| Papers [1-15] of 33 :: [Page 1 of 3] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 —> | Search results on "HEIDEGGER ART": |
|
|
Heidegger and Art, 2006.
This paper attempts to define the origins of art, as detailed in Martin Heidegger's book "Poetry, Language, Thought."
1,948 words (approx. 7.8 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes Martin Heidegger's definition of art. The author claims that the origin of art is created from some form of activity on the part of the artist, whether it be creating a painting, song, sculpture or poetry. This paper focuses on Van Gogh's painting "A Pair of Shoes" and describes Heidegger's view of this particular work of art as well as his perception of the artist. The writer of this paper questions whether the artist creates the art or if art in fact creates the artist. This paper also discusses the significance of technology and nature in any work of art while describing Heidegger's definition of the 'thing' needed when creating art.
From the Paper
"After mentioning the artist, Heidegger begins to question what the artist is. We must question then if the work is what makes the artist, or is it the artist that makes the work. He tells us that the artist is the source of the work, and the work is the source of the artist. Both the work and the artist depend on each other, and one of them cannot exist without the other. Both the artist and work are related to a thing that comes before each, and that is what Heidegger calls art. If artist and work are both dependent on each other to be the source of the other, so do to both depend on art as their source. Heidegger asks if art can be a source of a work of an artist. Heidegger then claims that art is nothing more than a collective noun that signifies nothing now."
| |
|
Heidegger and the Origins of Art, 2004.
Discusses philosopher Martin Heidegger's text, "The Origin of the Work of Art".
700 words (approx. 2.8 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 24.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Martin Heidegger's "The Origin of the Work of Art" is no less ambitious a project than an attempt to discern the very source of art. As such, he attempts to investigate where art itself comes from. The paper shows that, in this complex work, he looks into the relationship of art, the artist, and truth. Further, he discusses the interpretation of art in terms of a circle of interpretation with many different aspects.
From the Paper
"The term hermeneutic circle is simply another way of describing Heidegger's circle of interpretation in art. In "The Origin of the Work of Art", Heidegger notes that you cannot fully understand a single part of a work until you understand the whole. Further, he notes that you cannot understand the whole of a work of art until you understand all of the parts of the art. On the surface, Heidegger?s circle of interpretation seems tautologous and circular, yet his circle is not a trap."
| |
|
Heidegger's Architecture: An Analysis, 2005.
This paper analyzes Heidegger's view of architecture.
4,950 words (approx. 19.8 pages), 21 sources, MLA, $ 175.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The writer examines Heidegger's view of architecture in terms of his talismanic building, dwelling and thinking. The writer discusses Heidegger's poetics as the building blocks for the world and the loss of the world in modern times. In this paper, the writer studies what Heidegger means by "building," "dwelling" and "thinking."
From the Paper
"In order to understand Heidegger's view of architecture and its role in society, it is important first of all to understand what Heidegger has to say about technology, as well as his talismanic approach to construction. This construction needs to be recognized not so much as a literal constructing of objects in the physical world, but rather as a way of looking at that world-and as a way of using that world so that human beings become part of the world rather ... "
| |
|
Martin Heidegger on the Nature of Being, 2008.
A analysis of the work and beliefs of Martin Heidegger, the philosopher.
3,533 words (approx. 14.1 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 99.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the work of the philosopher Heidegger, whose central concern was with the nature of Being, and discusses the origins of his lifelong fascination with this foundational, ontological issue. The paper relates that Heidegger made a massive contribution to ontology, forcing others to think about the nature of Being from the foundations up. The paper concludes that Heidegger left an important legacy, in that he re-opened key questions that to this day still have not been answered satisfactorily.
From the Paper
"Many philosophers are concerned with the key question of "Why is there anything, rather than nothing at all?" In other words, they are interested in why things have Being, or exist. Such philosophers are often interested in ascertaining who or what was the Prime Mover - the first thing that had Being, and that subsequently caused other things to have Being (commonly thought of as God). Other philosophers are concerned with how we can know about Being. This is referred to as epistemology, or the theory of knowledge. In Heidegger's time, many philosophers attempted to follow in the Kantian tradition, and were primarily concerned with asking "What can we know?" They frequently posed this question in relation to knowledge as the foundation of science.
