| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "HEALTH CARE UNITED STATES": |
|
|
Socialized Health Care in the United States, 2006.
An opinionated discussion on health care in the United States.
1,836 words (approx. 7.3 pages), 11 sources, MLA, $ 58.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses America's current free market system of health care in a negative light and offers a suggestion of socialized health care to improve the status quo. The paper also explores socialized health in the rest of the world and expands on why it would be suitable for the United States, offering statistics to qualify its opinion.
From the Paper
"Many of the critics of the concept of a universal health care system point to what they consider deficiencies in foreign systems of socialized medicine, and warn against similar programs in the U.S. Since the Canadian system, which provides universal care to the entire population and contains costs effectively, can hardly be faulted, critics look overseas to Great Britain, which has one of the most complete systems of socialized medicine. One of the first objections to the British system is that it restricts freedom of choice and lowers overall standards of care; the fact that fully private care is available to anyone in Britain who can pay for it would appear to answer that question effectively."
| |
|
Health Care in the United States, 2006.
A look at two major problems facing the health care industry in the United States and possible resolutions to these problems.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 4 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that two major problems in health care today in the U.S. are staffing shortages and the health care needs of the retiring baby boomer generation. The paper also explains that there are ways that hospital administrators can address these problems and describes what these methods are.
From the Paper
"Two major problems in health care today that can be addressed by hospital administrators are staffing shortages, and the health care needs of the retiring baby boomer generation. The issue of staffing in America's hospitals began when salaries were cut, working conditions became inadequate, and overtime was mandatory at many health care facilities. Because of these factors many nurses left the health care field, and those that were considering nursing careers chose other professions. Now, as the baby boomer generation prepares to retire in massive numbers, Americans are concerned that there will not be a sufficient number of nurses to care for this aging population. Yet, hospital administrators have the ability to begin a resolution to each of these issues. Staffing shortages in health care are primarily evident in the nursing field, with fewer individuals in these groups comprising the staff at..."
| |
|
Health Care and Nursing in the United States, 2004.
Examines how health care reforms in the past years have affected America's uninsured and the nursing industry.
2,111 words (approx. 8.4 pages), 11 sources, MLA, $ 66.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how the health care reforms instituted under the past two presidencies have failed to address the problems of uninsured Americans in the United States. The first part of this paper examines the long road to health care reforms. It pays special attention to the thorny issue of universal insurance and the trends towards the privatization of health care. The next part of the paper then focuses specifically on the field of nursing. It looks at how health care reforms have changed the nature of a nurse?s job, increasing both the level and difficulty of a nurse?s workload. These changes also have significant implications for the quality of patient care in health care facilities and the rise in the number of self-care practitioners in the United States.
From the Paper
"Many nurses also report a rise in patient acuity. The privatization of healthcare has resulted in a new mindset in the medical workplace, one that requires hospitals to limit admissions to only ?the sickest patients for the shortest possible stays? (Sochalski and Aiken 1999:1). In addition to the increase in the number of patients, nurses are also managing an increased number of patients who are much more ill and who require more attention. As a result, the level and difficulty of a nurse?s workload has significantly increased."
| |
|
Health Care Reform In the United States, 2002.
This paper discusses Clinton's 1993 "State of the Union Address" and his health care promises.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 6 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This short paper discusses Clinton's 1993 "State of the Union Address" and promise that during his presidency all Americans would find themselves covered by some form of medical insurance. Seven years later, in the twilight of his presidency he continues to promise health care reform. This paper also looks at why nurses support health care reform. The focus of the paper will be on the benefits of health care reform.
| |
|
Universal Health Care in United States, 2002.
Examining the health care crisis in the States, reasons for the crisis and possible solutions.
3,589 words (approx. 14.4 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 100.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The first part of this paper examines the scope of the current healthcare crisis, with a special focus on New Jersey. It looks at the number of uninsured people in America, the rising costs of health insurance and other reasons why more and more people cannot afford adequate health care. The paper then studies why the current healthcare system fails to address their health needs. After looking at the failed health reform plan of former President Clinton and the various grassroots efforts towards providing low- or no-cost health insurance, the paper discusses the need for a single payer system of national health insurance.
From the Paper
"The United States has arguably the most scientifically advanced healthcare system in the world. Its physicians and scientists make significant strides in complex medical procedures such as organ transplants and treating cancer. People from around the world travel to the United States to consult with health experts and to seek medical help. It is therefore a sad irony that an estimated 44 million Americans could not afford adequate medical care. A growing number of Americans do not have health insurance and live in fear of an unexpected illness and financial ruin."
| |
|
The United States Health Care System, 2008.
Argues for universal health care in the United States.
2,195 words (approx. 8.8 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 68.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper states that the United States is virtually the only industrialized country in the world that does not automatically give citizens the benefit of free health care, but notes that there are, however, several other types of health care options in the U.S.. The paper then describes problems with these health care options such as that they require the individual to independently pay for private health insurance or Medicare. Next, the paper relates that, in other countries such as Canada and Britain, the universal health care concept is viewed as very successful. The paper contends that when the United States government realizes that universal health care is the best option, all citizens of the U.S. will begin to live a healthier life.
