| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "FREDERICK TAYLOR THEORY SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT": |
|
|
Frederick Taylor?s "Theory of Scientific Management", 2005.
This paper investigates the possible application of Frederick Taylor's "Theory of Scientific Management" to increase productivity in a telecommunications installation company.
1,560 words (approx. 6.2 pages), 20 sources, APA, $ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper relates that, the division of labor suggested in Taylor's theory is still extant in American business; in fact, it is undeniably present in businesses, such as telecommunications, that have both inside and outside functions, both executive/managers and a large complement of workers. The author points out that, while Frederick Taylor's ideas, used in their pure form, might have worked well in a pre-human potential movement era of abundant factory work and climbing wages; in today's labor market, they are likely to be counterproductive, unless balanced with a large amount of input from modern labor relations. The paper concludes that Taylor's emphasis on measurement should be simply a tracking tool, not a management hammer; used as such, it can point to the areas in which human/labor relations might need to step in.
Table of Contents
Division of Labor along with Narrow Specialization
Centralized Decision-Making
Proposed Solution
From the Paper
"Taylor was not the first, by any means, to develop a theory of production. Earlier minds, such as that of economist Adam Smith, were also concerned with the problem of increasing production. Indeed, "Economic theory of production had a promising start with Adam Smith's pin factory" in which Smith explained the benefit of the division of labor. Smith was a perfect precursor to Taylor: he observed "how allotting specialized tasks to pin factory workers led to greater dexterity by the workers and considerable saving of time from moving from task to task and allowed for output of pins to increase from a mere 20 pins to 4,800 pins per worker per day." "
| |
|
Taylor's Theory of Scientific Management, 2002.
An analysis of Frederick Taylor's theory of scientific management.
3,490 words (approx. 14.0 pages), 23 sources, MLA, $ 98.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the different issues involved in Taylorism - Taylor's theory of scientific management. The paper describes the major concepts of Taylorism, provides a critical review of this theory as opposed to other management theories and concludes with a synthesis of all the information.
From the Paper
"With the coming of the Industrial age at the turn of the Century, and a new era, came the need for more efficient management techniques. Several Classical Theories evolved during the early years of this discipline. Fordism arose from a synthesis of the other earlier theories. Fayolism philosophy included close communication between bosses and workers. Taylorism developed a theory known as "Scientific Management" to study and set appropriate work quotas based on research. Lillian Gilbreth believed that workers were motivated by both direct and indirect motives. Arthur Gantt developed a task chart to help monitor and plan projects more efficiently."
| |
|
The Father of Scientific Management ? Frederick Winslow Taylor, 2006.
An analysis of Frederick Winslow Taylor's seminal work detailing his philosophy on scientific management, "The Principles of Scientific Management".
2,600 words (approx. 10.4 pages), 12 sources, APA, $ 78.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper studies "The Principles of Scientific Management," the definitive philosophical work of Frederick Winslow Taylor, published in 1911. The author assesses Taylor's philosophy, which is based on four principles: (1) developing the best work method for every job; (2) scientifically selecting and developing workers; (3) combining the best work method and the best workers to complete the task according to that method; and (4) co-operation of managers and non-managers. The paper concludes by looking at modern day examples of Taylor's philosophy in action, particularly in the franchise industry.
From the Paper
"Frederick Taylor was depicted as the "father of scientific management". Taylor believed it was the management of an organization that was the key to solving any industrial problem. He was one man that recognized that there was no incentive for workers to increase their productivity rate because they might just work themselves out of a job. He also believed that hourly or daily wages were also no incentive to increasing productivity. Most of the ideas in scientific management were already known before Taylor's time. Taylor's contribution was to combine them into one, all-inclusive philosophy. His definitive work was The Principles of Scientific Management, first published in 1911."
| |
|
Frederick Taylor's Scientific Management Movement, 2007.
An analysis of the lasting effects of Frederick Taylor's scientific management movement.
1,758 words (approx. 7.0 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 56.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Many theories and methods have been devised to help managers organize their work areas, processes and workers toward the greatest possible good since the emergence of the factory in the 1800s. This paper examines how one such idea is Frederick Taylor's (1856-1915) scientific management method. It looks at how the founding idea behind the theory is the concept that the principal object of management should be to secure the maximum prosperity for the employer, coupled with the maximum prosperity for each employee. The paper also examines how Taylor's theories can be seen in many organizations that exist today and in particular looks at how they are used in the processes that characterize the popular fast food chain MacDonalds.
From the Paper
"Taylor's theory centered around the concept that management and the workforce should work in tandem for a mutual benefit, but that it was essential for management to make benefits directly applicable to the employee who worked hard. He noted that "there is no question that, throughout the industrialized world, a large part of the organization of employers, as well as employees, is for war rather than peace" (Taylor, 1911: 67). In order for an organization to prosper, Taylor argued, it was necessary for the organization to enable and encourage the employee on an individual basis to reach their full efficiency. "In a word, that maximum prosperity can exist only as the result of maximum productivity" (Taylor, 1911: 68). The only way to encourage the individual to strive to their full efficiency, though, was to enable them to receive some kind of direct benefit, such as a higher wage for a higher productivity. "
| |
|
"Frederick W Taylor & The Rise off Scientific Management", 1996.
