| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "MADISON HAMILTON": |
|
|
Madison and Hamilton, 1993.
Discusses the views of James Madison and Alexander Hamilton in defense of the Constitution and the Federal form of government, also discussing the later disagreements between Madison and Hamilton over greater centralization.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 1 source, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Liberalism and republicanism were both involved in the creation of the American government and the development of the Constitution that would be the framework for that government, and the two approaches were discussed, compared, and argued in the debate between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The basic issue both faced was the ratification of the Constitution, with the Federalists supporting this document and the federal form of government it would represent and the Anti-Federalists opposing the document and the underlying philosophy. Yet, ultimately, both points of view were represented in some degree in the final document and in the government it created. The Federalist Papers were written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison as a defense of the developing Constitution. Madison and Hamilton were clearly allies in this endeavor, but ..."
| |
|
"The Federalist Papers", 2002.
An understanding of American government through a review of "The Federalist Papers" by John Jay, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 1 source, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will discuss "The Federalist Papers" written by John Jay, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton. By analyzing the way that this paper was written and what was meant by it, there can be a better understanding on how the American government was formed in its early stages. The topic, law, and opinions of its authors will be discussed in order to clarify what this important writing held for the future of the United States of America.
| |
|
James Madison, 2005.
This paper examines the role of James Madison in the creation of the U.S. federal government.
1,980 words (approx. 7.9 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper argues that James Madison's role in the creation of the U.S. federal government from the early Continental Congress to the Bill of Rights, including the Annapolis Convention, the Constitutional Convention, the Federalist papers and other contributions, was the most important among the Founding Fathers. The author contends that had it not been for the genius and foresight of James Madison, citizens would not enjoy the protection of several important civil liberties; indeed, without Madison's contributions, the country might not even exist as a sovereign republic today. The paper relates that Madison's constitutional vision of limited government set the base for the American liberty.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Review and Discussion
Background and Overview
Madison's Role at the Annapolis Convention and Continental Congress
Madison's Contributions to the Bill of Rights
Madison and "The Federalist"
Conclusion
From the Paper
"According to one biographer, James Madison was "A giant in intellect, who convinced the squabbling states to send representatives to Philadelphia over 200 years ago to 'form a more perfect union.' For the Constitutional Convention, he prepared a scheme of national government untried in the world." This "untried scheme" was necessary because, on the national level, the Articles of Confederation had made the single-branched Continental Congress responsible for conducting the war, for administering foreign relations, and for handling other matters of national concern; however, they had not entrusted the Congress with the power to tax and provided no power to enforce its decisions. "In other words," McDonald notes, "compliance with its decisions was to be voluntary.""
| |
|
"James Madison and the Creation of the American Republic", 2007.
This paper reviews Jack Rakove's "James Madison and the Creation of the American Republic".
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 0 sources, $ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Jack Rakove's "James Madison and the Creation of the American Republic" covers all stages of Madison's life including his early life and career, his efforts in the constitutional convention, his contributions to shape the new nation and his performance as Secretary of State and as President of the United States. The author points out that Rakove described young Madison as always interested in gaining knowledge despite being sickly as a child and as a young man. The paper relates that the chief set of ideas that Madison brought to the framing of the Constitution was the Virginia Plan, which replaced the existing unicameral congress with a national government of three independent branches. The author comments that Rakove shows how Madison and Thomas Jefferson worked closely together to smoothly run the progression of the new country
From the Paper
"James Madison was born on March 16, 1751 in Virginia to James and Nelly Madison. His father was a wealthy slave owner that ran a tobacco plantation. He was the oldest of 11 children but only six of his siblings lived to adulthood. "By early teens, Madison was acquiring the intellectual earnestness that marked him ever after" When he was eleven years old he began attending a local school run by Donald Robertson, which was rare because schools in the area where he grew up were scarce.... Because of his intense desire to learn and his eagerness to study, his teachers and parents decided in 1769 to send him to the College of New Jersey, which later became Princeton University."
| |
|
"Alexander Hamilton" by Steven O'Brien, 1991.
