| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "INCREASING HEALTH CARE COSTS": |
|
|
Increasing Health Care Costs, 2002.
Looks at possible causes of increasing health care costs.
4,591 words (approx. 18.4 pages), 17 sources, APA, $ 119.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores all of the myriad and complex causes of the high cost in today?s health care environment and recommends changes that would be the most likely to positively impact change. Charts and graphs are used to help illustrate important points.
Introduction
Prescription Drugs
Medical Devices and Medical Advances
Rising Provider Expenses
General Inflation
Government Mandates and Regulations
Government Programs and Tax Laws
Increased Consumer Demand
Lack of Consumerism
Litigation and Risk Management
Fraud and Abuse
Managed Care System
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Priority Health also believes that the United States government is at fault for not imposing price controls on pharmaceutical products as do most other industrialized nations, thus leading to drugs costs that are as much as one hundred percent higher in this country. Additionally, the United States government imposes regulations for drug distribution and sales that make drugs less readily available and more expensive than in other countries. Also, government granted patents protect drug for up to seventeen years, limiting competition and driving up prices."
| |
|
Health Care Costs: Reaction Paper, 2004.
Personal reaction to an assessment of family health care costs.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 2 sources, APA, $ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents an assessment of the economics of health care costs. The paper argues that the problem is a complex maze of related issues such as funding mechanisms, delivery structures and individual responsibility. Additionally, the paper recommends a national health care system for managing family health care costs that is based on universal access to health care.
From the Paper
"Health care economics is entering another state of turmoil in the United States as the moderating effects of the managed care concept on increasing health care costs appears to have run its course. The Congress and state governments believed the promises of managed care proponents that managed care would lower health care costs dramatically and are resisting rapid increases in health care costs. Managed care companies are responding by dropping governmentally-funded patient groups including Medicare and Medicaid raising charges to..."
| |
|
Reducing Health Care Costs, 2007.
This paper examines the issue of health care benefits and costs.
2,938 words (approx. 11.8 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 86.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer discusses that a full-scale health care benefits crisis appeared to loom as employers were reported to spend $300 billion annually on the health insurance of employees, their dependents and retirees. Further, the writer discusses that health care related costs and premiums were expected to adversely affect the U.S. economy and, therefore, these preferred strategies could not continue indefinitely without a proportionate and adverse impact on total employee compensation. The writer looks at how employers act to reduce health care costs.
From the Paper
"The mass media, major consulting groups and health care experts agreed that health care costs were a critical or significant concern to the vast majority of chief operating officers, chief human resource officers and other business leaders. As against the estimated 14% increase, employers said they could accommodate only an average annual increase of 9%. This difference meant that employer costs would increase by approximately 54% in the next five years. During that period, employee contributions could increase three times until all the involved parties resorted to some proactive approach to contain the rise. HR leaders agreed that better value and lower health costs at between 83% and 96% if they worked together with employees for this purpose."
| |
|
Health Care Costs, 2008.
A discussion of the rising costs of health care in the United States.
1,050 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a look at the reasons health care costs continue to rise in the United States. It points out that many factors interact to increase costs and these factors include certain elements that, ironically, are thought to reduce costs or that may have been intended to reduce costs. The paper adds that costs increase in part for natural economic reasons, such as the cost of developing new drugs, or the added costs accruing due to the creation and implementation of new medical technology. The paper maintains that one of the primary reasons fo cost increases is that the public does not pay for what it uses in medicine, meaning that people do not pay directly out of their own pockets. Instead, millions have their costs paid by insurance or a company health plan, and this increases the overall costs. To conclude, the paper calls for a better and more certain analysis of how costs could be reduced.
From the Paper
"The patient may pay something on his or her bill, but it is usually only a part of the whole. Alterio (2007) notes how some of the efforts to control costs can harm patients, which in turn increases health care costs over time because patients may have to wait longer for treatment and need more medical attention when they do get it. Alterio notes that keeping down costs in HMOs often means requiring doctors to see more patients per hour and to give each patient less time, which saves money in the short-term while increasing costs in the long run."
| |
|
Health Care Cost Containment, 2004.
