| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGES": |
|
|
Homosexual Marriages, 2006.
A one-sided look at the 'negative' effects of homosexual marriages.
2,498 words (approx. 10.0 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 75.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this paper the author looks at the negatives aspects as he sees it, of same-sex couples getting together in marriage. He examines the implications of same-sex marriages on society and what it will mean, such as, legitimizing same sexual activity, joint tax benefits and many other day to day issues that will help them. The author looks at all of the negative sides of allowing homosexual marriages and urges the reader to help stop them by taking firm legislative action. He mentions many of the laws that have been passed and, are in the pipeline to prevent homosexual marriages. The paper then goes on to discuss what legalized homosexual marriages would do to the public school system and the societal effects that could result from it in public health education within the school system. In conclusion the author again points out that it is not fair for same sex marriages to reap all of the benefits of regular marriages.
From the Paper
"Legalizing same-sex "marriage" and/or domestic partnerships would in essence normalize homosexuality in the public school system. Why? Compulsory education forces all children to attend school. Public schools require children to take health education courses. If same-sex "marriages" or domestic partnerships were to become a reality; children would be taught in these health classes, as well as in marriage/family elective courses, that homosexual relationships are the equivalent of heterosexual relationships. Because teachers are authority figures, children would be more likely to accept homosexual relationships as normal. Of course, once junior and high schools teach that homosexuality is normal and natural, it's only logical that younger students would be subjected to the same propaganda."
| |
|
The Fight for Homosexual Marriage and Parenting, 2004.
Details and support leading to the rationalization of homosexual marriage and parenting.
3,500 words (approx. 14.0 pages), 20 sources, MLA, $ 98.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
An argumentative paper in favor of homosexual marriage. The paper discusses the ways that homosexuals have the same lifestyles as heterosexual couples, just with different focuses. It concludes that if they can marry, then they should also be allowed to be parents.
From the Paper
"The Encarta MSN Dictionary online defines a Homosexual as, ?somebody attracted to the same sex: somebody who is sexually attracted to members of his or her own sex.? (2003) For years the homosexual community has been battling over their rights of marriage and parenting. Some heterosexual members of society are fighting against them in efforts to preserve their own way of life, keeping homosexuals from marrying and restricting them from parenting children. Encarta MSN Dictionary online defines Homophobia as, ?irrational hatred of homosexuality: irrational hatred, disapproval, or fear of homosexuality, homosexual men and lesbians and their culture." (2003) We should allow homosexuals to marry and raise children because other than sexual orientation, there are virtually no differences between homosexuals and heterosexuals."
| |
|
Homosexual Marriage in the US, 2007.
This paper argues in favor of homosexual marriage in the United States.
1,323 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the issue of gay marriage, arguing in favor of its acceptance. The writer explores both sides of this debate, citing religious and moral reasons as the basis for opposition to gay marriages. Additionally cited is the recent Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) passed by Congress. The author believes that if gays are unable to have legally recognized unions, homosexual people will be continually denied rights that all United States citizens rightfully deserve under the Constitution.
From the Paper
"As of now there is no state in the United States that legally recognizes same-sex marriages. The state that is closest to legalizing these marriages is Hawaii. In repute to the possibility of Hawaii's legalization of same-sex marriages, Congress passed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defines marriage as "the legal union between one man and one woman" (NOW). DOMA also allows each state to decide whether or not it will recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states or municipalities within the state (NOW). The debate over this issue is hot all across the country, with people on both sides of the argument standing firm in their beliefs. The issue is working its way through the legal system and the outcome at this point is completely unpredictable. Denying marriage to a specific group of people is unconstitutional and something must be done so that all people in the United States will be legally able to enjoy the benefits of marriage with a spouse of his or her choice."
| |
|
Homosexual Marriage, 2002.
An argument for the right of gay couples to be allowed to marry.