From the Paper
"The quality of health care in the United States can be considered opinionated to a certain extent but the amount of money the U.S. spends in comparison to other countries is inarguably absurd. There cannot be any denial of the inflation rate of uninsured citizens. The number of Americans without health insurance is now up to 45,000,000. That is a huge increase considering that in 1990 there were 35,000,000 uninsured citizens. Being uninsured increases your chance of fatality. If a universal health care system were to come into existence, we would see far less deaths in the U.S."
| |
|
Managed Care in the United States, 2006.
A look at the origins and history of managed care in the United States.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 6 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Managed care in the United States consists of Health Management Organizations (HMOs), Preferred Provider Organizations (PPOs), and Medicaid and Medicare. These organizations arose as the growing population of the United States began to demand forms of health insurance that would not only provide services to workers but also their families. This paper discusses managed care health organizations in the US, looking at the reasons these organizations came into being, their origins and their original purpose.
| |
|
Health Care in the United States, 2006.
This paper discusses and argues that health care in the United States is a spectacular mess.
2,700 words (approx. 10.8 pages), 15 sources, $ 106.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper argues that the above quotation accurately sums up the situation of health care in the United States. As is argued, there are many aspects to this mess. The writer points out that the most important is that millions of Americans do not have health care, or have insufficient health care. Further, the writer notes that millions of Americans are unproductive because of this, and thousands die. Other problems mentioned are that the health care system is more expensive than it needs to be, due to a number of factors.
| |
|
Health Care Systems Of United States And The United Kingdom, 2002.
Compares healthcare costs and outcomes.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 7 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Compares healthcare costs and outcomes. Underlying structures and principles of healthcare in each country. Social policy. Health care delivery. Advantages & disadvantages of each. Focus on quantitative measures (costs, mortality rates, quality, access to care, public satisfaction). Managed care. Fee-for-service. Primary care. Chart of costs. Table of outcomes.
From the Paper
"COMPARATIVE HEALTH CARE COSTS & OUTCOMES ? UNITED KINGDOM & UNITED STATES
The structures and the principles underlying the health care systems in the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (US) are dramatically different. Depending upon one?s perspective on social policy generally and health care delivery more specifically advantages and disadvantages characterize each country?s health care system in relation to that of the other country.
This research compares the costs and outcomes of health care delivery in the UK and the US. The primary focus of this comparison is on quantitative measures. The quantitative measures presented in this research, however, reflect both objective data (e.g., actual costs, mortality rates, and so ..."
| |
|
Health Care in The United States and Denmark, 2002.
An in-depth research paper comparing the health care policy in the United States and Denmark.
6,680 words (approx. 26.7 pages), 19 sources, MLA, $ 152.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay is an extensive comparison of health care policy in the U.S. and Denmark. It examines the major differences between the two countries and their policies by illustrating the vast difference in the population and geographical size of the two countries, plus the contrasting political systems of competitive free enterprise system within the democratic U.S. versus a long standing national health system of socialized medicine, supplemented by private sector resources in the much smaller constitutional monarchy of Denmark. The paper describes the common factors shared by the two nations are that they are industrialized Western country with an economy based on capitalism and a tradition of private medical practice. The paper includes a historical survey of health care policy, insurance and services in each country.
From the Paper
"Comparison of health care policy in the United States to health care policy in Denmark is essentially a comparison of a very large country with a free enterprise competitive system within a democracy to a much smaller constitutional monarchy with a long standing national health system of socialized medicine, supplemented by private sector resources. In the US, where national health insurance is non-existent, medical care is largely privately controlled with minimal government regulation except for public sector Medicare and Medicaid programs, created in 1965, to aid the poor and elderly. Denmark, under state supervision, provides health insurance for all residents and administers basically free health care, administered by counties and municipalities, for all who apply, with private supplementation available as desired. This essay presents a brief historical overview and general comparison of the two countries current policies and offers comparative analysis of the following specific aspects of the policies: health insurance, private vs. public sector programs, free enterprise, recent developments and future possibilities.
Among the greatest differences to be noted in consideration of the contrasting health systems of Denmark and the U.S. is the vast variance in population size and make up. In 2001 the population of Denmark was approximately 5 and a half million. The U.S. in 2001 had a population of over 278 million (http://www.worldfactsandfigures.com/worldfactspop.php).
Denmark is a high-income industrialized country, one of the ten richest countries in the world in terms of GNP per head with a generally homogeneous population and little immigration. The United States, although a wealthy industrialized nation has a much more diverse population with higher poverty and immigration rates ( http://www.who.dk.). Denmark is also a much older nation than the relatively young U.S. Historians believe that the Danes were living on the Scandinavian peninsula as early as the fourth and fifth century AD Over the centuries the Danes developed a strong national identity and sense of themselves as a nation that takes care of its people. In modern times they developed from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy with a 98% Lutheran population. (Encarta) In contrast, the U.S. has developed rapidly in the years since 1776 into an internationally powerful nation with a strong tradition of fierce personal economic independence which may have contributed to this nation's delay in developing a national health care system."
| |
|
Health Care in the United States, 2004.