A look at the rapidly increasing cost of providing health care services, one of the most critical issues facing health care facilities and organizations.
3,242 words (approx. 13.0 pages), 7 sources, APA, $ 93.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the critical problem facing healthcare facilities and organizations of providing quality care and services while at the same time maintaining very limited budgets. The paper points out that cost control and management can only be accomplished through innovative cost containment methods and effective data analysis related to facilities expenditures, operating expenses, and overhead expenses, and then makes recommendations for achieving these ends.
From the Paper
"One challenge that healthcare facilities face is the wide diversity of services provided by various facilities. No two healthcare providers is alike, and expenditures vary greatly from one facility to the next, based on the type of services offered to patients, equipment utilized and cost containment mechanisms in place within a facility. A blanket solution to cost containment is not therefore, possible within the world of healthcare because facilities vary so greatly in the services they provide. Thus each situation must be examined uniquely and separate from other competitors, in order to develop solutions that meet the need of a particular venture."
| |
|
Rising Health Care Costs, 2004.
An overview of the reasons and possible explanations for the dramatic rise in health costs.
2,180 words (approx. 8.7 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 67.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how, although advances in medicine have meant that people live longer, they come with a price, which the medical aid schemes are typically required to cover. It looks at how the bottom line is that working people's premiums have to subsidize pensioners, who are the ones who usually require most of the care. It discusses how, as the cost of medical treatment escalates, a fine balancing act is also required to balance the books and how major chronic illnesses, such as HIV and various forms of cancer, are impacting the people who can pay health care premiums, as well as increasing the number of those who require a high level of medical attention.
Outline
Health Care Spending
A Brief Explanation
Utilization
Competition
Past Medical History
Medical Technology
Conclusion
From the Paper
"In the mid-1990s, Americans began spending more of each dollar on health care than on food or housing (Phelps, 1997). This new way of spending indicated that society can devote fewer resources to life's basics and more to resources to improving the quality of life. This was proven true when the prediction that health care spending would surge within the decade, had multiplied from one-seventh of the gross domestic product (GDP) to one-quarter of the GDP by the year 2000 (Strunk, 2003). According to Struck it continued from there because in 2001, health spending rose 8.7 percent, to $1.4 trillion, and accounted for 14.1 percent of the total economy, the largest share on record (2003)."
| |
|
Medicare Reforms and Health Care Costs, 2004.
This paper is a research proposal to examine Medicare reform and determine whether it will actually end up costing taxpayers more money than the previous system did.
5,355 words (approx. 21.4 pages), 8 sources, APA, $ 132.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper relates that, with the proposed reforms of the Medicare system, most people will not be able to use it because it would actually cost them more to do so than it would to simply not have insurance at all. The author feels that one of the biggest problems is that seniors who have Medicare do not have any coverage for prescription drugs, and because of this, they have to pay a large amount of money out of pocket., The paper stresses that the study, designed to be more of a subjective rather than an objective study, is based on the review of the available literature and the opinions and beliefs of those that make up this literature group because it does not appear that statistical research would be helpful.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Statement of the Problem
Overview of the Study
Significance of the Study
Rationale of the Study
Scope of the Study
Review of Related Literature
Description of Sources Used
Positive Aspects
Negative Aspects
Literature Review
Methodology
Research Design and Approach
Procedures Used and Data Analysis
Research Considerations and Limitations
Validity and Uniqueness of the Data
Summary
From the Paper
"The sources used for this particular literature review did not come from the expected peer reviewed journals and magazines. This is largely because the Medicare reforms have not officially been enacted, and therefore studies into how they are impacting individuals who use the Medicare system have not been conducted. Because of this, there are few sources that can actually be found that deal with the Medicare reforms and how they are going to affect the elderly. At least, this is true of professional journals and official sources."
| |
|
Health Care Managers and Health Care Delivery, 2004.
Examines the relationship that exists between health care players, how they perform their duties, and how they join their forces in health care delivery.
