| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "ISRAELI PALESTINIAN CONFLICT MIDDLE EAST": |
|
|
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict and Middle East Terror, 2004.
This brief review links the Israeli-Palestinian conflict with wider Middle East terror.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This article provides a connection between the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and with wider Pan-Islamic terrorism of the Middle East. The writer discusses the impact of the creation of Israel in this regard. The writer also examines the division of Palestine. The ongoing constant frictions are discussed in this paper.
From the Paper
"The Arab-Israeli war held unpleasant experiences for Arab states in the Middle East as much as it did for the Palestinians. It brought about the beginning of a mass movement of Palestinians from Palestine to Lebanon, Jordan and Syria. Further, the creation of the State of Israel in an Arab state evoked anger in the populations of all of the Arab states which threatened the political leaders in those states. The United Nations Partition Plan ... "
| |
|
Conflict in the Middle East, 2005.
A discussion on why the Middle East can be considered a conflict area.
26,575 words (approx. 106.3 pages), 40 sources, MLA, $ 249.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Over the last hundred years, the Middle East has been one of the most troubled regions in the world. This paper attempts to define the attributes for success in the modern world that the Arab community lacks such as freedom, knowledge and woman power and how these impact the current political situation.
Outline
Islam Causes Conflict in the Middle East
Islam Does Not Cause Conflict in the Middle East
The Arab-Israeli Dispute Causes Conflict in the Middle East
Israeli Leadership Contributes to Conflict in the Middle East
Palestinian Leadership Contributes to Conflict in the Middle East
Lack of Democracy Contributes to Conflict in the Middle East
Oil Profits Cause Conflict in the Middle East
Water Scarcity Could Cause Conflict in the Middle East
From the Paper
"Sharon has spent years trying to erase the stain of the Lebanon War. Still, the legal defeat would seem to be the least of his troubles. After he won the premiership by promising to bring peace and security to Israel's citizens, Sharon has produced neither. The conflict with the Palestinians continues to escalate. The day of the court ruling, four Israelis died in Palestinian attacks; the following day, six soldiers died in a strike against an army roadblock. Sharon responded with a rare speech to the nation--in which he disappointed all expectations that he would announce a new policy direction. Among voters, confidence that he has a strategy is bleeding away. In one Israeli public-opinion poll, 29 percent of respondents said that Sharon had a clear plan, while 58 percent said he was simply reacting to events."
| |
|
The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, 2005.
A discussion on if and how the Israeli-Palestinian conflict can be resolved.
12,319 words (approx. 49.3 pages), 36 sources, APA, $ 237.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been one of the most divisive contests in the history of the Middle East. Unfortunately, Israel has been a hub of violence since its inception in 1948. This paper examines the history of the conflict and debates how best to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Outline
Israel Should Withdraw from Palestinian Territories
Israel Must Reoccupy Palestinian Territories
Creating a Palestinian State Could Resolve the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict
Creating a Palestinian State Would Not Resolve the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Palestinians Must Fight for Equal Rights
Palestinians Must Reject Terrorism as a Weapon of War
Economic Development Can Facilitate Peace Between Israelis and Palestinians
From the Paper
"President George W. Bush has referred to the "legitimate aspirations" of the Palestinian people for an independent state. But people who embrace suicide bombings and choose career killers as their leaders--as the Palestinians have done--have no legitimate political aspirations. Writer William F. Buckley, for all of his many faults, is credited with a turn of phrase that eloquently captures this fact. Speaking about an African country's desire for independence, he quipped, "They'll be ready for democracy when they stop eating each other." Although he was referring to the practice of literal cannibalism, the same thing applies metaphorically to the Palestinians. They can be trusted with a representative government only when they stop worshipping murderers."
| |
|
Conflict Between Cousins: The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, 2006.
An analysis of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from a cultural perspective.
