| Papers [1-15] of 47 :: [Page 1 of 4] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 —> | Search results on "MANHATTAN PROJECT": |
|
|
The Manhattan Project, 2007.
A look at the historical development of the Manhattan Project.
1,485 words (approx. 5.9 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 49.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the Manhattan Project, describing its historical development and the political and diplomatic relations which it entailed. The fear of the Nazi's developing an atom bomb is considered one of the motivating reasons for the US speeding up its nuclear fission program. The paper further mentions how the US shared or did not share its research with its allies. The paper then describes some technical aspects of the research. The actual deployment of the bomb is discussed and how it contributed to the Cold War between the US and USSR. The paper concludes with the negative consequences of the Manhattan Project, including the tremendous loss of life caused by detonating two atomic bombs.
From the Paper
"American research in the field of nuclear physics had been progressing in a rather unsystematic manner. The British were interested in finding out about the American work. To this aim, they did not hesitate in what including atomic information in the exchanges of technical information and scientific missions that were going on in the beginning of the 1940s. This interchange of scientific information was very important; proof of its importance is that face that one of the documents forwarded to the United States was the Thomson Committee Report. This document stated the feasibility of an atomic bomb and led to the British decision to become involved in such a project; also, it represented an important factor that influenced the U.S. follow the same path and become involved. This was followed by an offer issued in October, 1941 by President Roosevelt to Winston Churchill for cooperation in relation to the project. After the agreement, the next step in the evolution of the project was a division of labor."
| |
|
The Manhattan Project: The Building of the Atomic Bomb, 2002.
This research paper is a description of the progression of the Manhattan Project, the undercover name for the building of the first atomic bomb by scientists.
2,260 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 69.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This is a detailed study describing the progression of the Manhattan Project and the invention of the atomic bomb. The ?Manhattan Project? was a code name given to the efforts and collaboration of many scientists to build the first atom bomb. The author sees two major challenges that faced the team of highly capable scientists. The first was the actual production of the atom bomb. This involved actually making innovative discoveries that would revolutionize war and change man?s idea of war for good. The second involved all of the ethical debates on whether or not the bomb should have actually been used in warfare. The author concludes that the building of the atomic bomb proved to be the most pivotal advance seen by science up until the early twentieth century.
From the Paper
"We have too many men of science, too few men of God. We have grasped the mystery of the atom and rejected the Sermon of the Mount...The world has achieved brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants. We know more about war than we know about peace, more about killing than we know about living...? stated General Omar N. Bradley, Chief of Staff of the United States Army in 1948, voicing the opinion, shared by many of the time, towards the building of the atomic bomb. The ?Manhattan Project? was a code name given to the efforts and collaboration of many scientists to build the first atom bomb. There were two major challenges that faced the team of highly capable scientists. The first was the actual production of the atom bomb. This involved actually making innovative discoveries that would revolutionize war and change man?s idea of war for good. The second involved all of the ethical debates on whether or not the bomb should have actually been used in warfare. The project lasted from 1942-1946 and cost approximately 1.8 billion dollars, which is comparable to 20 billion dollars today. The building of the atomic bomb proved to be the most pivotal advance seen by science up until the early twentieth century."
| |
|
The Manhattan Project, 2007.
This paper discusses the Manhattan Project and Trinity Site where the United States tested its first nuclear weapon.
1,461 words (approx. 5.8 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper talks about the Manhattan Project that began in 1939, with the goal of planning and designing the world's first nuclear weapon. The paper looks at Trinity Site, located in a remote part of New Mexico, which was selected for testing the bomb. The paper describes the Trinity test and explains that this test in fact put an abrupt end to World War Two, as the successful implosion sparked an enthusiastic attack on two Japanese targets: Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The paper contends, however, that with hardly any evidence and only one plutonium test at Trinity, the United States government foolishly launched nuclear weapons at Japan.
From the Paper
"Whether due to a morbid self-satisfaction, naivete, or sheer stupidity, the members of the Manhattan Project reveled with "elation" and "jubilation" at the sight of the mushroom cloud (Department of Energy). The Trinity Site, located in a remote part of New Mexico, was believed to be far enough from the civilian population to guard against fallout, but local ranchers lived only 20 miles away. Official reports indicate that civilians suffered "little external injury," but that their "livestock were not as fortunate, suffering skin burns, bleeding, and loss of hair," (DOE). Stafford Warren, the project's chief medical officer, would later recommend that future tests be conducted within no less than 150 miles from human population and claimed that the Trinity nuclear tests had been near-misses (DOE)."
| |
|
The Manhattan Project, 2004.
