| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "JOHN LOCKE TREATISE": |
|
|
The "Declaration of Independence" and John Locke?s "Second Treatise", 2002.
This paper illustrates the many parallel constructs between the "Declaration of Independence" and John Locke?s "Second Treatise".
2,000 words (approx. 8.0 pages), 2 sources, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The author believes that one of the ideas most expounded by John Locke was his belief that all men have been created free and equal by God. The paper points out that Locke said that God gave man "certain rights that shall not be taken away from him, those rights being life, liberty, health and possessions; but, in the "Declaration of Independence", the pursuit of happiness is mentioned instead of possessions. The author concludes that men tend to remain passive in times when action is necessary on the assumption that someone else will instigate a change. Table presentations.
From the Paper
"Men give their consent to be governed: therefore, the true power of the government is derived from the consent of the governed, as no people can be suppressed unwillingly for too long a time when freedom stirs in their souls. Once a man enters into a united political society, thereby submitting himself to the power, which he and his fellow citizens have bestowed upon his government; he is bound by obligation to uphold the laws that have been established by the government for the benefit of the community."
| |
|
John Locke's "Second Treatise on Government", 2008.
A look at how John Locke expresses his belief in "Second Treatise on Government" that the English did the right thing in replacing the reigning monarch, James II, with William of Orange.
865 words (approx. 3.5 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that John Locke wrote the Second Treatise on Government at a difficult time in English history - when the English had just driven out the reigning monarch, James II, replacing him with William of Orange in the Glorious Revolution of 1688. The paper further relates that while prominent political theorist decried this as a violation of the divine right to kings, Locke believed that the English had done the right thing and set out to prove this view. The paper then looks at how Locke expresses this belief in his "Second Treatise on Government".
From the Paper
"An individual's body is property belonging only to that individual. Anything that the individual removes from the state of nature by the labor of the individual's own he invests with labor by the very act of removing the thing from the state of nature. In doing so, the individual makes it his own property, appropriating it exclusively to himself. The labor which the individual invests in goods in taking them from the state of nature makes that the individual's property. Whatever he takes out of a natural state is improved by taking it out of the natural state."
| |
|
John Locke's Philosophy of Government, 2007.
This paper examines the work of several critics in order to analyze the meaning of political power as presented by John Locke in his "The Second Treatise of Civil Government".
3,850 words (approx. 15.4 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 105.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that John Locke suggestion, in his "The Second Treatise of Civil Government", that establishing the rule of law without the use of force is not easy; however, Locke's discussion is clouded not only by vagueness but also by the fact that he "says too much". The author stresses that there is evidence that John Locke indeed supported the American colonies' drive for freedom. The paper relates that Locke points out specifically in his "Second Treatise" that taking property without the will and consent of the people is against both natural law and the fiduciary nature of civil authority.
Table of Contents:
The Limits and Functions of Government
Political Power
Hobbes on Sovereignty
Does Locke Trust People Too Much?
Conclusion
From the Paper
"In fact, the British had repealed the Stamp Act after the colonies dumped tea in Boston harbor and otherwise rebelled against heavy-handed British rule; the colonies also objected to the very fact that they had come over to the new world seeking both religious freedom and a chance to get a new start economically. And from far away in England, came oppressive rule and taxation "without representation." Locke expressed - in his Letter on Toleration, which was "highly esteemed in New England" and which "the care of souls cannot belong to the civil magistrate," ..."
| |
|
Locke?s ?Second Treatise?, 2004.
This paper discusses John Locke?s ?Second Treatise? and its influence on the form of government in the United States and other countries.
975 words (approx. 3.9 pages), 1 source, APA, $ 34.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that John Locke argued that the only legitimate sovereign power that exists lies in the community as a whole. The author points out that the American political system makes the same twinned assumptions as Locke: Power lies in the people as a whole, and there will always be internal differences in every community. The paper stresses the idea that kings and queens governed at the pleasure of their populations was a fundamentally important element of Locke?s philosophy.
From the Paper
"Locke helped free the populations of Europe from the idea of divine rule; rebellions against a monarch were still a very serious act, of course, but only because all acts of violence between humans are serious. He made both regicide and democracy possible. But even more than helping to free people from the idea that to rebel against a monarch was to rebel against God, Locke planted the idea that kings and queens ruled by authority granted to them by the people themselves. Locke set ordinary individuals in the place that had quite recently been held by God alone."
| |
|
John Locke's Second Treatise, 2002.
The iImpact John Locke's "Second Treatise of Government" had on the Founding Fathers?
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 7 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper states what aspect of Locke's theory so influenced the founding fathers in their inception of the USA.
| |
|
John Locke, 2005.
Explores the ideas of John Locke, 17th Century political philosopher.
2,029 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 64.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses several ideas put forth by English philosopher, John Locke, in his "Two Treatises of Government" and "Two Treatises of Civil Government". It examines Locke's ideas on property, his theory of social contract and rebellion. The paper provides a critical opinion on these ideas.
