| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "FUNCTIONALISM NEO": |
|
|
Functionalism and Neo-Functionalism, 2005.
This paper compares the ideas of functionalism and neo-functionalist schools in international relations.
920 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 6 sources, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper defines functionalism and neo-functionalism in international relations. The author includes references to these ideas and the work of David Mitrany and Jean Monnet.
From the Paper
"The political theory known as functionalism refers to that policy of shifting responsibility for resolving problems from the nation-state to international bodies indirectly by ..."
| |
|
Structural Functionalism and Neo-Marxism, 2002.
This paper compares and contrasts the primary basis for two main bodies of thought, according to modern sociological theory: structural functionalism and neo-Marxism. It then presents a critical analysis of their relevance to sociological thought.
4,767 words (approx. 19.1 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 122.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper also presents and discusses major variations within these approaches. Structural functionalism sees the social system as being made up of mutually dependant part. Neo-Marxist theory states that there are systemic biases that stem from conflict between two fixed classes that are endemic to capitalism.
From the Paper
"In analyzing Neomarxist theories, it is most effective to see the many varieties as a continuum, beginning with Marx and his original concept, then tracing the way sociological theorists have built on these and each others theories. Marx developed a theory that contained a far-reaching worldview. Because his perspective was so broad, 1 Ritzer, p. 207 there is considerable opportunity for conflict and irreconcilable differences among the theorists who each claim to be the true inheritor of the Marxian tradition.3 "
| |
|
Federalism Versus Neo-Functionalism, 1999.
This essay seeks to establish the extent to which the theories of federalism and neo-functionalism are different and similar to each other.
3,410 words (approx. 13.6 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 96.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper gives a comprehensive understanding of the application and theory-building nature of federalism versus neo-functionalism. The two theories are compared and contrasted for their similarities and differences, along with arguments about which theory is more influential to international organizations, as they have developed over the years. The U.N., E.U., NAFTA and CARICOM among others are mentioned as the analysis in the paper spans the developed and developing world.
From the Paper
"Both neo-functionalism and federalism are integration theories, which developed in the light of the European experience particularly after World War II, with federalism emerging first and neo-functionalism shortly after. With respect to neo-functionalism, an operational definition was given by M. Robert Shuman, embodied within a quotation in an outlined plan for the European Union. It was formerly called the Coal and Steel Union. He stated that: "Europe will not be made all at once, or according to a single general plan. It will be built through concrete achievements which first create a de facto solidarity...the pooling of coal and steel production will immediately provide for the setting up of common bases for economic development as a first step in the federation of Europe". Carl Friedrich, on the other hand, described federalism as: "A kind of constitutional order. The function it serves is to restrain the power wielded by the inclusive community and those in it..."."
| |
|
International Relations Theory, 1996.
Describes & compares functionalism, neo-functionalism & integration theory & their approach to global problems of change & conflict.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 9 sources, $ 79.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"International relations is an activity in which persons from more than one nation interact individually and in groups. Much of the scholarship of international relations arose between the world wars, as academics sought ways to prevent these tragedies. Several schools of thought emerged on how to prevent war. Three such schools that are still important today are functionalism, neo-functionalism and integration theory. This research analyzes these schools of thought and attempts to draw commonalities between them. Specifically, the relationship between functionalism and integration theory and neo-functionalism and integration theory will be explored, and the conditions likely to aid or hinder an integrated global community will be discussed."
| |
|
Neo Classicism, 2002.
An analysis of the origins and impact of neo classicism on art, culture and politics in France 1760-1848.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 6 sources, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will explore the origins and manifestation of neo classicism in France in the period from 1760 to 1848. As will be seen, neo classicism exerted a profound influence not only on the art of France during this period, but also upon its culture and political theory. However, as will be seen, French neo classicism was significantly influenced by events that took place outside of France, such as the excavations at Pompeii and Herculaneum in Italy. While these discoveries contributed more to an interest in all things classical rather than to specific artistic or cultural occurrences in France at this time, they nonetheless suggest something of the transnational nature of the neo classicism movement.
| |
|
Argentina and Neo-liberalism, 2008.
This paper explores the effects of neo-liberal policies on Argentinean human development.
2,769 words (approx. 11.1 pages), 11 sources, MLA, $ 82.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper argues that although governmental incompetence has contributed to its problems, Argentina's present impoverishment and dependence is very much a product of neo-liberal policies foisted upon the country by powerful international actors like the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. The paper provides an overview of Argentinean domestic policy, notes the neo-liberal agenda and impact of the World Bank and IMF and illustrates the consequences flowing from neo-liberal policies made all the more powerful by compelling global phenomena. The paper shows how while neo-liberalism is certainly not all bad, it does discourage the sort of internal development a poor and weakened nation like Argentina desperately needs.
