| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "FREEDOM EXPRESSION": |
|
|
Mill and the Freedom of Expression, 2001.
A look at how John Stuart Mill views the issue of freedom of expression.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 2 sources, APA, $ 73.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines John Stuart Mill's view on freedom of expression and the liberal stance that he takes toward it. It also analyzes the way in which Mill believes freedom of expression impacts individual development.
From the Paper
"In On Liberty, John Stuart Mill offers a grand and sweeping defense of the principle of liberty. Mill defends the principle on two grounds: it enables individuals to realize their unique, individual potential, and by liberating individual talents, creativity, and spontaneity, it provides the essential nurturing for moral and intellectual progress. Freedom of expression is especially significant to his theory of liberty, as it plays a vital role in individual development. Crucial to Mill?s theory as well is his belief that interference with individual liberty is never justified unless it is to prevent harm to others. This, in turn, leads to Mill?s liberal view on freedom of expression, as he allows for little legitimate interference in this sphere, arguing instead for the fullest liberty in professing and discussing opinions, ideas, and doctrines."
| |
|
Freedom of Expression, 2002.
Discusses some of the cases where American citizens have misused their right to freedom of expression their own advantage.
1,483 words (approx. 5.9 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 49.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at three famous legal cases in the United States which resulted in landmark decisions regarding the boundaries to freedom of expression. In each case, the paper discusses the events leading up to the case, the arguments presented on both sides, and the final Supreme Court ruling.
From the Paper
"Freedom of expression plays an important role in the doctrines of human liberty. However not every country grants this right to its citizens. There are many countries in the world where freedom of expression is still a contentious issue and which have been categorized by Freedom House as not being entirely free. The United States of America is one country where the constitution gives every American the freedom of speech and expression. However there have been cases where American citizens have misused this law to their own advantage. Freedom of expression and speech is a right to use and not to abuse."
| |
|
Freedom of Expression, 2002.
A discussion of freedom of speech and expression in the film industry.
1,100 words (approx. 4.4 pages), 0 sources, $ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay discusses the validity of movies in which the directors come from a different background than that which the story is based upon (e.g. a white director directing a movie about African slaves). It moves on to talk about freedom of speech and expression.
From the Paper
"I do not believe that it is mandatory for a movie depicting a certain race or culture should be directed by a person of the same ethnicity. However, a film such as Malcolm X gains more reliability as a result of Spike Lee directing it as opposed to someone like Ron Howard, who is about as white as they come. I am not saying that a white person is not capable of directing a movie focused on African Americans or visa versa, but the final product will appear more authentic. A black director like Spike Lee is able to directly relate to Malcolm X based upon firsthand experience of growing up as a black minority in the United States, just as Malcolm did. Whereas, on the other side of the spectrum, a white director will never fully comprehend what it is to be a minority in our country, and no matter how hard he/she tries, will never be able to put his/herself in a black person?s shoes. Just as Francis Ford Coppola directed The Godfather trilogy, and Steven Spielberg directed Schindler?s List, this assisted in increasing their credibility because, of course, Coppola is Italian, and Spielberg is Jewish. Therefore, the subject matter of these films hits closer to home to each director respectively, rather than if someone of different nationalities had been responsible for them. In the public eye, each film appears to be more realistic, and in turn, moviegoers are more apt to spend the money to go see them. Ponder over this one: If a white director had done Malcolm X, would the black population, who is aware of this, be more likely to go to the theater to see it than if a black director had been the mastermind behind it? Probably not."
| |
|
Freedom of Expression, 2005.
A comparison of freedom of expression laws in America, Canada and the United Kingdom.
1,074 words (approx. 4.3 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, because the laws of all three nations-the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada-are based on the same underlying body of law, loosely described as English jurisprudence-the right to freedom of speech/expression in all three is quite similar. This paper compares the three country's laws and regulations regarding this issue.
From the Paper
"A flap in town council demonstrates the principle of free speech as practiced in the U.K. As the result of an insult flung about in the council chambers, one of the government/political people attending said something to a reporter "no gentleman would say." The commentator on the incident noted that both politicians and journalists can play rough, and, to the public mind, it is a non-starter as an issue. However, a piece of legislation was in place that was causing some discussion concerning the insulter's right to make the insult. "The real villain of the piece is an item of legislation entitled-soporifically-The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct) (England) Order 200." It contains a section demanding that members of city councils must "treat others with respect." This makes politeness mandatory, which also, then, limits how one may express one's self, at least if one is a council member in Great Britain. Moreover, the demand to express thoughts only in a polite manner extends to 'others' and not just voters or officials...anyone and everyone, obviously at all times. This law only applies to council members: One assumes that, except where specifically codified into law, other citizens of the U.K. can be verbally disrespectful if they wish."
| |
|
Freedom of Expression, 2002.
An examination of the limits of the freedom of expression in Canada.
