| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "LEGAL ECONOMIC GRAFFITI": |
|
|
?A Legal and Economic Analysis of Graffiti?, 2005.
This paper analyzes D. J. D'Amico and W. Block's article "A Legal and Economic Analysis of Graffiti", presented at Grove City College (2004), which argues for the legalization of graffiti.
1,735 words (approx. 6.9 pages), 0 sources, $ 56.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that D'Amico (the primary author) commits many logical fallacies throughout his paper thus making his conclusions completely erroneous. The author stresses that the assumption of an unjust government, upon which D'Amico's entire argument hinges, is false because he begins by likening all governments to the "unjust government". D'Amico argues, using the non sequitur that because one has the right or even duty to "abolish" such a government, it follows that one has the right to "deface government property". The paper concludes that D'Amico's entire argument is circular reasoning because he claims that graffiti artists are taking back private property based on the fact that the government has stolen the private property and then he justifies his claim that the government has stolen the private property because it belongs to the graffiti artists who have homesteaded it.
From the Paper
"D'Amico continues to pursue this false analogy by using the "just war theory" to justify graffiti and by doing so commits yet another fallacy. D'Amico admits that, "although the theory applies, explicitly, only to governments, let us she how a non governmental "war" matches up against these criteria." By his own admission, the just war theory explicitly states that it should not be applied to anything other than governments yet D'Amico insists on applying it to graffiti. Governments have the obligation to protect citizens and are thus not acting in its own self interest. This element is something that can never be reproduced in a graffiti artist."
| |
|
Legal Naturalism vs. Legal Positivism, 2002.
A comparison of laws understood to come about naturally or through some form of positive creation.
2,630 words (approx. 10.5 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 79.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines two of the general theories of law - legal naturalism and legal positivism, both of which have had an enormous influence on law throughout history. The first part of the paper looks at natural law which describes those diverse theories of law that do not accept human law as true law and hold that a particular "something other than the positive law is the true law". The second section examines legal positivism where one of several general theoretical traditions is based on the belief that the source of knowledge lies in experience, not in reason, nor in mind.
From the Paper
"A good example of the usefulness of classical legal naturalism can be seen in the rise of commercial law in the Middle Ages in Europe. As Glendon, Gordon, and Carozza point out, the rise of commercial law took place when Roman civil law provided no adequate coverage of new problems that arose as trade "emerged from the localism and relative economic stagnation of the Middle Ages" in the form of international banking, expanded maritime trade, and rising commercial centers."
| |
|
The Legalization of Gay Marriage in the United States The Legalization of Gay Marriage in the United States, 2006.
A discussion regarding the controversial issue of same sex marriage in the USA.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 0 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the long debated issue of gay marriage in the United States. This paper reports how proponents of the issue contend that same sex marriage is not about gay rights but about human rights. It further discusses how these individuals believe that gays in modern society have long been subjected to inequalities and a lack of support from the social order. The opponents of the gay marriage issue refer to a stereotypical framework for gays in general that suggests that gays are evil and dangerous to children.
| |
|
Legal Theory and Institutions, 2005.
Discusses the doctrine of judicial precedent in the process of adjudication and legal reform in the legal system of England and Wales.
1,912 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 9 sources, MLA, $ 61.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the doctrine of judicial precedent in the process of adjudication and legal reform in the legal system in England and Wales. Judicial precedent is an important element of the Western legal system, but it is not in continental civil law systems. In particular, it discusses how the judiciary has received much criticism in the procedure of precedent.
From the Paper
"The historical power struggle began in the 17th century between the legislature and the Crown (Stuart Monarchy) and ended with Parliament becoming an independent in the power of making law in the name of the Crown. Nowadays, the ultimate power of making new law lies with the primary legislature (Parliament). Parliament has the capability of authorising and altering laws and as Parliament is an elected house, the power is given through democracy, but this is not so in the House of Lords because they are not an elected chamber. The House of Lords has received proposals for reform and those proposals are to modify the traditional form of the Life Peerages Act 1958 and the Peerage Act 1963. "
| |
|
Legalization of Prostitution, 2002.
A case for legalizing prostitution on the grounds that women generally receive a greater level of respect and acceptance for their profession in countries where prostitution is legal.
1,900 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 8 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay makes a case for legalizing prostitution. It argues that women generally receive a greater level of respect and acceptance for their profession in countries where prostitution is legal. They also receive more protection from routine police abuse, and get better medical care. However, the very nature of the profession means that the legalization of prostitution still comes with some stigmas and problems continue to proliferate even where it is legal. This essay still makes a claim for the legalization of prostitution, which, in spite of the problems that continue to be associated with it, tends to offer a safer service both for the individuals in the profession, and for their clientele. .
| |
|
The Legalization of Marijuana, 2008.
An in-depth analysis of the issue of legalizing marijuana and a conclusion against its legalization.