From the Paper
"Before proceeding too far, it is necessary to provide some background information on the country of Argentina; this background, needless to say, can offer a great deal of insight into why Argentina's current predicament is as bad as it is. For most of the twentieth century, Argentina's economy has been characterized by stagnation and by recession; indeed, since the middle 1970s, per capita income has tumbled and (by the middle 1990s) was less than that of relatively poor nations such as Chile and Malaysia. Additionally, the emigration of Argentineans seeking a better life has emerged as a pressing concern in recent years. To all of this must be added the fact that Argentina's interior - which comprises roughly 70 percent of the nation's land and, as of roughly a decade ago, comprised just under a third of its population - has been chronically poor since at least the 1930s (Sawers, 3-4)."
| |
|
Joseph Schumpeter and Neo-Classical Economics, 2002.
Explains Joseph Schumpeter's economic theories and the neo-classical view of economics and then contrasts the two theories.
3,400 words (approx. 13.6 pages), 4 sources, $ 124.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Schumpeter's economic theories as they are outlined in "Capitalism, Democracy and Socialism" differ significantly from the neo-classical view of economics. The neo-classical view is outlined-with reference to Adam Smith as a representative neo-classical economist--and contrasted with Schumpeter's theories. Schumpeter's absorption of Marxism, his views on markets and monopolies, and his ruminations on the future of capitalism are highlighted and contrasted with the neo-classical paradigm.
| |
|
Neo-Marxian Theory, 2002.
A discussion of the differences between Neo-Marxian theory and Marxist theory.
1,919 words (approx. 7.7 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 61.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides an insight into Neo-Marxian theory and discusses how it differs from traditional Marxian theory primarily in its rejection of both economic determinism and the view that individuals play no role in shaping society. It analyzes how Marx believed the ideas of individuals to be powerless as a force in history unless they are connected with materialism. It examines how Neo-Marxian theorists have emphasized the individual in ways that certainly distinguish those theorists from both Marx and his traditional interpreters. It concludes that the greatest weakness of neo-Marxist reconsideration of Marxist theory is that it is still in process and requires additional study (particularly the questions of over-accumulation and stagnation), but such a "weakness" is to be expected in such a revisionist effort.
From the Paper
"Lukacs' neo-Marxist view of class consciousness gives more power to individuals than Marxist theory, or least individuals within the proletariat, which is capable of a true class consciousness he believes is denied to the bourgeoisie, which "at best . . . understands the development of capitalism as something external, subject to objective laws, which it can experience only passively." The proletariat, on the other hand, has the capacity to develop true class consciousness, and as it does, the bourgeoisie is thrown on the defensive. Lukacs refused to see the proletariat as simply driven by external forces but viewed it instead as an active creator of its own fate. . . . "The class struggle must be raised from the level of economic necessity to the level of conscious aim and effective class consciousness" [writes Lukacs]. When the struggle reaches this point, the proletariat is capable of the action that can overthrow the capitalist system."
| |
|
Neo-Liberalism, 2002.
A discussion of the consequences of neo-liberalism.
1,925 words (approx. 7.7 pages), 9 sources, MLA, $ 61.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides an insight into "Neo-liberalism", a set of economic policies that have become widespread during the last 25 years or so. It looks at how the capitalist crisis over the last 25 years, with its shrinking profit rates, inspired the corporate elite to revive economic liberalism and that's what makes it "neo" or ?new?. It defines some of its main features such as cutting public expenditure for social services and deregulation and discusses how around the world, neo-liberalism has been imposed by powerful financial institutions like the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank and it is raging all over Latin America. It evaluates the social, cultural, political and economical consequences as well as its effect on globalization. It concludes by asking the question of what kind of society do we want faced with a new kind of economic determinism that assumes that it is the only possible option and that all aspects of human life ? political, social and cultural ? are determined by the profit motive.
From the Paper
"Neo-liberal economics empowers and enriches big business, especially multinational corporations, and impoverishes damned near everyone else, including workers, peasants, the middle class and small business. Monetary policies attack wages through high interest rates and high unemployment. Unemployment, reduced wages and expensive credit all dramatically increase the amount of unwaged work we have to do to survive. Financial deregulation has diverted profits from new machines to all kinds of unproductive speculation. Industrial restructuring breaks workers' power and increases that of corporate capital."
| |
|
Neo-Liberal Institutionalism, 2005.
This paper discusses the strengths and weaknesses of neo-liberal institutionalism.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 11 sources, $ 79.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer discusses the strengths and weaknesses of neo-liberal institutionalism. The writer looks at the significance of the Prisoner's Dilemma to the discussion. The fundamental difference between the realist and neo-liberal institutionalist is examined in this paper. The writer suggests that the weaknesses of neo-liberal institutionalism may outweigh its benefits.