3,650 words (approx. 14.6 pages), 7 sources, $ 133.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses freedom of expression in Canada in terms of assessing at what point freedom of speech becomes undemocratic, how hate speech is controlled, and what government policy makers, the Canadian media, and the general public think about the issue.
| |
|
Freedom of Expression in Education, 2005.
Examines the issue of freedom of expression for teachers and students.
2,670 words (approx. 10.7 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 80.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper argues that schools, by their very nature, must encourage free inquiry and free expression of ideas. Oral expression is needed as a learning mechanism, as well as a psychological outlet. The paper argues that schools, both public and private, should provide opportunities for students and teachers to express themselves orally, with the understanding that measures of protection are in place which will allow for this expression.
From the Paper
"In many communities around the country, however, school administrators and librarians are under heavy pressure from religious and other groups to censor what students read and study. Teachers are becoming self-censoring in the selection process, making every effort to make "safe" book choices. These practices aren't eliminating the problem, they're only amplifying it . Educators cannot, for the sake of the students, allow themselves to be pressured into diluting their curriculum into superficial facts."
| |
|
The Freedom of Expression and the Misconceptions of Society, 2005.
An examination of the relationships between various artists and the concepts of freedom of expression and the misconceptions of society.
3,030 words (approx. 12.1 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper tackles the reception of and reaction to, artists and their works by society, paying particular attention to the consequences of this towards the freedom of speech. It includes close references to, amongst others, the works and observations of Eminem, Oscar Wilde and Seamus Heaney.
From the Paper
"The culture of apportioning blame onto those artists who may or may not have had a negative influence upon an individual is one that I feel to be totally flawed and in some cases completely unfair. Marshall Mathers has used various alter egos to put across his opinions and views, and through Slim Shady or Eminem I feel that many of his observations and experiences of society have been conveyed using the satire and parody these characters purvey. Unfortunately members of the public have taken it upon themselves to adjudge the responsibility of the actions of individuals who have interpreted his material in a literal manner onto Marshall Mathers himself."
| |
|
Freedom of Expression and The United States Supreme Court, 2000.
How Supreme Court freedom of expression decisions during the 1960s changed American government and politics.
2,428 words (approx. 9.7 pages), 3 sources, $ 74.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"In his dissenting opinion on a 1919 case, Justice Holmes wrote, ?[W]e should be eternally vigilant against attempts to check the expression of opinions that we loathe and believe to be fraught with death...? (Abraham and Perry 157). The case was Abrams v. United States, a freedom of speech case dealing with the distribution of socialist literature during World War I. There were other similar cases in the early part of the 1900s such as Schenck v. United States, Frohwerk v. United States, Debs v. United States, and Gitlow v. New York (Abraham and Perry 154-5, 156, 158). Although these cases laid the foundation for all of the freedom of expression cases that would later come before the Supreme Court, they did little when compared to the free speech cases that came before the Court in the 1960s. While the cases in the early part of the century were important for the precedents that they set, freedom of expression cases during the 1960s changed American government and politics. Supreme Court decisions on freedom of expression cases during the 1960s placed never before seen limits on governmental power and guaranteed the protection of several fundamental rights."
| |
|
The Internet and Freedom of Expression, 2002.
Argues that the Information Age has not really altered the fundamental issues surrounding freedom of speech and censorship.
1,900 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 9 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The computer age has produced renewed debate pertaining to questions of freedom and speech, as opposed to censorship. This discussion ventures to explain how the advent of the so-called Information Age does not really alter the dynamics of a longstanding question, or rather a set of questions, that have been basic to political theory among other of the social sciences. Two articles selected from The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, on radically different topics, help to reveal certain approaches to all questions of communications, the media, and the 'post-modern' age, within academic research. These materials are examined en route to sections that focus directly on issues of the internet and freedom of expression.
| |
|
Art, Sex, and Freedom of Expression in Asian Art, 2008.
An analysis of sex and sexuality in contemporary Asian art.
1,332 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the expressions of sex and sexuality in the contemporary art of three Asian nations: Japan, China, and South Korea. The paper also looks at public and critical reactions to such works of art, in order to gain insight into the role sex and sexual art play in Asian cultures. The paper then points out that to a Western viewer, images of sex in contemporary Asian art are often shocking in their explicitness or sheer strangeness. The paper explains that once we begin to understand the context in which it has emerged, the representation of sex in contemporary Asian art is analogous to our own in the Western world. The paper concludes that sex is clearly a universal area of interest for artists from all over the world. While some nations, such as the Japanese, are free to explore the subject in all its glorious, perverse, and occasionally horrific detail, other nations punish their artists for making the most minor transgressions.
From the Paper
"In Japanese art, what comes across as shocking to an American audience does not necessarily seem so to the Japanese themselves. This is because the Japanese do not carry the burden of Christian guilt, nor have they been influenced by the Puritan ideals that continue to surface in American discourse. Indeed, the Japanese have a much more open attitude towards sex than any other nation in Asia. Sex in art, however, is often used to challenge accepted modes of discourse in Japanese culture, and is thus considered to be a tool of dissent. This is particularly true for Japanese women artists who wish to challenge the Confucianist idea of women as submissive beings."
| |
|
Freedom of Speech in Public Schools, 2006.
