| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "LINCOLN RHETORICAL GOD": |
|
|
Lincoln's Rhetorical Use of God, 2006.
An examination of the way in which U.S. President Lincoln rhetorically used the Christian God throughout his presidency, culminating in his "Second Inaugural Address".
1,718 words (approx. 6.9 pages), 0 sources, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the use of God in three major speeches given by Abraham Lincoln: the First Inaugural, The Gettysburg Address, and the Second Inaugural. This author discusses Lincoln's use of divine agency as a rhetorical tactic for explaining the circumstances of the Civil War and the abolition of slavery.
From the Paper
"In his later speeches, and his "Second Inaugural Address" in particular, Lincoln tends to borrow a significant amount of his ethos, as politicians are apt to do, from the Christian God and scriptures. Of course, we see this in his earlier speeches as well. His "House Divided Speech," given before the Illinois Republican State Convention of 1858, gets its most memorable line, and its very name, from the Gospels. However, Lincoln does seem to increase his rhetorical use of the Christian God throughout his presidency, and his "Second Inaugural Address," may be a culmination of this tactic."
| |
|
Rhetoric of Abraham Lincoln & Martin Luther King, 1996.
Compares sociopolitical essays: Lincoln's "The Perpetuation of Our Political Institutions" & King's "Letter from Birmingham Jail, 1963."
2,025 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 8 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865) and Martin Luther King (1929-1968) wrote with an astounding historical importance extending well beyond their own time. As a young lawyer Lincoln was concerned with the high degree of lawlessness surrounding him. Leery of the growing rage of the mob rising in mid-nineteenth century America Lincoln penned "The Perpetuation of Our Political Institutions" arguing for the importance of civil law and the necessity of civil obedience. Nearly a century later the unjust and racially prejudicial society framing King forced him to dissent and compose the now justly famous essay "Letter from Birmingham Jail, 1963." Choosing to center an antisegregration drive in Birmingham, Alabama, King wrote this piece as a rallying cry to join the nonviolent movement beginning to stir in the..."
| |
|
?The Rhetorical Stance?, 2005.
An analysis of "The Rhetorical Stance" by Wayne C. Booth.
1,033 words (approx. 4.1 pages), 0 sources, $ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at "The Rhetorical Stance" by Wayne C. Booth and discusses the nature of each rhetorical stance that Booth argues to be inefficient in composing a convincing and interesting write-up. It also argues how Booth successfully formulates and eventually proposes the concept of rhetorical balance in his essay by introducing the pros and cons concerning teach rhetorical stances enumerated.
From the Paper
"The first rhetorical stance is identified as the pedant's stance. Booth identifies this rhetorical stance as an appeal that a writer makes when s/he places too much emphasis on the information and arguments made about the subject, sacrificing, in the process, the emphasis put in establishing "the personal relationship of speaker and audience" (27). In his discussion of the this kind of rhetorical stance, Booth explains how, as a teacher, he instructed his students to write expositions without telling them "what their expositions were for" (28). Thus, what happens is that the student goes through the process of explicating on the subject matter, but never making any connection with the reader-that is, the reader does not feel that the information s/he is reading is written for a particular audience in mind."
| |
|
Aristotle?s Rhetorical Theory, 2005.
This paper discusses Aristotle's rhetorical theory and its influence on modern democracy.
4,080 words (approx. 16.3 pages), 10 sources, APA, $ 109.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Aristotle was not the first philosopher to argue from a rational, humanistic perspective nor to suggest that debates and arguments should be performed as an art form known as rhetoric; however, he is the most influential. The author points out that in his "Rhetoric", which is substantially shorter and relatively more straight-forward than most of his work, Aristotle presents a theory of rhetoric as an art that focuses on the capacity to persuade, the usefulness of rhetoric, the necessary elements of persuasion including appeals to emotion, status and logic and presents a wide range of specific stratagem for convincing an audience of one's point. The paper relates that the foundation of the modern approach to society, including the entirety of the modern political system, is fallout from the medieval rediscovery of Aristotle's work; during the Crusades, Europeans re-discovered Latin translations of Aristotle in various libraries throughout the Islamic world.
