| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "INTERNET FREEDOM EXPRESSION": |
|
|
The Internet and Freedom of Expression, 2002.
Argues that the Information Age has not really altered the fundamental issues surrounding freedom of speech and censorship.
1,900 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 9 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The computer age has produced renewed debate pertaining to questions of freedom and speech, as opposed to censorship. This discussion ventures to explain how the advent of the so-called Information Age does not really alter the dynamics of a longstanding question, or rather a set of questions, that have been basic to political theory among other of the social sciences. Two articles selected from The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, on radically different topics, help to reveal certain approaches to all questions of communications, the media, and the 'post-modern' age, within academic research. These materials are examined en route to sections that focus directly on issues of the internet and freedom of expression.
| |
|
Mill and the Freedom of Expression, 2001.
A look at how John Stuart Mill views the issue of freedom of expression.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 2 sources, APA, $ 73.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines John Stuart Mill's view on freedom of expression and the liberal stance that he takes toward it. It also analyzes the way in which Mill believes freedom of expression impacts individual development.
From the Paper
"In On Liberty, John Stuart Mill offers a grand and sweeping defense of the principle of liberty. Mill defends the principle on two grounds: it enables individuals to realize their unique, individual potential, and by liberating individual talents, creativity, and spontaneity, it provides the essential nurturing for moral and intellectual progress. Freedom of expression is especially significant to his theory of liberty, as it plays a vital role in individual development. Crucial to Mill?s theory as well is his belief that interference with individual liberty is never justified unless it is to prevent harm to others. This, in turn, leads to Mill?s liberal view on freedom of expression, as he allows for little legitimate interference in this sphere, arguing instead for the fullest liberty in professing and discussing opinions, ideas, and doctrines."
| |
|
Freedom of Expression, 2002.
An examination of the limits of the freedom of expression in Canada.
3,650 words (approx. 14.6 pages), 7 sources, $ 133.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses freedom of expression in Canada in terms of assessing at what point freedom of speech becomes undemocratic, how hate speech is controlled, and what government policy makers, the Canadian media, and the general public think about the issue.
| |
|
Freedom of Expression, 2002.
Discusses some of the cases where American citizens have misused their right to freedom of expression their own advantage.
1,483 words (approx. 5.9 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 49.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at three famous legal cases in the United States which resulted in landmark decisions regarding the boundaries to freedom of expression. In each case, the paper discusses the events leading up to the case, the arguments presented on both sides, and the final Supreme Court ruling.
From the Paper
"Freedom of expression plays an important role in the doctrines of human liberty. However not every country grants this right to its citizens. There are many countries in the world where freedom of expression is still a contentious issue and which have been categorized by Freedom House as not being entirely free. The United States of America is one country where the constitution gives every American the freedom of speech and expression. However there have been cases where American citizens have misused this law to their own advantage. Freedom of expression and speech is a right to use and not to abuse."
| |
|
Freedom of Expression, 2002.
A discussion of freedom of speech and expression in the film industry.
1,100 words (approx. 4.4 pages), 0 sources, $ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay discusses the validity of movies in which the directors come from a different background than that which the story is based upon (e.g. a white director directing a movie about African slaves). It moves on to talk about freedom of speech and expression.
From the Paper
"I do not believe that it is mandatory for a movie depicting a certain race or culture should be directed by a person of the same ethnicity. However, a film such as Malcolm X gains more reliability as a result of Spike Lee directing it as opposed to someone like Ron Howard, who is about as white as they come. I am not saying that a white person is not capable of directing a movie focused on African Americans or visa versa, but the final product will appear more authentic. A black director like Spike Lee is able to directly relate to Malcolm X based upon firsthand experience of growing up as a black minority in the United States, just as Malcolm did. Whereas, on the other side of the spectrum, a white director will never fully comprehend what it is to be a minority in our country, and no matter how hard he/she tries, will never be able to put his/herself in a black person?s shoes. Just as Francis Ford Coppola directed The Godfather trilogy, and Steven Spielberg directed Schindler?s List, this assisted in increasing their credibility because, of course, Coppola is Italian, and Spielberg is Jewish. Therefore, the subject matter of these films hits closer to home to each director respectively, rather than if someone of different nationalities had been responsible for them. In the public eye, each film appears to be more realistic, and in turn, moviegoers are more apt to spend the money to go see them. Ponder over this one: If a white director had done Malcolm X, would the black population, who is aware of this, be more likely to go to the theater to see it than if a black director had been the mastermind behind it? Probably not."
| |
|
Freedom of Expression, 2005.
A comparison of freedom of expression laws in America, Canada and the United Kingdom.
