| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "GUN CONTROL MISGUIDED PURSUIT": |
|
|
Gun Control: A Misguided Pursuit, 2002.
An essay on the fallibility of the ideals of gun control advocates.
1,405 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the three major arguments of gun-control advocates and disproves them one by one. The major arguments are - more guns, more crimes; possible accidental deaths and criminal access to guns.
Thesis: Despite the good intentions of gun control advocates, their means in attaining what they want are entirely misguided and misinformed.
Table of Contents
Accidental Death
Child killed by ownership of firearm
Suicide in relation to ownership of firearms
More Guns More Crime
Gun ownership as a crime prevention
Gun ownership for self-defense is most common
Gun ownership as a deterrent to tyranny
Criminal Acquisitions of Guns
Limiting the attainability legally of guns only limits law-abiding citizens
Criminals acquire guns on black market
Brady Laws do nothing to deter criminal misuse
From the Paper
"Gun Control has been a center issue in American Politics for quite some time. Advocates of Gun Control often state the hazards of owning guns and their constant use in criminal activity. The ultimate solution for these people is to completely eliminate the right of an individual to own a gun. On the other hand, the Anti-Gun Control advocates state that people are responsible for their own actions and that the existence of the gun is not what causes crime, or accidental death. So despite the good intentions of Gun Control advocates, their means in attaining what they want are entirely misguided and misinformed."
| |
|
Gun Control Policies do Not Save Lives, 2006.
A position paper arguing against gun control laws.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 4 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the argument espoused by gun control advocates that gun control and licensing measures in the United States represent a political solution to avert the loss of lives due to handguns and firearm use. The paper suggests that these gun control advocates have long utilized an alternate reading of the Constitution's Second Amendment to argue that the Constitution itself does not permit individual firearm ownership and that therefore the right to bear arms is a misguided interpretation of the Constitution.
From the Paper
| |
|
The Misguided Advice of Friar Laurence in "Romeo and Juliet", 2003.
How Shakespeare uses the character of Friar Laurence to alter the destinies of "Romeo and Juliet".
1,370 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
An overview of the actions Friar Laurence took in advising Romeo and Juliet, his possible motivations, and their results. Split into three sections, the first focuses on the Friar's relationship with Romeo; the second, on his relationship with Juliet; and the third, tying the two together and exploring the consequences of the Friar's actions. The paper takes a somewhat defensive view of the Friar, pointing out that he did nothing maliciously, but that perhaps his confinement as a Franciscan monk had made him immature in his ability to advise the young lovers.
From the Paper
"In Romeo & Juliet, Friar Laurence provides an interesting departure from Shakespeare?s regular devices of tragedy. Instead of inescapable fate and/or evil schemers leading to the deaths of the main characters, Friar Laurence single-handedly causes one of Shakespeare?s greatest tragedies with no thought of evil, and no help from fate. Instead, misappropriated influence combined with lack of worldly experience, panic and cowardice conspire to alter the Friar?s well-intentioned advice and actions into the deaths of Romeo and Juliet, those he was trying to help."
| |
|
Rent Control, 2002.
This paper examines some of the arguments for and against rent controls.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 5 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper states that the impetus behind rent control is benevolent but misguided. The author believes that rent controls are more damaging than often believed and there is little that government policy can do to ameliorate the situation. The paper relates that price floors are economically unsound policy platforms, and it is more likely that rents would better be determined and controlled by the free use of market forces.
| |
|
Reduction of Gun Violence in Toronto, 2008.
This paper discusses social action versus stricter gun laws towards the reduction of gun violence in Toronto.
2,345 words (approx. 9.4 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 72.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer notes that gun violence in Toronto seems to have grown as a matter of public concern in recent years in response to a number of highly publicized incidents of gun violence. One of the most commonly proposed solutions to this problem is stricter gun laws. However, the writer points out that many have argued that stricter gun laws in isolation could not remedy this problem. This essay examines this issue with reference to the source of the weapons, systemic racism and class and social factors that contribute to Toronto's gun problem. The thesis is argued that stricter gun control laws/policies will not reduce gun violence in Toronto unless the above three factors are also addressed. Beginning with a description of the nature of the problem itself, this paper shows how there needs to be a multi-pronged effort at federal, provincial and municipal levels to address the underlying root causes that fuel gun violence in Toronto.
