| Papers [1-15] of 26 :: [Page 1 of 2] | | Go to page : 1 2 —> | Search results on "HOTSPUR HAL": |
|
|
Hotspur and Hal, 2004.
An examination of the characters of Hotspur and Hal from William Shakespeare's "Henry IV Part I".
1,777 words (approx. 7.1 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 57.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how Shakespeare?s characters always cause us to wonder, and how, in his play, "Henry IV Part I", it is interesting to consider how Hotspur and Hal?s lives would have been changed had they become friends. It looks at how, certainly, both would have benefited greatly from the experience. Hal could have taught Hotspur to relax and enjoy life a little bit more, and Hotspur could have taught Hal how to be more serious about life, especially his duties as prince. By examining both characters, it shows how we can easily see how each character?s weaknesses and strengths could have contributed to a friendship that may have achieved peace in a different way.
From the Paper
"On the other hand, Hal is slow to move toward his position as prince. He prefers to spend time in the tavern with Falstaff and our first impression of him is that he is quite lazy. He has fun with his friends and even repays the travelers the money that was stolen from them. In essence, Hal does not seem to want to grow up. This is most obvious in the scenes at the tavern. Hal seems to be aware that the happiness he finds at the tavern is something he will not or cannot find in a courtly life. He can also be himself there. He can drink and have fun. He tells the others, ?I am now of all humors that have showed themselves humors since the old days of good man Adam to the pupil age of this present twelve o?clock midnight? (II.v.82-4). Although we have no problem understanding why Hal likes his life at the tavern so much, we also realize that Hal is not exactly eager to fulfill his duties."
| |
|
The Forms of Honor in the First Part of 'Henry IV', 2002.
A discussion of how various characters such as Hotspur, Prince Hal and Falstaff represent different manifestations of the concept of honor in Shakespeare's 'Henry VI'.
1,985 words (approx. 7.9 pages), 0 sources, MLA, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Honor, the central theme in Shakespeare's Henry IV, Part 1, is embodied primarily in the two main characters. This essay compares and contrasts the concept of honor as lived by Hotspur and Prince Hall, making frequent use of quotes to substantiate claims. Other characters, King Henry and Falstaff, who Shakespeare finds useful in this major treatment of honor, are also discussed.
From the Paper
"One of the main themes around which Shakespeare dramatizes the history of his country in The First Part of King Henry IV is honor. To the Elizabethans honor was a major topic of debate as it had been to Englishmen of all ages. Honor is a complex subject, highly personal to some, highly public to others. Honor can be something for which one quietly stands, or about which one shouts in flowery language. The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast some of the various forms taken by honor as represented in Shakespeare?s Henry IV, Part I."
| |
|
Character Analysis: Prince Hal, 2006.
A character analysis of Prince Hal from William Shakespeare's play, "Henry IV".
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 1 source, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a character analysis of Prince Hal from Shakespeare's play "Henry IV", explaining that Shakespeare introduces Prince Hal as an individual that is mischievous and irresponsible, carousing with others at the Boar's Head Tavern that in modern society would be considered the wrong crowd. These individuals include Poins, Falstaff, Bardolph and Francis the Page. The paper further explains that the escapades of Hal and his comrades include the staging of a play at the tavern that is intended to degrade the English court, and the theft of a knight's ring. The acts of Hal during this period of the play further include schemes intended to embarrass his friends, who are continuously manipulated into aiding Hal's efforts. The paper also notes that the presentation of the character in this manner leads to an initial impression that Hal holds no true concern for others, and that the crown will never be an issue of priority within his life.
| |
|
Prince Hal and Falstaff, 2004.
An examination of the relationship between William Shakespeare's characters, Prince Hal and Falstaff.
1,887 words (approx. 7.5 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 60.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how the relationship between Falstaff and Prince Hal is among the most interesting, most talked about, and most analyzed story lines in all of William Shakespeare?s plays, and for good literary reason. It looks at how even a cursory description of the dramatic emotional, intellectual, socioeconomic, psychological, and physical differences between the characters, and between their manners and styles, sets up a myriad of potential juxtapositions from which to attack existing analyses or forge fresh ones.
From the Paper
"First, prior to examining what Falstaff wants from Prince Hal, a look at what there is about Falstaff which attracts Hal. A careful reading of Acts 1 through 3 clearly reveals that Hal does not hang out in the tavern because of any character flaw on his own part, or obsession with alcohol to the point of needing to be drunk; or from any corrupt desire to pursue low-level ambitions of the flesh. To the contrary, Hal is drawn to the Eastcheap tavern environment because he is fond of Falstaff. Hal is greatly impressed by Falstaff?s irrepressible humor and superior wit, and Hal obviously is both amused and delighted when Falstaff recovers from embarrassing circumstances by pure brainpower and charm."
| |
|
"When The Legends Die" by Hal Borland, 1996.
