| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "INVASION COLONIALISM SCIENCE FICTION": |
|
|
Invasion and Colonialism in Science Fiction, 2008.
A discussion of invasion and colonialism themes in science fiction.
1,565 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the theme of invasion in science fiction and how it is, in fact, a colonial topic. The paper also takes a look at related themes such as infestation and infection. It draws upon famous film examples such as "Robocop", "Invasion of the Body Snatchers", and "Alien" to illustrate the symbolic significance of the invader's appearance and what it represents. To conclude, the paper asserts that battles against slick and slimy science-fiction monsters and bad guys reflect the West's battle against outside religious extremists.
From the Paper
"Invasions taking over the mind or body, in an offensively intimate way, are all part of the colonial horror. We are beguiled by a slick oppressor. Memorable science fiction films hone in on this theme of the intruder's allure. A storm trooper is as glossy as a Nazi soldier's boots. There is a brutal anonymity to their sheen, which makes viewers feel dishevelled yet intrigued with what lies beneath. On the other hand, the monster in Alien is covered in slick ooze (Pickover 99). The monster resembles a malignant organ. Ridley Scott's monster is like the lost part of our civilized psyche's missing mojo, and we almost want to stuff it back in, though the monster's only goal is to destroy (Mulhall 47). It is like an AIDS virus: death within temptation. In my opinion, this connection between bodily fascination and death has helped keep the Alien franchise lucrative."
| |
|
A Comparison of Science Fiction Film Classics, 2004.
A comparison of two science fiction films: "Alien" and "The Invasion of the Body Snatchers".
904 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 0 sources, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is a comparative analysis of two movies, "Alien," and the science fiction classic "Invasion of the Body Snatchers."
| |
|
Assessing the American Spirit through Fiction and Non- Fiction, 2002.
Reviews both American non-fiction and American fiction works of art to support the notion that the American spirit is reflected in both types of literature.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 4 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
One of the most poignant quotes in American literature comes from Donald Briscoe, who stated that "To understand American Literature, it is necessary to examine both its fiction and its non- fiction because the key to the American Spirit can be found in both." This paper assesses Briscoe's quote through addressing two works of American fiction and two works of American non- fiction with the intent of proving how the spirit of the American people is reflected in both types of literature.
| |
|
Fiction vs. Non-fiction, 2002.
A discussion of reading comprehension and the differences in comprehension of fiction versus non-fiction reading.
4,050 words (approx. 16.2 pages), 9 sources, $ 109.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper starts with a general discussion of reading comprehension and its importance for academic success. Factors involved in reading comprehension, such as phonological memory and word recognition, are examined, as well as other influential forces, such as time limitation and silent reading are outlined. Then the topic of comprehension of fiction versus non-fiction material is explored through a review of the relevant literature.
From the Paper
"Literacy and reading comprehension are subjects that have been explored for decades. Through these explorations we have discovered that comprehension is an essential component in the ability of a person to succeed in academia and in life. Comprehension is defined as ?the act or action of grasping with the intellect?the capacity for understanding fully.?(The Dictionary) Comprehension is important because it allows us to gain knowledge of new concepts; without comprehension it would be impossible to learn anything.
"This discourse will present a literary review of the aforementioned topic so that we can understand comprehension and the effect of comprehension on academic success. The literature presented will seek to display this information in a manner that will inform and enlighten.
Reading comprehension covers a broad range of topics. For the purposes of this literary review we will seek to explain what comprehension is and the effect that fiction and nonfiction works have on comprehension. This review will use a wide range of sources including journals, digests and academic studies."
| |
|
The Bay of Pigs Invasion, 2006.
An overview of the Bay of Pigs invasion and the aftermath of the invasion, particularly with regard to American-Cuban relations.
2,846 words (approx. 11.4 pages), 9 sources, MLA, $ 84.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes and discusses the Bay of Pigs invasion, implemented and designed by President John F. Kennedy, and the impact this failed maneuver had on American foreign policy and on American-Soviet, as well as American-Cuban relations. The paper describes the attempted invasion, the Cuban response to the invasion, the events leading up to the invasion and why it represents one of the worst political disasters in recent U.S. history. The paper further discusses the political repercussions that followed the attempted invasion and its long-lasting impact on American-Cuban relations.
