| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "INFLUENCE KARL MARX": |
|
|
The Influence of Karl Marx, 2004.
Looks at the far-reaching influence the teachings and writings of Karl Marx have had on society.
1,239 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper points out the influence Karl Marx has had, not only on the study of politics, but on the study of philosophy, sociology, history, and science as well. The paper continues with a discussion of subsequent Marxist activists and philosophers and their interpretations of the Marxist doctrine. Contentions arising from the different interpretations and disagreements with the doctrine itself are also discussed.
From the Paper
"The influence of Karl Marx?s thought on the events transpiring subsequent to his writings is so immense that it perhaps towers over any other theorist of his time or era. Perhaps the only 19th century thinkers whose ideas can be said to have had a similar wide-based appeal and dissemination might be Sigmund Freud and Charles Darwin?but although those great thinkers have established much in their given fields, certainly Marx has more deeply affected the world community and global politics on a massive scale. Without Marx there would not be any idea of socialism or communism as we know it, and the revolutions of 1848, the Russian revolution, the ascendancy of Mao Tse Tung in China, and the Cold War, might all have never occurred or have been significantly differently. Part of the pervasiveness of Marx?s idea is that it is applicable to several widely different arenas of study and crosses the gaps between many of these disciplines."
| |
|
Karl Marx, 2005.
A personal look at the influences and flaws of Karl Marx's philosophy.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 2 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Karl Marx was one of the great geniuses of the 19th century, and his writings had an enormous influence on the world. His ideas contained much of value, and he helped people to see the world in new ways. However, many of his ideas were seriously flawed, and history has shown clearly that they were wrong. This discusses the ideas that the author believes were good and useful, as well as showing what Marx achieved in terms of influencing the world. I also discusses what the author believes were his mistakes.
| |
|
Karl Marx, 2002.
This paper discusses the life of Karl Marx and his influence on the Russian Revolution
2,075 words (approx. 8.3 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 65.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Karl Marx's character came from his experiences as a child. As a convert, a lofty Christian idealism paved his way into philosophical study, but the Prussian authorities' unwarranted suspicion of his father, who was a lawyer, a constitutionalist, a democrat, and a Jew, led young Karl to consider, with discontent, the structure of government. The author points out that, although Marx studied under Hegel, the greatest influence in his life was his longtime friend, Friedrich Engels, who introduced Marx to many of the works of influential economists of the time, which would help him shape his economic and human philosophy. The paper relates that Vladimir Lenin extended Marxism and made it more comprehensible for the masses, augmenting it into Marxist-Leninism. Without Karl Marx, there probably would never have been a Russian Revolution.
From the Paper
"In 1864, the International Working Men's Association (IWMA) was founded. It gave Marx the needed conduit for his revolutionary cause. Marx actually drew up the rules for the group, clearly advocating the gradual gain of power through parliamentary assemblies. This became the best means for freeing the proletariat in industrially advanced countries like Britain. With his strong opinions and stronger understanding of politics, Marx eventually became a member of the IWMA's general committee. This position gave him the clout he needed to present his ideas: such as strong support of the Paris Commune. This bold action drew the attention of all, especially the frightened French bourgeoisie. Unfortunately his position in the IWMA was the height of his official political career. He became under attack from the working class, who were unsupportive of his extreme measures, and others disliking any kind of authority. With Marx's political defeat, the IWMA lost all of its effectiveness and eventually dissolved into nonexistence. Although Marx no longer had any official place in politics, working-class leaders from Germany, France, and Britain continued to consult him about their problems."
| |
|
Karl Marx, 2007.
This paper examines the beliefs of German philosopher Karl Marx.
1,563 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article the writer analyzes the views of Karl Marx, in particular with regards to his views of the alienation of a worker. The writer discusses that Karl Marx defined this type of alienation as being a social problem, which had been in fact created by the bourgeois management of production on one hand, and exchange on the other. The writer notes that today, the condition of the worker is not as alienated as described by Karl Marx during his times, but still, a human being still produces automatically to earn his livelihood, rather then producing without any sort of external necessity, perhaps like an artist or a musician. The writer concludes that in a society where the forces of the market are able to dictate human behavior, people would never be able to realize their full potential, and this would mean that capitalism today, which interferes with the true nature of a human being, must be abolished as far as it is a possibility.