5,139 words (approx. 20.6 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 128.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper explores the arguments for and against the legalization of marijuana and takes the position that, while there are some rational points of view in favor of legalizing marijuana, the legalization of yet another drug is not justified. The paper argues that the legalization of any drug promotes a culture of acceptance and dependence which can lead to further acceptance and dependence on other types of drugs. The paper includes color graphs and appends a graph of Marijuana seizures and a color map of countries and their marijuana laws.
Outline:
Introduction
Overview
The Debate: Pros and Cons
Summary and Conclusion
From the Paper
"The debate about the legalization and the pros and cons of the drug marijuana has been one that has constantly been fought in the public as well in the medical arenas. The issue of the possible legalization of this substance has also been linked to facets such as crime, social stability and norms and the affect on the family structure. There are numerous arguments both for and against the legalization of marijuana. Proponents of legalization claim that marijuana is in fact relatively innocuous compared to other substances and drugs which are already legal. This refers to various accepted drugs and of course to the fact that tobacco and cigarettes are legally obtainable. Many people state that in comparison to many other legal drugs, marijuana is in fact less harmful in many respects and should be legalized. Among the many arguments put forward in favor of Marijuana is the assertion that it provides medicinal value which makes it more acceptable."
| |
|
The Art of Graffiti, 2004.
Examines the history of graffiti, with special focus on a well-known graffiti artist.
1,370 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the art of graffiti. The author focuses on the history and meaning of street graffiti using the work of one well-known graffiti artist to draw from for examples. The work of world renowned graffiti artist, Cool Disco Dan, is examined and explored.
From the Paper
"If one drives through any inner-city area in the nation one will see graffiti along the walls, subways and sides of buildings. Many people believe that graffiti is little more than gang vandalism, used to tag and mark areas that they believe they ?own,? but with graffiti?s long history and widespread use it represents much more than that. While it is true that some gangs use a tagging process to mark their geography grounds, true graffiti has nothing to do with tagging. Graffiti is an art form and is often referred to as the language of the street."
| |
|
Graffiti, 2002.
This paper discusses graffiti as a social phenomena and an art form; "graffiti" is the plural noun form of the word "graffito" which means to scratch, to scribble or to write.
2,482 words (approx. 9.9 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 75.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper details the history of graffiti, the taggers (people who make graffiti), the law, the culture, the music, the style, the types and the international appeal. The paper concludes that most graffiti is created from a person?s unique ideas on what looks good to them; therefore, graffiti has to be considered an art form regardless if it is showcased in a museum or on the streets.
From the Paper
"Wanting to be popular among fellow taggers and the rest of their community, taggers had to find ways to become more noticeable than their competitors through the 70?s did. They did this by changing their writing style from standard lettering to more artistic forms of lettering, such as bubble and calligraphy, and by making their tags larger. Making the tags larger was a great task at first because ?the standard nozzle width of a spray can is narrow?. Therefore, taggers began swapping caps from other aerosol products in order to get larger nozzle width. "
| |
|
Legal Positivism in the American Political System, 2006.
A look at how legal positivism appears to be the most dominant form of legal theory in the American political system.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 5 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Legal positivism contends that laws are formulated based on the social system of the time and the sources that the social system gives authority to form legal decisions. These sources may be in the form of a constitution, amendments, judicial decisions or state legislation, for example. The belief that legal decisions are based on justice is not the foundation of law in positivism; yet, it is based on what has previously been determined, or posited in the social order. This paper discusses the American political system and contends that the court system of the United States consistently determines law in relation to the American political system based on previous judicial decisions that form the basis of the decisions of the justices.
|
| Term Paper # 99979 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
|
|
Legalization of Marijuana, 2002.
A look at the pros and cons of the legalization of marijuana in the United States.
914 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 32.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper introduces, discusses and analyzes the topic of legalizing marijuana. Specifically, it discusses the current United States' policies, the uses of marijuana, and the arguments for and against legalizing marijuana. Includes an outline.
Legalization of Marijuana
I. Current U.S. Policy regarding legalization of Marijuana
a. State law overview
b. Penalties
c. Pending legislation
II. Uses
a. Medical
b. Recreational
c. Environmental
III. Arguments
a. Pro legalization
b. Against legalization
c. National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws
From the Paper
"The legalization of marijuana is one of the most controversial and volatile topics facing Americans today. In 2001, 34 percent of adult Americans believed marijuana should be legalized, the largest percentage since 1969, and up to 70 percent of adults approve of the use of medicinal marijuana (Cauchon, 2001, 01A). However, in November 2002, voters in Nevada turned down a measure to make the drug more readily available in the Silver State. Opposition is strongest among conservative Americans, while younger adults favor decriminalization. "The USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup Poll found that support for legalization is highest among 18- to 49-year-olds, people in the West and independent voters. Opposition was greatest among the elderly, regular churchgoers and Republicans" (Cauchon, 2001, p. 01A)."
| |
|
Perspectives on Legal Order, 2005.