From the Paper
"On the morning of the invasion, it was reported that the exile forces, together with the CIA, had literally destroyed numerous locations, had landed in several provinces within Cuba, had freed thousands of political prisoners and had driven inland, practically dividing the whole country into two separate parts, not to mention placing the Cuban Navy in revolt. In reality, however, none of these claims were true, for the exile forces in the Bay of Pigs encountered immediate difficulties. For example, the location for the first assault was suppose to have been an isolated area, a good place for a surprise attack, yet the forces discovered a militia patrol which destroyed the element of surprise; the beachhead was suppose to be sandy and free of obstacles, yet many reefs were encountered which sank some of the boats. Worst of all, Castro's men were lying in wait just north of the original landing point. Much gunfire then erupted and the exile forces found themselves pinned down; to make matters worse, reports soon came in the Russian tanks were moving closer with every passing minute."
| |
|
The Invasion of Iraq, 2002.
A justification of the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq and an analysis of the French and opposing position.
1,034 words (approx. 4.1 pages), 8 sources, APA, $ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how the U.S. led invasion of Iraq has invited a lot of controversy about the justification, legality and ethics of a ?pre-emptive? strike against a foreign government. It examines how although the U.S. government has justified it on several grounds, most countries in the rest of the world, notably France remain unconvinced. It looks at how the U.S. (and its coalition partners) justify the invasion of Iraq and compare it to the French position. It also analyzes the impact of the invasion on future international affairs.
Outline
U.S. Justification for the Invasion of Iraq
The Opposing (French) View Point
Analysis of the Two Positions
Tactless Diplomacy and Fear of American Power
The Real Agendas?
Impact of the Invasion on Future International Affairs
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Even after the end of the War in Iraq, the controversy about whether the invasion was justified continues unabated both inside and outside the United States. The reasons for the continuing debate are not hard to find. In the days before the war there had been unprecedented demonstrations all over the world by peace activists against the war. During debate at the United Nations, the French government had threatened to use its veto to defeat a resolution that sanctioned an invasion of Iraq. Most other European countries, except the UK, and including Russia had supported the French position. Gerhard Schroder even won the recent German elections on the basis of his opposition to the Iraq war. Perhaps the only countries of significance that supported the war were Britain and Israel, and even in Britain there was significant opposition to the war among the public."
| |
|
Colonialism in Africa, 2002.
The paper compares the effects of colonialism in three sub-Saharan African nations: Chad, Nigeria, and Angola.
2,300 words (approx. 9.2 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 70.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper begins by tracing the origin and development of colonialism throughout Africa. It continues with a colonial history of Chad. Following this historical outline, the paper explores the effects of colonialism on this African country. The paper follows this form (of giving a historical outline and then exploring the effects of colonialism on the country) when discussing Nigeria and Angola. The paper also includes a comparison of the three countries in terms of the political, economic and national consequences of colonialism.
From the Paper
"Colonialism by stronger nations has been a part of history for thousands of years. The Romans practiced colonialism in ancient times, and the practice was exceedingly common in the 19th century. European nations tried to add to their power and prestige by adding to their cache of land, especially in Africa, where countries were ripe for the taking. "This colonial frenzy in the last twenty years of the nineteenth century saw all but 10 percent of the African continent colonized in a complex mix of political, economic, strategic, cultural, and religious rationales" (Wright 13)."
| |
|
English Colonialism, 2004.
Discusses the idea of British colonialism from a non-English perspective.
2,629 words (approx. 10.5 pages), 9 sources, MLA, $ 79.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay discusses the rationale for British colonialism from the perspective of other colonial powers from Europe. The European perspective is favorable to colonialism, the primary, albeit non-spoken, premise being assertion of superiority. The revisionist perspective, on the other hand, is one of revulsion towards imperialism. The lives of three symbols of colonialist power are illustrated in this paper: Lord Robert Clive, the first Governor General of India; Lord Charles Cornwallis, last Governor General of America; and Captain James Cook, the discoverer and first foreign, non-aboriginal purveyor of the newly discovered land of Australia. The paper shows that, although Britain's history might expound their virtues of martial and leadership abilities and their adventurous spirit, their exploits also resulted in untold hardships in the colonies they helped establish. The paper includes an annotated bibliography.