From the Paper
"In other words, Karl Marx was of the firm opinion that in general, a worker was alienated to a large extent. Perhaps, said Karl Marx, the obvious expression of this alienation was seen in the fact that the worker was quite unable, in capitalist times, of actually owning what he had produced with his effort and hard work. The fact cannot be denied, that the existing conditions of production did indeed dehumanize the worker, to such an extent that he became a mere animal, in following his routine and losing his creativity. The worker would also feel alienated because of the fact that work is not 'himself', it is outside of him, and therefore, not at all a part of his true nature. He becomes both mentally and physically 'debased', and is happy only during his leisure time, which is not much, and he is almost like an animal, in the basic satisfaction of his animal functions of eating, sleeping, procreating, while in his creativity and so on, he is reduced to an animal like thinking. Therefore, the animal becomes human, and the human, animal."
| |
|
Karl Marx, 2002.
A paper which studies the life, history and theories of founder of socialism and communism Karl Marx.
1,615 words (approx. 6.5 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 52.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper looks at the life history of father of modern socialism and communism, Karl Marx. The paper traces his beginnings as a child in Trier, Germany, through to his education in Bonn and his career as a writer. Karl Marx's works are discussed, such as "The Manifesto of the Communist Party", "The Poverty of Philosophy" and " A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy". Finally the paper looks at Karl Marx's contribution to sociology.
From the Paper
"Moreover, there was the history of factory legislation in England which, from its modest beginnings with the first acts of 1802, finally reached the point of limiting working hours in almost all manufacturing as well as the cottage industries to 60 hours per week for women and young people under the age of 18, and to 39 hours per week for children under 13. Thus, Marx has given an excellent book, which from this point of view is of the greatest interest especially for every industrialist."
| |
|
Adam Smith and Karl Marx, 2005.
This paper examines the writings of Adam Smith and Karl Marx by reviewing their positions on joint-stock companies and Adam Smith's famous deer-beaver argument.
1,410 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Adam Smith thought that the separation of ownership and control raised serious questions about the management of joint-stock companies and led him to analyze the agency problem. The author points out that Adam Smith and Karl Marx agree that an advantage of the joint-stock company is that it allows entrepreneurs to put together large sums of money and capital; furthermore, Marx concludes that the joint-stock form leads to a "tremendous expansion in the scale of production and enterprises, which would be impossible for individual capitals." The paper states that Karl Marx would have called Adam Smith's hunters simple commodity producers with each hunting with his own relatively simple weapon in a forest, which is open to all, and satisfying his needs by exchanging his excess catch against the products of other hunters.
From the Paper
"Competition is another quantitative aspect of economics. One first needs to examine the conditions under which exchange ratios would correspond exactly to labor -time ratios. We begin with Adam Smith's famous deer-beaver example, "If among a nation of hunters, for example, it usually costs twice the labor to kill a beaver which it does to kill a deer, one beaver should naturally exchange for or be worth two deer. It is natural that what is usually the produce of two days' or two hours' labor, should be worth double of what is usually the produce of one days' or one hours' labor.""
| |
|
Karl Marx, 2006.
A discussion on Karl Marx's views on capitalism.
2,259 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 69.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper examines how the scandals in the American corporate world have taught us that capitalism may not be the ideal economic system. The paper discusses how interest in Karl Marx's writing, especially those concerning the ills of capitalism, has soared. The paper attempts to understand why capitalism was disliked by great theorists such as Karl Marx, and tries to better understand the Marxist view on capitalism. The paper further examines the strengths and weaknesses of the capitalist and socialist systems. The paper concludes that while capitalism in America may never find a suitable replacement in the socialist system, it can certainly learn something from communism's idea of fair distribution of resources and right to equal opportunity.
