| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "KUWAITI WOMEN VOTE": |
|
|
Kuwaiti Women's Vote, 2004.
This paper discusses the issue of suffrage for women in Kuwait.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer studies the outline of a public diplomacy action plan to generate pressure toward suffrage for women in Kuwait. The writer discusses how the right for women to vote and hold public office became a major issue in Kuwait.
From the Paper
"The question of extending the voting franchise in Kuwait to Kuwaiti women and the right for women to hold public office has recently emerged as a major issue in Kuwaiti politics. It has also become a factor in Kuwait's international image and therefore in its relations with its neighbors, trading partners and the world community. Today, Kuwait is one of only two Arab countries in which women cannot vote. The Kuwaiti constitution does not prohibit ... "
| |
|
Kuwaiti Women, 2005.
This paper examines articles on the topic of Kuwaiti women suffrage in the Middle East.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper examines three articles and discusses how the first of them is editorial in nature, while the last two are more detached and temperate. The paper explains what should emerge is that the final two contextualize the amendment by looking at the political history leading up to the bill, while the first article examines the social characteristics, creating the need for a 2005 amendment granting women the right to vote.
| |
|
American Voting vs. British Voting, 2002.
A comparison of the electoral systems in the in the United States and Great Britain.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 5 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares public opinion, voting, and elections in the United States and Great Britain, and discusses the various advantages and disadvantages of each political system.
| |
|
The Importance of Voting, 2007.
This paper demonstrates the significance of voting and the consequences of not voting.
1,116 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses how the vote of the people determines who is in power at the local, state and national level. However, voting is not compulsory and the number of people voting is approaching fifty percent. The paper illustrates how the actual voting population becomes the group that the people in charge aim to please. By choosing to vote every person can gain even a small degree of influence. Apathy, on the other hand, allows those in control to take actions without a high level of concern over how the action will be perceived. The paper concludes that if more of the population voted, there would be a more balanced system of government where everyone is represented and where there is some measure of control over those in power.
From the Paper
"One of the main arguments against non-voting is that it has no effect. It is a decision not to act done as a form of protest against a system. However, as Dave Renton describes "like all campaigns based on inaction, it is a fundamentally weak gesture. It says to our rulers, "Look, you don't have our support", and they say, "Look, we're not bothered." Michael Staudenmaier makes another argument against voting stating that it has become based on people choosing the lesser of two evils. In effect, people vote because they don't want a certain person in office, not because they want a certain person in office. The problem with this argument is that not voting at all is not a solution."
| |
|
Electronic Voting, 2005.
A look at electronic voting as a way of presenting the same type of problems that arose in the 2000 presidential elections.
3,618 words (approx. 14.5 pages), 10 sources, APA, $ 100.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the topic of electronic voting, its advantages and disadvantages, and the problems associated with it that must be solved before it can be implemented on a large scale. The paper describes the problems with the present system of voting, alternative systems of voting as well as electronic voting, and the technology that could support this type of system.
From the Paper
"The electronic voting machines currently in use include touch-screen voting, while suggestions for online voting over the Internet have been made but rejected because of the security difficulties of such a system. If those could be solved, however, then online voting might become a reality as well. At the present time, different states are considering how to implement some form of electronic system that will not create the sort of problems seen in Florida in 2000, will be secure, and will be accurate. They look to some of the systems that have already been used and so tested by different states to see what has worked and what has not."
| |
|
The Electoral College vs. Popular Vote, 2007.
This paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of both the current American electoral college and an alternative popular vote system.
955 words (approx. 3.8 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that critics charge that the current American electoral college makes it possible for presidents to be elected who do not have an absolute majority of the popular vote, which diminishes the legitimacy of the final victor. The author then points out that one of the arguments in favor of the electoral college is that it prevents powerful, populous regions from monopolizing the electoral outcome as would happen in a popular vote system. The paper relates that, in the popular vote, direct ballot system, parties are given seats in proportion to their share of the votes cast, thus ensuring that the popular vote is not distorted; however, the popular vote system will contribute to fragmentation and instability by making it easier for "fringe" or narrowly-focused political parties to emerge in opposition to the current two major parties.
From the Paper
"Other criticisms leveled against the Electoral College include arguments that the system creates the potential for "faithless voters" who are pledged to vote for one candidate but who chose, for a variety of reasons, to vote for another. Interestingly, if one expert is correct, there have been a number of such electors in recent years. Moving forward, critics also charge that, because every state is given the same number of electoral votes regardless of its "voter turnout", there is no incentive to encourage greater voter participation - although Kimberling seems skeptical about its overall impact."
| |
|
Internet Voting, 2003.
Examines the idea of casting votes over the internet.
2,917 words (approx. 11.7 pages), 24 sources, APA, $ 86.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the feasibility of on-line voting in public elections, considering the issues of security, reliability, privacy and authentication. It examines the use of computers for voting at polling places, remote sites and on the internet and considers the possible effects of on-line voting on the future of American politics. There are some serious problems involved with voting via internet that so far seem to have no solution. This paper explains those problems and what is needed to solve them. It ends with a discussion of the possibility of America becoming a direct democracy, with the people voting on-line on every issue that is now voted on by Congress.