From the Paper
"Even with a theoretical ability to rebel against the government, a social contract that is not explicitly accepted by citizens is little more than coercion with an elaborate philosophical justification. The relationship between a government and a citizen by birth who has not explicitly accepted a social contract is a state of war; the government is attempting to assert absolute power over him without his consent. (II S. 17) Having the consent, or at least passive acceptance of a majority of citizens, the government is free to make war upon the remaining citizens at will."
| |
|
John Locke and the American Declaration of Independence, 2007.
This paper demonstrates John Locke's influence on the Declaration of Independence.
1,049 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper analyzes the importance of John Locke's philosophy on the American Declaration of Independence of 1776. The paper examines various segments of Locke's "The Second Treatise of Civil Government" and shows how the textual language within the Declaration of Independence reflects his philosophy. The paper discusses the historical proof that Locke was not merely a secondary influence on the document but that he was a main philosophical component of the birth of the American republican ideology.
From the Paper
"The first philosophical basis of the Declaration of Independence was found upon Enlightenment philosophers, such as John Locke. In many ways, the development for a new phase of human freedom was being known through such terms as "natural rights", which were based on new perspectives about Nature and the way that human beings interrelated within a government prospectus. Although some may argue that Locke played a minor part in the many influences on the document, it is apparent that his philosophy is paramount to the anti-monarchical disposition of the Continental Congress. The dictates of new governing principle relied on the importance of human liberty for all, not simply the few that controlled government."
| |
|
John Locke, 2008.
This is a historical study and analysis of John Locke's philosophy towards the American Declaration of Independence and his influence on the American Revolution.
2,530 words (approx. 10.1 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 76.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay analyzes the importance of John Locke's philosophy on the American Declaration of Independence of 1776. The paper analyzes various segments of Locke's "The Second Treatise of Civil Government," the philosophical influence of the 'government by consent' for American leaders who sought to create a new representational republican government. This paper argues that the basis of Locke's philosophy on governing is readily applicable to the way and manner in which personal liberties took a greater value in early America. By understanding the premise of life, liberty, and the pursuit of individual liberties, Locke's philosophy represents a major influence on how America's revolution created a republican government that denied absolutist governmental institutions within this historical period.
From the Paper
"The ultimate act of revolution must stem from a dissolution of the laws that had once formed the unity of government. Locke also proposed this solution when a government had violated its own laws, especially through the corruption of those that rule or make these laws in association with the people. For the Founding Fathers, the ideology of representational government had become paramount, as they had virtually no rights to legally debate or vote in laws that might be beneficial for them, as well as the British government. They defined these beliefs through Locke's understanding of the inherent right of those being ruled to have a legal representation, even under a monarchy..."
| |
|
Hobbes and Locke on The Best Regime, 2002.
The ideas of Thomas Hobbes, from "Leviathan", and John Locke, from "Second Treatise on Government". on the best regime.
2,610 words (approx. 10.4 pages), 2 sources, APA, $ 78.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper emphasizes, using specific examples, how the systems of John Locke and Thomas Hobbes both leave too much room for abuse of power in their ideal governments. Specifically, Thomas Hobbes allows abuse of power by a monarch, and John Locke allows abuse of power by faction groups.
From the Paper
"In all likelihood, there has never been a more controversial political topic than what constitutes the best regime. Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes and John Locke?s Second Treatise on Government are two examples of political theorists attempting to determine the best regime through reasoning. This paper will examine the connection between each author?s views on the state of nature and their idea of the best regime. It will also examine the problems with each author?s idea of the ?best regime?. Although there is something to be said for the views of both authors, they fail to provide enough checks on political power to ensure freedom from absolute tyranny."
| |
|
"Second Treatise of Civil Government", 2006.
A review of John Locke's theories in his book, "Second Treatise of Civil Government."
838 words (approx. 3.4 pages), 0 sources, $ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses John Locke's "Second Treatise of Civil Government" and his theory of property discussed within. The paper analyzes his beliefs and theory and then examines the arguments that could be put forward by critics of Locke's theory. Finally, the paper briefly summarizes Locke's theory.
From the Paper
"Locke's theory is somewhat schizophrenic in that he believes a person should not take more than they need, yet he also believes it is alright to stockpile resources. Essentially implying that you ought to do what is right and help others...as long as your own preservation is not effected. Locke does not clearly identify if it is justifiable to tax and redistribute resources to the poor in his treatises. Most modern interpretations of Locke do believe that he would indeed defend the obligation the society would have to meet the needs of all its citizens. However, Locke's social contract would likely not include the amount nor tolerate the inefficiencies of modern democratic welfare systems."
| |
|
Locke and Mill Compared, 2005.
Questions what political theorist John Locke would have made of John Stuart Mill's justification of individual liberty.
1,169 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper begins with a description of John Locke and John Stuart Mill and their views on government. The paper analyzes the texts of both Mill ("On Liberty") and Locke ("Two Treatises of Government"). Beginning with Locke, the paper argues that his justification for liberty derives from a higher being; since we are all God's creation, we are no longer free, and only in this capacity are we free from others because, just as we cannot do as we wish, we can also not impose ourselves upon others. Mill, on the other hand, takes a utilitarian standpoint, suggesting that individual liberty should be allowed because, ultimately, it brings progress and innovation to all.