Table of Contents
Aristotle's Personal Work on "Rhetoric"
Aristotle's Historical Effect on "Rhetoric" and its Continued Fallout
Aristotle's Effects on Modern Democracy and the Sensitivity of Pathos
Does Aristotle Inadvertently Justify the Chicaneries of Modern Lawyers?
Conclusion
From the Paper
"At the foundation of American democracy, the nation had a relatively homogenous culture. (Assuming, of course, that one follows in the founder's footsteps and ignores the presence of slaves and natives) Athens, also, was a homogenous culture, where the members had most interests in common. So Aristotle's ideas on comprehending the common beliefs on one's audience and building on them based on syllogism and appeals to the common good were quite efficient. However, as the nation aged it has become increasingly multi-cultural, with a wider variety of base worldviews interacting to create the polis. A similar progression has taken place through-out the European democracies, and of course many post-colonial colonies have had to deal with such disparities from the beginning. Hence, it may seem that Aristotle's vision of rhetoric may have difficulties in a modern setting."
| |
|
The Rhetorical Triangle, 2008.
This paper explains the application of the rhetorical triangle in the writing of argumentative essays.
840 words (approx. 3.4 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses the function and significance of the rhetorical triangle's three elements: ethos, logos and pathos. The paper also shows how a well-rounded argument is not possible unless each of these components is in place. Moreover, the paper emphasizes how if a writer is not mindful of the rhetorical triangle, his or her efforts to influence others is usually doomed to failure.
From the Paper
"The Rhetorical Triangle or Aristotelian Triad is often misunderstood by students for no other reason than they are not used to applying it when writing argumentative essays. Be that as it may, it is important to understand how to use the Rhetorical Triangle and each of its component parts for no other reason than that, if you cannot, someone who is arguing against you might be able to do so - and that could lead to their ideas, and not yours, gaining pre-eminence. To start with, the Rhetorical Triangle has three parts - the ethos, the logos, and the pathos. The first element is basically how the writer presents him or herself: does he or she engage in "cheapshots?" Is the writer well-informed and balanced in his/her assessment of the topic? Is there an effort to establish a "common ground" with the reader? "
| |
|
Rhetorical Truth, 2004.
An analysis of Plato's opinion on rhetorical truth.
1,188 words (approx. 4.8 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper claims that Plato stands resolved that rhetoric is a sham art. The paper explains that Plato has the burden of proof to prove to us why he believes this. This paper comes to show that rhetoric is not a sham, but a very necessary tool, that can be studied by all. The paper presents Aristotle's definition of the art of rhetoric as 'finding all of the available means of persuasion'. The paper states that Plato resolved that studying all of the available means of persuasion, is really a false art form. The paper defends the art of rhetoric, as well as attacks the truth.
From the Paper
"The use of Rhetoric has many powerful, positive implications. Many of which had to have been known by the Greek Armies. Plato even served in the military from 409 BC to 404 BC! Army Generals, in feudal times, who has the best strategies and tactics, had to resort to rhetoric. Athletic coaches borrow upon this strategy to give speeches to the athletes before "battle." World War II Army General George Patton even capitalized on rhetoric by delivering his famous "Blood and Guts" speech to his troops. Now was his speech all truth? Would Plato have approved? Probably not, but one can be sure to say that what was lost or gained after a battle, was not in the responsibilities of rhetoric, but that it may have helped towards the victory. "
| |
|
Rhetorical Theory and Practice, 2005.
An overview of the constant evolution of rhetoric theory and its practical uses.
2,803 words (approx. 11.2 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 83.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how ever since Greek and Roman times, rhetoric and rhetoric theory has been one of the issues that were discussed and improved, appearing in almost every aspect of life. It attempts to show how this constant evolution of rhetoric theory has given way today to a new theoretical description. It also shows how since it brings rhetoric from the high intellectual and philosophical areas and into our every day lives where it belongs, the theory is an excellent way to learn how to express solid arguments and win a dispute.
From the Paper
"One important similarity between present rhetoric and ancient one is the scope of the argumentation. In both cases, this is something (an idea, a fact, a reasoning, a conclusion, etc.) that one cannot actually reach directly and mathematically, "by means of calculation, measuring or weighing", that is by primary demonstration, but has to take to secondary forms of demonstration, closely related to the actual goal or point of view that one holds."
| |
|
A Rhetorical Analysis, 2006.