From the Paper
"Eric Sinrod, writing for Computerworld, suggests a step by step approach, starting with computer voting at poll sites, then moving to voting via kiosks, and finally Internet voting from home PCs.22 Voting at a poll site with a computer is little different in terms of security and privacy than voting with paper ballots. Voters are ID checked by election officials at the door so there is no need for an ID check on the computer. The computer just records and counts the votes. It is a closed system so it can be carefully watched to prevent hacks and viruses."
| |
|
Voting in the U.S., 2005.
This paper discusses that, despite the critical issue in the Bush-Kerry election, tens of millions of people said "I don't really care" and did not vote.
1,180 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, in the Bush-Kerry presidential election, only slightly more than a half of the eligible voters actually voted and, within the 18 to 21 year old group, only 17% voted. The paper points out that the key aspects of why Americans do not vote are a belief (1) that there really is no equality in America, (2) that one vote won't really make any difference and (3) a total mistrust of politics and politicians. The paper concludes that, although social studies and political science texts all refer to voting as both a duty and an obligation, too many millions of Americans don't care, don't understand or are merely unresponsive to their responsibilities as full citizens.
From the Paper
"Despite massive efforts to "get out the vote", transportation, free meals, promises of better things to come (etc), people stayed home. Yes, TV showed lines of people in Ohio, standing in the rain for up to nine hours to vote. It didn't show college kids partying, playing video games, sleeping, having sex-- anything to avoid even CONSIDERING going to vote. This lack of interest among the young is amplified by their belief that they are neither equal nor respected. This may sound a little pompous. But, there still are people in government who feel that only they have the wisdom and clear thinking that can make America a better place. These are the same over-the-hill idiots who created colors for alerts, who lied about weapons of mass destruction, who made friends with Enron and Worldcom and gave Nalliburton billions of wasteful dollars."
| |
|
E-Voting, 2004.
An examination of the pros and cons of virtual voting.
1,654 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses and analyzes the topic of e-voting, or voting through ATM-like electronic terminals. It looks at the pros and cons of the election process moving into an electronic age and away from the "hanging chads." The writer also examines issues of security, such as hacking and vote count integrity.
From the Paper
"The 2000 Presidential election and the fiasco in Florida's vote count were just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to voting in America. Today, voters are faced with more than punch cards. They are faced with "e-voting." What is e-voting? E-voting is a more practical way of voting by using electronic touch-screens or optical-scanning systems that record the vote when a voter touches the screen, clicks a mouse, or marks a ballot than can be optically scanned. The systems work electronically, and votes should be tallied almost instantaneously. The machines automatically show each office or item on the ballot as the voter enters their vote, and "If a voter makes a mistake, such as selecting two candidates for the same office, the computer points out this error and allows the voter to correct it" (Bonsor). These machines eliminate the inefficiencies of punch card and manual voting, and they are quicker for voters to use, so polling places can handle more voters in less time. In addition, they bring voting to many more people, including the blind and non-English speakers, for there are screens that talk back and screens in other languages."
| |
|
Electronic Voting, 2007.
This paper discusses the issue of electronic voting within the election system.
1,272 words (approx. 5.1 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer notes that voting fraud has always been a concern in U. S. elections. However, the writer points out that during the last few years, concerns over electronic voting and the possibility of fraud has sparked heated debates that continue today. The writer discusses the two different types of electronic voting systems, the optical scan system and the touch-screen system. The writer maintains that the success of the system of elections is based on three premises: the secrecy of the ballot, safeguards against fraud, and safeguards against voter intimidation. The writer concludes that, while criticism still echoes concerning electronic voting machines, butterfly ballots, chads and other twentieth century voting technology have all but disappeared.
From the Paper
"Internet voting is the process by which a voter casts his/her ballot on a personal computer that then electronically sends the ballot to the election office. While this system has the greatest potential for making election more convenient and accessible, it also presents major concerns surrounding the verifiability and security given the overall vulnerability of the Internet environment. Most agree that Internet voting is far too risky for general implementation, however as advances in encryption and other security measures are made, Internet voting will likely become more prevalent. The Defense Department is leading the way in resolving Internet security measures with several experiments and pilot projects. For example, to improve voting opportunities of overseas military personnel, the Defense Department conduct an experiment called Voting Over the Internet Pilot Project during the election of 2000, and planned another called the Secure Electronic Registration and Voting Experiment during the 2004 election, however this project was cancelled before the 2004 election due to unresolved security issues."
| |
|
Register to Vote, 2004.
An analysis of the importance of voting.
1,230 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines voting as the most important right exercised by any democratic society. The paper discusses the vital importance of being aware of exactly how the right to vote can change one's life. The paper highlights that this is not only true of presidential elections, but also of other, lesser election events. The paper explains that senators and mayors for example directly influence the way of life enjoyed by specific communities. The paper states that it is only through voting that we can truly change our community, our lives and the lives of our children.