Critical review of work by Daniel Nelson on Taylor's positive & negative impact on American industry, factory system, management & labor, productivity, innovations.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 1 source, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
Daniel Nelson, in Frederick W. Taylor and the Rise of Scientific Management, explores and analyzes the techniques and innovations initiated by Taylor (1856-1915) and the impact he and they had on the transformation of American industry, with specific reference to the factory system, industrialization, productivity, management and labor. Nelson's aim is both to portray Taylor's contributions to the development of scientific management, and to show that Taylor was not the "developer of ruthless, dehumanizing, and simple-minded techniques to exploit industrial workers" (book jacket) that he is often described as being. The author aims to show that, to the contrary, he was an integral part of his era, trying at all times to streamline a system which made him as much as he made it.
The problem with Nelson's book is that it does not make the..."
| |
|
Scientific Management, 2005.
This paper discusses extensively the scientific management theory of Frederick W. Taylor and applies it to high-tech management.
4,800 words (approx. 19.2 pages), 17 sources, APA, $ 122.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Frederick W. Taylor's theory of scientific management was widely misinterpreted as using time and motion studies to extract more work from employees at less pay; however, a more careful reading of Taylor's work shows that he placed the worker's interest as high as the employer's. The author points out that modern management theorists, such as Edward Deming, often credit Taylor with creating the principles upon which they base their work. This paper explains that, recognizing that resistance to change is certain to occur in high-technology environments, effective managers confront this resistance to demonstrate their concern for their employees and helping to direct and to bring personal agendas into line with company goals and objectives.
Table of Contents
Introduction
What Is Management?
Frederick W. Taylor
Scientific Management
Application
High-Tech Management
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Globalization also changes the ways in which companies compete with one another both for customers and for employees. Using technology (including the Internet), a company can be located nearly anywhere in the world and provide products and services to customers located nearly anywhere else. Electronic funds transfer make it possible for payments to flow from one country to another easily and quickly while advances in transportation logistics (including using computers and bar code readers to track shipments) make it possible to send products around the world."
| |
|
Scientific Management, 1999.
Examines theories of Douglas McGregor (Theory X) and Frederick Taylor and argues that management has not changed as much as believed.
2,025 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 13 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Introduction
Over the past 30 years, much attention has been focused on new ways of managing people in the workplace. Personnel departments have given way to human resource departments, increased resources have been devoted to training, and managers have been schooled in diversity management, handling sexual situations in the workplace, and in providing a work environment which meets the human needs of workers. The workplace which was once defined by strict hierarchical structure has given way to "flat" organizations and, according to many press reports, increased participation by workers in decisions. Union membership is falling, the number of entrepreneurs is increasing and indications appear to be that scientific management and Theory X management is no longer in favor. But beneath the seminars and reports in ..."
| |
|
Scientific Management and German Design, 2006.
A discussion about the relationship between scientific management and German modernist art and how this relationship impacted German graphic art in a manner that continues today.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 7 sources, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The relationship between scientific management and German modernist art and architecture has often been overlooked - which is unfortunate insofar as the former has greatly impacted the latter and provided it with some of its most conspicuous and enduring features. With this in mind, this paper explores this link by looking at examples of Taylorist sensibility in four noteworthy German designers; this paper also touches briefly upon how the works of these individuals - particularly Margarete Schutte-Lihotzky - reflected the dominant rationalist and modernist traits of the epoch and, in effect, set about creating a legacy for German graphic and architectural design which has persisted the present age.
| |
|
Frederick Winslow Taylor, 2004.
This paper discusses Frederick Winslow Taylor, the father of Scientific Management.
2,700 words (approx. 10.8 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 95.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines Frederick Winslow Taylor's innovations in industrial engineering. The author focuses on his time and motion studies. The paper review his four principles of management.
From the Paper
"Frederick Taylor was a mechanical engineer whose writings on efficiency and scientific management were widely read by businesses. Taylor is a controversial figure in business management history. His innovations in industrial engineering particularly in time and motion studies resulted in dramatic improvements in productivity. Under Taylor's management system, supervisors managed factories through scientific methods rather than by use of the empirical rule of thumb to decide on what constitutes a fair day's work. The main elements of Taylor's scientific management include time studies, specialized supervision, standardization ..."
| |
|
Scientific Management Pioneers, 2002.
An examination of the lives and accomplishments of Lillian Gilbreth, Fredrick Taylor and Charles Bedaux.
1,887 words (approx. 7.5 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 60.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews the life and works of three scientists in the field of scientific management. It evaluates how the three leaders have benefited numerous companies throughout the world and how each pioneer in one way or another has been able to increase productivity by lowering unnecessary unit work loads. It looks at the life of Dr. Lillian Gilbreth, the wife of Frank Gilbreth who was a pioneer in the industrial engineering field. It examines her education and her work in the shadow of her famous husband and against sexual discrimination. Fredrick Taylor is noted for his famed motion studies and his overall work principles have been transported all over the globe. The third scientist is Charles Bedaux who established his first management consultancy firm in Cleveland in 1916 and his work in measuring human energy has provided the basis for many work programs.
