| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "KING OEDIPUS": |
|
|
King Oedipus, 2005.
This paper evaluates the concept of Fate in "Oedipus Rex" by Sophocles.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 10 sources, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper shows how one sees the kingly stereotypes of realism and the dynamics of the character that Oedipus represents through the scope of Fate and why this created tragedy for this doomed character. The paper illustrates how King Oedipus could not accept the will of the Gods and selfishly sought to reject the greater plan they had created for him. The paper highlights how by his kingly nature he presents a realistic man, as he only wants to avoid death and destruction, but he also provides the mental and behavior dynamic that made him insane.
From the Paper
"This dramatic study will examine the nature of Fate in relation to the tragic life of Oedipus in the dramatic play "Oedipus Rex" by Sophocles. The critical aspects of character and plot revolve around the troubled vision of the leader Oedipus, as he descends into the abyss of Fate in relation to events within his life. The basis of this study will be to examine the tragic aspects of Oedipus' attitudes towards his followers, as he cannot recant the destiny that Teiresias imposes on him for his death. In this manner, Fate plays a large role in controlling the destiny of Oedipus, as he cannot find a way to evade the tragedy that awaits him."
| |
|
?Oedipus the King? and ?Death and the King?s Horseman?, 2002.
An analysis of two literary works, comparing the nature of parenthood as portrayed through the characters of the plays.
1,480 words (approx. 5.9 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the relationship of parents and children in Sophocles "Oedipus the King" and Wole Soyinka?s "Death and the King?s Horseman". The writer describes how Sophocles allows Oedipus? theme of parentage full stage in the play, while in Soyinka?s work, Elesin?s son, Olunde, contributes to the plot throughout the play.
From the Paper
"Although written some two thousand years apart, both ?Oedipus the King? and ?Death and the King?s Horseman? deal with a father?s shame and ultimate fate as a social outcast. One is a king, the other a king?s horseman, yet both are equally men of honor and social standing, bound by customs, cultures, and spiritual beliefs in the afterlife. There are no true villains in either play. The characters are simply human, with human frailties and vanities, but appear good at heart with good intentions. The nature of parenthood is important in each author?s theme. Sophocles?s Oedipus and Wole Soyinka?s Elesin are both fathers who inadvertently cast shame not only unto themselves, but to their children as well. Moreover, both fathers are concerned with the fates and their own personal role in fulfilling their place in this life and the life beyond death. Sophocles?s play centers on Oedipus? parentage, discovering in the end that he has unwittingly killed his own father and committed incest with his mother."
| |
|
Oedipus the King and Antigone, 2008.
An analysis of the underlying themes and character development in Sophocles' "Oedipus the King," "Antigone" and "Oedipus Colonus."
1,464 words (approx. 5.9 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes the deeper inferences that Sophocles portrays through the vivid character history of the main characters in his "Three Theban Plays." It describes the characters and the development of the character Oedipus as the model for the tragic hero in "Oedipus the King," "Antigone" and "Oedipus Colonus." The paper concludes that the life of suffering is the underlying theme in the story of Oedipus and Antigone.
From the Paper
"It is also important to note that 'innocence' is not rewarded with an escape from any type of suffering. As in the case with Jocasta and Ismene, who play passive roles, both experience an element of suffering. While many view Jocasta as more a tragic character than Ismene, it is important to note that Ismene is governed by fear of man, rather than will of the gods; serving as the perfect foil to her older sister Antigone.
"Ultimately, the life of suffering is the underlying theme in the story of Oedipus and Antigone. In both plays, the hero's suffer extreme consequences for the choices laid upon them, regardless of their favor to the gods. In this sense, suffering is not only a consequence of choice, but also an inherent part of life. Sophocles portrays this theme perfectly through his tragic hero's and characters, laying the groundwork for many tragedians in the future."
| |
|
"Oedipus the King", 2002.
Analysis of the Greek Tragedy "Oedipus the King" with special focus on the meaning of the last line in the play.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
"Oedipus the King" is a tragedy that focuses on the life and downfall of the unfortunate King Oedipus, who was condemned by the oracle at an early age to murder his father and marry his mother. This paper, analyzes, and pays special attention to the last line in the play, "Crave not mastery in all." And what this means in the context of the play and the ending of it all.
| |
|
"Oedipus the King", 2008.
A brief analysis of Sophocles' "Oedipus the King".
874 words (approx. 3.5 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how "Oedipus the King" by Sophocles is about Oedipus, a man doomed by his fate. It looks at how, like most tragedies, "Oedipus the King" contains a tragic hero, a heroic figure unable to escape his own doom, and how the tragic flaw that Sophocles gives Oedipus is hubris (exaggerated pride or self-confidence), which causes Oedipus to walk right into the fate he sought to escape. The paper also discusses how Oedipus' pride pushes him toward his tragic end in the initial journey, when he kills his father, in the episode of the sphinx.
