| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "IMPRINT IMPERIALISM SOUTH AFRICA": |
|
|
Imprint of Imperialism in South Africa, 2005.
Examines the role of literature in presenting the inconsistencies of stereotyping and racism in South Africa.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 4 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This is a thematic paper based on the example of South Africa's imperialism and beyond, in Apartheid and anti-Apartheid movement, and correlations in a global Black Power movement of different manifestations. Through various points in the paper, a warning is made of the perils of including racial categories in future thinking, in the need for humanism as opposed to new categories or patterns as guidelines for assessing conflict in the future. The paper shows that there is a clear role for the artist and writer in presenting the inconsistencies of humanity and the need to guard against stereotypes of every variety.
From the Paper
"Imperialism in South Africa produced archaic institutions that till the late 20th century, remained in effect, and in particularly South African forms. From the 1652 landing on the Cape, the Dutch put in place the foundations of a society distinguishing European and African, towards what Dunbar Moodie would describe in the 20th century as an Afrikaner 'civil religion'. (1975) When South Africa became part of the British Empire, different Afrikaner attitudes, practices and institutions were carried over, combined with Victorian British ideas of how colonies ought to be organized, and reinforcing a social order according to race that drew much from Social Darwinism as it shaped metropolitan British culture of the day."
| |
|
South Africa's New Imperialism, 2006.
This paper examines the role of the British government in southern Africa during the phase of "New Imperialism" between 1880-1900.
1,604 words (approx. 6.4 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 52.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper details the impact of the British government's involvement in southern Africa during the phase of new imperialism between
1880-1900, in which various European governments began to scramble for land in the region. This paper explores Britain's interests in southern Africa, which were heightened with the discovery of prolific deposits of gold and diamonds. The writer discusses the lack of investment into the local economy which combined with a policy of black segregation and the enforced migration of labor, created a situation of devastating poverty among the black Africans. This paper paper also focuses on the segregation policies of the diamond mines which set a direct precedence for the establishment of the apartheid policy in the South African government.
From the Paper
"An interesting feature of the diamond industry was the unmarketability of the gems. They were luxury items that held varying degrees of popularity in Europe at the time, and the responsibility for the successful sale of diamonds rested on the shoulders of London merchants. What resulted was an increased financial involvement between British businessmen at home and overseas, thus strengthening British private investments in the region. Politically, the British were unwilling to provide their annexed territories with ample governmental administration. Instead, they preferred to rely on the cooperation of the local white population."
| |
|
Imperialism in India and Africa, 2002.
An analysis of Indian and African reaction to European Imperialism, 16th to 18th Century.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 2 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will discuss the nature of imperial western powers and their influence over India and Africa in the Sixteenth through Eighteenth centuries in brief. By realizing the ways that they influenced the trading and economic and especially the warfare elements in this period of history, we can understand how the western powers interacted with these cultures.
| |
|
Age of Imperialism in Africa 1875 - 1914, 2000.
A look at European imperialist policies in Africa from 1875-1914.
1,271 words (approx. 5.1 pages), 5 sources, $ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents an overview of European imperialist policies in Africa, including religious influence, economic change, and social stratification caused by the various European powers who colonized the continent.
From the Paper
"During the period of imperialism and colonial expansion of Western power in the late 19th century, vast empires were developed as European governments scrambled frantically for territory. ?White? people came to rule millions of ?black?, ?brown? and ?yellow? people in Africa and Asia. There were many reasons and many justifications for the expansion, but it is generally accepted that competition for trade, superior military force, nationalism, and a racist belief in European superiority were among the most important."
| |
|
Imperial Expansion in Africa, 2002.
A look at the economic impact of the imperial expansion into Africa.
2,900 words (approx. 11.6 pages), 7 sources, $ 106.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is on "Imperial Expansion in Africa". It argues against the statement, which is "The great outburst of imperial expansion at the end of the 19th century was the product of great power rivalry and not of economic necessity", this statement has been disparate because the economics had everything to do with the expansion of empires into Africa, not power. It analyzes the topic with evidence and explores whether the historians used original material or have they rehashed things from other writers?
| |
|
Consequences of Imperialism, 2004.
This paper discusses the consequences of imperialism while highlighting the effects of European imperialism in Africa, Asia, and Algeria.
1,256 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper gives a detailed explanation about how the European imperialism started and how it exploited the resources and people of both Asia and Africa. The paper also emphasizes on the outcome or after-effects of imperialism in Europe, Asia, and Africa.
From the Paper
"For four hundred years, the world has been quite aware of the European imperialism. Examples of European imperialism were found not only in Europe but also in other continents as a result of outward European expansion. The word Imperialism was basically invented during the mid-nineteen century when the age of autocracy was on the rise. Imperialism has led to multiple effects of globalization and multiculturalization in the modern day Europe."
| |
|
How Can British Imperialism Be Explained?, 2002.
