| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "GLASNOST DEMOCRATIZATION": |
|
|
Glasnost and Democratization, 2004.
An analysis of Mikhail Gorbachev's Glasnost and democratization under Boris Yeltsin.
2,518 words (approx. 10.1 pages), 10 sources, APA, $ 76.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The end of the Cold War found Mikhail Gorbachev and Boris Yeltsin seeking solutions for problems that needed to be solved. Their attempts to reform the socialist state are reviewed in this paper, followed by a summary of the research in the conclusion.
Outline
Introduction
Review and Discussion
Background and Overview
Gorbachev's Glasnost
Yeltsin and Democratization
Analysis
Conclusion
From the Paper
"In many ways, Mikhail Gorbachev came to power during a period in Soviet history where things had been going downhill for some time, and the Old Guard was dying off; however, the primary catalyst for reform during Gorbachev period of glasnost, or "openness," was one of economics. For example, in their book, Glasnost, Perestroika and the Socialist Community, Bukowski and Walsh (1990) report that, "The impetus for reform in the Soviet Union came from a number of directions, but the factor of fundamental importance was the economic one. Gorbachev's economic reforms are meant to revitalize a stagnant Soviet economy that has been growing at only about 2 percent annually for a decade. The reasons for the slowdown are partly internal and structural, and partly external." "
| |
|
Democratization: A Democratic Audit of Russia, 2006.
An audit of the emerging democracy in Russia using the principles outlined on the website, DemocraticAudit.com.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 3 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper uses the DemocraticAudit.com website in order to to audit democracy in Russia. The paper assesses whether the principles of democracy outlined by the site are being honored and administered in Russia as it emerges from its totalitarian past. These principles are identified in four blocks: Citizenship, Law and Rights; Representative and Accountable Government; Civil Society and Popular Participation; and Democracy beyond the State.
| |
|
Democratization in Hong Kong, 2005.
This paper discusses the pushes for and against democratization in Hong Kong.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 5 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer discusses the matter of democratization in Hong Kong. The writer looks at activism in favor of democratization. Further the writer examines forces against democratization in Hong Kong.
From the Paper
"The issue of democratization in Hong Kong is one that has polarized the former British colony, now a part of the People's Republic of China. Since the handover proceedings in 1997 and in the years leading up to it, there has been a strong political activism in favor of democratization. And while it can be difficult in the West, sometimes, to imagine a people that would not be wholeheartedly in favor of increased democratization, there are equally strong forces in Hong Kong acting to resist democratization."
| |
|
The Process of Democratization, 2005.
A discussion of the current issue in Iraq contrasts with the past process of democratization in post-WWII Germany and Japan.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines several recent attempts at democratization in the 20th century. The paper suggests that in Japan and Germany in the years following World War II, Allied attempts to foster the creation of democratic societies were successful to varying degrees. The paper then concludes that consequently many have drawn a parallel between democratization in those nations and current attempts to create a democratic society in Iraq.
From the Paper
"The Process of Democratization: How Does the Current Issue in Iraq Contrast with the Process in Post-World War II Germany and Japan? The process of democratization in a nation is not as simple and straightforward as many politicians would have us believe. This is evident when we examine several recent attempts at democratization in the 20th century. In Japan and Germany in the years following World War II, Allied attempts to foster the creation of democratic societies were successful to varying degrees."
| |
|
Democratization, 2005.
A discussion on the process and likelihood of democratization in the various former Soviet states.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 8 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at democratization in the various former Soviet states, noting that many observers are optimistic about the prospects for democratization in many of these states. It looks at how the likelihood of democratization in the different states depends on a number of variable factors, such as regional history, economic and political stability and international pressures.
From the Paper
"The Soviet bloc disintegrated in 1989, and immediately many in the West began worrying as to whether these states would be able to achieve democratization or democratic consolidation or would be further damaged by the effort. A more recent assessment finds that many observers are optimistic about the prospects for democratization in many of these states. The likelihood of democratization in the different states depends on a number of variable factors, such as regional history, economic and political stability, and international pressures. Philip G. Roeder, for instance, first defines democracy as an ideal arrangement in which more than fifty percent of the population is able to remove or prevent the removal of leaders (13). "
| |
|
Democratization in Iran, 2005.
A literature review on democratization in Iran.