From the Paper
"Voting is one of the most important rights in a democratic society. In the United States, this right has been intermittently fought for by minority groups such as black people, women and others. It is a right that has been earned by pioneers and fighters, and one that is being taken for granted all too easily in today's society. According to a column by Hillary Clinton (2001) for example, young people between the ages of 18 and 24 are losing interest in voting. A survey conducted by the National Association of Secretaries of State concludes that this generation may become the first class of non-voters. This does not bode well for the United States of the future. The country's past is riddled with struggle in order to reach the state of democracy that everybody enjoys today. The right to vote is one of the most important privileges granted by this democracy, but Americans are losing touch with the importance of voting. "
| |
|
Voting in America, 2005.
An essay discussing the importance of registering to vote in the U.S.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay provides three important reasons why more Americans, particularly young Americans, should register and vote. The paper discusses the importance of voting for political and social reform, and the importance of having a majority of citizens vote for reforms.
From the Paper
"As such there are a number of important reasons why voting is a very important action on behalf of US citizens. Voting is important because social and political reforms often depend on the voices and actions of US voters. Voting is also important because participation in political solutions today relieves future..."
| |
|
Voting Behavior and Education, 2002.
And analysis of studies on the relationship between level of education and voting behavior.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 13 sources, $ 79.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Analysis of studies on the relationship between level of education & voting behavior. Higher education and increase in voter participation. Other factors that impact voting behavior including party identification, socioeconomic class, religion, personal feelings about candidates. Discusses findings of a survey on educational level & presidential selection in 2000. Two tables.
From the Paper
"Voting Behavior and Education
Introduction
Piven and Cloward (2000) have noted that education is an investment in human skills, one with both its costs and its returns. For example, the cost of finishing high school to the student is, according to the authors, very low because it consists mainly of the relatively low wages earned by a 16 to 19 year old. On the other hand, the cost to the student of attending college is higher and includes tuition, books, fees, and the earnings given up by not working and/or by working only part time.
However, the returns of a higher education can be strong and varied. One of these returns, Piven and Cloward (2000) state, is a greater interest and participation in civic affairs..."
| |
|
Economic Models of Voting, 2004.
An overview of the competency and low-cost economic models of voting.
1,100 words (approx. 4.4 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how it is generally believed that the more the economy grows or slows down, the more all voters reward or punish the incumbent party for improving or worsening their economic situation and how presidential approval ratings often drive the results of the economic models of voting. It looks at how these approval ratings are typically conceptualized as capturing both non-economic factors and other economic factors beyond near-election economic growth. It discuss two major economic models, the competency and low-cost of voting, both of which show how economic outcomes may affect party choice.
From the Paper
"It is logical to expect public support for the EU, as a relatively new political system, to be more responsive to short-run policy outcomes than is public support for political institutions in mature democracies. In other words, EU institutions might not benefit from broad legitimacy. Thus, the European publics have a tendency to blame EU institutions rather than policy-makers for short-run policy failures. However, even if this is the case, only a weak theoretical connection exists between EU policy and domestic economic performance (Palmer 1995). Until very recently, the EU was responsible for neither fiscal nor monetary policies. And while EU membership represents a constraint on national economic policies, historically, this effect has been indirect."
| |
|
Paying Attention: Voting Intention and Voter News Consumption, 2004.
Evaluates the link between voting intention and news consumption; based on research data collected during the 2000 Canadian federal election.
4,225 words (approx. 16.9 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 112.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The main aim of this paper is to investigate the connection between the amount of attention paid to news coverage in elections by citizens, and the effects of this on voting intention. Analysing secondary source data from the 2000 Canadian federal election, this paper finds that the only significant correlations between voting intention and attention paid to news were found amongst television viewers and newspaper readers. The data shows that the more attention individuals pay to news, the more they move away from being an undecided voter and towards identifying with a party.
Paper Overview
Abstract
Background
Research Question
Rationale for Method Used
Methodology
Design
Procedures
Analysis and Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Tables, etc.
References
From the Paper
"Paul Nesbitt-Larking argues that the media love elections because they "possess all the qualities of first class sporting events-provide cheap thrills for the media, who are able to garner much good material for little or no expenditure. Elections are easy because the protocols and rhythms of what will take place have been reasonably well established." If he is correct, then the 2000 Canadian federal election should have had Canadian media salivating. It was momentous for many reasons. It was the first election of a new millennium. It marked the third campaign as incumbent begun by then Prime Minister Jean ChrA(c)tien who, if he won (which he did), would have been handed with his fellow Liberals their third majority government. Finally, adding drama, there was a new, right-of-centre party on the scene in the form of the Canadian Alliance led by a young, charismatic, sea-doo riding leader by the name of Stockwell Day. Arguably therefore, it could be expected that the media would dramatically increase its coverage of the election campaign. By doing so however, the media become not just passive observers of the election, but also active participants and take for themselves the ability to, within newscasts especially, prime the electorate as to which issues are important."
|
|
|