5,567 words (approx. 22.3 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 135.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper puts forward the case of homosexual marriage. It discusses the history of sexual desire dating from the days of Plato and the right of every human being to be able to fulfil his sexual desire and live a happy life. It analyzes the concept of marriage in general, examining how in many cases people do not actually marry for love and how homosexual couples may, like heterosexual couples desire to share financial assets and responsibilities. It reviews the legalization of gay marriages around the world and analyzes why in particular America is a sex-ambivalent society, alternately fascinated and repelled by sexuality. It contains an extensive literature review and the author's personal opinions.
From the Paper
"Gay couples, elated not to have to hide or to face the stigma of being viewed as sick or criminal, will have a psychological burden lifted from their shoulders. This sort of humane support of other human beings, no matter how different they might be from oneself, should bring a contagious elevation of spirit to any soul that desires to feel at peace in the world. Those who oppose gay marriage, should look closely at their motivation. Is their own sense of masculinity at stake? How can the sexual preferences of others harm them? Do they feel threaten simply because they are not sure of their own convictions about their sexuality or moral beliefs?"
| |
|
Homosexual Marriage, 2006.
An analysis of the factors affecting perceptions on homosexual's right to marry.
4,157 words (approx. 16.6 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 111.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This research paper attempts to show through a survey that Caucasians are more likely to support homosexual's right to marry. It discusses how this tendency of Caucasians to favor laws protecting homosexuals more than African-Americans is most likely to because they have never suffered discrimination to the same extent as African-Americans themselves, and therefore do not feel as threatened by extending such rights as marriage to homosexuals. It analyzes how this relationship is clearly evident again when control variables are introduced.
Outline
Introduction
Literature Review
Data and Methods
Analysis
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Darren W Davis approaches the subject of civil liberties differently. In his article "Exploring Black Political Intolerance" Davis states "racial differences in political tolerance are primarily viewed as a function of racial differences in education and the perceived level of threat passed by various groups" ( Davis (1995) 3) Davis asserts that African Americans do not merit the protection of civil liberties as much as Caucasians not only as a consequence of a lesser education, but also as a combined result of low self esteem and because they feel threatened and fear impugnation. In an ill fated attempt to preserve their own rights, African Americans are willing to deny civil liberties to organizations or people who they perceive to be a threat. "
| |
|
Issue of Homosexual Marriage, 2001.
Discusses social & economic benefits to partners. Arguments for & against same-sex marriage. Legal domestic partnerships vs. traditional marriage.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 5 sources, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The issue to be discussed is whether or not homosexuals should be allowed to marry one another. The main reason why those in the gay community have called for the right to marry is usually not from a desire to be married as such but because of the desire for various social and economic benefits denied to gay people because they cannot marry. For some in the gay community, demands for gay marriage may in fact be a form of challenge to the "straight" community. For those who are truly serious about the issue, however, what is important is the attempt to secure for homosexual partners rights that are taken for granted by heterosexual married couples, such as the right to inheritance, to insurance benefits, for one partner to visit the other in a hospital, and so on. Society to date has deemed marriage to mean more than this and to have at least the..."
| |
|
Ethical View of Homosexual Marriage, 2003.
Argues that the definition of one's sexuality should not decide who that one person might be allowed to marry.
1,431 words (approx. 5.7 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Marriage, meaning the legal binding of two people in a loving agreement, does not say anything about what sexual preference of the two should be. The paper argues that, if the Declaration of Independence says that all men are created equal, then we all have equal rights. It argues that whether one is a man, woman, gay or lesbian is irrelevant; we all have equal rights, and therefore, should all be allowed to marry.
From the Paper
"When... a major employer offers financial benefits for people who participate in deviant behavior, those kinds of people are going to...live and work in the community"(24). Jack Chambers explains that both partners are more likely to believe in the community that helped them be one, by freeing the financial dilemma of health insurance. If the marriage of two homosexual partners were to be legalized, less financial problems would exist which would make today's society healthier. Today's society does not recognize homosexual marriages as binding; many homosexual people have to fight for their love to stay alive."
| |
|
Homosexuality in America, 2007.