2,725 words (approx. 10.9 pages), 22 sources, MLA, $ 81.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper attempts to understand the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from the perspective of cultural similarities and differences between the two peoples. The author begins by providing a definition of culture, and then offers a thorough analysis of the various cultural attributes of both groups -- from religion to power to territorialism. The paper concludes with a section entitled "Is Peace Possible?", which looks at this perennial question from the unusual perspective of the cultural impediments to peace, rather than the political ones.
Introduction: What is Culture?
Why Israel and Palestine are Like Each Other and Dislike Each Other
Territorialism
Religious Differences
Influence of United States and Europe
Dissimilar Values
Money
Power
Different Governments - Different People
Is Peace Possible?
From the Paper
"Traditionally the word culture is used to define people who share a certain set of values. These values may include similar national character, a particular geo-political heritage, or a state sanctioned religion. The article, "The Man in the Baghdad Cafe" goes on to say that in many cases people define themselves by a very small number of shared values rather than the cultural larger set that are said to be shared by Europeans or Asians or residents of the Middle East. In Europe, more people identify with their geographical territory such as Germany or France or England than they do either with national character or religion (Protestant work ethic)."
| |
|
The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict and the Media, 2004.
This paper examines the issue of media bias as it pertains to certain news groups and their reporting of the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
4,500 words (approx. 18.0 pages), 16 sources, APA, $ 159.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper assesses the bias and lack of objectivity pertaining to the coverage of the events occurring in the Middle East by both CNN and Al-Jazeera. The writer contends and proves how both media outlets were found to be significantly biased in their reporting of the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This paper touches on the political purposes while also discussing the religious and ethnic reasoning behind both CNN and Al-Jazeera's style of reporting.
From the Paper
"Three highly divisive forces at play globally in the first decade of
the twenty-first century are nationalism ethnicity and religion. Problems associated with these forces are exacerbated where religion ethnicity and nationalism interact. The longer such problems simmer the more intractable they appear to become."
| |
|
The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, 2004.
A comparison of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to the wars mentioned in the Bible and the Koran.
1,375 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how the conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians has been the topic of debate for many years. It attempts to relate the war in the Biblical books of "Joshua" and "Judges" to the present day Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In addition, the discussion also reviews what the Bible and the Koran say about who should have the land. It also discusses opinions from both sides and includes the views from other cultures.
From the Paper
"There are a myriad of opinions concerning the conflict that exists between the Israelis and the Palestinians. Most of the world seems to have sided with the Palestinians. The Arab world certainly believes that the conflict has been created by the Jews. They feel that the Palestinians have been wronged and forced from their land with no recourse. In addition, the creation of the wall has further complicated the plight of Palestinians living in the region by denying them access to work, schooling and shops. (Shahin) In many cases the animosity that exists has resulted in violence."
| |
|
The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, 2002.
A discussion on the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, from a Palestinian perspective, focusing on a string of historical events leading up to the current political situation.
1,355 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The following paper examines several issues in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, such as the Suez Canal crises, the Balfour Declaration, the Yom Kippur War and the Six Day War. The writer discusses the events that lead to the major unresolved issues that remain today in Israel, namely the status of Jerusalem; the future of Israeli settlements; and the rights of Palestine refugees. This paper is written by a pro-Palestinian supporter.
From the Paper
"In 1994, Israel withdrew from the Gaza Strip and Jericho, ending 27 years of occupation. A Palestinian police force replaced them. In 1995, then a Jewish extremist assassinated Israeli Prime Minister, Yitzhak Rabin, who had been involved in the latest peace processes.
In April 1996, Israeli forces bombed Lebanon for 17 days, with Hezbollah retaliating by firing upon populated areas of Northern Israel. Israel also bombed a UN shelter, killing about 100 out of 800 civilians sheltering there. The UN claimed it was intentional. In 1998, the Wye River Memorandum planned Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank but Israel suspended it in 1999 due to internal disagreements on its implementation."
| |
|
Women?s Living Standards in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, 2002.