From the Paper
"When we compare this with Mills, a secular utilitarian, we see the first inklings of a distinctive argument. Mills surmises that freedom of action and expression is ultimately needed by society for its own development and prosperity. His argument follows a simple but revolutionary theory where the individual action and expression of ideas force society to first evaluate the merit of that particular idea and then question its own already accepted beliefs on that same issue. We see here that personal liberty should be defended by society for its own benefit."
| |
|
Confucius and Locke on the Institution of Family, 2008.
A comparison and contrast of Confucius and John Locke's views on the family and its relation to politics.
2,328 words (approx. 9.3 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes the views of the ancient Chinese philosopher, Confucius in "The Analects" and the early modern British philosopher, John Locke in "Second Treatise of Government." It particularly looks at the views of each philosopher in relation to the social institution of the family and their models of political order. The paper suggests that the different ways they understand familial relations can be seen as reflecting their distinct conceptions of political order in society as a whole.
From the Paper
"Locke contends that freedom comes with maturity and the capacity to exercise reason, and that it is the primary responsibility of the parent or guardian of a child to promote this in the child until he attains the age of maturity. Thus, while people in Confucius' political philosophy were advised never to think about government or politics, Locke in contrast argues that it is the prime duty - indeed, the defining characteristic - of an adult human being that they be able to consider questions of government and politics."
| |
|
The Family and its Relation to Politics, 2008.
A comparison of the views on family and politics expressed by John Locke in "Second Treatise of Government" and by Confucius in "The Analects."
2,696 words (approx. 10.8 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 80.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the family unit and its relationship with politics. It looks at John Locke's views, in his "Second Treatise of Government" of the place and nature of the family as a social unit in its contribution to what we today know as political science. It also looks at the viewed expressed in "The Analects" of Confucius. The paper compares and contrasts the two authors' views on family and politics.
Outline:
Introduction
Second Treatise of Government
The Analects and the Ideal Family
Reflection and Conclusion
From the Paper
"As approaches to the family in relation to the greater forces of politic science and social order, both Locke and Confucius are intriguing to investigate, again, referring to the present, given that both began in reactions to observed and experienced political turbulence and situations of social disorder. For instance, what does it mean when conservative Americans and others proclaim the need for what are called Family Values, or why is it that members of non-Western societies so denounce what they perceive of Western individualism and non-existent family life? Put differently, what implications can be expected in societies to very much emphasis individualism, personal agency and competition, as part of how children are prepared for adult life? In the case of what is referred to as the Sinic World of cultures shaped by Chinese civilization, why might authoritarian governments of one kind or another be expected, or accepted?"
| |
|
Locke and Government, 2008.
This paper looks at John Locke's concept of government as a trust.
943 words (approx. 3.8 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses how John Locke conceives of government as a trustee, exercising power for the benefit of the society in general. The paper discusses Locke's "Second Treatise on Government" and how a critical requirement of goverment for Locke is that the power of government can never extend farther than the common good, and to be directed to no ends but the peace, safety, and good of the people. The paper concludes that Locke set the foundation for much of the political theory of western democracies.
From the Paper
"A trust is a legal arrangement under which one person (or entity), a trustee, exercises power over property for the benefit of someone else, the beneficiary. This power must be exercised for the benefit of the beneficiary in keeping with the concept of fiduciary duty (Black, 1680). John Locke envisioned government as a trustee for the benefit of society.
"As he explains in the Second Treatise on Government, beginning in chapter 9, entitled "Of the Ends of Political Society and Government," the individual gives up the rights he has in the state of nature in order to enjoy the security of a governed society. In the state of nature, "he be absolute lord of his own person and possessions, equal to the greatest, and subject to no body" (ch 9, 123), but "the enjoyment of [this freedom] is very uncertain, and constantly exposed to the invasion of others" (ch. 9, 123). To gain the benefits of order, he will give up his freedom, but only so that he can improve his condition."
| |
|
Locke?s State of Nature, 2001.
Examines John Locke's "Second Treatise of Government" and his description of the state of nature.
2,553 words (approx. 10.2 pages), 1 source, APA, $ 77.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In Locke?s "Second Treatise of Government", his main concern is with the protection of private property. The paper examines Locke's arguments for a ?positive? and a ?negative? state of nature and his theories on how property can be protected from the government.
From the Paper
"To understand Locke's theory of legitimate government one must look at his theory of men in the state of nature. However in Second Treatise of Government there are inconsistencies and ambiguities as to the description of a state of nature. At first he describes men in a "good" state of nature: "a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of Nature, without asking leave or depending upon the will of any other man" (ch. 11, sec.4) They are also in a state of equality in nature; no man has more power than another does. The law of nature teaches mankind that, all being equal and independent; no one ought to harm another in his life, liberty, and possessions."
|
|
|