3,375 words (approx. 13.5 pages), 13 sources, $ 133.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to review some of the existing literature on the subject of democratization in Iran. The goal is not to draw any specific conclusions about this political process or its prospects for success or failure. These are questions that can be examined and answered elsewhere. Instead the paper examines what current theorists are saying about the possibility of democratization in Iran and points out some existing trends in the literature that will guide further research into this issue.
From the Paper
"One of the most persistent discussions in the Western world, especially in political seats of power, in recent years has been the issue of Iran. Specifically, with Western and Islamic nations aligning themselves in direct conflict to one another, the possibility that Iran might develop nuclear weaponry is frightening for many Westerners. However, there is also increased discussion about the possibility of democratization in Iran. While this might seem a strange possibility given the general conception of Iran as an Islamic fundamentalist nation ruled with an authoritarian fist, the possibility is discussed seriously. Whereas recent U.S. efforts to democratize Iraq have been almost entirely imported, there is strong popular support for democratization in Iran. However, reconciling this popular demand with the authoritarian institutional structures in the nation is no easy task and should not be treated as such."
| |
|
Democratization in Middle Eastern Monarchies, 2006.
Examines the democratization process in three Middle Eastern countries: Jordan, Morocco, and Saudi Arabia.
2,475 words (approx. 9.9 pages), 15 sources, $ 97.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the countries of Jordan, Morocco, and Saudi Arabia and the progress or lack of progress made in their democratization. The paper examines their progress by looking at the process of globalization and democracy as a global social movement. The paper also looks at the concepts of constitutional monarchies, capitalism, and democracy as well as the impact of the IMF/World Bank on global democratization.
From the Paper
"Heavy US and UN intervention in the Middle East in the past 20 years has had some substantial effects on the governmental and social structures of various countries in that region. A few specific countries can be used as geopolitical barometers to understand the relationships between monarchy and democracy and their effects on the Middle Eastern world, specifically Jordan, Morocco and Saudi Arabia. All of which are highly significant in international relationships, and all are in various states of democratization. Looking at these three countries we will understand the relationships between democracy and democratization and their cultures and political structures, as well as the countries' relationship to globalization and international affairs."
| |
|
Resisting Democratization in Hong Kong, 2005.
This paper discusses reasons for and against the democratization of Hong Kong.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 5 sources, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at some of the arguments for and against the democratization of Hong Kong. The possible effects of democratization on global affairs are discussed. Also mentioned are the new anti-sedition laws passed by China's Communist government and the effects this would have on US-Chinese relations and Taiwan's independence. Some larger global issues are also mentioned in this article.
From the Paper
"It would seem absurd to suggest that any country's citizens does not want their country to become a democracy. We see daily news reports of citizens all over the world marching in demand to be allowed to hold free elections with universal suffrage. So why do two of the three major political parties in Hong Kong hold anti-democracy positions? This paper examines the reasons for and against democratization of China's Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, who holds those opinions and what future possible repercussions might be. Protests and demonstrations of over 500,000 people have been held yearly in Hong Kong, demanding the democratic rights of free elections for all people of voting age in the SAR."
| |
|
Democratization, 2003.
An analysis of democratization processes in Kuwait, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela.
5,750 words (approx. 23.0 pages), 38 sources, APA, $ 135.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper studies the democratization processes and outcomes in four countries: Kuwait, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela. The paper employs a multi-unit comparison. The paper begins by looking at economic issues that shape the current geopolitical situation and process of democratization, examining, specifically the effect of oil wealth of the Middle East. Next the paper discusses several key variables such as national and religious culture, political structure and geographic location. The paper concludes by comparing and contrasting Muslim/Eastern and Western views.
From the Paper
"The research problem to be addressed centers upon the relationship between democratization and the economic system of the so-called renter state, specifically focusing on those states..."
| |
|
The Democratization of Middle East, 2007.
This paper, written from an Islamic perspective, discusses what the writer views as roadblocks to the democratization process in the Middle East.
1,714 words (approx. 6.9 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper, written from a religious Islamic perspective, explores how diversity represents a major roadblock to achieving peace and harmony in the Middle East. The writer first describes the Muslim outlook on cultural diversity, as opposed to Christianity. The paper then highlights the different religious outlooks and sects within Islam. Several obstacles to establishing democracy in the Middle East are illustrated, with an emphasis on the suppression of minorities in the region. The author concludes citing Islamic concerns about democratization in Israel.
