| Papers [1-15] of 22 :: [Page 1 of 2] | | Go to page : 1 2 —> | Search results on "HABEAS CORPUS": |
|
|
Habeas Corpus, 2004.
Explores the history of Habeas Corpus.
5,893 words (approx. 23.6 pages), 12 sources, MLA, $ 140.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the history of Habeas Corpus and the role it plays in the law today. It looks at how the scope of Habeas Corpus has changed over time, what Habeas Corpus came to mean in English courts, and what it meant to the U.S. founding fathers when they included it in the Constitution. The paper then focuses on the history of Habeas Corpus in the U.S. by looking at how the Civil War, World War II, and Supreme Court rulings have affected and influenced its implementation. The paper also looks at limitations of Habeas Corpus and how Supreme Court rulings regarding Habeas Corpus have also affected the United States form of government.
Outline
The Start of Habeas Corpus
Early Beginnings
American Habeas Corpus
Habeas Corpus Act
Habeas Corpus
Habeas Corpus Defined
The Great Writ
Judiciary Act of 1789
Suspension of Habeas Corpus
Suspension by Lincoln
Testing the Issue
Seizing Power
After the Civil War
Resolution in 1924
Influence on World War II
Expansion in 1942
Abuse of the Writ
Total Exhaustion
1991 Decision
Limitations
Death Penalty and the Supreme Court
Effect on the Government
The Court?s Decision
California and HR 4167
Handling of Habeas Corpus Proceedings
California Habeas Corpus Resource Center
Requirements for Habeas Counsel
2255?s Original Purpose
Delay in Finality
Modern Day Sense
From the Paper
"Habeas corpus was first introduced in England in 1215 when the Magna Carta was written. When habeas corpus was first used, it had a limited range. Over time the scope expanded due to jurisdictional disputes between the superior courts and local courts of England. Habeas corpus cum causa was the form of habeas corpus used by the courts which ?compelled the sheriff to produce the prisoner who was the subject of the courts? jurisdictional dispute (Orye, law review).? A series of crucial cases which began with the Case of the Five Knights and concluded with the Chamber?s Case questioned the ?validity of commitments, previously an incidental effect of the writ, making it a major object (Orye, law review).?"
| |
|
President Lincoln and Habeas Corpus, 2004.
An overview of President Lincoln?s suspension of habeas corpus during the Civil War.
7,209 words (approx. 28.8 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 160.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines President Lincoln?s suspension of the writ of habeas corpus throughout the Civil War. Habeas corpus is the right not to be held or imprisoned without being charged and given a trial. It looks at how Lincoln suspended the right in varying degrees throughout the war and used as a way to protect the Union from insurgents within. It explores how some have charged Lincoln with dictatorship and circumventing the Constitution for doing this. The paper takes on the argument that Lincoln was acting justly and in the best interest of his country. The paper explains each act of suspension, outlines what caused the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus, the Act that suspended the writ and what the stipulations were, and also what the outcome was. In addition, it examines the some arrests under the suspension, popular opinion, and the opinion of a Supreme Court judge. The thesis is that President Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus for the good of the nation and to protect it from those who wished to do the government harm, and in doing so, held this nation together in its most trying time.
Outline
Lincoln Acts to Protect the Capitol
Getting a Hold on Suspending Habeas Corpus
The Policy Questioned
Lincoln Answers for His Actions
Expanding the Suspension
Congress Supports the President
Lincoln Defends His Policy
Habeas Corpus Suspended Nationwide
The Last Suspension Proclamation
From the Paper
"As the American Civil War began to come to a rolling boil President Lincoln was faced not only with rebels in the South but insurgents within the Union as well. There was no question how to deal with the rebels in the South who took up arms against the government. But those in the North who attacked their government in other ways were another, more difficult issue. One effective way to deal with these insurgents was to detain them for their own safety and for the safety of the nation. But many times this proved difficult because the insurgents could not be formally charged and without being formally charge the writ of habeas corpus allows them not to be detained."
| |
|
Habeas Corpus, 2007.
An analysis of the implementation of habeas corpus in Australian law and its effect on issues such as asylum seekers and anti-terror legislation.
5,334 words (approx. 21.3 pages), 30 sources, APA, $ 131.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how the broader-brushstroke concepts of the Australian democratic system are more frequently becoming the subjects of debate and reform, particularly as the tenets of democracy are criticized by those who espouse extremist views. In particular, the paper discusses whether the fundamental remedy of habeas corpus can be effective in the face of arbitrary uses of executive power, particularly with reference to issues such as indefinite detention of asylum seekers and the introduction of new anti-terror legislation in Australia. Comparisons are also made with U.S., Canadian and British law.