From the Paper
"On his trip away from Corinth, he unknowingly met with his father, King Laius. When Oedipus tells Jocasta of his encounter he says that he met with a carriage at an intersection and they fought over the right of way. He also mentions one man (King Laius) struck him and said that: "He [King Laius] was paid in full and ... my stick had struck him backwards from the car and he rolled out of it. And then I killed them all" (45, 1.801-13). Oedipus' pride caused him to kill his own father (unknowingly). He kept seeking for ways to avoid his destiny. This shows that he was so zealous that he thought he could avoid destiny. Also, in trying to avoid his destiny, he got into an argument over a small right of way incident. Had he just swallowed his pride and let the carriage have the right of way, he could have avoided everything. "
| |
|
"Oedipus the King", 2002.
An analysis of "Oedipus the King" as interpreted by Sophocles, Aristotle, and Sigmund Freud.
880 words (approx. 3.5 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how "Oedipus the King" ("Oedipus Tyrannus"), by Sophocles, which is set in the remoteness of ancient Greece and has come down to us in the form of a tragic myth, was allegedly inspired by true events and actual characters. It examines how the Greek philosopher, Aristotle, referred to this play continually in his "Poetics", pointing out features of the ideal tragic poem, and in the later years of the 19th century, Sigmund Freud adapted this myth as the basis for one of his most controversial psychoanalytic interpretations, namely, the "Oedipal Complex."
From the Paper
"In the case of Aristotle, Oedipus the King was interpreted not only as a powerful myth but also as a source of what defines true tragedy. For Aristotle, this connoted "an imitation of an action, not of narrative, that is serious and complete and through pity and fear, the proper purgation of these emotions is effected" (Martin 136). Thus, the central character of a tragedy like Oedipus the King must emote some sense of being virtuous despite having feelings of pity and fear for his eventual downfall which creates in the reader or the viewer a kind of outrage. Also, such a character cannot revel in evilness; he must be one "who is not outstanding in virtue nor full of righteousness but through a fatal flaw (hamartia) meets his end" (Woodard 178)."
| |
|
"Oedipus the King", 2002.
A literary review of the character of Oedipus in Sophocles' "Oedipus the King".
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 4 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
A paper on the character of Oedipus in Sophocles "Oedipus the King".
| |
|
Irony in "Oedipus the King", 2002.
Examines how Sophocles wove irony into all elements of his tragic play "Oedipus the King".
1,100 words (approx. 4.4 pages), 1 source, $ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay addresses the numerous instances of irony in Sophocles' renowned Greek tragedy "Oedipus the King"; in the plot, the themes, and the dialogues. The author discusses how the audience knows of Oedipus' situation, long before he figures things out for himself, and examines one of the most ironic scenes between the king and the blind soothsayer, Teiresias.
From the Paper
"Oedipus the King is one of the best-known Greek tragedies in dramatic history. The central theme was instrumental to daily life of the early Greeks, because it demonstrates the powers of fate. The main plotline revolves around Oedipus and his quest to escape his own destiny, which turns his life to turmoil. The play is about murder, incest, and suicide. Knowing the play contains these exciting elements, one would think there would be no problem drawing an audience. When the play was produced, however, the Greek audience would have been familiar with the legend of Oedipus Rex. Sophocles faced a great challenge to develop a play that would generate interest in watching a play in which the patrons already knew the story. Sophocles captures and holds his audience?s attention by introducing profound irony in the dialogue, in the plot and in the setting of Oedipus the King. "
| |
|
"Oedipus the King", 2002.
This paper discusses Sophocles's "Oedipus the King".
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 1 source, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes the character of Oedipus in Sophocles's "Oedipus the King" and an ineffective ruler.
| |
|
"Hamlet" and "Oedipus the King", 2005.
Character analysis of Prince Hamlet in "Hamlet" by William Shakespeare and Oedipus in ?Oedipus King? by Sophocles.
807 words (approx. 3.2 pages), 1 source, APA, $ 28.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this paper, a character analysis of both Prince Hamlet and Oedipus is conducted, arguing that both characters have exhibited tragic flaws that ultimately determined their downfall in life.
From the Paper
"In Aristotle?s literary discourse, ?Poetics,? he discusses his theory of tragedy, wherein he introduces the concepts of tragic flaw or ?hamartia,? which serves as the catalyst for the protagonist?s downfall or the tragedy of the story to happen. He determines a tragedy as a ?drama? that brings about a ?sorrowful conclusion, arousing fear and pity in the audience? (Roberts and Jacobs, 1998:1189). Tragic stories are identified through three (3) characteristics or elements: first, the protagonist, usually a male, must be of noble stature; second, the protagonist or tragic hero must possess a tragic flaw or ?hamartia? that shall become his downfall at the end of the story; and third, the hero?s downfall must come with a self-realization on his part, making him a ?reformed? individual even if a tragic outcome happens to him."
| |
|
Character In Oedipus The King, 2002.
