| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "KENNEDY OBSESSION": |
|
|
"The Kennedy Obsession", 2003.
An examination of John Hellman?s "The Kennedy Obsession: The American Myth of JFK".
1,241 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper briefly reviews Hellman's book, which explores America?s obsession with John F. Kennedy and the entire Kennedy family. Hellman notes that, despite Kennedy?s charisma and charm, America has long been obsessed with the Kennedy family, far beyond any seemingly reasonable interest or curiosity.
From the Paper
"Hellman notes that despite Kennedy?s charisma and charm, America has long been obsessed with the Kennedy family far beyond any seemingly reasonable interest or curiosity. Hellman?s text explores Kennedy?s deliberate creation of his self-image, and how his public persona interacted with the mass media and the political machine to create the pervasive Kennedy myth. The book is concise and illuminating, and never falls into the sensationalist or trite. Overall, Hellman is an engaging and interesting author who does a lot to bring the already interesting subject matter to life."
| |
|
Arthur Schlesinger's "A Thousand Days: Kennedy in the White House", 1972.
This paper discusses Arthur Schlesinger's "A Thousand Days: Kennedy in the White House", an overview of the Kennedy administration's accomplishments and crisis from the point of view of a member of the Kennedy circle as well as a historian.
3,375 words (approx. 13.5 pages), 1 source, $ 119.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Arthur Meier Schlesinger, Jr., author, historian, political scientist, son of an author and historian, professor of history at Harvard University, special presidential assistant from 1961-1963, eminent man of American letters, would seem to be overly well-qualified to write what he calls a personal memoir of the days when John Fitzgerald Kennedy occupied 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, D.C..
Schlesinger, born in Columbus, Ohio, October 15, 1917, was a contemporary of the assassinated president. An alumnus of Harvard, he was an associate professor of history from 1946 to ... "
| |
|
"The American Romance with Robert Kennedy", 2006.
This paper reviews and examines author Ronald Steel's questionable portrayal of Robert Kennedy in his book "In Love With The Night: The American Romance With Robert Kennedy."
1,025 words (approx. 4.1 pages), 1 source, APA, $ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores author Ronald Steel's flawed method of razing the myths of Robert Kennedy. This paper proves that while Steel's interpretations are at times plausible, at others they are completely contrived and argues that the author's depiction of Kennedy is flat, one-dimensional and sorely lacking in facts. This paper also contains a brief history of Robert Kennedy's political career.
From the Paper
"Steel reports that Robert's stand on the Vietnam war was not so different from Nixon's own position, but Robert admitted that he had been mistaken about Vietnam. There are no known reports that Nixon ever admitting that he was wrong about Vietnam. Steel could have taken a closer look at how Johnson and John Kennedy parted on the issues of Vietnam. He may have found that Johnson did state a greater doubt than had been known about the stability and rectitude of his policy, and while John Kennedy called the war immoral, he did not call an outright end to the war."
| |
|
The ?Kennedy Image?, 2002.
This paper explores the 'Kennedy Image' (the view of Kennedy as an almost saint-like figure) to determine the extent to which it is realistic.
1,780 words (approx. 7.1 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 57.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper states that the Kennedy image was greatly strengthened from the moment Kennedy was assassinated which it makes it near impossible to criticize the dead president. The author points out a number of important positive aspects of this image including the man?s youth, his family oriented life, his liberalism and the glamour that surrounded him. However, the author also demonstrates that Kennedy had a number of negative aspects to his image such as his womanizing and his relationship with the Mafia.
From the Paper
"The domestic policy action that had the most impact during Kennedy?s presidency was very low-key. It was the creation of the ?President?s commission on the state of women?. This was something created as a gesture of thanks to Eleanor Roosevelt (who became the commission?s leader) for her help during the presidential campaign and to please the women in the Democratic Party. The commission produced an important report on the need for improved opportunities for the education of women. It is fitting that the main important Liberal reform made by President Kennedy was almost accidental in origin."
| |
|
Weight Obsession, 2001.
This paper discusses the obsession that some women have about their weight and how society contributes to this obsession
1,500 words (approx. 6.0 pages), 9 sources, $ 49.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a look at the obsession that women have about their weight and size. It claims that advertising, social pressure and media all have major roles in fanning this obsession. It provides a history of the fashion industry and show how this too has influenced this phenomena.