Review of & personal response to Ute Indian's struggle to find his place in white culture while preserving traditional cultural connections.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 1 source, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"When the Legends Die (Borland, 1963) describes the struggle of Tom Black Bull, a Ute Indian born shortly before 1910, to find his place in the world. Because his father is a fugitive, Tom?s childhood is spent in the mountains of Colorado with only his parents, living as Indians had lived for generations, hunting and gathering, in harmony with the land and with animals. During his boyhood, Tom?s father and then his mother die, but Tom continues to live in the mountains with a bear cub he calls his brother.
When Tom is eleven, Blue Elk, paid by the Indian agent, brings Tom to the reservation school where he and his bear cub are held captive. When Tom escapes, he discovers that Blue Elk has stolen his belongings and burned his lodge. With no home remaining, Tom returns to the reservation school where he dresses like a white and does..."
| |
|
"The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture" by Hal Foster, Ed., 1993.
A review of the essays on art, theory, sculpture, film, design, elitism v. popular culture and criticism.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 1 source, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Editor Hal Foster states in the preface to his book, The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture, that he brought together the essays for this work in an effort to present a dialogue on the meaning of postmodern culture as reflected in all the arts. It is the purpose of this paper to discuss postmodern culture, its theory and practice, its affect on design issues, and its influence on society and reaction from society.
Foster defines postmodernism as a "conflict of new and old modes--cultural and economic" (xi). The anti-aesthetic relates to an interdisciplinary cultural position on the present time. It is his aim to reflect various different views coming from different art forms in order to stimulate thinking about the diverse nature of postmodernism and the anti-aesthetic.
In theory, postmodernism refers to the moving away of the..."
| |
|
The Struggle towards Unity in ?Henry IV?, 2004.
A look at how William Shakespeare, in his "Henry IV, Parts I and II", emphasizes the ideas of struggle and progress through his characterizations of Henry and Hal.
2,262 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 0 sources, MLA, $ 70.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines William Shakespeare's plays, "Henry IV, Parts I and II", and, in particular, looks at how Henry misjudges his son and cannot see that Hal, who is not guilty of usurpation and regicide, will be able to unite the now divided kingdom. It shows how Henry?s faults and strengths cause him to symbolically reflect the struggle for progress, represented by the bridge between the corruption of England during Richard II?s reign and the unity of Henry V?s kingdom. It also explores how, after the ?struggle? ceases and Henry IV dies, Prince Hal becomes King Henry V ,and the previously divided nation progresses by integration.
From the Paper
"Hal?s adoption of the commoners is best described by the Duke of Warwick when he says: ?The Prince but studies his companions, / Like a strange tongue? to gain the language?? (Pt. II, IV, iv, 76-78.) Hal is like a growing tree basking in the sun, Henry IV is the gardener who planted Hal?s seed, and the commoners form one of Hal?s developing branches. By growing into a man ?of all humors,? (Pt. I, II, iv, 89) Hal is becoming his entire nation in an individual form, which is symbolically what a king is. Hal has studied the commoners well and is able to both talk and think like them, as portrayed in Hal?s witty exchanges with Falstaff. Hal?s desire to adapt to the needs of the various peoples of his country foreshadows the harmony that will dominate England when he is king."
| |
|
"When the Legends Die", 2008.
A review of Hal Borland's novel "When the Legends Die".
1,001 words (approx. 4.0 pages), 0 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how protagonist Thomas Black Bull comes full circle in Hal Borland's novel "When the Legends Die". It examines how as a Ute native from Colorado, Tom spends a large portion of his childhood in the wilderness, how he is tricked into returning to mainstream civilization and how, after spending years of his life in misery, Tom eventually returns to the woods at the end of the novel. It discusses how the old ways are better than the new ways for Tom because they teach Tom how best to survive and stay physically and mentally healthy and how, in many ways, the novel is about survival.
From the Paper
"After spending many years on the Ute reserve, Tom and his family take some time to adapt back to the old ways. They rely only on a bow and arrow to go hunting. They learn how to preserve meats to store for the long winter. The family seeks an ideal site on which to build a winter cabin and teach Tom the old ways. After several years Tom grows into a traditional Ute boy and knows little else but the ways of his ancestors. When his father dies in an avalanche, Tom is prepared to become a man and carry on the Ute ways of life. Even Tom's transition into adulthood is marked with Ute traditions. The burial of Black Bull and Tom's assuming the name Bear Brother are both in keeping with age-old Ute traditions. "
| |
|
"Information Rules", 2006.
