| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "HILARY RODHAM CLINTON SPEECH AMERICAN": |
|
|
Hilary Rodham Clinton's Speech to the American Medical Association, 1995.
This paper is a rhetorical analysis of the 1993 address "Health Care: We Can Make A Difference" about health care and public interest by Hilary Rodham Clinton's to the American Medical Association: Identification, demonization, information, reassuranc
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 3 sources, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"On June 13, 1993, Hilary Rodham Clinton addressed the American Medical Association in Chicago, Illinois; the subject of her speech was "Health Care: We Can Make A Difference." Ms. Clinton was speaking to the AMA in two capacities: as Chairperson in charge of the President's Task Force on Health Care - and as the wife of recently elected President William (Bill) Clinton. During his presidential election campaign less than a year earlier, Bill Clinton had pledged to give health care reform one of his top priorities, subsequently assigning his acknowledged chief advisor, Hilary Clinton, the role of researching and formulating a comprehensive reform package his Administration would then present to Congress. Together with the respected former Wall Street analyst Ira Magaziner, Ms. Clinton formed and headed a 500-member task force ... "
| |
|
Hilary Rodham Clinton, 2006.
A review of Donnie Radcliffe's book on Hilary Rodham Clinton, "Hillary Rodham Clinton: A First Lady for Our Time".
1,560 words (approx. 6.2 pages), 2 sources, APA, $ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews and summarizes Radcliffe's book about Hilary Clinton, her successes, failures, political career and personal life and the forces that shaped her early career.
From the Paper
"Hillary Rodham Clinton grew up in an era where women often felt like they had to make a choice-choose between children and a career, between love and pursuing a life's dream of professional success. But Hillary Clinton was determined to 'have it all.' She wanted both a fulfilling private and personal life, and a fulfilling life as a career woman and later, as a politician on the national and international stage. This conviction came not simply from her ambition and her desire to advance the career of her husband. Rather, it was also motivated by a desire to engage in social activism, particularly to advance the causes the First Lady felt passionate about, such as children's rights, as well as and including women's rights."
| |
|
1994 Allegations Against Hilary Rodham Clinton, 2001.
Background of alleged improper or illegal commodities futures trading of 1978. Responses of President and Mrs. Clinton. Political viewpoints.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 16 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"This research examines allegations in 1994 against Hillary Rodham Clinton with respect to possible improper or illegal commodities futures trading conducted in 1978. The research will set forth the context in which these allegations were made and then provide a review of the accusations against her, the responses of President and Mrs. Clinton to the accusations, and how third-party legal, business, and political commentators viewed the accuracy and seriousness of the allegations.
In the spring of 1994, at the time that a special prosecutor, Robert Fiske, had been selected to head the so-called Whitewater investigation into a real estate project in Arkansas in the mid-1970s, The New York Times published an account of first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton's 100-to-1 profit on an investment in cattle futures on the commodities market ..."
| |
|
Hillary Rodham Clinton, 2006.
An assessment of the political opportunities and obstacles facing Hillary Rodham Clinton.
2,700 words (approx. 10.8 pages), 15 sources, $ 106.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Prevailing political theories do not completely capture the opportunities and obstacles facing Hillary Rodham Clinton, for no woman in American politics has ever been a powerful and influential First Lady, a prominent senator from a major state, and an acknowledged front-runner for the Presidency. In addition to this unique combination of accomplishments, no woman in American politics has ever been demonized by political opponents like Mrs. Clinton has, for she has been relentlessly slandered by conservatives as a dangerous radical and has been accused of criminal conduct ranging from Whitewater fraud to the murder of Vince Foster. This paper presents a political profile of Hillary Rodham Clinton and examines what opportunities and obstacles lay ahead for her in her political life.
| |
|
Hillary Rodham Clinton, 2007.
A biography on the life and political career of Hillary Rodham Clinton.
2,560 words (approx. 10.2 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 77.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses how the news of a possible candidacy from Hillary Clinton in the presidential elections has created a media frenzy, polarizing the public opinion into supporters and opponents. The paper further discusses Clinton's possible opponent, Condaleeza Rice. The paper concludes that, while Dr. Rice could boast coordinating the American foreign policy in the 2004-2008 period, Hillary Clinton will encourage people to vote for her with slogans emphasizing her care for the American public. The writer proposes that her status as New York senator will help her in this sense.