"However, Heidegger was never part of any herd. He dismissed epistemology, saying that it "continually sharpens the knife but never gets round to cutting" (Being and Time, p. lviii, quoted in Inwood, p. 13). Heidegger seems to have been more concerned with cutting, with penetrating right into the meat of reality. He was concerned with the nature of what is, i.e. with the nature of Being. This is known as ontology, or the study of existence. While this is sometimes conceived of as the most general branch of metaphysics, it can also be seen as the most particular branch of metaphysics - and certainly the latter is truer of Heidegger's approach to ontology. His study of the nature of Being is one of the key concepts in his work, and potentially the most useful to subsequent students of philosophy. Certainly, Heidegger envisaged his examination of the concept of Being as a radical re-visioning which would impact not only the future, but the past. He planned to re-examine past philosophers and (and possibly show how they had erred), in a Second Part to his seminal Being and Time. Unfortunatley he never achieved the latter, as he never wrote this Second Part. Nevertheless, he did address many issues which have impacted philosophers that have come after him - most notably, of course, the concept of Being, and also the related concept of time."
| |
|
Heidegger's Well-Wrought Urn, 2007.
An analysis of the terms "conscience" and "know-how" as Aristotelian modes of disclosure as discussed in Martin Heidegger's "Plato's Sophist".
1,520 words (approx. 6.1 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines Martin Heidegger's view, in his essay "Plato's Sophist", of the Aristotelian concepts of "conscience" and "know-how". The paper points out that Heidegger delimits these concepts as modes of disclosure, to reveal the manner in which their deliberation of beings relates to their agent and his experience of "being in the world". "Know-how" concerns itself primarily with the production of objects as form, which are then removed from its sphere of influence to realize their being through proper use. "Conscience" takes as its object life itself, and its dileberations of "excellence" are integrated into the agent. The paper maintains that, according to Heidegger, this creates a transparency of action and "being in the world" (Dasein) that must constantly reassert itself to resist life's natural tendency toward concealment. The paper concludes that the fundamental difference between these two modes of disclosure can be seen in their relationship to "excellence" and the manner in which their products are manifested.
From the Paper
"The characteristic of excellence ( ) finds its expression differently in (know-how) and (conscience), revealing a primary distinction between these two modes of disclosure. While both direct themselves toward the becoming of beings which 'may be otherwise', stands beside ( ) its productions, whereas integrates its productions. Excellence ( ) is to manifest the perfection inherently possible to beings, which requires a degree of certitude. T finds this possible, within its limits of disclosure, while can never have such. Though the authentic being of an object is inaccessible to because it does not participate in its use, perfection of form ( ) may be reached through its fundamental methodology. As a set of principles drawn from a multiplicity of experiences, the process of trial and error creates a certainty that the form ( ) has achieved its maximum potential. As with the scientific method, the more experiments that reinforce a theory, the more accurate a representation of reality it is assumed to be. Any error results in a reworking of the theory to include such information, therefore increasing its accuracy ( ). "But in the case of , on the contrary, where it is a matter of a deliberation whose theme is the proper Being of Dasein, every mistake is a personal shortcoming". Errors do not open up the possibility of a higher degree of knowledge; rather, they are a complete corruption of proper being. Every deliberation of is in the form of an either/or proposition: it cannot have an end ( ) of excellence ( ) because it is excellence ( ) in its constant becoming. "The [origin] with which has to do is the action itself. And the which is taken into consideration in is the action itself". Thus, within , that which is uncovered remains uncovered through the constant struggle which orients it always toward its continuous expression in the actions ( ) of authentic Dasein. Conscience may be distorted by the desires and their usurpation of Dasein, but it can never be forgotten."
| |
|
Martin Heidegger and Hans Georg Gadamer, 2002.