A rhetorical analysis of the article "Predictors of Male and Female Servers' Average Tip Earnings".
1,312 words (approx. 5.2 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper analyzes the article "Predictors of Male and Female Servers' Average Tip Earnings", from the "Journal of Applied Social Psychology". The paper describes the article as a typical research article which conforms to the standard academic and scientific methods and writing procedures. The paper further discusses how an article of this nature is intended to be read by a purely academic and scientifically inclined audiences although this particular article makes interesting and informative reading and could easily be adjusted and rewritten in terms of the discussion and results for magazine publication.
From the Paper
"An article of this nature has three main intentions. These are firstly to outline or deal with an issue that has a certain research and scientific interest. In other words the article must first persuade the reader that there is a need for this particular area of research. This is usually presented as a summary or abstract. Therefore there is a certain argumentative or persuasive aspect to the rhetoric of to this type of article. This is intended to prove or show that there is academic or scientific value in the study that is being suggested or undertaken."
| |
|
Rhetorical Writing, 2002.
A literary analysis of "Letter from Birmingham Jail" and "The Speech the Graduates Didn't Hear".
1,415 words (approx. 5.7 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores Martin Luther King's essay "Letter from Birmingham Jail" as well as Neusner's "The Speech the Graduates Didn't Hear". The analysis includes a thorough discussion of the historical and cultural context, tone, persona and rhetorical strategies utilized by King and Neusner to establish their stance about black American oppression and the futility of formal school education amidst the harsh realities of life.
From the Paper
"?Letter from Birmingham Jail? is a letter written by Martin Luther King Jr. in 1963, which addresses the accusations of the Alabama clergymen about the ?violent? demonstration that he and his organization had conducted. The demonstration is actually a peaceful demonstration that aims to protest the prevalence of black American oppression and discrimination in the society despite legal laws and regulations that declare the black Americans? equality with the white Americans."
| |
|
Irony: An Effective Rhetorical Strategy, 2002.
Compares the use of irony as a literary tool by Johnathon Swift in "A Modest Proposal" to its use by Martin Luther King Jr. in "Letters from Birmingham Jail".
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 2 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the use of irony and satire in Jonathan Swift's "A Modest Proposal" and Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Letters from Birmingham Jail". The two works have used irony to convey their message effectively but whileKing's irony appears to be constructive, Swift's satire is nothing more than harsh commentary on the condition of the poor population of Ireland.
| |
|
Rhetorical Analysis of 'Media, Communication, Culture', 2007.
This paper looks at the work 'Media, Communication, Culture' by James Lull and discusses modern communication's impact on society.
2,089 words (approx. 8.4 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 65.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer discusses that in today's world, the mass media has an impact in almost all we do as people. The writer notes that media affects everything from what clothes we wear to what television programs we watch. The writer discusses that James Lull, in his book 'Media, Communication, Culture' explains how media interacts and affects the communication among people and how culture changes with advances in media and technology. The writer concludes that 'Media, Communication, and Culture' informs an audience of how the mass media and modern forms of communication have affected the development of culture and the ways of society. Further, the writer maintains that James Lull uses a distinctive style and a logical structure in order to properly educate his audience about the influence mass media has on today's world.
From the Paper
"Within each chapter, he inserts an article on a real life example of events where mass media, human communication, and culture were involved and had an effect. Such events as the Chinese student rebellion at Tiananmen Square in 1989 and the Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky scandal in the mid-1990's are included along with explanations of how media, communication, and culture had an effect on these historical events. Along with modern events, Lull includes historical changes in media and communication to emphasize his argument that mass media and technological advances have had major effects on societies across the world. His structure also allows for any member of his audience to follow and understand what he puts forth. Lull avoids implication and instead tells the audience what he wants them to know to avoid letting them infer it on their own. An informed audience will also understand an author's purpose more readily than an audience which inferred the author's intentions. Lull also tends to end discussions by putting more emphasis on his own ideas and support of others that follows what he believes about media, communication, and culture."
| |
|
"The Real Lincoln", 2006.