From the paper:
"36-24-36? Those numbers might not mean a thing to some, but for many women, they are the hallmark of western society's obsession with weight. Everywhere you look, scantily clothed women with well-defined midriffs are smiling back from televisions, movie screens, magazines, and billboards. The advertising world wants you to believe that these women have it all: they are beautiful, they are thin, and as a result, they are happier than you. While most people would agree that this is certainly not true, a growing number of women are left wondering: Do I have to be thin to have it all?"
| |
|
Justice Anthony McLeod Kennedy, 2006.
This paper is an in-depth discussion of the life of Supreme Court Justice Anthony McLeod Kennedy including many of his cases.
3,160 words (approx. 12.6 pages), 24 sources, APA, $ 91.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Justice Anthony McLeod Kennedy's intricate role on the Rehnquist Supreme Court has led many to question his views and ideals. The author points out that, although he usually votes with the conservative bloc, in certain cases involving abortion, capital punishment, and gay rights, he has voted liberal. The paper relates that, through his lawyer-legislator father, Kennedy, who was born in 1936 in California, met many influential figures such as future Chief Justice Earl Warren. The author explains that, while on the Circuit Court, Kennedy became a leader of the conservatives avoiding writing controversial opinions, which allowed his Supreme Court confirmation hearings to be considered amicable. The paper relates that Justice Kennedy's work on the Supreme Court demonstrates consistently his beliefs that the court should not be legislative. The paper describes many of Kennedy's cases.
From the Paper
"The 2000 case of Stenberg, Attorney General of Nebraska, et al v. Carhart returned Justice Kennedy to the conservative end of the Court. This case mirrored back to Planned Parenthood v. Casey, stating that the Nebraska state government cannot illegalize partial birth abortion because this will impede on the undue burden privilege established four years earlier. Justice Kennedy dissented Justice Breyer's Opinion of the Court. He believed that Planned Parenthood allowed the for state to protect the life of the child to a certain extent. The Nebraska law was struck down, but by 2003 the federal government had adopted a law prohibiting partial birth abortions ("Stenberg v. Carhart")."
| |
|
John F. Kennedy, 2004.
An analysis of who the real John F. Kennedy was.
804 words (approx. 3.2 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 28.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper attempts to discover who the real John F. Kennedy was. The paper claims that, shrouded in myth and mystery, Kennedy is usually presented as a leader who could make a difference. He is seen as a man of character who wanted equal civil rights for blacks, effectively dealt with the Cuban missile crisis, was a good father and had a perfect wife. Kennedy is even touted as the man who could direct the country to more prosperity had he not died in office. The paper contends that this is just a mythical image of Kennedy. The paper identifies the real Kennedy as shockingly less pious and anything but a good leader. What he promised he never delivered and was consistently unfaithful to his very devoted wife.
From the Paper
"Let us start with his political undertakings. As much as we would love to believe that Kennedy was a great political leader, the truth is that he was anything but that. President Kennedy used the political system to his advantage only and not for public's benefit. For one he never tried to change or shape the system in which he worked. He was too concerned about his own popularity to try changing public opinion or political system. Leaders bring changes; they are fearless and love taking calculated risks. Kennedy doesn't fulfill any of these conditions. He avoided risks even the ones that the country desperately expected him to take such as civil rights for blacks. He always played safe simply because that was afraid of losing his popularity in the Congress. "
| |
|
Kennedy's Legacy, 2008.
This paper argues that had John F. Kennedy not been assassinated and his presidency allowed to run its course, history would not look so kindly upon him and neither would popular opinion.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer notes that what John F. Kennedy had going for him was that he was perhaps the most charismatic, engaging, youthful, accessible, and believable leader that the United States had of the 20th century. The writer maintains that his political substance came not from having particularly effective or strong convictions, but because he held the imagination of the baby boomers - he was the voice of clarity and difference and he was outside of beltway, he stood above the political system that had been so corrupted by the fury of the cold-war and of McCarthyism. The writer discusses however, that although very popular, Kennedy simply wasn't very effective as a President. All the good intentions and pretty political speeches do not make up for a lack of actual lasting policy impact. The writer maintains that Kennedy's popularity in hindsight seems to be based more upon the perpetuation of an idealized image. He represented the power of youth, of potential. The writer concludes that unfortunately, Kennedy's mistakes seemed to be born of youth and a lack of true conviction that what he was doing was right.