From the Paper
"The Sunni is the largest group of the Islamic faith, with nearly 90% of all Muslims subscribing to this practice (Ibrahim, p. 323-369). The Kharawaj is another major political force in the Islamic world. When the prophet Muhammad died he had no sons to inherit leadership. The primary point of contention between these two groups is how to decide the leadership succession. The Kharawaj reject the Sunni idea that bloodlines are the most important factor, but feel that the right to rule is divinely granted."
| |
|
Democratization, 2002.
A look at the debate of democratization.
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 1 source, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This six-page level three paper is for a European Studies class. The paper discusses the issues in the debate about democratization. It also includes some of the perceptions that the writer holds about this issue.
| |
|
Rapid Democratization in Hong Kong, 2005.
This paper assesses the pros and cons of rapid democratization in Hong Kong.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 6 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper briefly explores the pros and cons of rapidly democratizing Hong Kong despite the marked reluctance of the Chinese government to see this occur. The paper indicates that there are obvious advantages to rapid democratic reform, but also reveals the dangers that lie in pushing for too much, too soon. Finally, the paper concludes that the present "Two Systems" approach in China is ultimately unworkable.
From the Paper
"The matter of democratic reform in Hong Kong has caused much comment for a very long period of time. Despite popular demands for immediate democratic reform, many powerful individuals in the upper stratosphere of government - both in mainland China and in Hong Kong - have resisted calls for change. This paper will examine the arguments for and against immediate democratic reform, as well as taking a closer look at the individuals who are pushing for reform and those who are opposing it."
| |
|
Liberal Democracy and Democratization, 2005.
Examines the difference between liberal democracy and democratization.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 2 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this paper, it is shown that the elements of liberal democracy are not truly present in Iraqi, as the United States is controlling elections and policy made by the Iraqi government. The paper argues that democratizing Iraq will not yield positive results, as the American presence only increases terrorism and the need for the Iraqi people to demand sovereignty of their country. Though an aspect of American imperialism, there is little success in this format of foreign policy in American plans for the Middle East.
From the Paper
"This governmental study will analyze the difference between liberal democracies and those imposed democratized American institutions that now reside in Iraq. By divulging the process of government, which is now present in Iraq, one can reveal how the United States holds a greater power of influence in recently ousting past President Saddam Hussein. By understanding the economic and militaristic dominance of America over Iraq, the form of government of both of these countries present their differences in power and issues of sovereignty in development. In this manner, one can understand how democracies cannot be imposed, and that democratization is unsuccessful in the current Iraqi government. The new government of Iraq, since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein in 2003, has been a burgeoning republic, which has been being developed through American intervention."
| |
|
Economic Development and Democratization in East Asia, 1993.
Focusing on Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia and questioning whether economic development promotes democratization.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 4 sources, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Economic Development and Democratization
Introduction
Early development theory held certain tenets to be truths about how development was to proceed in countries that were not yet industrialized. The assumption was, for example, that the first priority was to create infrastructure, such as roads, dams, and airports, to support an industrial economy. Development theory has been refined, and in some instances changed, as the development process has proceeded in a number of different types of countries around the world. There are still some principles that are basic tenets of traditional development theory. One of these is the idea that population growth tends to fall as development increases and per capita income rises. Another is the belief that economic development promotes democratization. The focus in this paper is ..."
| |
|
Democratization and Underdeveloped Nations, 2004.
This paper discusses that the characteristics of democracy vary from one country to another.
3,575 words (approx. 14.3 pages), 12 sources, APA, $ 99.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the key element of democracy is majority rule, based on the idea that all citizens are equal, and the judgment of the many will be better than the judgment of the few. The author points out that another essential characteristic of democratic government is an independent judiciary to protect the integrity of the rules and the rights of individuals under these rules, especially against the government itself. The paper states that the issue of culture and democratization in underdeveloped nations is very delicate and encompasses issues of dominance on the international political stage and modern imperialism, which is extremely relevant to the current era of preemptive strikes against nations in the name of democratization.
From the Paper
"Political parties are also a necessary part of democratic government; rival parties make elections meaningful by giving voters a choice among candidates who represent different interests and points of view (Swank, 2003). The United States and many other countries, such as the United Kingdom have chiefly two-party systems, but many other democratic countries have multiparty systems (Swank, 2003). Often in these countries, no single party gains a majority in the legislature; as a result, two or more parties must join to make up such a majority, by forming a coalition government (Swank, 2003). In democratic countries, the party or parties that are out of power serve as the "loyal opposition", that is, they criticize the policies and actions of the party in power (Swank, 2003). In dictatorships, the people have no real choice among candidates, and no opportunity to express dissatisfaction with the government."
|
|
|