An analysis of Positivism, Marxism, Natural Law, Anarchism, Legal Realism, Feminism, and Critical Legalism, and their impact on Canadian Law.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 2 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses and analyzes various perspectives on legal order. The paper examines different concepts, including Positivism, Marxism, Natural Law, Anarchism, Legal Realism, Feminism, and Critical Legalism. The paper analyzes the role that these theories played in Canadian lawmaking, determining that Positivism had the most influence on contemporary Canadian lawmakers.
From the Paper
"What is the purpose of law and why do we need it? Would society completely crumble into a chaotic mess if law did not exist? Well, from what I understand thus far, and from what I have seen on TV lately, law is important to maintaining order in society. Without law and order, anarchy would rule our lives. This sentiment was proven recently in the wake of hurricane Katrina. The devastation and human suffering is a result from lack of government organization."
| |
|
Legalization of Drugs, 2005.
This paper explores the issue of drug abuse and considers decriminalization or legalization.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 1 source, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses that drug abuse is a real problem in the United States. The paper questions if the present way of handling the drug problem is the best way to cut down on drug abuse. The paper asks if decriminalization is better than legalization. The paper then questions if drugs should be legalized and if so, which drugs should be legalized. The paper considers that legalizing different drugs would put the responsibility on the user and thus change the problems associated with drugs, including criminalization.
From the Paper
"According to the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse released in 2002, "an estimated 15.9 million Americans aged 12 and older were current users of illicit drugs in 2001, meaning that they used an illicit drugs" (Crime 408). Drug abuse is a real problem in the United States, but is the current manner of handling the drug problem the best way to cut down on drug abuse? Analyzing "Crime in the Modern World" will show how legalizing different drugs such as marijuana can be beneficial as well as reduce cost to enforcing laws and sending offenders to prison. An important difference should be noted, however, between decriminalizing drugs and legalizing them: "[Decriminalization] reduces criminal penalties associated with the personal possession of a controlled substance, legalization eliminates the laws and associated criminal penalties that prohibit its production, sale, distribution and possession" (Crime 428)."
| |
|
Should Illegal Immigrants be Legalized, 2001.
The arguments for and against legalization of foreign illegal workers.
1,100 words (approx. 4.4 pages), 0 sources, $ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the pros and cons of legalizing the mostly Mexican illegal immigrants currently working in the United States. It begins by laying out the hardships at present which those working and trying to gain legal citizenship face and the burdens to the U.S. economy. This is followed by a well composed argument for legalization, include points such as; the need for agricultural workers, reduced border patrol and increased taxation.
From the paper;
?The issue of the legalization of illegal Mexican immigrants now living in the United States has long been controversial. Opponent's feel legalizing the immigrants will take away jobs from U.S. citizens, and that it sends the wrong message to the thousands of immigrants who entered the country through the proper legal channels. ABC News reports "'This is a kick in the teeth to the thousands of individuals across the world who are legally attempting to enter the United States,' said Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., chairman of the Congressional Immigration Reform Caucus. 'Instead, the U.S. is saying, "Why wait? Sneak on in! Whether you enter illegally or not, you will be a resident or citizen in no time." The first lesson these new residents will learn about the U.S. is it is OK to break the law.'"
"Current estimates show at least 4 million undocumented workers live in the U. S. About one-quarter of them live in California, and most of them are Mexicans. Mexican immigrants have received amnesty before. ABC News reports, "The last time the United States granted amnesty to illegal immigrants was in 1986, when President Ronald Reagan signed a law that eventually resulted in the regularization of about 2.7 million people, mostly Mexican immigrants in California."?
| |
|
Legalizing Marijuana, 2001.
This paper explores the debate over whether to legalize marijuana.
1,965 words (approx. 7.9 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the history of the legalization and prohibition of marijuana. It discusses the arguments for and against legalizing marijuana, and along with this, the legality of alcohol and cigarettes' consumption. This paper recommends the legalization of marijuana in exchange for making alcohol and cigarettes usage illegal.
From the Paper
"The debate over whether to legalize marijuana has been one of the most controversial issues dividing courts, the federal government, state governments, and voters. In 1996, Arizona and California voters overwhelmingly approved the legalization of marijuana for medicinal purposes. Propositions 200 and 215 represented a dramatic shift from a previously united federal and state front against illegal drugs to one where state governments and voters are now at odds with the federal government over the medical use of controlled substances. Rather than focusing on how to improve and maintain the long-standing war on drugs, the policy issue has now become: who controls America's drug laws- courts, the federal government, state governments, or the voters? In addition, the legalization of marijuana poses other questions: Does legalizing marijuana undermine the seemingly endless federal war on drugs by moving towards greater tolerance of marijuana and other drugs? Is more research necessary to determine the benefits or hazardous effects of marijuana? Would legalizing marijuana open the floodgates to legalizing other controlled substances such as heroin or LSD?"
|
|
|