This paper discusses the life of Alexander Hamilton, based on the book, "Alexander Hamilton" by Steven O'Brien.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 1 source, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The purpose of this paper is to discuss various details about the life of Alexander Hamilton, based on information provided by the book, "Alexander Hamilton", by Steven O'Brien.
Alexander Hamilton was born in the British West Indies to James Hamilton and Rachel Lavien, who, because of an earlier divorce decree, had been forbidden to remarry. This made Alexander illegitimate, a fact he never forgot and which many think was the driving force in his later will to succeed.
James Hamilton tried to be successful at family life for several years, until 1766, when he left his wife and children on the island of St. Croix, never to return again. Apparently, as an adult Hamilton very seldom said anything about his parents, although he referred more often to his father than his mother. In later life the two of them resumed communications, but their ... "
| |
|
The Presidency of James Madison, 2007.
A discussion of James Madison's commitment to the separation of church and state.
2,616 words (approx. 10.5 pages), 9 sources, MLA, $ 78.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper gives an historical analysis of James Madison and his Presidency, focusing on his commitment to the separation of church and state. This commitment influenced the decisions he made and the political ideology that he upheld. The paper traces Madison's political career and its interconnection with the birth of the US. Madison's famous treatise on separation of church and state entitled "The Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments," is analyzed. The paper concludes by reinforcing James Madison's commitment to the separation of church and state and the protection of individual liberty.
From the Paper
" From the early days of the development of the British colonies into an independent nation, Madison was involved. As a student of history, government, and law, he took part in framing the Virginia Constitution in 1776 and held membership in the Virginia Assembly ("James Madison"). Madison served in the Continental Congress and engaged in frequent debates at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia ("James Madison"). Together with Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, Madison made a major contribution to ratifying the Constitution by writing the Federalist essays, which were in favor of the creation of a more powerful federal government to replace the ailing Confederation. The essays earned him the title of "Father of the Constitution," although he claimed the document was "the work of many heads and many hands" ("James Madison"). He also shared in framing the Bill of Rights and passing the first revenue legislation."
| |
|
James Madison, 2006.
A discussion regarding the 4th President of the United States, James Madison.
2,545 words (approx. 10.2 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 77.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a look at the life and career of James Madison, the 4th President of the USA. According to the paper, Madison is known as the 'Father of the Constitution'. The paper further discusses how Madison was one of the first thinkers in colonial America who understood why church and state must be separated.
From the Paper
"During August 1789, Congress deliberated on what would become the religion clauses of the First Amendment. Madison's first draft read, "The civil rights of none shall be abridged on account of religious belief or worship, nor shall any national religion be established, nor shall the full and equal rights of conscience be in any manner, or on any pretext, infringed" (Boston). His proposal was sent for consideration to a committee, which eventually settled on language reading, "Congress shall make no law establishing articles of faith or a mode of worship, or prohibiting the free exercise of religion" (Boston). However, the House of Representatives rejected this version, and so a joint Senate-House committee, which included Madison, met and agreed to the language we know today, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" (Boston). "
| |
|
James Madison and "The Federalist Paper Number 10", 2002.
This paper discusses James Madison's beliefs as expressed in "The Federalist Paper Number 10", which helped persuade people into ratifying the proposed U.S. Constitution.
610 words (approx. 2.4 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 21.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses that, in "The Federalist Paper Number 10", Madison responded to critics who had argued that the United States had too many "factions," to be ruled democratically by a single government. The author states that Madison believed that factions posed a problem to a democratic form of government but had a positive role to play. The paper concludes that James Madison's ideas and arguments in "The Federalist Paper Number 10" remain the foundations of pluralistic democracy.
From the Paper
"Madison acknowledged the importance of factions in the opening paragraph, stating that, ?Among the numerous advantages promised by a well constructed Union, none deserves to be more accurately developed than its tendency to break and control the violence of faction? . In prescribing how to rule and control the effects of factions, Madison detailed their relationships with other important concepts, such as liberty and property, and asserted his belief that factions were both the underlying basis of, and the fundamental problem in, politics."
| |
|
Marx and Madison: Addressing Class Struggle, 2000.