Outline:
Introduction
Gun Violence in Toronto - The Myth and the Reality
The Sources of Guns in Toronto
Gun Violence and Systemic Racism in Toronto
Social and Class Support
Conclusion
From the Paper
"In dealing with the question of gun violence in Toronto it is first necessary to define the parameters of the problem. To do this we must attempt to distinguish between the myths and the reality of gun violence in Toronto.
"The current concern with gun violence in Toronto stems from 2005 when 58 people were slain by firearms in Toronto, out of a total of 84 murders in the city that year. The concern with the violent use of firearms stems not only from the perception - as these numbers would suggest - that guns are increasingly used in acts of violence in Toronto, but that the profile of gun violence has also changed. The media designated the summer of 2005 as Toronto's "Summer of the Gun" and the year concluded with a Boxing Day gun fight between rival gangs near the crowded Yonge and Dundas intersection that killed 19 year old female bystander, and injured six others."
| |
|
Gun Control, 1991.
This paper argues that the second amendment, the right to bear arms is an essential safeguard of liberty and that gun control advocates are misguided.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 6 sources, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The Second Amendment states, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.". At the time of the Second Amendment, there was no national standing army. During and after the Revolution, the state militias were the bone and muscle of the nation's infantry. The basic Constitution, in Article 1, Section 8, empowered Congress to provide for "calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions.". The militias were regarded not only as a vital national resource, but also as the sole defense of the states against national encroachment and internal subversion.
For the next 100 years, the firearms used in the state ... "
| |
|
Gun Control Legislation, 2002.
Argues that gun control will prevent the unnecessary death of children by gun accidents without harming the rights of lawful gun owners.
2,150 words (approx. 8.6 pages), 12 sources, $ 80.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this paper, I discuss a childhood experience I had with firearms and then proceed to argue that while gun control laws don't prevent criminals from getting guns, they can help reduce the number of childhood deaths resulting from guns. Recent research suggests that legislation which implements safety locks on firearms, forces gun owners to store their weapons more safely and removes the legal loophole at gun shows can help reduce deaths from playing with guns and prevent easy access to firearms. These steps would not infringe on the rights of lawful gun owners and would have real benefits on society.
| |
|
Guns, 2006.
A look at the possibility of gun control or elimination and issues of the Second Amendment.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 3 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the idea of eliminating guns in society, noting that there are alternatives to violence that must be pursued. Polls suggest that a large number of Americans, and a clear majority in some states, favor gun control or even the elimination of guns from some regions. According to this paper, gun advocates cite the Second Amendment and hold that guns therefore cannot be eliminated or even controlled. The fact is that the elimination of most guns would certainly reduce gun deaths, reduce much street crime, and eliminate the many gun accidents that occur each year.
From the Paper
"Gun control in some degree is essential in a society as awash in guns as ours, and the argument that we need guns for hunting has nothing to do with handguns. In a democratic society, there are alternatives to violence that must be pursued. The problem with absolutists is that they cannot lose an argument or admit defeat, and this is an anti-democratic view."
| |
|
Gun Control, 1997.
Assesses some of the arguments for and against the restriction of guns for American citizens. Pro-gun arguments are based on the law, anti-gun arguments are based on medical and emotional arguments.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 9 sources, $ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Legislation requiring the registration of handguns and some control over the distribution and sale of handguns should be passed. Legislation banning the sale of any automatic weapon, including assault rifles, should be adopted. Such action should be taken at the federal level because guns, like the issue, cross state lines and make a mockery of the patchwork, state-by-state approach that presently exists. An examination of the issue shows that the arguments of the gun lobby are empty and that instituting controls on handguns in every state would reduce the number of guns in circulation and thus reduce the number of crimes committed with handguns.
Opponents of gun control believe that any controls at all, such as those on assault weapons in the Brady Bill legislation, will lead in time to the confiscation of guns, and they point to the ..."
| |
|
Gun Control, 2002.
A look at both sides of the gun control issue in the United States and an argument against gun control.
3,240 words (approx. 13.0 pages), 12 sources, APA, $ 93.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Gun control is a heated issue in political, social and religious circles. The paper discusses the philosophies and arguments of both camps. It describes how those who favor gun control claim it will stop the senseless murders which are on the increase in American society. The paper argues that although gun control looks good in theory, there are many reasons why it is not a plausible idea such as the fact that it is undemocratic and it will not remove the guns from the hands of criminals. The paper particulary focuses on the way that the issue of gun control has becoming so political in nature over the years.