A discussion of British imperialism in Africa through Joseph Conran's "Heart of Darkness".
2,523 words (approx. 10.1 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 76.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper puts forward the argument that the colonial period in Africa was characterized by the arrogance of whites and atrocities committed against blacks. In the colonial period, Africa became the land of opportunity for Europeans who exploited the people and resources for profit. It examines how the author Joseph Conrad was one British citizen who saw through the rhetoric and hypocrisy to the dark heart of the horror of British imperialism. In his novel, "Heart of Darkness", he does not hesitate to explore the underlying drive behind imperialistic inhumanity and shows how Africa, known as the dark continent to the colonizers, represents all that the British Empire does not wish to see about itself.
From the Paper
"In 1896 King Leopold of Belgium, about to begin building his empire in the Congo, expressed his intention "to open to civilization the only part of our globe where Christianity has not penetrated and to pierce the darkness which envelops the entire population." (Hennessy 87) It was also Leopold whose often quoted words made clear that the "primitive barbarism" of Africans must be replaced by subservience to whites of which the primary consideration was forced labor: "They must accustom the population to general laws, of which the most needful and the most salutary is assuredly that of work." ( Hennessey 86) Of course this labor was salutary only to the whites."
| |
|
The 'New Imperialism', 2002.
This paper examines the 'New Imperialism' ('Capitalist Imperialism') of 1870-1914.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 11 sources, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is structured around a debate about Marxist analyses of imperialism, particularly in the period 1870-1914 and alternative explanations.
| |
|
European Imperialism, 2002.
European Imperialism and its effects in the New World, Asia, Africa and India.
1,005 words (approx. 4.0 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
European Imperialism has been described as the age of global integration as European social order manifested an outward movement to other continents. This paper examines how the slow "globalization" by Europeans was fostered by different cultures in the lands they occupied. It has been said that most of the countries did not suffer from imperialism, but this paper shows that this depended on the ruler of the country and the way the changes were implemented. Cultures in the different areas are compared - Asia, Africa and the New World - to see how they were effected by European Imperialism.
From the Paper
"Duiker and Speilvogel's book, World History Since 1865, Volume II examines the emergence of imperialism promoted by Europeans and the resulting affects of their determination to expand, far surpassing imperial Rome. Great Britain, France, Holland, Belgium, Italy, Germany, Spain, Portugal and even Russia intruded forcefully into Africa, Asia, the Middle East and the South Pacific and finally sought out the North and South Poles. Today, there is common agreement that European overseas expansion was a constant factor of the nineteenth century, with British commercial activities the most obvious."
| |
|
Imperialism, 2007.
This paper discusses the role of imperialism in the development of nations.
1,027 words (approx. 4.1 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article the writer points out that imperialism has been a driving force in global economic and social development throughout much of history. A definition of imperialism is provided as acquiring nations by extending control over foreign entities. The writer notes that from ancient China, through Western Europe, and even today, the process of garnering control and using underutilized assets from lesser developed nations has shaped the world. The writer then discusses that as trade barriers dissolve, it becomes increasingly clear that imperialism has changed form from a singular nation-strategy, to a multi-national organization strategy as a globalizing force. The writer concludes that globalization, in a more socially responsible format, could lead to bona fide human liberation globally, making it the farthest thing from imperialism as possible and, therefore, perhaps the light at the end of the dark imperialistic tunnel.
Outline:
Introduction
Imperialism Under the Guise of Developing Underdeveloped Nations
Capitalism, Privatization and Modern Imperialism
Imperialism and Globalization
Conclusion
References
From the Paper
"Throughout history, societies have been subdivided into levels of development. The industrialized nations of Western Europe and North America, and currently more recently industrialized nations such as Japan, have been dubbed "First World" nations, while others such as many nations in Asia, Africa and Latin America, are categorized as "Third World" nations. This categorization occurs due to several factor include poverty levels, industrialization, and productivity of the nation. Historically, Imperialism is the process of seeing the underutilized riches in an underdeveloped nation, and then taking control of the nation in question, in order to benefit from their lack of ability to defend themselves. It is this historic exploitation that has often negatively affected the nation's current global standing."
| |
|
African Imperialism, 2005.
This paper discusses Great Britain's interest in Africa in the 18th and 19th centuries which epitomized imperialism.
2,040 words (approx. 8.2 pages), 7 sources, APA, $ 64.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how, in the 1880s, Britain annexed large sections of Africa in a combination of economic and strategic considerations relating to the rising levels of commercial and political competition in Western Europe. In particular, it looks at how Senegambia, the first British colony in Africa, received a constitution by act of Parliament in 1765 and how Gambia remained a British colony until 1965.