From the Paper
"Ironically also, when much is made of the British Royalty that probably will stand the test of time, Britain was the first nation to demonstrate to the world that democracy was the best form of governance, bar none. This ideal put pay to entire eras of medieval serfdom. Self-determination of the common man, wherever practiced today, means that the people are relatively satisfied. Revisionist theories would predict, however that democracy as a concept was self-evolving and would have happened at some point in history, whether it happened with British or not."
| |
|
Patriarchy and Colonialism, 2004.
Examines the intersection of patriarchy, colonialism, and gender roles/relations in Frida von Bulow's "In the Land of Promise, A Colonial Novel About Carl Peters."
2,000 words (approx. 8.0 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The essay begins by focusing on gender relations and character descriptions in the novel, "In the Land of Promise, A Colonial Novel About Carl Peters" by Frida von Bulow. It then focuses on the relationship between colonialism and gender and the ways in which the male/female relationship mimics the relationship of colonizer and "subject". Finally, the paper addresses the problem of whether the text supports traditional gender expectations or not.
From the Paper
"As the central character in Frieda von Bulow?s In the Land of Promise, A It is tempting to argue that von Bulow accepts and agrees with traditional gender roles. After all, she devotes much time to discussing the virtues of manhood and extrapolates upon relationships that are more or less patriarchal. The possibilities and potential of colonialism are also central themes, if not the central theme, and there are parallels between patriarchy and colonialism in the text. However, to make such an argument would mean overlooking the central role that the character of Maleen plays in challenging traditional views."
| |
|
Invasion of Privacy, 2008.
An analysis of torts with regards to an invasion of an individual's right to privacy.
1,680 words (approx. 6.7 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 54.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses an individual's right to privacy and the results of an invasion of that right. It specifically discusses a tort with regards to invasion of privacy. The paper analyzes the two basic elements that occur with invasion of privacy - the fact that the individual's right to privacy is invaded and the resulting damage that occurs as a result.
From the Paper
"The right of privacy in the private sector has taken on a whole new dimension since the times of Justice Brandies with the advent of the internet, email, YouTube and the myriad of personal blogs raise the specter of anyone becoming a world-wide celebrity. If you doubt the power of the internet to create celebrities out of the ordinary person, recall the "numa numa" phenomenon, the portly college lip syncing into his computer became an overnight celebrity via viral video. This was voluntarily placed on the internet, the repercussions of instant involuntary notoriety where unimagined in the late 19th century when the right of privacy was first put forward by Justice Brandies. There are many personal issues that individuals wish to keep private, and the vast amount of case law regarding all four aspects of invasion of privacy needs to be kept in context of the modern era of the internet, AIDS and the 24 hour cable news station."
| |
|
The Invasion of Iraq, 2005.
A look at American and French justifications for the invasion of Iraq.
1,325 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The U.S.- led invasion of Iraq has invited a lot of controversy about the justification, legality and ethics of a "pre-emptive" strike against a foreign government. Although the US government has justified it on several grounds, most countries in the rest of the world, notably France remain unconvinced. This paper examines how the U.S. (and its coalition partners) justify the invasion of Iraq and compares it to the French position. It also discusses the impact of this invasion on future international affairs.
From the Paper
"The main reasons given by the US government (and its main ally, Britain) are that Iraq and its regime under Saddam Hussain possessed weapons of mass destruction; that it has failed to co-operate fully with UN inspectors as called for by UN Security Council resolutions; that the regime has links to terrorist groups including Al-Qaeda, and that Saddam Hussain's regime posed "a clear and present danger" to the United States and the rest of the world if left unchallenged. It was implied that the regime was likely to provide weapons of mass destruction (including biological weapons) to terrorist organizations with devastating effect. The US government, therefore, felt justified in leading a "pre-emptive" strike on Iraq to find and destroy the weapons of mass destruction and to effect "a regime change."
| |
|
Japan's Invasion of Manchuria, 2004.