1,074 words (approx. 4.3 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, because the laws of all three nations-the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada-are based on the same underlying body of law, loosely described as English jurisprudence-the right to freedom of speech/expression in all three is quite similar. This paper compares the three country's laws and regulations regarding this issue.
From the Paper
"A flap in town council demonstrates the principle of free speech as practiced in the U.K. As the result of an insult flung about in the council chambers, one of the government/political people attending said something to a reporter "no gentleman would say." The commentator on the incident noted that both politicians and journalists can play rough, and, to the public mind, it is a non-starter as an issue. However, a piece of legislation was in place that was causing some discussion concerning the insulter's right to make the insult. "The real villain of the piece is an item of legislation entitled-soporifically-The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct) (England) Order 200." It contains a section demanding that members of city councils must "treat others with respect." This makes politeness mandatory, which also, then, limits how one may express one's self, at least if one is a council member in Great Britain. Moreover, the demand to express thoughts only in a polite manner extends to 'others' and not just voters or officials...anyone and everyone, obviously at all times. This law only applies to council members: One assumes that, except where specifically codified into law, other citizens of the U.K. can be verbally disrespectful if they wish."
| |
|
Freedom of Expression in Education, 2005.
Examines the issue of freedom of expression for teachers and students.
2,670 words (approx. 10.7 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 80.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper argues that schools, by their very nature, must encourage free inquiry and free expression of ideas. Oral expression is needed as a learning mechanism, as well as a psychological outlet. The paper argues that schools, both public and private, should provide opportunities for students and teachers to express themselves orally, with the understanding that measures of protection are in place which will allow for this expression.
From the Paper
"In many communities around the country, however, school administrators and librarians are under heavy pressure from religious and other groups to censor what students read and study. Teachers are becoming self-censoring in the selection process, making every effort to make "safe" book choices. These practices aren't eliminating the problem, they're only amplifying it . Educators cannot, for the sake of the students, allow themselves to be pressured into diluting their curriculum into superficial facts."
| |
|
The Freedom of Expression and the Misconceptions of Society, 2005.
An examination of the relationships between various artists and the concepts of freedom of expression and the misconceptions of society.
3,030 words (approx. 12.1 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper tackles the reception of and reaction to, artists and their works by society, paying particular attention to the consequences of this towards the freedom of speech. It includes close references to, amongst others, the works and observations of Eminem, Oscar Wilde and Seamus Heaney.
From the Paper
"The culture of apportioning blame onto those artists who may or may not have had a negative influence upon an individual is one that I feel to be totally flawed and in some cases completely unfair. Marshall Mathers has used various alter egos to put across his opinions and views, and through Slim Shady or Eminem I feel that many of his observations and experiences of society have been conveyed using the satire and parody these characters purvey. Unfortunately members of the public have taken it upon themselves to adjudge the responsibility of the actions of individuals who have interpreted his material in a literal manner onto Marshall Mathers himself."
| |
|
Freedom of Expression and The United States Supreme Court, 2000.
How Supreme Court freedom of expression decisions during the 1960s changed American government and politics.
2,428 words (approx. 9.7 pages), 3 sources, $ 74.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"In his dissenting opinion on a 1919 case, Justice Holmes wrote, ?[W]e should be eternally vigilant against attempts to check the expression of opinions that we loathe and believe to be fraught with death...? (Abraham and Perry 157). The case was Abrams v. United States, a freedom of speech case dealing with the distribution of socialist literature during World War I. There were other similar cases in the early part of the 1900s such as Schenck v. United States, Frohwerk v. United States, Debs v. United States, and Gitlow v. New York (Abraham and Perry 154-5, 156, 158). Although these cases laid the foundation for all of the freedom of expression cases that would later come before the Supreme Court, they did little when compared to the free speech cases that came before the Court in the 1960s. While the cases in the early part of the century were important for the precedents that they set, freedom of expression cases during the 1960s changed American government and politics. Supreme Court decisions on freedom of expression cases during the 1960s placed never before seen limits on governmental power and guaranteed the protection of several fundamental rights."
| |
|
Iran, the Internet and Freedom., 2002.
A look at the limitations Iran has placed on internet use.
2,525 words (approx. 10.1 pages), 9 sources, $ 93.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the governments attempt to drown out the freedom that the Internet provides. The information that the Internet provides poses a serious threat to the authoritarian regime in Iran.
| |
|
The Battle for the Internet: Who's Idea Of Freedom Will Win?, 2002.
An overview of the debate on Internet regulation.