From the Paper
"The nation, however, did not seem to blame Kennedy. The people did not take the point of view that their President had just committed an egregious act of idiocy. Instead, they looked on in dread at the looming communist menace next door - because they were told to do so. The Bay of Pigs can only be described as an absolute fiasco of epic proportions - one that could have only come from a man not truly invested in the process of removal of Castro, but more in the rhetoric. In this Kennedy appeared to be following up on his anti-Communist speech with anti-Communist actions. But, the level of actual commitment was clearly not there. Kennedy had the entire United States military at his disposal. All he had to do was use them. But, clearly, he did not have the stomach to follow it all the way through. Kennedy wanted to appear strong but did not want to have to be strong - image meant everything."
| |
|
The Assassination of John F. Kennedy, 1998.
This paper discuses the mystery surrounding the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
1,450 words (approx. 5.8 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, although there is a sufficient number of incriminating facts against Lee Harvey Oswald Oswald, there is just as much evidence to prove that Oswald was innocent of assassinating President John Fitzgerald Kennedy. The author claims that the Central Intelligence Agency was involved because it wanted the United States to enter the Vietnam War, but President Kennedy was reluctant to send our troops. The paper relates that Kennedy's body was most likely tampered with before the autopsy in Washington. The author points out that the Secret Service despised Kennedy because he threatened to disband the FBI several times. The paper concludes that it is obvious that Oswald was framed. The paper includes an annotated bibliography.
From the Paper
"Later that day when the Knoll was inspected, cigarette butts and fresh footprints were found behind the fence, proving that someone had been there recently. During the motorcade, two men were spotted exchanging hand signals. One of the men would pump his umbrella and the other man raised his right hand. The umbrella was closed until Kennedy was directly opposite the man at which he pumped the umbrella, and the other man raised his right fist in the air. Robert Cutler, an assassination researcher, said the umbrella was likely to be a dart gun (one of the fifty issued by the CIA in 1963) which shot Kennedy in the throat and paralyzed him."
| |
|
Kennedy's Inaugural Address and Globalization, 2002.
Examines the significance and importance of John F. Kennedy's inaugural address of 1961 and how it introduced the concept of globalization.
1,643 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay explores John F. Kennedy's inaugural address of 1961. It looks at the ways in which Kennedy's speech effected America and the world during the Age of Industrialization. Gauging history from the perspective of a refined hindsight telescope, this essay explains the relevance that Kennedy's speech had on the future course of globalization. The essay also highlights parts of Kennedy's address that relate to today's War on Terrorism.
From the Paper
"Kennedy, like Eisenhower before him, faced many obstacles in his search for allies. Initially, polycentrism posed a serious stumbling block for the cause of freedom. Just as there were many nations willing to align themselves with America in the fight for liberty, there were also a plethora of autonomous Communist movements that were spreading Communist ideals throughout Asia and the USSR. Kennedy also confronted problems of apathy and neutralism. Many nations denied the invitation to side with Democracy or Communism feeling that it was in the best interest of their respective nations to abstain from foreign involvement. This further delayed progress and globalization. Aggressive China, with her enormous population and dominant Asian influence, spread the seeds of Communism that grew to bite the heels of American soldiers throughout the long struggles of Vietnam. Kennedy?s task was not an easy one. As president, Kennedy made countless attempts to ease conflict with Russia after the Cuban Missile Crisis. In spite of his attempts to ease tensions, Kennedy could not shrink from the fundamental principle of national restraint originally outlined in the Truman Doctrine."
| |
|
Successful Presidency of John F. Kennedy, 2004.
This paper discusses why John F. Kennedy was such a successful President.
1,187 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer maintains that John F. Kennedy was by all means a successful President. The writer points out that with the Cold War overshadowing his presidency, John F. Kennedy successfully prevented the outbreak of a nuclear war between the United States and the Soviet Union, while at the same time domestically fighting for civil rights and bringing attention to the need for foreign aid to underdeveloped countries. To evaluate his success the writer notes that one must not look at his predecessors, but at the state of affairs of the United States when Kennedy came to power. The writer concludes that John F. Kennedy was successful in his presidency because of the significant contributions he made to the American people and to the people of the world.
From the Paper
"The Ghettos were generally populated by blacks, but there were also known to be other ethnic races coinciding. The ghettos residents were largely impoverished which led to problems with crime, housing, employment, and lack of sanitation, education and health care. This segregation imposed upon them by the more affluent white middle class began to stir up a civil rights movement.