An analysis of Japan's invasion of Manchuria in 1931 and America's reaction.
2,147 words (approx. 8.6 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 67.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931 in order to defend its national and economic interests in the area. The paper examines the events that led up to the invasion and then explores the incident itself in detail. America's reaction to the invasion is analyzed.
From the Paper
"According to Ronald E. Dolan, when Japan joined fourteen other nations in 1928 in signing the Kellogg-Briand Act which "denounced recourse to war for the solution of international controversies," it was a foregone conclusion that Japan would inevitably invade Manchuria in order to "defend its national and economic interests" in the area. 1 In response to this invasion in 1931, the League of Nations, set up after World War I through President Woodrow Wilson and the Treaty of Versailles, "issued a report condemning Japanese aggression" which prompted Japan to withdraw "from the League, thereby further heightening world tensions." 2 Not surprisingly, America's response to the invasion of Manchuria was typical of the time, for many American citizens and government officials were highly concerned that American interests in the area would lead to all-out war between Japan and the Western powers, not to mention the prevailing attitude among some Americans for an isolationist policy, i.e. complete separation from other nations in the context of disputes and military actions."
| |
|
U.S.-Led Invasion of Iraq, 2002.
An analysis of the reasons for the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, according to the Americans.
1,542 words (approx. 6.2 pages), 8 sources, APA, $ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The U.S.-led invasion of Iraq has invited a lot of controversy about the justification, legality, and ethics of a ?preemptive? strike against a foreign government. Although the U.S. government has justified it on several grounds, most countries in the rest of the world remain unconvinced. In this paper, the writer examines how the U.S. and its coalition partners justify the invasion of Iraq and compares it to the French position. It also discusses the impact of this invasion on future international affairs.
From the Paper
"The main reasons given by the US government (and its main ally, Britain) are that Iraq and its regime under Saddam Hussain possessed weapons of mass destruction; that it has failed to co-operate fully with UN inspectors as called for by UN Security Council resolutions; that the regime has links to terrorist groups including Al-Qaeda, and that Saddam Hussain?s regime posed ?a clear and present danger? to the United States and the rest of the world if left unchallenged. It was implied that the regime was likely to provide weapons of mass destruction (including biological weapons) to terrorist organizations with devastating effect. The US government, therefore, felt justified in leading a ?pre-emptive? strike on Iraq to find and destroy the weapons of mass destruction and to effect ?a regime change.? "
| |
|
Colonialism, 2004.
Provides an overview of different reactions to colonialism throughout history.
1,219 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how there are many different responses to colonialism and how armed resistance, acquiescence or compliance, and modernization are the three most commonly observed in situations where one nation imposes on the land and people of another. It looks at how the Philippines-American War of 1899 is an example of armed resistance against colonialism by the people of America, how British imperialism and colonialism in India can be described as an acquiescent relationship, and how the U.S influenced Japan through modernization.
From the Paper
"Britain justified expansion of their territory in India on the grounds that Indians needed ?civilization? and a reliable system of justice and law (Davies, 2003). Many have described the relationship that Britain had with India as ?paternal? in nature, where British government acted as a ruling or authority figure to guide cultural and societal values (Davies, 2003). Though there was some resistance and personal opposition amongst the people of India who often felt that they were second class citizens, for the most part many accepted the idea of what Britain promised as ?equality of opportunity? for all it?s citizens (Davies, 2003)."
| |
|
Native Literature and Colonialism, 2002.
Discusses the role of Native Literature in Canada and the United States in the witnessing and resisting of colonialism.
1,650 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 6 sources, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Colonialism in Canada and the United States has had a significant and detrimental effect on Native peoples and their cultures. By virtue of its very existence, Native literature speaks against colonialism through stories that both demonstrate injustice and point to the possibility of renewing Native identity and restoring vitality to Native culture. Contemporary Native writing is unavoidably connected to the oral tradition. Its power to resist colonialism can be found, therefore, in its capacity to continue the process of passing Native culture, knowledge and identity from generation to generation.
|
|
|