An analysis of the pros and cons of the Manhattan Project.
1,427 words (approx. 5.7 pages), 0 sources, MLA, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a look at the history and controversies surrounding the Manhattan Project and examines whether or not we should have dropped the bomb. The paper first looks at how the project came about following the rumours that Nazi Germany was working on a bomb and then looks at the challenges faced by the project managers to complete it before the Germans did. Finally, the writer explores whether or not America was justified in using the bomb.
From the Paper
"In 1939, the United States got word through various channels of intelligence that the Nazis in Germany were planning to develop an atomic bomb. This was startling and upsetting news for the United States, as the prospect of the Nazis with the most powerful weapon in the world was not a comforting one. As a result, the United States began its own project to develop and build an atomic bomb before the Nazis or the Japanese did. The United States began this project in 1942 under the Army Corps of Engineers. It was the atomic bomb that was developed during this effort, an effort known as the Manhattan Project, that was eventually dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki."
| |
|
The Manhattan Project, 2007.
A discussion of the Manhattan Project: America's secret project to design and build an atomic bomb during World War II.
1,584 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 9 sources, MLA, $ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper describes the United States' rush to build an atomic bomb during World War II. The paper details the bomb's inception and shows how it was used on Hiroshima and then on Nagasaki, forcing Japan to surrender. The paper explains that the long-term push for the bomb set the United States on a course of creating and stockpiling nuclear weapons that shaped the nature of the Cold War. The paper discusses how although the atomic bomb ended World War II, the controversy surrounding its use continues because of the enormous consequences of using nuclear warfare.
From the Paper
"The Los Alamos site was chosen for two main reasons: First, a special weapons laboratory was needed to put the bomb together. Second, the massive security regulations were becoming a problem, with the compartmentalization of tasks so that the people involved with the various aspects of the Manhattan Project would know only enough to carry out their own jobs effectively. This approach worked well and was one reason why no information ever reached German hands. However, at the scientific level, such compartmentalization was a problem."
| |
|
Manhattan Project, 2005.
This paper examines the U.S. government's decision to exclude the Soviets from the atomic secret.
3,252 words (approx. 13.0 pages), 9 sources, MLA, $ 93.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This is a research paper examining the decision to exclude the Soviets from the Manhattan Project. An historical overview of the time period is provided, and the writer then looks at what led up to this decision. The paper also discusses the implications of such a decision on future international relations and U.S. foreign policy.
From the Paper
'In the midst of atomic confusion during the development and years to follow of the atomic bombs ?Little Boy? and ?Fat Man? (starting as early as 1939), the United States government became entangled in mass debate over which (if any) foreign nations to include in the secrets of the Manhattan Project. After much consideration, the United States enlightened Britain with the diplomatic secrets, though clarifying the US dominance in the matter. However, the United States still deliberated over secret sharing with the Soviet Union and other nations, such as France. With the conclusion of the US to not share information of the atomic weapon with the Soviet Union, and later, the dropping of two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and later Nagasaki, the US conveyed a sense of distrust for the Soviets. This led to tense American-Soviet relations, which eventually brought about the Cold War."
| |
|
The U.S. and the Atomic Bomb, 2009.
An in-depth exploration of the development of the atomic bomb by the United States in what was known as the Manhattan Project.
5,265 words (approx. 21.1 pages), 15 sources, APA, $ 130.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper provides a qualitative review of literature relating to the Manhattan Project and how the atomic bomb was developed by the United States and used in World War II against Japan. The paper presents the thesis that the atomic bomb saved lives by ending a brutal war where the opponent, Japan, was unreasonable in its demands. The paper further posits that the success of the Manhattan Project is not only in ending World War II but also in acquiring many technological advances.
Outline:
Introduction
Background
Statement of Thesis
Purpose of Study
Methodology
Literature Review
Summary
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The driving force behind use of the atomic weapon was a force that was similar to nuclear fission itself due to the complexity of the diverse commitment, energies, and effort focused into these endeavor. Universities were deeply involved in this endeavor and created an entire segmented program in which none of the program sectors were aware of the research of other program sectors. German scientists were well aware of this information and agreed to come to the United States and join research with the United States. As well, research was an effort characterized by cooperation and collaboration among universities and various research sectors among the Manhattan Project's efforts. The entire cognitive citizenry of the United States was aware that a new age of military warfare was soon to come and the United States was collectively in the majority willing to affirm that since it was to happen the United States must be the first to accomplish the atomic bomb."
| |
|
Chase Manhattan Bank, 2002.