2,367 words (approx. 9.5 pages), 9 sources, APA, $ 72.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines and provides information on the roles and responsibilities that health care managers are tasked to accomplish in today?s health care systems. Moreover, this paper examines how a health care manager's job as a leader who ensures a smooth and organized management and operation of health organizations, influences his/her perspective on health care professions. The paper emphasizes the importance of understanding how health care managers perceive their duties in health care service.
From the Paper
"The basic role every manager must be able to render is the task of providing good human relations to everyone at work. Through this role, the objective of accomplishing jobs in an environment where good work relationship is maintained can be made possible. In the field of health care, healthcare managers must have the ability to perform this basic responsibility. A healthcare manager should be a specialist in managing the condition of the healthcare staffs. Though this duty may be perceived as a simple task, it is critical that a good human resource management be delivered to a health organization to ease the stress and pressure that health care providers, such as the doctors and nurses, experience from their duties."
| |
|
Health Care and Managed Health Care: The Need for Sweeping Reforms, 2002.
A look at role of primary care nurse practitioners in relation to health care reforms.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 6 sources, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper investigates the role of primary care nurse practitioners in respect to health care and health care reform. The failure of primary healthcare is critically assessed, in the respect that health care is currently "managed" by independent "for- profit" organizations, where there is an emphasis on financial success rather than patient welfare. This paper also places a strong emphasis on the role of nurse care practitioners in the state of Florida and in community health care clinics.
| |
|
The Rising Costs of Health Care, 2005.
A look at the issues concerning the rising costs of health care in the U.S.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 3 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the issue of rising health care costs in the United States, and relates the issue to the government, business, and health care industries. The paper further looks into these organization's roles in halting rising health care costs, and discusses professional opinions in relation to the matter. The addition of technology and its affects on health care are also discussed.
From the Paper
"In the United States there are many poor, aging, and young who have traditionally been without health insurance due to the rising costs associated with care. When society considers those entities that should play a significant role in reducing health care costs the organizational elements of government, industry, and health care providers them selves are logical considerations. Yet, while the United States patiently waits for some type of health care cost relief there does not appear to be any notable action being taken to reduce these costs. During the December 2002 online discussion posted on NewsHour, with Jim Lehrer, the issue of health care costs was discussed in relation to insurance providers, hospitals, and health care workers. Lehrer spoke with many professionals in these organizations, and discovered that there are primary causes for the rise in health care costs in the United States. "
| |
|
Quality And Costs In Health Care Services, 2007.
An analysis of the relationship between cost and quality in health care services in the United States.
1,640 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper researches the quality of health care services in the United States and analyzes the relationship between cost and quality in health care services. The paper examines the role of four agencies in addressing quality in healthcare - the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Finally, it addresses the implications to the profession of nursing relating to cost and quality in health care and particularly relating to advanced practice nurses.
Table of Contents:
Objective
Introduction
Review of Institute of Medicine Report
Role of Four Identified Agencies and Quality in Healthcare
Healthcare Cost and Quality and the Implications for Advanced Practice Nurses
From the Paper
"It is extremely important in view of the limited supply of workers in today's health care workforce that the APN be highly educated, highly trained, and experienced to a great degree in health care service delivery. The APN must know the policies and regulations of agencies that regulate and monitor the health care organization. The APN must be well versed in indicators, procedure and protocol in order to avoid medical errors either in failing to test, monitor, or instruct the patient. The scope of the APN's duties require that the APN be technologically savvy, detail oriented, and conscious of all procedures and checks that will avoid useless and avoidable medical errors in the health care organization which has employed them. The APN must play an active role in development of education for nursing future APN's. The APN must furthermore, actively document the effectiveness of the APN role for the purpose of gaining the trust of the public in the quality of care received which has been provided by the Advanced Practice Nurse and in a cost-effective manner while showing that APN provided care is highly successful in avoidance of useless and avoidable errors in the health care organization."
| |
|
Quality, Cost and Access in Health Care, 2002.
This paper discusses three seemingly separate, yet interlocking issues in health care.
1,540 words (approx. 6.2 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper researches the health care issues of quality, cost and access. The writer first introduces statistics that illustrate the difficulties faced by health care organizations when attempting to maintain quality standards with insufficient budgets. The paper finds that the Federal government is becoming more committed to determining methods to make the health care system in America more equitable for all citizens.