"In his pre-election campaign, Kennedy had chosen to ignore Civil Rights, preferring to show no view, as he feared antagonising the white southern vote. But, ten days before the election an event which would help shape the destiny of Kennedy's presidency occurred."
| |
|
John F. Kennedy: A Transformational Leader, 2005.
This paper selects John F. Kennedy as a transformational leader based on the book "Leadership Enhancing the Lessons of Experience" by R.L. Hughes et. al..
1,320 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 1 source, APA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that John F. Kennedy was a transformational leader in the 1960s in the U.S. and abroad because, even though he was certainly charismatic, his basic achievements were to enlist and arouse political activism among the young, a generation which had seldom been concerned with politics. The author points out that Kennedy's ability to reframe issues by (1) arousing emotions of his followers, (2) dealing with conflict and change, (3) utilizing his outstanding rhetorical skills, (4) creating an image, (5) developing a sense of trust and (6) establishing group cohesiveness made him a transformational leader. The paper relates that, unlike the text's examples of other transformational leaders, Kennedy cannot truly be judged on his accomplishments since he was assassinated well before many of his ideas became reality and his legislative and foreign affairs efforts worked out.
From the Paper
"Kennedy had to deal with conflict and change. This meant not only the Cold War with Russia, but the serious situations escalating in Viet Nam. Of course, the two most serious conflicts during his presidency were the Cuban missile crisis, where he and his advisers managed to get Krushchev to back down from the installation of missile sites in Cuba; and the Bay of Pigs fiasco, where poor planning and judgment led to the deaths and capture of some Cuban refugees trying (with the covert help of the U.S.) to invade Cuba and somehow overthrow Fidel Castro."
| |
|
President John F. Kennedy, 2008.
A look at President John F. Kennedy as an American hero.
1,395 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 11 sources, MLA, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper describes the characteristics that define an Aristotelian tragic hero and then asserts that John F. Kennedy was such a hero. The paper then goes on to provide a biographical account of Kennedy's adult life and looks at why Kennedy met all the criteria for an Aristotelian tragic Hero.
From the Paper
"As the 35th president of the United States, Kennedy was the youngest man to ever be elected to the Oval Office. From his early youth, Kennedy was a charismatic and lovable man. He grew up in a rich Irish Catholic family where he was one of nine children. Kennedy received his secondary education at a private boarding school called The Choate School. When he graduated, he was ironically elected to be the student "Most likely to become President". Kennedy then went off to college and later served in the United States Navy, where he achieved the rank of lieutenant and demonstrated daunting courage, commanding a PT boat."
| |
|
The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy, 2006.
A paper describing the effects on the American people of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
2,964 words (approx. 11.9 pages), 22 sources, MLA, $ 87.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper describes the reactions of people in America and across the globe to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. The paper quotes statements from people who remembered the assassination to convey the feelings of loss experienced by Kennedy's death and describes the effects his death had on American citizens. The paper also discusses Kennedy's leadership during the Cuban Missile Crisis and looks at how this crisis was probably a defining moment in his career as President.
From the Paper
"John F Kennedy once said, "Today is day that will do down in infamy." Little did he know, that day had not yet come. The day that will go down in infamy, is November 22, 1963. The day John Fitzgerald Kennedy was shot in the head in the back of a convertible riding through the streets of Dallas. The nation was in shock. "The assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy on November 22, 1963, was a cruel and shocking act of violence directed against a man, a family, a nation, and against all mankind" (Report of the Warren Commission On the Assassination of President Kennedy. New York Times: New York, 1964, P.19). Every person alive that day remembers what they were doing at the time they heard the news of Kennedy's assassination. It is a moment in time burned into their brain."
| |
|
How Johnson and Hoover Assassinated Kennedy, 2001.
A persuasive paper about the assassination of John F. Kennedy.
960 words (approx. 3.8 pages), 2 sources, $ 34.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper describes how Lyndon B. Johnson, with the help of J. Edgar Hoover and mob boss Carlos Marcello, was the only person with the motive, means and opportunity to assassinate John F. Kennedy.
From the paper:
"Just as with any other murder investigation, to uncover President Kennedy?s killer, one must find the person(s) with the motive, means, and opportunity to commit the crime. As presented in class, Lee Harvey Oswald had none of these. Oswald possessed no motive. Despite his ?defection? to the Soviet Union in 1959, Oswald bore no malice toward Kennedy or his administration. Oswald did not have the means to commit the actual murder, especially on his own. The official records of the assassination state that three shots were fired in 5.6 seconds from 60-80 yards away."
|
|
|