A review of the arguments for and against allowing homosexual marriages.
1,225 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents the debate over whether same sex couples should legally be allowed to marry. It analyzes the position in the United States regarding this issue and the political and religious implications of the government's decisions. The paper briefly discusses different views on homosexual marriage and touches on the history of human attraction.
From the Paper
"Due to the inability of same sex-couples to reproduce there would most certainly be an increase in the number of child adoptions. Allowing the homosexual community to wed will allow a child to leave the foster home and live with two loving parents. Granted, a woman cannot teach a little boy how to grow up and be a man, and a man cannot teach a little girl how to grow up and be a woman. What same-sex couples can do for children who are in some type of foster care is care for them like any other straight couple would do. Since same-sex adoptions have not become wide-spread, evidence at this point is inconclusive as to whether the adoption by a homosexual couple hinders a child's ability to function as well as a child who is being raised by the traditional male and female parents (Messerli)."
| |
|
Family Law and Gay/Lesbian Marriage, 2004.
Discusses the controversial topic of homosexual marriages and whether the government has the right to regulate such unions.
2,374 words (approx. 9.5 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 72.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the controversial topic of what constitutes a marriage and what unions between partners are worthy of the state and federal government?s institutional protection. The paper looks at how this applies to gay marriages and then presents legal arguments and looks at social and private values that support the individual's right to a homosexual marriage.
From the Paper
"What makes a marriage, in the eyes of society and the eyes of the law? As this paper is being written, President George W. Bush has called for a constitutional amendment upholding the idea that marriage is an institutional bond that can exist only between a man and a woman. Somewhat belying his claim that this idea is purely legal in its nature, however, is his stress that a constitutional amendment is required to sustain this principle on a federal level. Bush is essentially attempting to pass judgment to all of the state legislatures of the land, forcing them to comply with upholding a singular and specific ideal regarding what constitutes a marriage. This goes against some of the past, predominant legal strictures of this nation, which has left defining and limiting marriage to states and communities, rather than to the nation as a whole. However, setting unified standards regarding marriage on a national level, in Bush?s defense, is not without precedent. (Loving v. Virginia, Arleen, 48-49)"
| |
|
Lutherans and Homosexuality, 2004.
A discussion of the Lutheran Church's attitude towards homosexuality and same-sex marriages.
1,323 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
A look at the current, closed position that the Lutheran Church has taken on homosexuality and same-sex marriages. It discusses the way that many other church groups have become more open to these ideas and examines whether the Lutheran Church will be able to follow suit.
From the Paper
"The subject of homosexuality is widely-debated in our society, and has been the cause of many arguments, debates, and even hate crimes. Every single person in the United States is entitled to his or her opinion--that is what makes this country so great. However, when you have millions of differing opinions, it becomes too easy for people to denounce certain opinions as ?wrong.? What many people do not realize is this: there is a difference between fact or faction and one?s opinion. For instance, a Lutheran?s perspective on homosexuality might be different from that of a Jewish person. Neither person?s opinion is right or wrong; it?s just how that person feels."
| |
|
Same-Sex Marriages, 2005.
Argues that gay marriages diminish the sanctity of the marriage institution.
1,939 words (approx. 7.8 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 61.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper argues that homosexual marriage diminishes the family. It shows that as long as the majority of people are against homosexual marriages, we should not allow gay marriages in our society on legal, moral and ethical grounds, in order to protect the family as the backbone and most important institution of our society.
From the Paper
"The church should also avoid using the word "holy" union. There is nothing "holy" about gay lifestyle. The bible strictly forbids homosexuality, and the church should draw the line in the debate with the words of the Holy Scriptures. Church policy should not be law, but neither should the church lower its moral values to allow for alternative lifestyles. The church is not government. It does not have to make laws protecting the rights of the minority. Those who disagree with a church's moral codes can form their own religion. Freedom of religion is still a right in this country."
| |
|
Homosexuality and Christianity, 2008.