From the Paper
"More medical schools are graduating more doctors and more private groups are funding health care research. In addition, many diseases which once decimated society are being brought under control. In many ways, the United States health care system is a victim of its own success. Rapid developments of beneficial medical technology has produced a situation in which funding all interventions that would provide some health benefit to some patients would preclude spending on any other desirable social good."
| |
|
Impediments to Health Care Access for Low Income Visible Minorities, 2002.
Identifies causal factors for the gap in health care access for lower-income Americans and visible minorities and the more affluent members of America's majority.
29,350 words (approx. 117.4 pages), 135 sources, APA, $ 249.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
As the American population continues to become more diverse racially, members of visible minority groups within the population become more prominent. Simultaneously, with the increase in diversity, income distribution in the American economy has become more distorted. While economic growth in the United States has surged over the past decade, the income gap has widened; not only between the richest and poorest Americans, but also between moderate-income and low-income Americans. Members of visible minorities in the population tend to be represented disproportionately in the low-income and poverty classifications in the United States. While there is an abundance of implications of this state of affairs, one of the more crucial ones is access to health care. Individual and household financial capacity, the scarcity of employer-paid health insurance among small businesses, cultural differences based in social psychology and other factors frequently act as impediments to health care access for low-income individuals and households among visible minority population groups in the contemporary United States. This problem and these issues are investigated in this study. The study identifies causal factors for the gap in health care access between lower-income Americans and members of visible minorities in the United States, on the one hand, and more affluent Americans and members of the majority segment of the population, on the other hand. The initial chapter of this study delineates the problem investigated. Specific research questions are formulated and stated to provide greater focus for the investigation.
Social psychological theory and applied social psychology literature are reviewed in the second chapter. Literature relevant to the functioning of low-income and visible minority population groups in the United States within a social psychological context are reviewed in the third chapter. The fourth chapter is devoted to a review of literature relevant to both the health care system in the United States and the experiences of low-income and visible minority population groups in relation to health care access and health care delivery in the United States. An assessment of the problem investigated, performed within the structure of the research questions, is presented in the final (fifth) chapter. Conclusions drawn from the study findings are stated and recommendations for further research are made. The summary conclusions reached through the conduct of this study relate both to health care access and health care utilization by low-income persons and members of visible minorities. With respect to health care access, the summary conclusion reached is that a universal system of health care entitlement is required in the United States. In relation to health care utilization by low-income persons and members of visible minorities, the summary conclusion reached is that extensive education is required for both low-income persons and members of visible minorities, on the one hand, and health care providers, on the other hand. Low-income persons and members of visible minorities require education on the benefits and function of health care services, while health care providers require education in the social mores of the diverse populations they must serve.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Problem Delineation
Background on the Problem
Statement of the Problem
Research Questions
Review of Relevant Social Psychology Theory and Literature
Introduction
Sociological Theory and Health Care
The Welfare State
Accessing Contemporary Health Care
Role of Ethics in Accessing Health Care
Alternative Health Care Delivery Systems
Chapter Conclusions
Social Functioning of Low-Income and Visible Minority Population Groups
Introduction
HIV/AIDS Related Behavior
Initiatives to Improve Health Care
Access and Behaviors
The American Health Care System and the Experiences of Low-Income and Visible Minority Groups
Introduction
The American Health Care System
Analysis of Health Care Delivery Systems
Care Quality
Alternative Approaches to Health Care
Bioethical Issues
Problems of Accessibility
Initiatives to Improve Minority Access
Chapter Conclusions
Assessment of the Problem Discussion, Recommendations for Further Research
Appendices
Annotated Bibliography
From the Paper
"Social Cognitive Theory [self-efficacy] emphasizes the role of expectancies, self-efficacy, peer normative influences, and social competency skills as key components affecting adolescents? behaviors (DiClemente, Lodico, Grinstead, Harper, Rickman, Evans, & Coates, 1996). The applicability of models based on social psychological principles for understanding African-Americans? decision-making and sexual behavior has been questioned because most such models tend to be individually-focused and do not take into account the social context in which the behavior is embedded (Cochran & Mays, 1993). Social cognitive theory, however, explicitly integrates behavioral, cognitive, and environmental factors as reciprocally interactive. Thus, given the hypothesized multi-factorial nature of sexual decision making and the potential impact of the high-risk social environment of the study population, approaches based on social cognitive theory are thought to be particularly relevant for understanding the myriad factors that may affect African-Americans? sexual behavior."
| |
|
Health Care Privatization.