A profile and analysis of Chase Manhattan Bank and its role in the evolving financial services market.
3,193 words (approx. 12.8 pages), 19 sources, MLA, $ 92.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
When Chase Manhattan and Chemical Bank merged in 1996, the surviving Chase Manhattan Bank was the largest bank in the United States. Over the past three years, however, Chase Manhattan has slipped to number three on the list of the largest banks in the country. This research develops an organizational profile of the bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Chase Manhattan Corporation. The paper shows that the bank is far more profitable in 1999 than it was in 1996 and it is creating greater shareholder value that it was in 1996.
Paper Headings:
Introduction
History of the Bank
Current Structure of the Bank
Organization
Management
Contemporary Operations
Competition
Market Share
Competitive Advantage
Financial Performance
Financial Position Summary: December 1991
Selected International Lending Ratios
Key Financial Operating Measures:1998
Regulatory Affairs
Summary and Conclusion
From the Paper
"Chase Manhattan Corp. restructured mentoring and employee development initiatives in an effort to be more inclusive of women in relation to induction, promotion, and organizational decision-making. The key for the endeavor, according to Chase management, is the communication of management?s commitment. While cautioning women employees that, to be on a fast track, one must be willing to put a lot of effort into one?s career, without interruption because it takes a long time to attain senior-level positions, Chase Manhattan also cautions senior executives within the organization that, if being a parent is not an issue for male candidates for promotion, being a parent must not be an issue for the promotion of female candidates for promotion."
| |
|
Maid in Manhattan, 2007.
This paper studies the film 'Maid in Manhattan' as a portrayal of cultural influences.
1,264 words (approx. 5.1 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer maintains that the overt message of the film 'Maid in Manhattan' is that "love conquers all." The writer points out that in real life, however, cultural differences between people are often complex and difficult to overcome. The writer discusses that as the story has very little substantial content and is really meant only to entertain, instead of looking for the messages it sends purposely, it is helpful to look deeper for messages, such as the casting of the characters, to see how the film portrays ethnicity. The writer claims that ethnicity and culture are treated in the film as though they are not very important in the larger scheme of things. The writer concludes that the message is that the rich treat the poor who serve them as though they were not really human beings.
From the Paper
"Puerto Ricans are actually migrants, not immigrants. Their island became a protectorate in 1898 when the U. S. won it in the Spanish-American War. As natural citizens, they should have an advantage over immigrants from foreign countries; nevertheless, life in the U. S. has been difficult for them. Puerto Rican migration occurred from 1946-1959. Most of the migrants were jibaros, farm workers, poor and uneducated, who moved into large city slums. Since then, they have been subjected to discrimination, denied employment opportunities, and kept out of nice neighborhoods. The film hints at this when Marissa tells Chris he ought to spend some time in the Projects and get to know the people living in them. She tells him he could then speak knowledgably about low-income housing, and wouldn't have to memorize a speech."
| |
|
Citibank and Chase Manhattan, 1994.
This paper compares the financial performances of Citibank and Chase Manhattan: Industry conditions, services, assets, loans and net worth. Graphs.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 5 sources, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Chase Manhattan and Citicorp are two of the largest bank holding companies in the United States. Chase Manhattan is the sixth largest bank holding company and Citicorp is the largest bank holding company in the country. Both companies had checkered financial performance during the 1980s and early 1990s, and both have recently recovered. This research examines the financial performance of the companies in relation to each other and to the banking industry as a whole.
Citicorp provides a broad range of financial services for individuals and institutional clients from offices in 32 states and 92 foreign countries. Consumer banking services are provided through more than 1500 offices in five states and the District of Columbia, and through 2000 foreign offices. The company also has a ... "
| |
|
Citibank and Chase Manhattan, 1995.
This paper analyzes Citibank and Chase Manhattan as investment opportunities: Economic performances, activities and stocks. Charts.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 5 sources, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Citicorp is the parent of Citibank, which is the largest American bank with assets in excess of $216 billion in 1993.. The company offers a broad range of financial service for individuals and institutional clients from offices in 32 states, the District of Columbia, and 92 foreign countries. Citibank is involved in consumer loans, credit cards, institutional loans, real estate and a host of other business transactions. Chase Manhattan is a bank holding company also, and is the sixth largest such company in the United States; Chase Manhattan Bank is the fifth largest American bank.. This research considers recent performance of both banks, their stock performance, and considers both companies in terms of an investment opportunity.