From the Paper
"He argued that in capitalist system, workers are underpaid and overworked and this largely results in severe economic disparities, which further lead to social gaps. What we know about rich getting richer was actually a concept first introduced by Karl Marx as he believed that with capitalist bourgeois amassing wealth and using unskilled poor workers to achieve their objectives, world was likely to turn into a living hell for most urban poor. The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonism."
| |
|
Mary Wollstonecraft and Karl Marx, 2002.
Examines the views of women's right activist Mary Wollstonecraft and political philosopher, Karl Marx on the formation of society.
1,548 words (approx. 6.2 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Both Mary Wollstonecraft and Karl Marx developed ideas about the way society is formed and the way it should be formed and both did so in economic and social terms. The paper shows that there are considerable differences between the views they take on these topics. Each wanted to change society and each examined the nature of their society and determined what sorts of developments should be taken in the future. The paper examines Wollstonecraft's "Vindication of the Rights of Woman" (1792) and Karl Marx's class theory.
From the Paper
"Marx and Engels do not speak of individuals as a rule but rather of classes, mass grouping of people according to economic and social position. In the perspective of Marx and Engels, the bourgeois society in which they lived was a system of class conflict and the domination of the bourgeois class over the proletarian class. They described the nature of this society not as an aberration but as a stage in social evolution, succeeding the feudal period and preceding the era of the dictatorship of the proletariat. This view was based on the idea that these stages were inevitable and that the only way for the proletariat to gain a better position in life was through revolution, through the violent overthrow of bourgeois society."
| |
|
The Influence of Karl Rove, 2007.
An analysis of James Moore and Wayne Slater's book, "Bush's Brain - How Karl Rove Made George W. Bush Presidential."
3,376 words (approx. 13.5 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 96.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper looks at the incredibly gifted and cunning presidential advisor and policy maker, Karl Rove. The paper reviews the book "Bush's Brain - How Karl Rove Made George W. Bush Presidential" and discusses the authors' position that it is a very dangerous dynamic to have one man, a man of questionable ethics, who was not elected by the voters, steering the country, pushing policy and manipulating issues in a way which allows his boss to get reelected. The paper highlights Rove's style of spreading rumors, initiating whisper campaigns and playing dirty tricks on opponents to make sure his candidate wins out. The paper shows the extent of Rove's influence on Bush, the Republican Party and ultimately on the United States.
Outline:
Introduction
Review and Analysis of Moore and Slater's Book
From the Paper
"This book was published in 2003, the handiwork of veteran political journalists James Moore and Wayne Slater. At the time of its arrival on bookshelves, Karl Rove was seen as an incredibly gifted and cunning presidential advisor and policy maker. He still is those things, but his star has fallen considerably. As the book went on sale, the 2004 Presidential Election was just ahead, and Rove's influence and reputation as a brilliant political tactician would grow even more. But following the Democratic takeover of the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate in November, 2006, there is these days some tarnish on the luster Rove has built up as a strategist. In fact, it appears that Rove's strategy for the 2006 Mid-Term elections is to energize Bush's conservative demographics, to attack the Democrats (who opposed the war in Iraq) as friendly to the terrorists and to belittle them as "cut-and-run" cowards."
| |
|
Emile Durkheim's and Karl Marx's Views of Religion, 2006.
This paper shall examine the views of both Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx as they pertain to religion.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 6 sources, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Religion plays a key role in the works of both Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx and a close look at their respective views on religion are therefore very important. With that in mind, this paper argues that, while both Durkheim and Marx are not strong advocates of religion, Marx is especially sharp in his denunciation. In particular, whereas Durkheim does see some salutary effects associated with religious practice - such as the promotion of social solidarity as well as a collective moral code - Marx views religion as being basically an appendage of the capitalist establishment. More than that, Marx's vision of both religion and of capitalism is so unflattering that he compares the former to an ancient Near Eastern religious sect which favored the sacrifice of children to an obscure deity.
| |
|
A Comparative Study Between the Economic Philosophies of Adam Smith and Karl Marx, 2003.