Examines initiatives by the U.S. government to provide cheaper health care to all its citizens.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The citizens of the United States benefit from the latest technologies in medical treatments and a comprehensive health care system. Providing excellent health care at the most affordable price has been the motto of every government that has functioned in America. The paper shows that the current Republican government has also taken considerable measures, and new policies have been implemented to bring down the surging Medicare costs and to provide quality health care for everyone in the nation. The paper shows, however, that the government is also faced with a growing problem. America not only has the best health care facilities in the world, but also has one of the largest, growing populations of aged people. The increasing litigation and the rising Medicare costs have necessitated new plans by the government. This paper examines the problem in detail and looks into the measures adopted by the government in response to the growing demand for cost effective health care.
From the Paper
"It is not infrequently that we see health insurance companies denying patients the right to have particular treatments, citing that they are ?medically unnecessary? or out of insurance coverage. The new bill has ensured that care seekers are not at the mercy of the insurance companies when it comes to choosing the type of treatment. In other words the initiative taken by the government in the form of the new bill has cleared most of the administrative roadblocks and made the health insurance plans more transparent and friendly to the patients. [Mike Enzi]"
| |
|
Health Care and The United States Government, 2006.
A review of the history of health care security in the USA.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 3 sources, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews the history of health care security in the United States. According to this paper, health care security became a significant issue among citizens with the rise of industrialization in the early 1900s. The paper further reports that prior to this time there was a general societal concern for secured health care, but it was not until industrialization that the country began to realize that millions were being affected by an inefficient manner of health care in the country.
| |
|
Health-Care in the United States, 2002.
This paper examines the drawbacks of a health-care system that is dominated by HMOs.
1,907 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 60.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper looks at the health-care system in the United States, first defining the HMO as the blend of insurer and health-care provider that was born in the 1970s and became an important element of American society by the late 1980s. The writer argues that among the most important drawback to this system is the limited choice that HMOs allow patients in choosing their physicians. The paper looks into these and other limitations of the HMOs.
From the Paper
"Alternatively, all prescribed medical expenditures, in and out of the hospital, may be covered by a comprehensive major medical policy. Such policies, also issued by large medical insurance companies like Blue Cross and Blue Shield as well as by general commercial insurance companies, typically require the patient to pay an initial fee (the deductible) and a percentage of any amount above the deductible; this percentage is called the coinsurance rate. Usually, an upper limit is specified on the benefits payable under the policy, but this amount may be extremely high (perhaps $250,000) (Court and Smith, 1999, p. 27)."
| |
|
Death In Pediatric Health Care Units, 2002.
Examines family and health care staff stress.
3,375 words (approx. 13.5 pages), 44 sources, $ 119.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Examines family and health care staff stress. Emotional and psychological impact. Children's understanding of death and their special set of needs. Other environments for dying children than hospitals (professional home care, pediatric hospice). Psychosocial effects on families and on medical professionals. Issue of burnout in oncology staff. Need for end-of-life education.
From the Paper
"This research examines family and health-care-staff stress in the context of death in health-care pediatric units. The plan of the research will be to provide an overview of the subject and then to present a review of relevant literature, with a view toward identifying major and subsidiary issue fronts relative to this topic.
That a child should predecease his parents is the most wretched of cosmic ironies. The subject has informed a body of popular literature, of which John Gunther's Death Be Not Proud, written in 1949 and taking its title from a sonnet by John Donne, is exemplary:
The impending death of one's child raises many questions on one's mind and heart and soul. It raises all the infinite questions, each answer ending in another question. What is..."
| |
|
Health Care Managers and Health Care Delivery, 2004.
Examines the relationship that exists between health care players, how they perform their duties, and how they join their forces in health care delivery.
2,367 words (approx. 9.5 pages), 9 sources, APA, $ 72.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines and provides information on the roles and responsibilities that health care managers are tasked to accomplish in today?s health care systems. Moreover, this paper examines how a health care manager's job as a leader who ensures a smooth and organized management and operation of health organizations, influences his/her perspective on health care professions. The paper emphasizes the importance of understanding how health care managers perceive their duties in health care service.
From the Paper
"The basic role every manager must be able to render is the task of providing good human relations to everyone at work. Through this role, the objective of accomplishing jobs in an environment where good work relationship is maintained can be made possible. In the field of health care, healthcare managers must have the ability to perform this basic responsibility. A healthcare manager should be a specialist in managing the condition of the healthcare staffs. Though this duty may be perceived as a simple task, it is critical that a good human resource management be delivered to a health organization to ease the stress and pressure that health care providers, such as the doctors and nurses, experience from their duties."
|
|
|