Outline:
The Foundation and Source of Habeas Corpus
Historical United States Examples
Present Understandings of Habeas Corpus in Australia
Indefinite Detention and Habeas Corpus
Migration Act 1958 and Related Legislation
Tampa, Ruddock v Vardalis (VCCL v MIMA) and Lim's Case
Al-Khateb and Al Khafaji
Recent United States Cases
Recent Cases in the United Kingdom
Recent Cases in Canada
The Communist Party Case
Anti-Terror Legislation - Proposals and Motivations
Conclusions
From the Paper
"As predicted in 2001, the applicability of laws relating to mandatory detainees incarcerated indefinitely arose, and was tested by the High Court. In Al-Khateb and Al Khafaji the majority of the High Court concluded that, provided the Immigration Minister retained the intention of eventually deporting such people, the detention would be valid even if it was potentially indefinite. Whilst it was determined that, people who do not necessarily pose any danger to the community and have committed no crime - 'unlawful non-citizens' kept in immigration detention indefinitely was not unconstitutional. There is some prospect of future cases overturning this, due to the sharp division in substantive reasons by judges. "
| |
|
Habeas Corpus - Civil Liberty or Civil Right, 2008.
An analysis of civil liberties and civil rights and which of them applies to habeas corpus.
3,137 words (approx. 12.5 pages), 15 sources, APA, $ 91.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the origins and history of habeas corpus, from its roots that predate the Magna Carta through to the present day, where it is being employed to the benefit of hundreds that wrongly languish in prison. The paper also explains the distinction between civil right and civil liberty and discusses which applies to habeas corpus. Lastly, the paper looks at the historic ups and downs of habeas corpus and discusses its unique place in the Constitution, separate from provisions contained in the Bill of Rights.
From the Paper
"Rights and liberties need to be at their strongest when public support is at its weakest. Civil rights are decreed by law, civil liberties are God given, and the actions of legislatures are inevitably governed by the politics of the time. Habeas corpus is a civil liberty included among the "self evident truths" of the Declaration of Independence, and alone one of the civil liberties that can be suspended by acts of the government during times of crisis. The president judged by history as one of the best, sought to suspend these liberties in time of extreme crisis in the nation's young history. It was circumvented to increase support during a world war, to intern "dangerous" citizens during another, and to grant due process rights to perpetrators of the war for the new millennium. It is now freeing hundred of wrongly convicted people of a crime. The future of habeas corpus is uncertain in the short term, but solid in the future as all inalienable rights bestowed upon the common man by his creator."
| |
|
Habeas Corpus, 2004.
A discussion of Abraham Lincoln?s suspension of the writ of habeas corpus.
2,020 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines Abraham Lincoln's actions regarding habeas corpus during the Civil War. The paper describes how Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus so that anti-Unionists might be summarily arrested. The paper presents various cases of arrests and imprisonments that occurred due to Lincoln's actions. Civil rights issues are discussed as are reactions to Lincoln's suspension of the writ of habeas corpus.
From the Paper
"Abraham Lincoln?s suspension of the writ of habeas corpus was considered by some to be the act of a traitor. Habeas corpus protects individuals from arbitrary imprisonment by the government and is for all intents and purposes, a right provided by the Constitution. Lincoln?s suspension raised questions about civil rights that ring familiar in light of the Patriot Act. While Lincoln defended his actions as preventative measures when the country was in a time of war, many individuals challenged his decision. In a historical context, Lincoln?s action was not a coup d??tat, but rather an act intended to prevent tension that existed within the country from growing out of control."
| |
|
"Habeas Corpus", 2005.
A review of Alan Bennett's "Habeas Corpus".
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 1 source, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper reviews the play "Habeas Corpus" by British playwright Alan Bennett. This two acts play, written in 1973 and set in the 1960s explores homosexuality.
| |
|
"Habeas Corpus", 2005.
A theatrical review of the play "Habeas Corpus" by Alan Bennett.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 1 source, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses "Habeas Corpus", a comedy written in the early 1970s by a British playwright Alan Bennett. The play is set in the 1960s Britain, the era of sexual revolution and turmoil in society. The play is set up in a typical British town in the 1960s. The paper analyzes how, on the surface it is a farce about sexual relations, and when it was first shown in the early 1970s, it must have been somewhat daring, even scandalous.
| |
|
Lincoln?s Wartime Actions: An Example of the Tyranny of the Executive, 2005.
Argues that Abraham Lincoln's Civil War suspension of the writ of habeas corpus represents a quintessential example of the breakdown of separation of powers and checks and balances.