From the Paper
"Hillary Clinton is following in the great procession of female politicians who have made history, like Indira Gandhi, Margaret Thatcher or Angela Merkel more recently. Starting as a successful lawyer and passing through the First Lady of the Untied States, she is now a political figure on her own and with significant chances of being taken into consideration for the highest position in US."
| |
|
Electing Hillary Rodham Clinton, 2002.
A review of the election campaign of Hillary Clinton, to the Senate.
3,742 words (approx. 15.0 pages), 11 sources, MLA, $ 103.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews the strategy used by Hillary Clinton in getting elected to the United States senate. The writer studies this historic episode because Hillary Rodham Clinton is the only first lady ever to run for such a high office, and this fact alone draws considerable media and other attention. The paper explores women in politics and leadership before looking specifically the the case of Hillary Clinton. The writer includes a background into her politics, family life and values. The paper then explores the needs of the state of New York and the ability of Clinton to meet those needs.
From the Paper
"Hillary Rodham Clinton herself is a lightning rod for conservative and Republican political activists and for some voters, and this fact cannot be ignored. This is true not only because of a certain anger at the personal behavior of her husband but also because the Clintons have been demonized by the opposition since Bill Clinton was first elected President, and even before that in Arkansas. One might think that as the wronged wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton would gain more sympathy, but instead her status as victim is turned into a warped idea of how evil she and her husband are."
| |
|
Hillary Rodham Clinton, 1996.
Life, education, career, major influences, personal & sociopolitical concerns, role as First Lady.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 6 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Hillary Rodham Clinton has been the subject of admiration and criticism since Bill Clinton's election to the presidency in 1992. To some, she is representative of a new generation of women who work in white collar jobs (she was an attorney prior to becoming First Lady) and have separate career interests from their husbands. Although she has given up her legal practice since becoming First Lady, it is her actions and activities that are at the heart of the controversy which has dogged the president since he took office (with Congressional hearings that have lasted longer than the Watergate incident). Vilified by some as betraying traditional family values and held up as an example to young American women by others, Hillary Rodham Clinton is in the news perhaps more often than any other First Lady has been. This research ..."
| |
|
"It Takes a Village" ( Hillary Rodham Clinton ), 1997.
Critical review of First Lady's work on role of parents, community & government in raising & educating children.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 1 source, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
" Hillary Rodham Clinton, in her book, It Takes a Village and Other Lessons Children Teach Us, attempts to please all of the people all of the time. Her position is that children are at risk in today's society from drugs, violence, premarital sex, a lack of health care, too much television, the education system, in general, from the social structure of society itself. Hillary Clinton, throughout the book, states the importance of a child having "good" parents, but she consistently promotes the idea of governmental programs replacing parental oversight of children. She wants to remove the responsibility and credit of raising good children from the parents and place it on the government and society. This duality, claiming that parents have the greatest impact on a child's life and stating that parents must relinquish control of their own children to society, which wishes to "help".."
| |
|
Hilary Clinton and Abortion, 2005.
This paper serves as an analysis of Hilary Clinton's speech claiming abortion to be a tragedy.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 0 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer looks at how Hillary Clinton's speech regarding abortion as a tragedy, is intended to be an emotional appeal to the people. The writer notes that she uses Roe v. Wade as a benchmark in time, perhaps to give the speech legitimacy by associating it with that successful court case. The writer further points out that in her opening paragraph, Clinton sets the tone for the rest of her speech. This paper identifies some of the areas in which Clinton seeks to influence the thinking of her audience through emotions rather than facts.
From the Paper
"From its very opening, Hillary Clinton's speech is intended to be an emotional appeal to the people. She uses Roe v. Wade as a benchmark in time, perhaps to give the speech legitimacy by associating it with that successful court case. In her opening paragraph, Clinton sets the tone for the rest of her speech. She refers to the Roe v. Wade decision as being a "landmark decision that struck a blow for freedom and equality for women". Clinton speaks of people on "the front line," of Roe v. Wade as being "in jeopardy." She also equates Roe v. Wade with "quality healthcare". All of these words and phrases are intended to elicit the listener's emotions. Many such words and phrases populate Hilary Clinton's speech."
| |
|
Hilary Clinton and Lucretia Mott, 1993.
Compares the lives and careers of the First Lady and the 19th Century abolitionist, discussing feminism, women's and children's rights and social activism.