The following essay compares the economic philosophies of Adam Smith and Karl Marx with reference to their historical works.
2,270 words (approx. 9.1 pages), 0 sources, $ 70.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay compares the philosophies in Adam Smith?s ?The Background to the Wealth of Nations? and Karl Marx?s ?Communist Manifesto? & ?Das Kapital?. The way in which both Smith and Marx agreed upon the importance of capitalism for unleashing productive powers, amongst other similarities, is discussed. In addition the contradictions in their philosophies, such as their reasons for expanding markets, are also highlighted.
From the paper:
?Smith and Marx both agreed that capitalism required expanding markets. Smith believed this was so because jobs could not be divided too much without a large market. The money that went to paying wages came from profits. There always had to be an expanding market, so that there could be more profits or else there would not be more jobs.?
| |
|
Karl Marx, 2005.
Examines the times and philosophy of the father of Communism, Karl Marx.
1,356 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Karl Marx is known widely as the founder of Communism and the Communist system of government, popularized in his work "The Communist Manifesto," written with Friedrich Engels. This paper looks at this and other texts to get an idea of Marx's times, works, and ideas.
From the Paper
"The stated goal of Marx's communism in the Communist Manifesto is the
"Formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, (and) conquest of political power by the proletariat" (Marx-Engels). Marx is concerned with abolishing the bourgeois system of private property, but not all property standards necessarily, stating that the bourgeois system creates capital, not true property. Seeking
to elevate the status of the laborer, he states that "In bourgeois society, living labor is but a means to increase accumulated labor. In communist society, accumulated labor is but a means to widen, to enrich, to promote the existence of the laborer" (Marx-Engels).
Those who oppose their theories in proposed counter-arguments are dismissed as unenlightened mouthpieces of the bourgeois."
| |
|
Karl Marx, 2002.
An analysis of Karl Marx as a modern thinker.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will discuss why Karl Marx is considered a modern thinker. By using his concepts of German ideology, Jewish questions, communist manifesto, and class struggle, we can see why this is true. By learning these different facets of thinking, the basic concepts of Marx and his approach as a modern theorist can be shown.
| |
|
Karl Marx, 2007.
A look at the factors that Karl Marx might have overlooked when accounting for revolutionary change or its absence.
754 words (approx. 3.0 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how Karl Marx believed the constant battle of class against class to be the driving force of historical change and how he rejected the Hegelian notion that thought might be the underpinning of philosophy, the guiding force in human affairs. It looks at how, in his focus on the "concrete realities" of society, Marx neglected many other sources of historical change such as the formative powers of religion and social custom.
From the Paper
"However, if all change - all history - is based on economic considerations - how is that there can be any change at all, if a society's economic structure remains the same? What others call history is filled with examples of non-economic forces that drastically alter existing societies. In Das Kapital, Marx ascribes the origins of guilds and castes, "to the conversion of fractional work into the life-calling of one man." By considering these economic combinations solely from the point of view of the "units of production" i.e. the workers in these industries, Marx ignores certain aspects of guild and caste organization. The guilds that arose in Medieval Europe provided many social services to their members, and helped to create a sense of community among the workers. "
| |
|
Karl Marx, 2002.
A study of the life and poltical ideas of Karl Marx.
1,110 words (approx. 4.4 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the life and political theories of the father of communism, Karl Marx. It describes his personal life, health issues, and his intellectual pursuits. The paper illustrates that Marx's economic theories still are influential today throughout the world.
From the Paper
"'Marx?s impact can only be compared with that of religious figures like Jesus or Muhammad. Nearly four out of every ten people alive today live under governments which consider themselves Marxist' (Singer, 1). Many people may consider that account to be an overstatement of Marx?s historical importance, nevertheless he was undoubtedly the greatest thinker and philosopher of his, and recent, times. His theories on life, and on the social and economic structure of nations, have revolutionized the way in which people think (McLellan, 8). His life contributed to the way people think today, and because of him people are more open to suggestion and are quicker to create ideas on political, economic, and social issues. "
|
|
|