Current Citibank Activities
Today, the global ... "
| |
|
"Terrible Honesty: Mongrel Manhattan in the 1920s", 2002.
This paper discusses the portrayal of the atmosphere that characterized the era known as Prohibition in Ann Douglas's book, "Terrible Honesty: Mongrel Manhattan in the 1920s."
870 words (approx. 3.5 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines a passage in Ann Douglas's book, "Terrible Honesty," that deals with New Yorkers flaunting their defiance of Prohibition in the 1920s. The writer looks at the language of the passage itself and discusses the significance of the choice of words and phrases. The passage itself is reflective of New York during the period of Prohibition when there was excitement in just doing something illegal. Prohibition is a theme that comes up throughout the book and this particular passage on page 101, touches upon how life was changing during this period in history. According to the author, this passage serves as a bridge between the past and how the technological advances affected life as it had been known in the big city.
From the Paper
"Prohibition figures so prominently in this book because it was an important and heated issue, but as we have seen, it was also related to politics, suffrage, religion, and many other highly emotional issues. It was not just about getting a drink on a Saturday night, it was about the right of women to vote, to worship where you choose, and make your own personal decisions. It was an issue of too many laws, and the government trying to tell people how to live their personal lives. Drinking may be addictive and dangerous, but people have the basic right to choose, and if they choose to smoke, or drink, or vote, or visit a specific church, they have the right, and they may also have to suffer the consequences."
| |
|
Chemical & Chase Manhattan Banks, 1996.
Examines banks' services, performances, stocks, advantages & disadvantages of proposed merger.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 4 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Chemical Bank is the nation's third largest bank holding company, and has both domestic and international operations. Chemical has expanded during the 1990s through acquisitions, including the acquisition of Manufacturer's Bank and related companies during the early 1990s. Chase Manhattan is a bank holding company also, and is the sixth largest such company in the United States; Chase Manhattan Bank is the fifth largest American bank. This research considers recent performance of both banks and the pending merger between the two companies.
Overview of Chemical Activities
The financial services provided by the Chemical's domestic subsidiaries include personal and commercial checking accounts, savings and time deposit accounts, personal and business loans, consumer financing..."
| |
|
Chase Manhattan Bank, 2000.
An examination of the bank's structure, organization, management, workforce environment, performance, and role in evolving the financial services market. Tables.
3,150 words (approx. 12.6 pages), 19 sources, $ 111.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"A Profile and an Analysis of Chase Manhattan Bank and its Role in the Evolving Financial Services Market
Introduction
This research develops an organizational profile of the Chase Manhattan Bank, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Chase Manhattan Corporation. In many instances, the Chase Manhattan Corporation itself is profiled because much of the reporting of financial performance is consolidated.
History of the Bank
The bank was established in 1799 as the Manhattan Company. The name change to the Chase Manhattan Bank occurred in 1955. The contemporary manifestation of the bank was created in 1996, when Chase Manhattan merged with Chemical Bank of New York and the Chase Manhattan name was retained. "
| |
|
Nuclear Weapons and Moral Choices, 2008.
An exploration of the moral beliefs held by the scientists instrumental in developing the nuclear atomic bomb.
2,871 words (approx. 11.5 pages), 10 sources, APA, $ 85.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper presents the thesis that the physicists instrumental in the design and development of the nuclear atomic bomb held a level of pride in their accomplishment as well as regret for its potential for destruction, death and war. The paper describes the Manhattan Project and examines the personal moral standards of the scientists who developed it. The paper shows how regrets were certainly held by Bethe, Oppenheimer, Haber and other scientists and physicists sharing in the atomic energy and weaponry projects.
Outline:
Statement of Thesis
Introduction
The Manhattan Project
Moral Responsibility of the Physicist
Hans Bethe
Julius Robert Oppenheimer
Summary and Conclusion
From the Paper
"The work entitled: "Invisible: Atomic Bomb Efforts in the US, USSR and National Socialist Germany" relates that governments and physicists both came to realize "simultaneously...that their discoveries had military potential. If any nation could harness the energy of nuclear fission in an explosion, a super bomb would be possible." (Open Society Archives, 2007) The second World War erupted in Europe in 1939 and the publications concerning nuclear subject matter "disappeared from scientific journals and the race to the nuclear bomb was on." (Open Society Archives)"
|
|
|