Discusses the book, "Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy" by Carl Shapiro and Hal R. Varian
1,013 words (approx. 4.1 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Written by classically trained economists Carl Shapiro and Hal Varian, "Information Rules" offers readers practical guidelines for understanding and working within the new "network economy." The paper shows that by applying traditional economics concepts to new economic models, the authors suggest compelling ways of navigating through the nuanced world of information technology.
From the Paper
"Included in Shapiro and Varian's discussion are broad overviews describing and defining the information economy; business strategies that deal directly with the hardware, software, and online industries; information related to pricing and version upgrades; copyright law, managing lock-in; and other topics pertinent to information technology economics. Comparing newer corporate giants like Microsoft to old world technology bulwarks like Edison, Shapiro and Varian show how economics theories don't need to shift dramatically to account for the quirks of information technologies."
| |
|
?In Richard's Time?, 2006.
A comparison of Shakespeare's "Richard II" and "Henry IV".
2,350 words (approx. 9.4 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 72.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares Shakespeare's uses time in his plays "Richard II" and "Henry IV". The paper shows that Richard's inability to use time to his advantage while he reigned led Bolingbroke to feel justified in deposing him. On the other hand, the paper demonstrates how Hal was extremely good at using his time -- in secret, to hone his battlefield skills -- and because of this, he is able to defeat Hotspur. Ultimately, the paper concludes that while Richard was a procrastinator and philosophizer and Hotspur was rash and impatient, they both come to the same end-that is, subsumed by time and death.
From the Paper
"Richard's reign is plagued with the consequences of his inaction, and although he attempts to dress his authority with powerful language, his lack of success at seeming to act makes him appear impotent, and therefore ripe for deposition. In the very first act of Richard II, we see Richard in the process of "staging" his power at court in a feeble attempt to resolve a dispute between Mowbray and Bolingbroke in which he, himself, is tacitly implicated. Richard certainly makes a show of being in control of the situation, but when the rhetoric between the two complainants becomes too hot, threatening to expose Richard's part in Glocester's death, Richard seems to be content to talk the two gentlemen down from their rage. It is a dangerous position to take, and it is not the first time that Richard has avoided this confrontation because we learn "[his] leisure would not let [him] hear" the dispute in the past. (Richard I.I)"
| |
|
?The Grapes of Wrath? and ?Shampoo?, 2002.
This paper discusses two films with social overtones: ?The Grapes of Wrath? (John Ford, 1939) and ?Shampoo? (Hal Ashby, 1975).
1,085 words (approx. 4.3 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper states that ?The Grapes of Wrath? (1939) offers a photographically powerful panoramic view of the Great Depression and focuses on one family as a representation of an entire class. The paper explains that ?Shampoo? is a very daring film for its time because it is a social comedy-drama, which uses humor as a way of dissecting a real social issue. The author feels that the milieu of the seventies is well depicted and shows a society becoming more self-absorbed as the result of a loosening of restrictions.
From the Paper
"It is significant that his job is making women more beautiful, and they in turn give him particular affection because he has made them more beautiful. He is attracted to his own handiwork. The shallowness of this arrangement is what eventually makes itself known to him, but he has lived by it for some time and has depended on it form his livelihood as well as for his pleasures. The comedy in this film is dark, for the humor delves deeply into the real human feelings that are exposed by the filmmaker. The viewer is being asked to participate--the viewer is both attracted by the images of the beautiful people and the good life while being asked to see through the veneer to the lack of real human feeling beneath. This links the viewer with the hairdresser, who is going through the same process without the advantage of distance."
| |
|
"King Henry IV" and "King Henry V", 2002.
Examines fraud, theatricality and politics in Shakespeare's "King Henry IV" (parts one and two) and "King Henry V".
3,930 words (approx. 15.7 pages), 18 sources, MLA, $ 107.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The falsification of the audience?s expectations and Hal?s miraculous emergence as a great English king, alongside the Hal-Falstaff relationship out of which the future king?s identity is gradually constructed, are the main critical puzzles in most studies of the William Shakespeare's "King Henry" series. The paper examines concepts of fraud and politics in parts one and two of "King Henry IV" and in "King Henry V". It discusses notions by literary critics such as Stephen who claim that Hal is one of Shakespeare?s most Machiavellian characters. The paper argues that Machiavelli?s Prince is not sufficiently cruel or sophisticated to be ranked with Prince Hal, despite the fact that Falstaff?s cry for help, voiced in his paradoxical accusation that the Prince has corrupted him, seldom succeeds in inverting the audience?s impression that Falstaff is Hal?s misleader.