A review of the book "The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War", by Thomas DiLorenzo.
2,540 words (approx. 10.2 pages), 0 sources, $ 76.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses the book "The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War", by Thomas DiLorenzo.
The writer evaluates DiLorenzo's central arguments, including allegations that Lincoln regularly committed war crimes against Southern residents. The paper further discusses how DiLorenzo misinterprets and misrepresents Lincoln's key policies, in order to support a specious thesis. The writer concludes that due to the book's lack of balance and failure to provide proper context, the book fails to provide enough proof to challenge the myth of the Great Emancipator.
From the Paper
"DiLorenzo's arguments, while provocative, are far from new. Instead, the author rehashes conspiracy theories that have been circulating since the time of the Confederacy. This paper thus argues that when held under scholastic scrutiny, DiLorenzo's historiography falls short of his goals of shedding new light on the "real" Lincoln presidency."
| |
|
The Real Lincoln, 2006.
A review of the biography "The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War" by Thomas J. DiLorenzo.
1,365 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 0 sources, MLA, $ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses Thomas J. DiLorenzo book's "The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War". The paper describes the book as different from biographies that deify the 16th president. DiLorenzo argues that Lincoln's image as the great emancipator is a myth. The author maintains that Lincoln's decision to fight the Civil War was unrelated to slavery and that these ulterior motives centered on the concentration of political power in Washington, at the expense of the economic sovereignty of the Southern states.
From the Paper
"To be fair, DiLorenzo gets some of his facts straight. Historical accounts show that Lincoln did indeed start his political career as a Whig, before joining the Republican Party. Lincoln also supported the repatriation of freed slaves to colonies in Africa and Central America. However, the author's major support for Lincoln's mercantilist leanings stem from the president's admiration for Henry Clay, the man who pushed the mercantilist-based "American system." This is hardly enough to support a contention regarding Lincoln's deeply-held motives."
| |
|
Rhetoric and the Baroque Opera, 2004.
Examines the breakdown of rhetoric, how it tied into opera, and examines the rhetorical principles in Purcell's "Dido and Aeneas".
2,080 words (approx. 8.3 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 65.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper begins by first examining what rhetoric is and each of its parts, including ethos, pathos, and logos. From here, the paper examines how rhetoric was applied first in Renaissance vocal music and then developed into the Baroque opera. The paper concludes by looking at common rhetorical figures in music and examines the use of rhetoric in "Dido's Lament" from Henry Purcell's opera "Dido and Aeneas".
From the Paper
"During this start of Baroque music, Caccini talks about new forms of expression. He says that ornamentations of notes only be used where they would help to heighten the verbal expression. What was new here was that the text, which was often a dialog, was set for only one voice part with the rhythms and melodies of natural speech being followed precisely-the only important thing to this new style was to express the text of the piece of music as clearly as one can and with the greatest expression. The music was essentially a backdrop on which the words were set. All of the previous inventions related to polyphony were thrown out. This new style contained almost no word repetition, unlike the madrigal or the motet, since, when in an actual conversation with someone, you would not repeat yourself unless the other party has missed something you said or you are adding extra emphasis to a word or sentence. This new style was called monody."
| |
|
Lincoln and Jefferson, 2007.
An analysis of Abraham Lincoln and Thomas Jefferson's belief in God and its impact on their presidency.
1,882 words (approx. 7.5 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 60.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes and discusses the core beliefs of President Abraham Lincoln and President Thomas Jefferson. The paper particularly focuses on their belief in God as the one great Creator of mankind and it discusses how these beliefs impacted their presidency. The paper looks at the writings of the two Presidents and shows how their writings supports their beliefs.
From the Paper
"That our founding fathers, including Jefferson, so firmly believed in an Almighty creator who had gifted unto men the unalterable right to govern themselves is quite evident. That Lincoln believed the same way is just as evident in his writings and speeches. The question then becomes, is modern society so far removed from those beliefs that the Constitution is rendered useless? The answer would be an emphatic no. That such a question can even be asked (and answered) is a primary source for a continuing belief in the inspired nature of the Constitution."
|
|
|