An essay on the women's view of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the resulting lower standard of living of their people.
1,055 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 1 source, APA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper describes the Palestinian women's plight for better living conditions since the outbreak of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. It discusses that women are generally heads of households in Palestine. It briefly examines the Israeli female point of view and the de facto national house arrest as a result of terrorism. The paper also describes feminist demonstrations against the conditions.
From the Paper
"In many ways, women have stood at the periphery, at least in the world?s eyes, in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. To some ironic and terrible extent, this changed when female Palestinian suicide bombers began blowing themselves up earlier this year. The world appeared shocked and dismayed that women and children would join in the violence and bloodshed, begun and perpetrated by men, that has dominated the West Bank and the Israeli-occupied territories for so many years. "
| |
|
Religion and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, 2002.
A summary of Judaism, Islam and Christianity, their connection with the Holy Land and the way they tie in with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
2,640 words (approx. 10.6 pages), 11 sources, MLA, $ 79.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper introduces the 3 major religions - Judaism, Islam and Christianity. It shows their historical ties to the Holy Land and the significance of these religions to Palestine and Israel. The paper then gives an overview of the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and surmises that the conflict is not a religious one, rather it is a struggle over land.
From the Paper
"Moreover, to date, these conditions have further deteriorated in that area. The 11 September attacks were carried out by Arabs lead by Osama Bin Laden based in Afghanistan who expressed solidarity with the Palestinian cause for the first time. This also brought into world focus the South Asian region, US attacks in Afghanistan have further highlighted the second most dangerous flashpoint in the world that is between India and Pakistan.
The Palestinian/Israeli conflict and the south Asian situation can further get out of hand if both sides do not act rationally. Evicting one from the area will not solve the problem instead; it will further worsen the situation. Bilateral talks keeping in mind the proposals of both the sides. US can act as the mediator as it is world?s only super power and in spite of all the failures of the recent past can broker a deal between all the concerned parties."
| |
|
Reexamining the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, 2006.
A paper examining the approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by expert, Gershon Shafir.
1,922 words (approx. 7.7 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 61.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores Gershon Shafir's unconventional argument that economic forces were at the forefront of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from its beginning rather than religious differences. The paper also attempts to demonstrate the validity of this new way of thinking about the State of Israel.
From the Paper
"Shafir's argument may sound bold to some, however for the most part, he draws from the same primary sources used by other scholars. His sources are reliable from an academic perspective and are considered standard for scholars of Middle Eastern politics. Though he uses standard primary sources, his interpretation of these sources is what differentiates him from other historiographers. A majority of scholarly works on the subject concentrate on the religious aspects of the conflict., Shafir demonstrated that these issues are not the only issues in this area. He examined the sources for evidence of economic and non-religious reasons for the conflict. Shafir does not ignore the religious issues entirely, but places less emphasis on these issues than on the economic and practical reasons for the conflict. This approach has earned him a number of critics that wish to stick to the old dogmas surrounding the history of this era."
| |
|
The Israeli/Palestinian Conflict, 2002.
A study of this conflict in the Middle East.
810 words (approx. 3.2 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 28.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the Israeli/Palestinian conflict and the role that the U.S. plays in influencing this conflict. It searches for the roots of the conflict between these two groups. It also explores the steps that have been taken to resolve the conflict, focusing on the part of the U.S. in the trying to resolve the conflict.
From the Paper
"The history that fuels this conflict is vast but it is vitally important that the history of the region is understood before we can understand what is happening in the region currently. The conflict between the two groups began at the turn of the century when Zionists immigrants began to enter Jerusalem in an attempt to establish a homeland. Zionists believe that God made promises to Abraham that the Jews, who are Abraham's descendants through Isaac, were to have Canaan (The land now known as Israel). Arabs, who are Abraham?s descendants through his other son, Ishmael, were not to inherent the land.1 Palestinians were already living in the land when European Jews arrived after they arrived Palestinians and non-Jews comprised 90% of the population."
| |
|
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, 2002.