3,137 words (approx. 12.5 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 91.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper shows that the danger of tyrannical abuses of power that had once so deeply concerned the Anti-Federalists was realized by Abraham Lincoln's abuses of his executive power that took place during the American Civil War. The paper argues that the most important of these was his suspension of the writ of habeas corpus. Other actions that may have exceeded the limits of presidential authority included the closing of mail services to publications considered to be treasonous, the imprisonment of individuals who had merely exercised their First Amendment rights to free speech by publicly opposing the war and Lincoln's actions, and several financial arrangements in support of the war, such as paying civilians a total of $2 million to assist in military recruiting. The paper explains that under the Constitution, Congress rather than the president has the authority to declare war and to control the mails, the military and the purse.
From the Paper
"During the critical formation stages of our government, several issues on which many of the Founding Fathers disagreed still demanded to be resolved. One of the major problems that bothered the Anti-Federalists was the amount of power provided to the executive, which they believed was too extensive and far-reaching. They feared that this excessive authority might eventually allow the executive to become tyrannical, and a tyrannical executive power was exactly what these men had managed to escape from in England through the Revolutionary War. Less than a century after the Founders had abandoned the Articles of Confederation and the states had ratified our Constitution, the executive did in fact demonstrate this dangerous foray into tyrannical abuses of power that had once so deeply concerned the Anti-Federalists."
| |
|
The Corpus Pauline Literature, 2002.
An overview of the development of the corpus Pauline literature including the origins and the controversies surrounding it.
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 5 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is on the development of the corpus Pauline literature from occasions for the writing of the letters themselves and the earliest collection of letters to the final canonical stage. It also discuss the reasons for the writing of new letters in the name of Paul, the later use of Paul's letters, and the controversies surrounding the heritage of the great apostle to the Gentiles.
| |
|
The Patriot Act: An Essential Weapon, 2008.
This paper presents arguments in favor of the USA Patriot Act of 2001.
2,158 words (approx. 8.6 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 67.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper attempts to demonstrate that the USA Patriot Act is a prudent and necessary legislation to protect the United States from the real threat of terrorism. The paper argues that the perceived threat to our civil liberties is unfounded. The paper compares the provisions of the Act to truly outrageous actions taken in the past by a government in crisis, such as the Alien Sedition Acts of 1798 and the suspension of habeas corpus by President Lincoln.
From the Paper
"The USA Patriot Act is the often discussed, much maligned, and little understood legislation that was put forward in response to the tragic aftermath of the 9/11 attacks that destroyed the World Trade Center in New York, heavily damaged the Pentagon in Washington D.C., and left a crater in Shanksville, Pennsylvania as a testimony to the heroics of ordinary citizens faced with the new reality of life during the first war of this young century. This abbreviated name wrongly suggests a simple law, and has been the target of many groups citing the end of personal civil liberties and the coming of a new police state. Nothing could be farther from the truth, in fact, this Act is extremely complex, far less reactionary that previous laws enacted during wartime, and fundamentally necessary to protect our fellow citizens from another early morning tragedy to unfold on live television."
| |
|
Abraham Lincoln: A President Under Fire, 2001.
A look at the problems faced by Abraham Lincoln, first American President.
2,529 words (approx. 10.1 pages), 8 sources, APA, $ 76.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper goes over the challenges that Abraham Lincoln faced during his presidency, as well as the sources of these challenges. Topics covered include the various elements of the Civil War Crisis, his suspension of the writ of habeas corpus, his issuing of the emancipation proclamation, and many others. This is an in-depth analysis of Lincoln's presidency, from several points of view.
From the Paper
"Today, it seems unfathomable that Abraham Lincoln be considered anything besides a great war leader and one of the greatest presidents in the history of the United States of America. While he was in office, however, many Americans, both from the North and the South did not share this opinion. During his presidency, Lincoln acquired many enemies and made a number of decisions that made him a target of great hostility. No matter what measures Lincoln took, ultimately, he was criticized. If he leaned one way, he would be chastised by one group, and if he leaned the other way, harsh words would reign down upon him from another sector of society. Basically, Lincoln found himself in a no win situation."
| |
|
Language Planning, 2003.
Presents a theoretic view of language planning (LP).
3,538 words (approx. 14.2 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 99.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that language policy is a big problem in developing countries, especially in the Maghreb world, which was under the French rule: Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco. The paper defines language planning (LP) as the activity of preparing a normative orthography, grammar and dictionary for the guidance of writers and speakers in a non-homogeneous speech community and relates that language planning includes language policy. The paper then discusses corpus, status and acquisition planning using examples mainly from the French Academy and the Hebrew revival movement.