Compares and contrasts the hermeneutical views of Martin Heidegger and Hans Georg Gadamer.
2,650 words (approx. 10.6 pages), 2 sources, $ 97.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts the similarities and differences between the hermeneutical views of Martin Heidegger and Hans George Gadamer. The latter was a student of the former, and although his ideas were deeply influenced by those of Heidegger, Gadamer's work concentrated on applied hermeneutics. Heidegger, however, had worked on the understanding of being-a central question asked by philosophers of earlier times.
| |
|
Heidegger's Being and Time, 2006.
This paper provides an analysis of Nazi aspects and looks at philosopher Heidegger's views.
3,375 words (approx. 13.5 pages), 0 sources, $ 133.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer discusses the political views and beliefs of German philosopher Martin Heidegger. The writer examines Heidegger's position as one of the major philosophers of the time, in spite of his apparent support for Nazi ideology. The writer looks at evidence portraying Heidegger as a philosopher who appeared to welcome and support Nazi policies and beliefs quite freely.
From the Paper
"For many years after the end of the Second World War, the German philosopher Martin Heidegger continued to be widely admired as one of the foremost philosophers of the twentieth-century. His position at Freiburg University and political activities during the rise of Hitler and the Nazis to power were generally interpreted in a sympathetic light, but the research of Victor Farias provided convincing evidence that Heidegger was the only major philosopher who freely embraced Nazi ideology and policies."
| |
|
Philosophy of Heidegger: The Concept of Dasein, 2002.
An analysis of the book "Being and Time" by Heidegger and a look at the concept of Dasein.
1,960 words (approx. 7.8 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the theory of Being as presented by Heidegger in his book "Being and Time" (1927). The ontological priority given to the concept of Dasein accrues from the importance that Heidegger attached to it. He felt that it was the Being-there, which should be studied in order to understand the Being itself.
From the Paper
?Martin Heidegger was a great German philosopher of the early twentieth century. He gave us some valuable concepts which are though important to the world of euphemism are still very complex to comprehend completely. I believe that a lot of confusion that we face today while trying to understand his work accrue partially from his work actually being complex and partly from the fact that German language has some terminologies which we are not able to grasp fully unless we are familiar with that language.?
| |
|
Martin Heidegger, 2004.
An overview of the connection between Martin Heidegger?s philosophy and Nazism.
746 words (approx. 3.0 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how the German philosopher, Martin Heidegger, is a highly controversial figure because of his Nazi connections during Hitler?s dictatorship in Germany. It looks at how, although the extent of his collaboration with the Nazis is now clearly established by irrefutable evidence, Heidegger is still considered to be a titan among the 20th century philosophers and has influenced thinkers as diverse as Herbert Marcuse, Jean-Paul Sartre, Jacques Derrida, and Paul Tillich, among others.
From the Paper
"Johannes Fritsche points out another connection to Nazism in Heidegger?s philosophy in his Historical Destiny and National Socialism in Heidegger's Being and Time. Fritsche believes that Heidegger?s idiom and use of language in Being and Time were part of a shared tradition of right-wing thought that emerged in the 1920s in Germany the subtlety of Heidegger?s language got lost in translation and led to its misunderstanding by the existentialist philosophers. He points out that Heidegger?s theory about achieving authenticity means the opposite of exercising freedom and is an answer to a call to live life according to one?s fate. For Heidegger, fate had a definite political content?the fate of the patriotic German being identified with the Volksgemeinschaft, a term used by the Nazis to denote a community of the people bound by race and heritage."
| |
|
Martin Heidegger, 2007.
An analysis of Martin Heidegger's theories of nothingness.
785 words (approx. 3.1 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the theories of Martin Heidegger which he presented in a book called "Being and Time." The paper describes his theories of nothingness and human "dread" and compares them to Deepak Chopra's similar quantum physics theories. The paper describes the basic meaning of the theories and concludes that had Heidegger possessed Chopra's gift for simplifying language, his concepts of nothingness might have been recognized sooner.