From the Paper
"Frank Gilbreth was most known for his passion for studying efficiency. Gilbreth logically examined how repetitive tasks were performed, such as the movements and motions of sports players, physicians, disabled individuals, and factory workers. He then described methods that a person could do that would enable them to perform the task the ?one best way.? His theories were designed to save people time through a more efficient use of the body?s movements. Much is known about Frank Gilbreth, but his wife Lillian Gilbreth, was also a pioneer in the industrial engineering field as well. Lillian seemed to be in her husbands? shadow, but she herself was also a pioneer of scientific management. "
| |
|
Scientific Management, 2000.
An analysis of the principles, major theorists, strengths and weaknesses of this management approach and its applicability to the public sector.
2,475 words (approx. 9.9 pages), 11 sources, $ 87.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Scientific Management: Review and Assessment For Applicability to the Public Sector
Introduction
The purpose of this research is, first, to analyze and discuss scientific management, and second, to consider the applicability of scientific management to the public sector. The findings of this research are presented in the following discussions: (1) evolution of scientific management; (2) criticisms and faults of scientific management; and (3)applying scientific management in the public sector.
Scientific management was a system designed primarily for use in manufacturing management. Scientific management was intended to "increase the output of the average worker and to improve the efficiency of management" (Sisk 24). These same..."
| |
|
Frederick Taylor and Max Weber, 2005.
An analysis of the contributions of Frederick Taylor and Max Weber to classical organizational theory and practice.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 4 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper explains that, in the history of organizational theory, few eras have been as significant on the shape of organizational management as the classical theories developed around the turn of the twentieth century. This essay examines the work that these two accomplished, specifically referring to Weber's "Bureaucracy" and Taylor's "The Principles of Scientific Management" and discuss why each theorist was so important to the development of early organizational theory. "
From the Paper
"In the history or organizational theory, few eras have been as significant on the shape of organizational management as the classical theories developed around the turn of the twentieth century. The theories developed in those early decades of the Industrial Revolution dominated organizational management throughout the course of the twentieth century. Theorists such as Max Weber and Frederick Taylor had a major impact on our understanding of how organizations are structured as well as how they can be mad more efficient. Unfortunately, perhaps the unintended consequence of this efficiency, as Weber and Taylor outlined it, was a severely dehumanized workplace. This essay will examine the work that these two accomplished - specifically referring to Weber's "Bureaucracy" and Taylor's The Principles of Scientific Management - and discuss why each theorist was so important to the development of early organizational theory."
| |
|
Max Weber and Frederick Winslow Taylor, 2004.
A comparative analysis of the works of Max Weber and Frederick Winslow Taylor.
1,380 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper contends that despite substantial differences amongst companies in terms of their corporate culture, there are also substantial structural and cultural similarities among nearly every company today. It looks at how the reason for these similarities lies in the work of Max Weber and Frederick Winslow Taylor. It shows how Weber's emphasis on the nature of work and the ways in which humans organize themselves and their labor to get work done and how Taylor's emphasis is on efficiency and organization of the workplace.
| |
|
Frederick W. Taylor, 1999.
Examines the life and career of this late 19th Century founder of a scientific management based on efficiency. Looks at systems engineering, bureaucracy and the implementation in Henry Ford's assembly line.
2,925 words (approx. 11.7 pages), 7 sources, $ 103.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"INTRODUCTION
Frederick W. Taylor is known as the father of Scientific Management, a major theory of management and administration that has been utilized in both the private and the public sectors. Taylor was a mechanical engineer whose writings on efficiency and scientific management were widely read, and he was also the founder of "systems engineering." Taylor's influence is still felt in the structure and operation of management and in bureaucracies both public and private around the world, and much of the development of public and private sector administration in this century owes a debt to Taylor and his writings. His approach has had psychological consequences in terms of the way we view and respond to management issues as well as considerable influence on ideas about efficiency. Scientific management itself was a form of ..."
| |
|
Frederick W Taylor, 1987.
Discusses theories of the American businessman/thinker in scientific approach to management. Examines goals, principles, human & technical problems, production levels and worker education.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 6 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
" Born near the mid-point of the nineteenth century, Frederick W. Taylor, is a striking example of the self-made man who, through his own efforts and intelligence, not only dramatically altered his own life, but also revolutionized the theory and practice of management. Taylor came on the scene in America at a time (1880 to 1890) when industrialization had hit a peak and the growing faith in science as the savior of man and his endeavors was becoming a significant aspect of the American ethic. Taylor synthesized these elements into both a theory of management practice and a ?scientific method? applicable to the solution of management problems (Merrill 66).
One of the characteristic developments in American industry which was coincidental with Taylor?s appearance and work, was the growing separation of attitudes and objectives of labor and(...)"
|
|
|