From the Paper
"The concept of necessity, as it arises from the morality-patterned Phychomachia, reinforces providentialist notions, an idea first advanced by Tillyard but in a rather different context. Religious providentialism fuses the personal and political domains and Hal?s borrowing from the theatrical and diachronic anthropological deposit causes the interweaving of theatrical illusion with politics, thus displaying their common structural patterns. The fusion of religion, politics and theatre culminates in Hal?s gradual conversion to virtue, which is at once a milestone in Hal?s allegedly privileged relationship with God, a major political event, and a stock trick of Elizabethan drama."
| |
|
"Leading Strategic Change", 2005.
A review of J Stewart Black and Hal Gregersen's "Leading Strategic Change: Breaking Through the Brain Barrier".
1,548 words (approx. 6.2 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses Black and Gregersen's book which claims that 70%of all organizations that seek strategic change, fail in their attempts to reform poor past practices and adapt to new challenges. It explains that this book attempts to analyze why this is so, and provides some potential solutions and guidelines for change-focused managers in organizations.
From the Paper
"Over the course of Leading Strategic Change, J. Stewart Black and Hal B. Gregersen examine the central reasons behind organizational failures to make necessary changes to adapt to circumstances. The authors trace organizational fears of change and failures to implement necessary changes in a sustainable fashion back to the tendency in human individuals to resist change. Black and Gregersen call these individual psychological obstacles 'brain barriers' that prevent organizational strategic changes becoming success stories. They call these brain barriers 'failures'-the failure to see, failure to move, and the failure to finish. The failure to see "keeps the change process from even getting started." But sometimes, even when change is put into motion, the "failure to move" keeps an organization's actors from fully entering the fray of the marketplace, and the "failure to finish" prevents the desired organizational changes from being implemented in a lasting fashion. (13-14)"
| |
|
"Henry IV", 2004.
A discussion of the art of the drama in Shakespeare's "Henry IV" and "Hamlet, Prince of Denmark".
1,322 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares the characters of Prince Hal and Hamlet in William Shakespeare's plays "Henry IV" and "Hamlet, Prince of Denmark". The paper analyzes the dramatic aspects of each character. The paper illustrates the personas that each character creates for himself, in addition to their personality as defined by the author. The paper highlights the constant contrasts between Prince Hal and Hamlet.
From the Paper
"Shakespeare is of course a dramatist, that is, he was an author of plays with fictional characters in them, portrayed by real people known as actors. Yet quite often Shakespeare's fictional characters are themselves 'actors' in their own life stories, creating personas that they play in addition to acting out their true, 'real life' struggles of the plot as defined by the author. For instance, Prince Hal, of Henry IV, Part I and Hamlet are two such individuals-the first pretends to be a rouge, even though he is really a skillful prince and politician destined to be a king, the second is an avenging son who assumes madness as a truth-telling device, and also as protection for his eccentric actions and behavior in a fraught Danish court. "
| |
|
Nobility and Commoners in Shakespeare's "King Henry IV", 2004.
Character analysis of the main characters in "King Henry IV".
2,171 words (approx. 8.7 pages), 0 sources, MLA, $ 67.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a character analysis of Henry and Hal, two of the main characters in Shakespeare's play, "King Henry IV", and shows how Shakespeare, by comparing and contrasting these two characters, was able to display the attitudes of both the nobility and the commoners and foreshadow Hal?s ability to become a stable, successful ruler.
From the Paper
"Hal?s feelings towards his father reflect the feelings of the commoners towards the king. Hal?s soliloquy, ?I know you all...? (I, ii 183-205) reveals Hal?s moral awareness and scorn towards the character he has used to disguise his true frustration with the standards that the king has disgraced. A noble and virtuous young man deliberately masquerading as a dissolute prodigal, Hal is not likely to overlook the deep moral blemishes in his father nor the hypocrisy of Henry IV?s assumption of rightful kingship. However, as the King?s subject and heir, Hal is denied all means of expressing his contempt for the dishonorable means by which Henry IV has maintained and stolen power. By showing contempt for the king, Hal would be following the example of Henry IV?s disloyal behavior towards Richard II, and siding with the rebels who now challenge Henry IV?s fitness to rule."
|
|
|