From the Paper
"Heidegger's theory of human "dread" is interestingly at the core of what he believes to be our deep-seated awareness of "nothing." The fact that humans are deeply aware that we will perish into nothing is what gives defineable value to our human experience. In other words, while we know consciously that everything in our human world will change and die, we also know that this concept does not apply to a world of nothing. Heidegger evidently had no faith in the possibility of an afterlife that might include any thing relative to our human existence. In his view, the inescapable loss of somethingness is at the bottom of the human "angst." (Philosophypages)."
| |
|
Heidegger, 'Aletheia', and Van Gogh?s Shoes, 2005.
Discusses Heidegger's concept of truth, known as aletheia, through his given example of Van Gogh?s painting of a pair of shoes.
1,859 words (approx. 7.4 pages), 12 sources, MLA, $ 59.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Heidegger had an alternate understanding of truth, aletheia, which involves an ?unconcealedness? of being. He illustrated this concept by way of a discussion of Van Gogh?s painting of a pair of shoes. The paper shows how this interpretation drew the criticism of art historian, Meyer Schapiro, who questioned whether the shoes are that of a peasant woman. This, in turn, triggered a response from Jacques Derrida about the subjective projections on both sides. This paper argues that what gets lost in the flurry of words is whether we have a mode of properly understanding aletheia.
From the Paper
"Consequently, it is possible to consider the concept on its own terms, regardless of how tenuous or how strong its ancient Greek origins may be. With such an allowance, it is possible to elaborate on two points in regards to Heidegger?s intent and purpose. First, al?theia results in knowledge that lies outside of interpretation and conceptualization, accompanied by the matching of those concepts with ?the facts.? In a later writing, Heidegger introduces the idea of wonder or astonishment in which one persists in a state of unsettledness. (1984 esp. 120) In contrast to the effort of matching mental contents with reality, an outright grasping for meaning and certainty, and the insistent elimination of confusion and doubt, things are left ungrounded and open."
| |
|
Rogers, Heidegger and Kelly, 2003.
A comparison and contrast between the theories of Carl Rogers, Martin Heidegger and George Kelly.
690 words (approx. 2.8 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the similarities and differences between Carl Roger's phenomenal field Concept, the existentialist vision of Desein as applied by Martin Heidegger, and George Kelly's personal construct theory.
| |
|
Heidegger and Guilt, 2002.
Explores the three definitions of guilt according to Martin Heidegger.
2,900 words (approx. 11.6 pages), 12 sources, $ 106.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper shows that Heidegger invoked three forms of guilt and used these three forms of guilt to show how it is an innate human emotion used to qualify the individual's interaction with society.
| |
|
Technology According to Heidegger, 2004.
An analysis of the question of technology in modern life, according to Heidegger.
2,385 words (approx. 9.5 pages), 11 sources, MLA, $ 73.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the role played by technology in today's world. The paper discusses Heidegger's ideas of our relationship to technology, how we allow technology to present itself and influence modern life. The paper states that humans have the capacity to manipulate their environment through unprecedented technological capabilities.
From the Paper
"The question of technology in modern life, according to Heidegger, is not so much a matter of technology taking over life, but rather the kind of interaction between mankind and technology which we allow. After all, technology had no soul, no independent mind of its own by which it seeks to take over, and dominate modern life. Technology is, at its core, our servant, and should remain our servant. The issue for Heidegger is our relationship to technology, and how we allow technology to present itself, and influence modern life."
| |
|
Heidegger's Notion of Being., 2002.
An insight into Heidegger's notion of Being through an analysis of his essay "What is Metaphysics?"
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 2 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay will examine the introduction to Heidegger's Being and Time and his essay, "What is Metaphysics?," in order to examine how one can gain access to a notion of Being. In addition to this, this essay will look at how one questions such notions of Being as well as the Nothing, which is necessarily connected to any notion of Being, and what place the term Dansein has in this system of thought.
|
|
|