2,025 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 7 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Women in positions of leadership traditionally have been treated as aberrations, and their accomplishments have been portrayed as less important than the sweep of male-dominated history. This attitude is not something that was once prevalent in our past and that is now no more than a relic, and the treatment of Hillary Rodham Clinton by the press (and by various Republican leaders and commentators in particular) shows this clearly. A woman is still seen as an adjunct to her husband, and for the wife of the president this seems to mean to some people that she should confine herself to giving teas and to standing beside the president at official functions. How else to explain the concern that Hillary Clinton, a lawyer, a political activist, and an accomplished woman in her own right, seems to have offended so many people merely by taking on a job heading a ..."
| |
|
Hate Speeches: The Right to Freedom of Speech, 2001.
A look at freedom of speech with respect to 'hate' speeches' and whether or not these speeches are protected under the First Amendment.
1,168 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 5 sources, $ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this paper the author argues that ?hate speeches?, however abhorrent, should be protected by the U.S. Constitution, that in the interest of free speech, they should be allowed. He suggests that this is synonymous with American freedom and refers to some specific examples in order to assess whether hate speeches should be protected under the First Amendment. The author contends that as long as we are free to judge the importance of what is being said for ourselves, then words should never be banned.
From the paper:
?Words are serious, not because they have any direct effect in their own right, but because words, and the ideas they express, are what we use to weigh up our own decisions, their likely effects, and our responsibilities. Words have consequences only if we choose to give them consequences.?
| |
|
Gay Speech, not Hate Speech, 2008.
A discussion on the use of word forms specifically constructed for recognition by gay and lesbian groups.
1,041 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper illustrates how language serves a purpose to the gay and lesbian community to assist them in recognizing themselves as a group in a world of opposition and ridicule of their status. The paper quotes several words and descriptively explains how the word is utilized in gay society. The paper then summarizes the situation with examples on how language has been used negatively with the resultant necessity for this group to formulate their own vocabulary.
From the Paper
"This usage appears to have grown out of political activism. The need to combat homophobic oppression - including internalized homophobia - was perceived, and a concrete way of doing this was to hold a public parade in which pride in one's alternative sexual orientation was expressed. Out of this activity, the word "pride" acquired a whole new meaning - a meaning that is useful for this community in overcoming the societal prejudices it has to deal with."
| |
|
Power of the Speech, 2002.
An analysis of Hillary Rodham Clinton' speech, ?Women's Rights are Human Rights.?
2,080 words (approx. 8.3 pages), 0 sources, $ 65.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the powers of the political speech. It shows how each word is chosen with utmost care and often the politicians words are remembered better than their actions. One such speech by Hilary Clinton is analyzed for its content, its intentions and its ramifications.
From the Paper
"Clinton?s speech can be seen as belonging to a line of similar speeches in American history, include speeches urging women?s enfranchisement given by Frederick Douglass and Susan B. Anthony. She relies heavily on the idea of enfranchisement, which lies at the heart of democracy ? so much so that we tend to use the word as synonymous with empowerment. "
| |
|
Inspirational Speeches, 2001.
Analyzes Hillary Rodham Clinton's '1997 speech to wives of Heads of State of governments of the Americas, & a commencement address delivered by the Dalai Lama. Primary purposes, styles of speeches, use of emotion, reason & parallel construction.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 6 sources, $ 79.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Seventh Conference of the Wives of Heads of State and Governments of the Americas"
Hillary Rodham Clinton
Setting
The setting is a meeting at the Seventh Conference of the Wives of Heads of State and Governments of the Americas in Panama City, Panama. This was held on October 10, 1997.
The speaker is Hillary Rodham Clinton, wife of President Clinton of the United States. As the representative of the United States at the conference, her words would have been of particular interest to the other countries of the hemisphere. She speaks primarily not to politicians but to their wives, and her message is tailored to what she presumes are their interests in protecting women, children, and families. The speech as given..."
| |
|
Speech Comparison, 2001.
Purposes & techniques , rhetoric & effectiveness of speech by Hillary Rodham Clinton to people in power, & by actor Charles Chaplin in the film "The Great Dictator" aimed to spur people into action.
2,475 words (approx. 9.9 pages), 5 sources, $ 87.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Women in positions of leadership traditionally have been treated as aberrations, and their accomplishments have been portrayed as less important than the sweep of male-dominated history. This attitude is not something that was once prevalent in our past and that is now no more than a relic, and the treatment of Hillary Rodham Clinton by the press (and by various Republican leaders and commentators in particular) shows this clearly. A woman is still seen as an adjunct to her husband, and for the wife of the president this seems to mean to some people that she should confine herself to giving teas and to standing beside the president at official functions. However, she is the wife of the President of the United States and..."
|
|
|