From the Paper
"Gun control proponents have on their side the funding of many environmental groups while the anti gun control camp has the power and funding the National Rifle Association behind them(Cannon, 2000). The teams square off in many arenas including political, educational and moral debates. The Million Mom march was about guns as have been the national rallies held by the NRA at key political times in the nation?s history. Each side provides celebrities to help their cause(Cannon, 2000). The NRA has famed actor Charlton Heston who was president of the club for several years and traveled the nation speaking out against gun control, while the gun control advocates have Rosie O?Donnell on their side. Great controversy arose when it was discovered that O?Donnell, has hired and armed body guards for her three children(Cannon, 2000). She promotes gun control however, from the standpoint that the body guards are trained and licensed in the operation of weapons not to mention registered. Regardless of which side one is on in the debate there are points to be won for everyone. When all is said and done however gun control goes against everything this country stands for and therefore would be a mistake of tremendous magnitude(Cannon, 2000)."
| |
|
"Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture", 2002.
A review of "Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture" by Michael Bellesiles on popular gun culture in America today.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 1 source, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will discuss the book "Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture", by Michael Bellesiles and reveal the central strategies that the author brings out in his studies. By telling the nature of gun culture in America, we can see how this book analyzes the components of American culture within the realm of gun use and the laws being made to control it. All of these factors will be covered in discovering the motivation behind the book and what it is telling us about popular gun culture in America today.
| |
|
"Texans, Guns and History" ., 2002.
A review of the book "Texans, Guns and History" by Colonel Charles Askins on the relevance of guns in history.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 1 source, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will report on the book "Texans, Guns and History" by Colonel Charles Askins and reveal what the book is about and how it was written as a history on guns. By analyzing the different aspects of this book, we can see how the history of guns in Texas has been an integral part in the study warfare in general for United States. The aim of the author is to use the relevance of guns, as pertains to history and this will be explained here.
| |
|
Toy Guns, 2003.
A discussion of the danger of toy guns, the effect they have on children, their involvement in crimes, cases of mistaken identity, and laws involving toy guns.
854 words (approx. 3.4 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes how toy guns are becoming a danger to society because of their similarities to real guns; some are so realistic that even police officers cannot tell the difference. It shows how many people, including children, die as a result of these cases of mistaken identity and how, by being allowed to play with toy guns, children get the impression that they are acceptable, which can lead to aggressive behavior and a careless attitude toward real weapons. It looks at how New York City lawmakers are seeking approval for a bill that would potentially ban the sale of toy guns altogether.
From the Paper
"It is a parent?s job to teach their children about gun safety. Kids learn just about everything from their parents, including their views on gun use. Allowing them to play with toy guns is sending them the message that toy guns are OK, when, in fact, they are not. Children may not even know that guns are dangerous because they are sold as toys. In addition to creating a generation largely unafraid of guns, ?some studies have linked toy gun play with aggressive behavior, and some child health professionals counsel families to limit this type of activity? (Collins 1). Children are already confusing toy guns with real guns, leading to serious injury to both the child and others and when playing, they are in effect practicing to shoot a gun."
|
| Term Paper # 28219 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
|
|
Gun Control, 2005.
Advocates a solution to the problem of gun control that balances
interests on both sides of the issue and reduces the total amount of harm to society caused by gun ownership.
2,982 words (approx. 11.9 pages), 7 sources, APA, $ 88.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the gun control issue from a perspective that supports gun control and presents a solution to the problem that seeks to find a middle ground between the extremes of advocacy and the polemical argument against the issue. It is the position of this paper that regulation of guns is necessary because it will lower the amount of total harm that affects society and will save lives and reduce damages to individuals within the society. Although many present regulations have been ineffective in controlling the problem, the solution
provided by this paper seeks to find out exactly why these measures have failed to assay conclusions that will lead to a better and safer future in terms of gun control by learning from the mistakes of the past.
From the Paper
"Those who do not support gun control have their own arguments, and believe that gun control represents an infringement upon their constitutional right to bear arms. It should be kept in mind that this constitutional right was written in during a time in which America had just won an armed revolution against a colonial power, and that it was
mostly arranged to support the military, which was then present in the form of organized militias. But devising the true nature of the founding fathers? ideas about gun control is a business that is difficult to determine, since they arguably did not intend for their addition
to the Bill of Rights to culminate in the modern mass killings of high-school students and innocent civilians that we are seeing in a contemporary environment. It is the argument of this paper that the Second Amendment was probably not meant to apply to civilians,
but rather was a provision that helped the only army America had at this point, which was the organized militia."
|
|
|