This paper applies the teachings of Christianity to argue against homosexuality and same-sex marriage.
2,555 words (approx. 10.2 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 77.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper argues that, based on the Bible, homosexual relationships are immoral. The author stresses that, from the Christian perspective, same-sex marriage destroys the sacredness of marriage. The paper relates that same-sex marriage destroys the function of marriage because the purpose of marriage is to create life and same-sex couples are not capable of fulfilling the duty of creating their own children. The paper urges that article 16 in the Universal Declaration of the Human Rights should be changed to state that marriage is exclusively for the union of one man and one woman. The author concludes that homosexuality in Christianity is not acceptable and that Christian homosexuals must repent now for them not to suffer the fire of hell.
From the Paper
"The truth is that the Holy Bible is our only God certified source of written truth. Our only correct source of enlightenment comes through our belief and faith in Jesus Christ as our personal savior and throughout reading the Holy Scriptures under the assistance of God's Holy Spirit. God created gravity and hardly anybody disagree the point. God created science and people are utilizing it to establish God does not exist. God created us in His image and likeness and as such provide us freedom to decide. God loves us and he has experienced long suffering for us and he has a plan, a wonderful plan."
| |
|
Same-Sex Marriages, 2006.
This paper argues in favor of same-sex marriages.
2,025 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 64.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the civil rights movements of the 1960s and early 1970s dramatically altered the political landscape for homosexuality and began the lingering battle over gay rights. The author points out that many laws banning homosexual marriage arose during the 1950s and 1960s because of the fear of the breakdown of American morality; however, targeting gays as scapegoats is inane because there are no connections between homosexuality and degenerate morals. The paper stresses that no state has the right to ban homosexual marriage any more than it has the right to prevent women from voting or blacks from serving in Congress because same-sex marriage is ultimately a civil rights issue.
From the Paper
"Times are changing. The 1960s saw a wave of social and political activism that put a stop to Jim Crow, secured greater freedoms for women, and enabled gays and lesbians to be included in anti-discrimination legislation. Much remains to be done in all three of these core civil rights rubrics. Race relations remain touchy in many parts of the United States and minorities are still underrepresented in positions of political and economic power. Similarly, women are underrepresented in many key professions and still earn less money than their male counterparts."
| |
|
Same-Sex Marriages, 2002.
A definination of gay and lesbian marriages.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 12 sources, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Defines Gay & Lesbian marriages. Discusses issues involved and arguments against & in favor of same-sex marriage. Discrimination against homosexuals. Civil marriage beneficiaries. Pressures of social conformity. Cites studies on the effects on children of same-sex marriages.
From the Paper
"This research examines the subject of gay and lesbian marriages. The research will set forth a working definition of the subject and then make a balanced presentation of the issue fronts involved in advocacy and opposition to it, with a view, however, toward demonstrating the basis for support for such marriages as a matter of sanctioned public policy.
Background for discourse of same-sex marriage can be dated from 1969, the year of the now-famous Stonewall riot in New York City, which fostered a generation of social activism and group advocacy on the part of homosexuals. Massachusetts US Representative Barney Frank, a self-identified homosexual, has been quoted on the issue in this way: "I don't understand how it hurts anybody else if two people want to be legally . . . responsible for each other" (Pearcey & Colson, 1996, p. 104)."
| |
|
Gay and Lesbian Marriages, 2001.
This paper discusses the Metropolitan Community Church in Toronto, which wholly supports and performs gay and lesbian marriages.
1,650 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 7 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the growing acceptance of gay and lesbian relationships in society, as well as homosexual marriages. The author focuses specifically on Toronto's Metropolitan Community Church, led by the Reverend Brent Hawkes, which offers the gay community vast support for the lifestyle, and performs controversial marriage ceremonies.
|
|
|