From the Paper
"Emphasizing that "a survey of the scene in Africa before the coming of Europeans would reveal considerable unevenness of development," Rodney writes about colonialism from Egypt through Ethiopia, Nubia, Morocco, the Western Sudan, and East Africa to Zimbabwe. He spends considerable time on the political and military skills and exploits of the great Zulu leader Shaka Zulu. He stresses that the suppression and loss of this history is, of course, one of the large negative consequences of the entry of the imperialistic and racist Europeans."
| |
|
Imperialism and Capitalism, 2003.
This paper explores the relationship between imperialism and capitalism.
2,300 words (approx. 9.2 pages), 10 sources, $ 79.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the relationship between imperialism and capitalism from the time of the Spanish Empire to the present. The author describes both forces--capitalism and imperialism--and argues that imperialism is the monopoly stage of capitalism. The paper relates the purpose of Spanish imperialism and how the forms of imperialism have changed over time.
From the Paper
"For many world scholars, the form of slavery, begun by the English in the seventeenth century and continued into the nineteenth century by the Americans, is merely the most naked form of imperialism. It is the domination of an oppressor ..."
| |
|
20th Century Imperialism, 2005.
An examination of imperialism movements in the 20th century.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 3 sources, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at imperialism in the 20th century. It takes a look at both the pro-imperialism and anti-imperialism points of view. Included are the pro-imperialism ideologies of Teddy Roosevelt and Adolph Hitler and the anti-imperialism arguments of Frantz Fanon and Mahandas Gandhi,as well as others. The political ideas of expansionism and protectionism are explored.
From the Paper
"As the 20th century unfolded, the struggle for and against imperialism continued escalate and became a dominant issue on the world political stage. While political figures in countries as disparate as Nazi Germany and the United States supported and justified imperialism, those who were subjects of it willingly put their lives on the line to oppose it and, hopefully, bring it to an end. For the most part, the pro-imperialist, based their arguments on economic need and/or racism. Such is true in the cases of Jules Ferry, Theodore Roosevelt, and Adolph Hitler. On the other hand, those who stood against imperialism based their arguments on human rights and self-determination. Just before the dawn of the 20th century, both Ferry of France and Roosevelt of the United States led the charge for expansionism by their respective countries."
| |
|
New Imperialism, 2005.
A look at the causes and consequences of the era of New Imperialism, 1871-1914.
1,386 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the New Imperialism, which took place between 1871 and 1914, resulted from industrialized nations seeking control of foreign territories for economic, military, political, and philosophical aims. The paper describes the conditions that motivated and fueled the New Imperialism, the active players in the age of New Imperialism, and the consequences of New Imperialism for industrialized nations and for the lands and peoples that were subjugated.
From the Paper
"One of the motivating factors for the New Imperialism was world trade. The world markets were becoming increasingly open to free trade, but because of an economic depression, many European powers sought to impose trade tariffs and other restrictions to assume dominance in the market. Also, nations needed new avenues for natural resources and the industrialized nations would compete heavily for access to the natural resources of Africa and Southeast Asia. Africa was the prime victim of the New Imperialism; only two nations remained free of European control. The New Imperialism completely restructured Africa, altering its social, political, and economic realities and undermining ancient indigenous traditions. The industrialized nations also sought potential for new markets for their finished manufactured goods. Therefore, the New Imperialism was mostly based on economic motives."
| |
|
Imperialism, 2007.
This paper discusses imperialism, making use of the opinions of various contemporary writers.
929 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 7 sources, APA, $ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer notes that various contemporary writers have interpreted the motives for imperialism, the political control by more powerful countries of weaker nations, in vastly different ways. The writer points out that supporters of imperialism, for example, consider it as a benign concept that is beneficial for the colonized people, but the Marxists condemn it as a naked form of capitalistic exploitation, believing that imperial expansion is driven solely by a search for new markets and investment opportunities overseas. The writer concludes that the writings of most pro-imperialism writers reveal an underlying theme that the benefits of imperialism outweigh the costs and that colonization was beneficial for the colonized people. The writer maintains that, in fact, the theory that the stronger and developed nations have an obligation to take over the responsibility of governing the weaker and poorer nations has definite racist overtones.
From the Paper
"Other Western writers and leaders of the period on either side of the Atlantic have expressed similar sentiments in their writings. For example, John Sullivan, a 19th century American journalist, coined the phrase of Manifest Destiny in 1845, arguing that the United States had a divine mandate to expand its territory throughout North America and God had chosen the nation to spread the natural law of freedom and equality among nations that were deprived of such virtues. Jules Ferry, twice Prime Minister of France in the late 19th century, strongly supported French colonial expansion for economic, patriotic, and racial reasons. He argued that French colonial expansion was necessary since the existing markets for French goods were shrinking due to trade barriers and competition from the United States and Germany. As a result, it was imperative for France to colonize weaker nations in Africa and Asia in order to find captive markets for its goods and if it wished to remain a "great nation." At the same time, Ferry expressed the opinion that "superior" races have the right to colonize since they have a 'duty' to civilize inferior races."
|
|
|