An essay examining the limits on the right to freedom of speech and expression in a public school setting.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 5 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses five cases which deal with freedom of speech and expression in public schools. The paper looks at how the First Amendment is limited in one aspect in the school setting and discusses several cases where the courts placed limits on freedom of speech and expression in school.
From the Paper
"The topic I have chosen is whether or not a school has the right to prohibit certain speech and expression which although lawful, the school does not approve of from being disseminated on school grounds. I have chosen this topic because it is important for those in the school system to understand what the right to free speech in the school environments entails. Furthermore, it is important for school students to understand the extent of their First Amendment rights in a school setting to avoid possible problems. The First Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees that every citizen shall have the right of freedom of speech and expression."
| |
|
Freedom of Speech, 2006.
The paper compares and contrasts freedom of speech and freedom of expression in the United States and Mexico.
4,520 words (approx. 18.1 pages), 15 sources, MLA, $ 117.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses freedom of speech in the American and the Mexican systems in light of the fact that the two countries are growing closer together in trade. The paper states that American individuals and businessmen need to understand the differences in the laws and customs on freedom of speech, as well as other cultural and legal differences between the two countries, in order to understand the meaning of actions and statements made by Mexican leaders. Examining the issue of freedom of speech in Mexico as compared to the U.S. can illustrate the differences and some of the reasons for those differences. The paper concludes that both systems are protected and neither can be seen as perfect in the degree to which it protects these freedoms. The Mexican government wants to be represented well in American thinking and to work with the American government for an improved economic situation for Mexico. Freedom of expression has been guaranteed by the Mexican Constitution, and now that promise has to be strengthened in order to assure that it is maintained.
Introduction
Mexico and the U.S.
Freedom of Speech
Freedom of Expression
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The United States has a long tradition of political freedom, while Mexico does not. The United States as a nation is more than 225 years old, while Mexico as a nation is a little more than a century old. The United States emerged from its Revolution as a country with a new form of government, one crated as a counter to the kind of rigid and hierarchical society the settlers had known in Europe. In the U.S., freedom of speech is divided into freedom of speech and freedom of the press as related concepts differentiated largely by whether the expression is written in a publication or expressed verbally or through actions (in some cases). Case law has established both these types of expression as fundamental rights based on their inclusion in the Bill of Rights in the First Amendment."
| |
|
Justifying an Evaluation: Pornography as Smut, 2006.
A discussion regarding the issue of pornography as freedom of expression.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 1 source, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper justifies an evaluation which holds that pornography is not something that should be given carte blanche protection under the Freedom of Expression prerogatives outlined in the American Constitution. In particular the paper looks at the injurious social effects associated with pornography and the paper also goes to some length to distinguish pornography from erotica. With regards to the last point the paper notes in particular the dehumanizing characteristics of pornography.
From the Paper
"Few topics are more divisive and contentious than pornography. The following paper will examine the subject of pornography and argue that any thoughtful consideration of the matter cannot help but lead to the conclusion that pornography dehumanizes women (and, arguably, men too) and also offers a profoundly distorted view of human relationships. To support this view, the author will cite a number of studies which corroborate the above view as well as examining the arguments commonly put forward by supporters of pornography. In the final analysis, freedom of expression is not absolute and society owes it to itself and to its posterity to ensure that citizens are protected from the ill effects of pornographic material. As mentioned above, the judgment of this writer is that pornography is an unacceptable form of expression."
| |
|
"Hate Radio", 2001.
A look at the essay by Patricia J. Williams on freedom of expression on the radio.
920 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 32.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The writer examines the essay titled "Hate Radio" in which Williams expresses her alarm about the absolute freedom of expression allowed on the radio which in turn has become almost hate talk and open racism.
From the Paper
"In her essay "Hate Radio," Patricia J. Williams comments on the growing trend of "anything goes" talk radio, led by radio personalities who seem determined to anger as many people as possible, and who cater to an audience of people empowered to say almost anything, no matter how prejudiced or ill-informed about other groups of people."
| |
|
Terrorists or Freedom Fighters - A Decision of Perception. Terrorists or Freedom Fighters?, 2002.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 8 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This is a question of perspective and of side. Depending upon the side you find yourself upon, your ideology, and your religion, determining who is fighting for the greater good and who is simply a terrorist is an impossibility of perception. Culturally, there is a great deal of support for freedom fighters. They are associated with the development of anti-oppression movements that we most closely associate with the American Revolution. To the British, the Boston Massacre was the suppression of terrorists, to the Americans, it was the massacre of innocents seeking nothing more than personal and communal freedom. This is how the world perceives Afghanis, members of Al Qaeda, and the combatants in Chechnya - as either terrorists or freedom fighters. It is the purpose of this paper to examine differences in perspectives on terrorism and how each group is perceived.
|
|
|