Discusses the situation in the Middle East.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 5 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Discusses the situation in the Mideast. Contends that the national rights of Israel and Palestine should be supported by the international community. Recent history of the conflict. Oslo Accords and the peace process. Israeli confiscation of the West Bank. Attitude of Israeli's toward the Palestinians. Argues against U.S. unquestioning support of Israel.
From the Paper
"INTRODUCTION:
The majority of Americans have only become aware of the current state of affairs in the Middle East as a result of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon that happened September 11, 2001. And to a great extent, many of them see Israel as an ally of the United States in the war against terrorism, as the Israelis fight the Palestinians. Many believe the Israeli actions are merely a response to "acts of terrorism" by Palestinian suicide bombers.
Unfortunately, this is not the case. The Middle East is still torn by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as it has been since the Balfour Declaration of 1917, and the seven wars that have been fought since 1948. In the aftermath of the Coalition victory against Iraq in 1991, American prestige and influence was ..."
| |
|
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, 1999.
Examines the historical, religious and political aspects, focusing on the role of social stratification between Arabs and Jews based on ethnicity, religion, region, rights, segregation and racism.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 5 sources, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In some ways, one could trace the development of the Israeli Palestinian conflict back to Biblical times, when the wandering Hebrew tribes fought their way into a place in what was then called Canaan. It was at that point that those tribes chose to make a covenant with their new God who was different from the Canaanite God, El.
From the Paper
"Social Stratification and the Israeli Palestinian Conflict
Introduction
In some ways, one could trace the development of the Israeli Palestinian conflict back to Biblical times, when the wandering Hebrew tribes fought their way into a place in what was then called Canaan. It was at that point that those tribes chose to make a covenant with their new God who was different from the Canaanite God, El. Not only were they of a different ethnicity than the original settlers of that valley, they chose to separate themselves from the religion and traditional practices of that people (Armstrong, 1993). Since that point, there has been increasing distinction between the two Semitic peoples who are now called Arabs and Jews, represented by the two distinct ..."
| |
|
The Middle East Conflict, 2006.
A history and overview of the ongoing Middle East conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians.
3,477 words (approx. 13.9 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 98.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper describes the origins of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, explaining that the seeds of the Middle Eastern conflict were sown well before the first war between the Israelis and Palestinians in 1948. The paper traces the conflict back to the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and looks at how and why it continues to this day. The paper also looks at revisionist accounts of the conflict, suggesting that these accounts are more objective and truer to history and, therefore, are the best place to start when looking for a solution to the conflict.
From the Paper
"The Middle East Conflict, the name given to the feud over territory between the Jews and Arabs, has been building for more than 50 years and in recent years threatened to become the cause of a far greater conflict especially when viewed in the context of world affairs. In spite of a number of efforts by the UN, the US and the countries neighboring the disputed territories of Israel, no major breakthroughs have been achieved and those that have come through have eventually proved to be futile due to a number of factions and problems clouding the issue. A number of wars have been bought and vast areas exchanged hands over the first few years of the conflict but the current situation involves a number of disputed territories, vast numbers of refugees and two nations of people with no home or identity."
| |
|
Media Coverage of the Middle East Conflict, 2004.
This paper analyzes the significant role of the media in reporting the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 9 sources, APA, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This argumentative paper examines the role of the media in its biased, albeit occasionally, reporting of the events occurring in the Middle East. The writer of this paper contends and explains why the media must be held responsible for its depiction of events. This paper also reviews the actual process of framing news coverage by the media particularly as it pertains to its reporting of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
From the Paper
"This paper at a general level assesses media performance. At a specific level this paper analyzes media coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as that conflict has evolved during the inclusive period. The specific focus in this analysis is on how the media framed the conflict in the coverage of the various stories and reports about the conflict."
|
|
|