Table of Contents:
A Theoretical View on Language Planning (LP)
Introduction
Definitions and Elements of LP
The Term "Language Planning"
Two Different Definitions of LP
Elements of Language Planning
Types of Language Planning
Corpus Planning
Status Planning
Acquisition Planning
Examples of Language Planning and Language Planning Policies
The "Academie Francaise" as an Example of Corpus Planning
The Promotion of Hebrew in Palestine as an Example of Status Planning
Examples of Language Planning Policies: Policy A, B, C.....
From the Paper
"Richelieu established the AF. In 1624, he became first minister in Louis XIII. Richelieu was so close to artists, writers in particular. In 1629, a group of men interested in language and literature started to meet at a rich man's house just for conversation. Richelieu wanted to transform this club into an official institution serving the country. He formed this group into an official body. He had a political purpose. He wanted them to work on his behalf by supporting his policies, which is the main reason behind his finding of the AF. "
| |
|
Corpora in Promoting Second Language Learning, 2008.
An analysis of the benefits of using corpora in the classroom in order to promote second language learning and a discussion of how teachers can overcome the difficulties of its use.
3,197 words (approx. 12.8 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 92.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how the use of corpora in the classroom would facilitate second language learning. The paper also discusses how the English as a second language teachers could overcome the difficulty in teaching English vocabulary in context through the use of the corpora. The paper hypothesizes that use of corpora will facilitate second language learning by contextualizing the taught vocabulary and providing a real discourse.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Definition of the Problem
Importance of the Study
Research Objectives
Research Hypothesis
Literature Review
Computer-based Corpus
Applying Vocabulary
Current Knowledge of Corpus Benefits
Methodology
Subjects
Instrument
Procedures
Data Analysis
Validity and Reliability
Scope and Limitations
From the Paper
"The scope of the study is to measure whether there is significant benefit in using corpus based materials over traditional methods for second language vocabulary learning. It is acknowledged that there are various limitations which the study must impose. The first of these is that the study is limited only to the one language school, and although there are a spectrum of students who attend the school, the results of the study may not translate into identical results when the study is taken outside of the school. In order to assess whether current curriculum structure should incorporate such methods outside of the language school in which the study is conducted it may be necessary to conduct a much large longitudinal study, involving several language schools in different areas."
| |
|
Folklore as Narrative Genre, 2008.
A discussion of folklore as a viable narrative genre of myths, legends and fables.
1,280 words (approx. 5.1 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a look at folklore, a body of tales of the common populace or 'folk'. It challenges the idea that modern society does not have a corpus folklore anymore, and that contemporary listeners have moved on from such superstitious ways of looking at the world. It argues that modern society still contains its own myths, legends, and fables, even though these tales may not always be called 'folklore.' The paper concludes that folklore remains part of our culture, and most cultures, because narrative is such an effective means of teaching lessons, and passing on commonly received wisdom and teachings.
From the Paper
"Fables thus reaffirm common cultural lessons, as legends affirm common cultural vales and myths create a sense of a common national or group purpose. Although animal tales may have declined in popularity as teaching stories, there remain many fables that are told and retold to children and adults alike, over the dinner table. Quite literally, the fable that children are often told, that their parents had it 'so much harder' and that they had to walk 'miles through the snow to get to school' is never literally believed or taken seriously, like the myth of Columbus or even the Kentucky Fried Rat. But the tale is meant half-seriously, in hopes that children will appreciate the moral, that they should honor the sacrifices of their elders in deference to what their elders have suffered on their accord, so the next generation can enjoy a better life."
| |
|
Darwin and Religion, 2008.
An analysis of the role of religion in the controversy surrounding Darwin's theories in the nineteenth century.
1,711 words (approx. 6.8 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how during the nineteenth century there was controversy surrounding Darwin's publication of "On the Origin of Species". It looks at how his arguments were so contrary to mainstream religious thought that, although they were quickly incorporated into the scientific corpus, the religious community and the lay public has had a more difficult time accepting Darwin's thesis.
From the Paper
"The scientific importance of Darwin's ideas, thus, was not without precedent. Other scholars had suggested similar explanations for speciation. What differentiated Darwin was the incredible wealth of observations and experimental evidence that he amassed in order to demonstrate the validity of his theory (McGowen 21). Despite this evidence, the explanation generated controversy almost from the start. Some of this controversy unquestionably came from the scientific community, which would have debated and argued the finer points of Darwin's work to determine its worthiness as an explanation for natural phenomenon."
|
|
|