From the Paper
"The neo-realist-neo-liberal institutionalism debate develops along a number of criticisms, primary among which is the realist or neo-realist assertion that international institutions play a minimal role in shaping international politics and that the prospects for cooperation in anarchy are bleak. Neo-liberal institutionalism questions these claims, challenging the logical coherence of the neo-realist argument and arguing that the explanatory power of neo-realism is weak because it fails to move beyond an emphasis on the primacy of states as key actors in international relations. In this ..."
| |
|
Neo-realism, 2000.
A study of Neo-realism and Hollywood and their different approaches to filmmaking.
1,541 words (approx. 6.2 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper defines Neo-realism as an aesthetic movement that created a group of films in Italy, after the war, between 1945 and 1955. The paper explores how Neo-realism evolved, its principles, techniques, style and how it differentiates from today's Hollywood style filmmaking.
From the Paper
"Lights, Camera, Action? Neo-realism, along with the glitz & glamour of Hollywood, approaches filmmaking in many different ways. Neo-realism first appeared in the early 1940s in the writings of Italian critics. From one perspective, the term represented a younger generations desire to break free of the conventions of ordinary Italian cinema. Neo-realism refers to an aesthetic movement that created a group of films in Italy, after the post war, between 1945 and 1955. Economic, political, and cultural factors helped neo-realism survive. Major neo-realists such as Rossellini, De Sica, and Visconti came to the movement as experienced filmmakers."
| |
|
Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism, and International Politics, 2005.
An overview of the relationship between liberal and neo-liberal theories and international politics.
861 words (approx. 3.4 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
According to sociologists, since the 1970s, market-based economic policies have been institutionalized as a nearly global policy paradigm embodying first, liberalism, and later, neo-liberalism. The purpose of this report is to discuss the theories of liberalism and neo-liberalism in studying international politics and to identify the limitations of these approaches.
From the Paper
"In neoliberalism, which developed in the final decades of the twentieth century, a set of economic principles became part of the accepted framework for thinking about and acting upon both the economy and the relations of states to one another. Neoliberalism assumed that a positive outcome both economically and politically would be generated through a wave of reforms ? privatizations, dismantling of social welfare programs, the retreat of the state from economic regulation, tax cuts, and the opening of national boundaries."
| |
|
Micah?s Response to the Neo-Assyrian Crisis, 2001.
This paper discusses the prophet Micah and his harsh response to the
Neo-Assyrian crisis with the Israelites.
990 words (approx. 4.0 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper studies the Neo-Assyrian crisis between the Neo-Assyrian's and the Israelites. It discusses Micah?s written prophecies which are divided into two distinct parts. The first section, from chapters one to five, deal with the coming destruction of the nation of Israel. The second half of the book deals with promises of a joyful, peaceful future, when the land is returned to the people, they are protected against invasion, and follow God as they ought. He says if they will just repent for their sins during the war and stand strong against the Assyrians religiously and politically, God will bless them. The paper conveys the message that God is always in control and acts according to the people's sins.
From the Paper
"The rise of empires, their conquest and cruelty against smaller nations, and their eventual decay and destruction are the stuff of histories through-out recorded history. In the polytheistic, ritualistic days of old, the triumph of a nation was almost always considered to be not only a matter of military and strategic superiority, but the triumph of one regional god over another, of cultural and mythological superiority. Every war was a holy war, and fraught with religious meaning. It is absolutely necessary to understand this state of mind when approaching the prophecies and histories of the Jewish people in the time before they were scattered. At their foundation, in the times of the war-lord Joshua, they had brutally slaughtered the inhabitants of the nation, destroyed all their cities, and considered themselves to be the Holy Wrath of God upon the people of the land. Their triumph over the natives proved the superiority of their God and religious system. However, when times changed and neighboring kingdoms began to have superior military power, it posed a threat not only to the people of Israel, but also to their ideas about God. Most of the recorded writings of the prophets deal explicitly or implicitly with the question of God?s power and relevance at a time when his people?s power and sovereignty is threatened."
| |
|
Globalization and Neo-Liberalism, 2002.
A look at the relationship between globalization and neo-liberalism in Canadian political contexts.
2,150 words (approx. 8.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 80.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is a discussion of the inter-relationship of globalization and neo-liberalism. The essay describes how globalization processes have re-enforced the movement of neo-liberalism, with an emphasis on Canadian political contexts.
| |
|
The Rise of the Neo-Nazis in Germany, 2002.
A look at the rise of the Neo-Nazis in Germany.
1,650 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 8 sources, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the different possible reasons for the rise of the Neo-Nazis in Germany. Humiliation and losing control over their own army are investigated as reasons for the rise of the Neo-Nazis in Germany.
|
|
|