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 5 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This undergraduate paper is an examination of the argument over regulation of the Internet. On one hand, there is the point of view that the Internet is a breeding ground for criminal and immoral behavior. On the other, there is the argument that controls would be the same as a limitation of free speech. The paper concludes that, ultimately, controls will be placed upon the Internet and that, hopefully, they will be rational and well thought out.
| |
|
Internet Censorship: The Freedom of Speech versus the Almighty Dollar, 2002.
This paper discusses the attempts of Congress to censor the Internet despite censorship legislation being struck down by the Supreme Court.
2,395 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 73.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the thesis that the government is playing a wild card in its attempt to censor the Internet. It discusses several laws and examines how public libraries who do not censor the Internet can suffer funding losses.
From the Paper
"In Antigone, Sophocles wrote, "There is nothing in the world so demoralizing as money." Today's society revolves around money. Without money, no person, organization, corporation, or entity can function. It is well known that in the hands of the government, when push comes to shove, money pushes, money shoves, and, more often than not, money prevails. In other words, if the government wants something done, money is the wild card. The issue of Internet censorship is no different. For years, the United States government has pushed to place censors on the Internet. After having censorship legislation stuck down by the Supreme Court, the government turned its attention to censorship of the Internet in public libraries and public schools. In recent months, the issue of censorship of the Internet in public libraries and public schools has reached a boiling point. When closely studied, it is obvious that the government has chosen to pursue censorship within libraries and public schools because all other censorship avenues have been blocked. Furthermore, it is also obvious that the government is playing their wild card in their attempt to censor, essentially backing libraries into a comer with legislation that denies public libraries and schools significant amounts of governmental funding if Internet censorship guidelines are not followed. Because the issue of Internet censorship centers on the First Amendment, it is important to understand exactly what the freedom of speech guarantees United States citizens. Since its inception, the First Amendment's guarantee of the freedom of speech has plagued all forms of."
| |
|
Freedom of Speech on the Internet, 2002.
This paper will discuss an argument for freedom of speech on the Internet.
1,900 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 5 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
By asking moral questions and answering them accordingly, this paper presents an opinion on the topic of freedom of speech over the internet. By differing methods of parental responsibility, porn will be curbed but not controlled by outside governmental sources.
| |
|
Freedom over the Internet, 2008.
An analysis of the pros and cons to the world and to Canada of Canada's plan to prevent the monitoring of online activity by various governments.
1,268 words (approx. 5.1 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the plan of the Canadian government to encourage more freedom around the world by thwarting the efforts of certain foreign governments to monitor what people do online. It discusses the pros and cons of such a plan to the world as a whole and to Canadian relations in particular, in terms of possible retaliation by these foreign governments, not just on the Internet but in trade and other commerce between nations.
From the Paper
"Canada has had several disputes with the United States in recent years, though overall relations remain good. The Iraq war proved to be a point of contention and "revealed differences in the manner in which the two states believe that force can be used to resolve conflicts" (Richter para. 1). The move under consideration could also become a point of contention, and this aspect should be examined closely because it could be even more harmful if it generates concerted opposition from those governments seeing the west as invading their rights. Essentially, the proposed program would be contentious and may not have the desired effect in any case, so it should not be pursued."
| |
|
Freedom of Speech, 2006.
The paper compares and contrasts freedom of speech and freedom of expression in the United States and Mexico.
4,520 words (approx. 18.1 pages), 15 sources, MLA, $ 117.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses freedom of speech in the American and the Mexican systems in light of the fact that the two countries are growing closer together in trade. The paper states that American individuals and businessmen need to understand the differences in the laws and customs on freedom of speech, as well as other cultural and legal differences between the two countries, in order to understand the meaning of actions and statements made by Mexican leaders. Examining the issue of freedom of speech in Mexico as compared to the U.S. can illustrate the differences and some of the reasons for those differences. The paper concludes that both systems are protected and neither can be seen as perfect in the degree to which it protects these freedoms. The Mexican government wants to be represented well in American thinking and to work with the American government for an improved economic situation for Mexico. Freedom of expression has been guaranteed by the Mexican Constitution, and now that promise has to be strengthened in order to assure that it is maintained.
Introduction
Mexico and the U.S.
Freedom of Speech
Freedom of Expression
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The United States has a long tradition of political freedom, while Mexico does not. The United States as a nation is more than 225 years old, while Mexico as a nation is a little more than a century old. The United States emerged from its Revolution as a country with a new form of government, one crated as a counter to the kind of rigid and hierarchical society the settlers had known in Europe. In the U.S., freedom of speech is divided into freedom of speech and freedom of the press as related concepts differentiated largely by whether the expression is written in a publication or expressed verbally or through actions (in some cases). Case law has established both these types of expression as fundamental rights based on their inclusion in the Bill of Rights in the First Amendment."
|
|
|