This paper argues in favor of health care privatization as opposed to health care nationalization.
755 words (approx. 3.0 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, unlike national health care, a government-operated, tax-funded system, the type of system, which is currently operated in Canada, Europe, Australia, New Zealand and other countries,the majority of health care funding in the U.S. comes from the private sector. The author points out that advocates of national health care ague it would reduce costs by eliminating unnecessary, duplicative paperwork, adopting mechanisms to stretch health care dollars, such as bulk purchasing of medications, and implementing measures to control future health care costs, such as negotiating fair fees with doctors and budgets with hospitals. But some economists put the cost of national health care reform at $339 billion per year in additional taxes. The paper concludes that the only people who are really better off are the uninsured, with everyone else footing their bill and sacrificing their own health care, which isn't a good option for most working Americans because national health care expands coverage to all by raising taxes, rationing services, and limiting modern medicine.
From the Paper
"Those in favor of national health care also believe that our health care is inadequate compared to other countries with national health care. The U.S. spends more per person on health care than any other country in the world, but the World Health Organization ranked the U.S. 37th in the overall quality of health care that it provides. We are the only industrialized country that lacks universal health care. More than forty-two million Americans have no health insurance, with access distributed unequally among rich and poor and among the races."
| |
|
Health Care Access for Low-Income Minorities, 2002.
This paper is a qualitative thesis, which assesses the impediments to health care access for low-income visible minorities in the United States.
30,578 words (approx. 122.3 pages), 135 sources, APA, $ 249.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper, based in sociological and social psychology concepts, identifies the causal factors for the gap between lower-income Americans and members of visible minorities in the United States and more affluent Americans and members of the majority segment of the population with respect to health care access. The author concludes, after an extensive review of the literature, that a universal system of health care entitlement is required in the United States. The author suggests that an extensive education is required for low-income persons and members of visible minorities to know the benefits and function of health care services, and health care providers require education in the social mores of the diverse populations they must serve.
Table of Contents
Problem Delineation
Background on the Problem
Statement of the Problem
Research Questions
Review of Relevant Social Psychology Theory and Literature
Introduction
Sociological Theory and Health Care
The Welfare State
Accessing Contemporary Health Care
Role of Ethics in Accessing Health Care
Alternative Health Care Delivery Systems
Chapter Conclusions
Social Functioning of Low-Income and Visible Minority Population Groups
Introduction
HIV/AIDS Related Behavior
Initiatives to Improve Health Care Access and Behaviors
The American Health Care System and The Health Care Experiences of Low-Income and Visible Minority Population Groups
Introduction
The American Health Care System
Delivery of Health Care to the Poor
Care Quality
Alternative Approaches to Delivery
Bioethical Issues
Problems of Accessibility
Initiatives to Improve Access
Chapter Conclusions
Assessment of the Problem
Discussion
Recommendations for Further Research
Annotated Bibliography
From the Paper
"One of the major impediments to the attainment of universal access to healthcare in the United States is the functioning of for-profit Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) and managed care organizations (MCOs). These organizations are investor-owned organizations that are in business to make a profit on healthcare delivery. Non-for-profit healthcare organizations also must earn a profit on their operations in order to be able to compensate and train staff, acquire new technology, and generally improve the quality of their services. Unlike investor-owned healthcare companies, however, non-for-profit organizations are not driven by share prices and the bottom-line mentality of for-profit companies. Thus, patient-centered care in not-for-profit healthcare organizations may be contrasted with the investor orientation of the for-profit healthcare companies. Recent decisions by for-profit healthcare companies to drop their Medicare healthcare groups because of substandard profit growth illustrates as no amount of rhetoric can the precedent of investor concerns over patient concerns in the for-profit healthcare companies."
|
|
|