Analyzes "Oedipus The King" focusing on a very important character, Jocasta.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 2 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This sophomore level paper analyzes a Character In Oedipus The King focusing on a very important character, Jocasta, who plays the role of Oedipus's mother and wife in the play. This paper thoroughly analyzes her personality and her motives. This paper also compares the character of Jocasta with Oedipus and how both end up in a miserable situation in the end, from where there is no turning back. The paper also highlights few quotes from the play, which contribute to the development of important theme. In the end an analysis of Jocasta's complicated character is made.
| |
|
"Hamlet" and "Oedipus the King", 1994.
A comparison in the search for knowledge and truth in Shakespeare's "Hamlet" and Sophocles's "Oedipus the King".
1,792 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 57.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper deals with the protagonists' search for knowledge and truth in Shakespeare's "Hamlet" and Sophocles's "Oedipus" the King. Examples from each play are given to reveal how the protagonists' motivations and personal traits play a key factor in the outcomes of their journeys.
From the Paper
"In Hamlet by William Shakespeare and Oedipus the King by Sophocles, the protagonists? tragic falls are caused by their unrelenting search for knowledge and truth. Regardless of the outcome, each protagonist is compelled to discover the meaningful aspects that make their lives important. The reader can only comprehend the necessity of the searches through an understanding of the protagonist?s motivation, personal traits, and the relevance of the outcomes to the overall quest."
| |
|
"Oedipus the King" and "Death of a Salesman", 2003.
A comparative analysis of the tragic heroes from Sophocles' "Oedipus the King" and Arthur Miller's "Death of a Salesman."
690 words (approx. 2.8 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the tragic heroes from Sophocles' "Oedipus the King" and Arthur Miller's "Death of a Salesman." It looks at the characteristics and fates of tragic the heroes and the effect of their quests.
From the Paper
" The tragic heroes of Sophocles' Oedipus the King and Arthur Miller's Death of a Salesman, Oedipus and Willy Loman respectively refuse to passively accept their fate. In his essay Tragedy and the Common Man, Miller argued ..."
| |
|
Creon in "Antigone" and "Oedipus the King", 2004.
Discusses he character of Creon in Sophocles's "Antigone" and "Oedipus the King", describing the same man in differing circumstances.
1,222 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In the play, "Oedipus the King", and in "Antigone", Sophocles has Creon as one of the central characters. This paper argues that a first look at Creon in the two plays suggests that Creon?s character has changed substantially. However, a closer look reveals that Creon remains the same basic character, only differing in appearance because of the situations he is in.
From the Paper
"The first character trait that defines Creon is his pride. This trait is clear in Antigone, where it is the major reason he refuses to change the law and allow Antigone to bury her brother, despite her many pleas. Creon initially makes the law out of a need to save Thebes. He is then unable to even consider changing the law, as doing so would show that he was wrong to make the law. In this way, his driving force is his pride. Creon?s actions in refusing to allow Antigone to bury her brother is often considered a sign of Creon?s cruel nature. This view fails to notice that, while the outcome may seem like cruelty to Antigone, Creon?s intention is not to be cruel. Therefore, a tendency toward cruelty should not be considered as part of Creon?s character. Instead, the outcome is a result of Creon?s character trait of pride. Creon?s motivation of pride is also seen where he makes the decision to send Antigone to her death. In deciding this Creon says, ?For since I have taken her, alone of all the city, in open disobedience, I will not make myself a liar to my people-I will slay her? (Sophocles, Antigone)."
| |
|
"Iliad" and "Oedipus the King", 2006.
A comparison of "Iliad" by Homer and "Oedipus the King" by Sophocles.
1,921 words (approx. 7.7 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 61.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how, in both "Iliad" by Homer and "Oedipus the King" by Sophocles, the idea of authority is used by both authors to construct the chains of relationships between the characters of these literary works. The paper further looks at how this idea also reflects the attitudes of one social group towards the other, or the relationships between men and women, between father and son, mortals and immortals. In addition, the paper discusses how both books help us understand better the ethics of ancient society.
From the Paper
"From the first pages of Book One of the "Iliad" we can see a number of levels of authority existing in the Ancient Greece. Even in the first few sentences one can notice hints which show the relationships between different classes. "Will of Zeus was accomplished"(Homer 59) can explain the very high level of authority of this god above others. The audience does not know what was that will exactly and how was it accomplished, so it makes an impression that anything said by Zeus was accepted and done immediately and without compliant. This leads to the conclusion that Zeus indeed possessed the highest level of authority above all others - both mortals and immortals. However, as we know from the further readings, other gods did not always agree with Zeus. "
|
|
|