A comparison of the beliefs of Marx and Madison on class struggle.
975 words (approx. 3.9 pages), 4 sources, $ 34.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the views of Marx and Madison on class struggle. The ideologies of both Marx and Madison are compared. It is shown that while Marx looked to socialism as a result and solution to the class struggle, Madison looked to establish a structure to minimize the effect of the differences, and in which capitalism could co-exist with representative government.
From the Paper
"Marx wrote that the history of all existing societies is the history of class struggle. Using this statement as a basis for his theoretical model, he argued that historical change was in large measure due to the forces of people acting to gain, protect or protest their relative social and material status. If everything is material and humans create social life in response to economic need, then aspects of human society are primarily based on economic structure, classes are determined by their relationship to that structure, and events can be seen as the outcome of the interaction of those classes. From the moment humans were able to produce more than was needed for mere subsistence, there was a struggle over who was to control the surplus and the means of production."
| |
|
Alexander Hamilton and the Federalist Party, 2007.
An analysis of the formation of the Federalist Party under Alexander Hamilton and their contribution to American politics.
2,018 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at Alexander Hamilton, whose fiery personality, keen intellect, and innovative political and financial ideas helped to shape the early government of America. The paper discusses how Hamilton not only contributed here and there, but was a founder of the Federalist Party, one of the first political groups of the young America and how both the party and Hamilton played significant roles in forming the laws and doctrines, which are the back bone of the American government.
From the Paper
"It is of some interest to note that Hamilton's life did not begin in England nor did it start in the soon to be America. It began in the British Virgin Islands, more accurately on the island of Nevis located on the Leeward Islands. (Mitchell 2) His mother was Rachael Fawcett, a spirited woman whose first marriage was to a man named John Larven. She had attempted to divorce him but there is some debate on if he went through with the legal motions for it or not. (Mitchell 3-4) After the alleged divorce she married a young Scotsman by the name of James Hamilton, the father of Alexander Hamilton. There is much debate over the legitimacy of Alexander and his brother James due to the fact that their parent's marriage may not have been legal. (Mitchell 4-10) At the young age of around ten or eleven Alexander and his family moved to the island of St.Croix where he would live until the age of seventeen when he would be sent to America for education. "
| |
|
Alexander Hamilton, 2006.
This paper details the life and political career of Alexander Hamilton, one the most influential founding fathers of the United States.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 73.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the life of Alexander Hamilton, the first secretary of the treasury who placed the U.S. on a firm financial footing. Hamilton was a decisive man of action who fought in the battles around New York in 1775 and whose zeal and organizing ability brought him to George Washington's attention which led to a commission as colonel in the Continental Army. This paper contains dates and detailed historical facts pertaining to Hamilton's political and military career.
From the Paper
"Hamilton's basic plan of government consisted of two legislatures, comprised by an assembly directly elected by the people to a three year term, and a senate, chosen by electors from senatorial districts to serve based upon merit, or good behavior. In addition to the aforementioned legislative bodies, there would be a Judiciary, consisting of twelve justices who would also serve based upon merit. This judiciary would have both original and appellate jurisdictions."
| |
|
Madison and The Bill of Rights, 2007.
This paper examines James Madison's role in advocating the first ten Amendments to the Constitution.
1,500 words (approx. 6.0 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 49.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper reviews a series of letters written by James Madison to other delegates at the Constitutional Convention, in order to determine who the major players were in the debate about the amendments and what their respective interests were. The paper discusses the discernible relative power and wealth of these individuals and the intended audience for these primary sources and analyzes how these sources could be used by a modern historian to write a historical essay. The paper shows how James Madison was indeed responsible for crafting the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution, although he did so somewhat reluctantly. The paper discusses how Madison realized that the support of the people was an absolutely essential ingredient in ensuring the survival of the new country and its form of government.
