plato's "Allegory of the Cave", 2004.
Analysis of the significance of enlightenment in Plato's "Allegory of the Cave".
9,750 words (approx. 39.0 pages), 12 sources, MLA, $ 198.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes the meaning of Plato's "Allegory of the Cave", explaining how it represents a pilgrimage of the human mind from ignorance to enlightenment. The paper begins with a biography of Plato's life and a discussion of some of the scholarly differences regarding the type of man Plato actually was. Next, the paper focuses on Plato's concepts of truth, reality, and knowledge as represented in "The Cave" and summarizes its dialogue. Additionally, the influence of Socrates's friendship with Plato and of his death on Plato's writing of "The Cave" is discussed in this paper.
Abstract
Introduction
The Allegory of the Cave - an Analysis
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The Republic is written by the Greek philosopher Plato in 500 BC. It is said that Plato?s real name was Aristocles and that Plato was a nickname. Plato was the youngest son of Ariston and Perictione and came from a wealthy family who had lived in Athens for many many generations. Plato?s real father died when he was very young and he grew up in his step-father Pyrilampes house. History shows that Plato studied under Cratylus who was a student of Heracleitus. The most interesting and most talked about relationship of Plato is that with Socrates with whom he became friends while very young. Plato got to know Socrates through his Uncle Charmides who himself was a close friend of Socrates."
| |
|
Plato's "Allegory of the Cave", 2004.
An analysis and interpretation of Plato's "Allegory of the Cave".
6,803 words (approx. 27.2 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 154.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper gives a vivid picture about Plato?s "Allegory of the Cave" from his book of "Republic". It examines his contention of Ideal Rule with reference to his "Allegory of the Cave" and also the various considerations that are considered necessary to build an ideal state. It looks at how the "Republic" of Plato is considered a treatise on how to lead life in personal, professional, and social circumstances and how the ideals that he mentions in his work have their limitations in becoming practical. In this paper, the emphasis is kept on the simile of the cave suggested by Plato, and the Ideal Rule is explained in relation to this allegory.
From the Paper
"Plato compares the fire in the cave to that of the sun?s power. The journey that the prisoner takes from the cave into the light of the sun stand to signify the journey of the soul to the intelligent realm. Here he makes the sun stand to represent all that is good, and the source of all goodness or the summum bonum or the greatest good thereby indicating that reaching goodness is the ultimate goal of knowledge. He feels that we have not completed our journey until we accept it. The journey is not complete until we have arrived here. He feels that an individual who has seen the sun cannot pretend to like it as he has not done so."
| |
|
Plato's "Allegory of the Cave", 2001.
This paper examines the "Allegory of the Cave" by the scholar, Plato, and why metaphors are used and what they represent.
1,913 words (approx. 7.7 pages), 0 sources, $ 61.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay focuses on Plato's clever use of metaphors in the "Allegory of the Cave". This essay discusses Plato, his philosophy, his teaching and why the "Allegory of the Cave" was so good at explaining his ideas. The author explains the Platonic theory of the Forms. Also examined are possible critiques and strengths in terms of criticism to human understanding.
From the Paper
"Plato believed in the Platonic theory of the Forms. The world in which we ourselves live in, which we would class is real, is in fact not real at all. It is merely a shadow of the real world, the world of the Perfect Forms. He believed that the world is constantly changing, but the reality, the forms behind are constant. He taught that the world we live in and believe is real is nothing more than a materialistic world and everything in it is an imperfect copy of the perfect forms. ?The world that we see is not the real world, the true world is beyond our physical senses."
| |
|
Plato's "Allegory of the Cave", 2007.
An analysis of Plato's "Allegory of the Cave" as found in Book 7 of "The Republic."
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the "Allegory of the Cave" which is found in Book 7 of "The Republic" by Plato. The paper describes the "Allegory of the Cave" as bringing out the essential doctrines of Plato, which emphasize the human need to rise from the darkness of ignorance and evil to the light of Good. It also describes, in general, Plato's exploration of the meaning of justice.
From the Paper
"To correct the situation, Plato suggests the design of an ideal society and government, free of injustice and conflict as one ruled by philosopher-kings (Constitutional Rights Foundation 2006). A philosopher-king is best equipped to run a government and society because he is provided with the information and adequate training for the task. He is selected for the function as soon as he is born. The future leader is shaped into a lover of truth, wisdom and all knowledge in contrast to those who grow up without the discipline. These undisciplined people are not reared in a special environment prepared for the philosopher-king. These undisciplined perceive and experience only shadows and illusions, like the chained men in the Cave in Book 7. They are ordinary men and women who are chained to ignorance and can perceive only what they are allowed to perceive. They prattle throughout their lives without perceiving one another and themselves as they really are. They come to accept shadows as reality. In the end, they resist or destroy whoever attempts to revise their way of thinking and living. Clearly, Plato argues that enlightenment is needed to promote and increase human happiness. But he also realizes that this will be a difficult or thankless job because of the very response of ignorant people towards wisdom (Constitutional Rights Foundation)."
| |
|
Plato's "Allegory of the Cave", 2004.
Summary and analysis of Plato's "Allegory of the Cave".
1,038 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 0 sources, $ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper summarizes and interprets the dialogue in Plato's "Allegory of the Cave". The paper explains the symbolism of the allegory and interprets Plato's message about ignorance and the human ability to achieve knowledge, the travails of a philosopher, invisible truths, and how we should educate people.
From the Paper
"The allegory of the cave can be summed up in one single sentence. It symbolizes the place of perceptions in the pursuit of knowledge. Indeed, in a preamble to the actual relating of the allegory, Plato is involved in a discussion as to who can be considered a true philosopher. The discussion meanders around attempting to answer the following enigmas: Just because someone subscribes to a specific philosophy, does that make him or her a philosopher? Does a person who indulges in a certain muse that is premised on a philosophy?directly or indirectly related to it?become a philosopher? Plato goes through pains explaining that a philosopher was (or should be) cut in a different mould. A philosopher, Plato avers, should be able to see beyond what is merely obvious or superficial. A philosopher should see the inner beauty of things and understand, abstractedly, the natural causes of this beauty. In other words, the philosopher should be perceptive."
| |
|
Plato's "Allegory of the Cave", 2005.
This paper discusses Plato's "Allegory of the Cave" in Book VII of "The Republic" .
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 1 source, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines Plato's argument on learning and education in Book VII of The Republic. The author points out that, in the "Allegory of the Cave", Plato makes his argument for the dialectic method of learning through a dialogue of the characters of Socrates and Glaucon. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of the validity of the dialectic process in the modern world.
From the Paper
"In Book VII of Plato's "The Republic", Plato uses the character of Socrates to discuss two models of education: the process of learning by seeing and the process of learning by questioning what is seen. This distinction is apparent in the "Allegory of the Cave," in which Plato, through the character of Socrates (henceforth referred to only as "Socrates"), demonstrates how the 'truth' that an individual see can differ from the 'Truth' of reality. These two models correspond to direct learning and indirect learning. Direct learning is that of 'teaching,' which Socrates did not favor. Indirect learning is that of learning through dialogue and reasoning, or 'dialectic' reasoning, which is the Socratic method. In his allegory, Socrates demonstrates the problematic construct of direct learning."
| |
|
Plato's "Allegory of the Cave", 2005.
A discussion of Plato's "Allegory of the Cave".
920 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides a discussion of Plato's "Allegory of the Cave" in order to demonstrate how classical Greek civilization explored the human condition, recognizing the realities and constraints of human life, yet constantly striving to achieve ideals.
|
|
|