Outline:
Introduction
Review and Discussion
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The Founding Fathers were faced with a number of important issues as they debated the form and content of the Constitution then under consideration, not the least of which was ensuring that their own individual interests would be addressed in the new country. The Constitution that emerged from this debate was not entirely satisfactory to all of the convention delegates as it related to individual liberties, though, and a series of amendments was proposed for this purpose that has become known as the Bill of Rights today. The author of the first ten Amendments to the Constitution was James Madison, but his reasons for advocating these civil liberties were substantially different than many modern observers might believe."
| |
|
Hamilton, 2005.
An examination of the positive and negative aspects of living in the city of Hamilton today.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 1 source, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the city of Hamilton, noting that the city of Hamilton is known as the Steel City, though this designation ties the city to a past that may no longer exist and may give the wrong impression of what the city represents today. The paper examines Hamilton from various points of view and a picture of the community emerges that shows that the city is not that unusual and features both positives and negatives for those living there.
From the Paper
"The city of Hamilton is known as the "Steel City," though this designation ties the city to a past that may no longer exist and may give the wrong impression of what the city represents today. Hamilton, like a great many cities, relies heavily on tourism for a portion of its income and seeks to promote itself as a tourist destination through its website, various local organizations, and advertising, but tourism also does not really define the city completely. Hamilton has been examined from various points of view, and a picture of the community emerges that shows that the city is not that unusual and features both positives and negatives for those living there."
| |
|
John Locke and James Madison, 2007.
A comparison of the philosophies of John Locke and James Madison.
1,169 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses the differing philosophies of John Locke and James Madison. The paper details how Locke suggests a "social contract" which would bind people together in order to secure their individual rights and the protection of their property. The paper further examines how Madison, in his argument for the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, argued that a democracy where all people had a say in government could actually lead to the denial of rights to part of the group - the minority. The paper concludes that if all men were moral, then Locke's system would be the perfect form of government. Unfortunately this is not the case, and so Madison's argument for divided government is preferable, because it protects minorities from ambitious factions.
From the Paper
"In his famous Second Treatise of Government, John Locke delineates why government is necessary, why people should consent to it, and what they can expect from it. The natural state of freedom into which all men are born is paradoxical because, in that state, all other men are free as well. The attainments of property are useless if a person cannot protect himself and his wealth. For economic and political reasons, Locke suggests people give up some freedom in order to gain freedom from being abused by other free people."
| |
|
James Madison's Role, 2006.
A discussion regarding James Madison's role in trying to balance civil liberties with government power through the drafting of the Bill of Rights.
8,150 words (approx. 32.6 pages), 26 sources, APA, $ 174.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a look at how the US Founding Fathers were faced with a number of important issues as they debated the form and content of the Constitution, not the least of which was ensuring that their own individual interests would be addressed in the new country. According to the paper, although it represented the work of many minds, the primary author of the first ten amendments to the Constitution was James Madison, but his reasons for advocating these civil liberties was substantially different than many modern observers might believe.
Outline:
Introduction
Review and Discussion
Background and Overview
Perspectives Articulated at the Constitutional Convention
The Changing Views of James Madison
Analysis and Discussion
Implications of the Ratification of the Constitution without a Bill of Rights
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Moreover, in spite of significant across-the-board gains for many formerly disenfranchised citizens during the latter half of the 20th century, the Bill of Rights continues to experience the ebb and flow of political thought in the nation today. Indeed, the civil liberties contained in the Bill of Rights have been subject to the arbitrary vicissitudes of executive whim and fancy more than once in the nation's history, and the U.S.A. PATRIOT Act is just a recent example of how these rights can be adversely affected even with the constitutional guarantees therein contained. In the final analysis, then, it is reasonable to say that James Madison did a better job of executing his responsibilities at the Constitutional Convention and thereafter than many of his peers could have done, and the implications of his failure to do so have also been the subject of much scholarly debate over the years and these issues are discussed further below."
|
|
|
