| Papers [1-15] of 60 :: [Page 1 of 4] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 —> | Search results on "FIREARMS": |
|
|
Death from Firearms, 2004.
An argument against the keeping firearms in one's home due to the high incidence of death from accidents with firearms.
1,171 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper argues that it a false belief that firearms are a good form of self-protection in the home and that few would debate that criminals should not have access to them. It notes that the best way to reconcile the public?s demand for the right to bear and keep arms with the sad reality of the damage they cause is to educate the public and to increase legal activity that will help prevent criminals from gaining access. It also argues that there is room to enforce existing laws, close gun show loopholes, and to improve the background check procedure.
From the Paper
"Death from firearms is a large problem in the United States. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a total of 30,708 persons died from firearm injuries in 1998. Of these deaths, 12.3 percent were children under 20 years of age. Despite these statistics, many Americans still feel that their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms should be preserved. This is often because citizens believe that guns protect them from crime in their own homes. Even though data from several studies suggests otherwise, Americans are still very emotional about keeping their rights to protect themselves. Few politicians seem up to the call for going against public sentiment. Therefore, the best solution involves proposals for educating the public about the presence of guns in the home and for fighting gun crime rather than an outright ban on gun ownership. "
| |
|
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, 2007.
A discussion of how the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives keeps the public safe.
3,726 words (approx. 14.9 pages), 14 sources, MLA, $ 103.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how everything the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) does is designed to keep the American public safe. The paper explains that ATF has always tackled the controversial issues such as alcohol and firearm control, smoking bans and explosives limitations. The paper looks at how the ATF has to balance its regulations in order to protect American citizens and businesses without infringing on rights. The paper then points out that the ATF needs to work on some areas, but in general, it is successfully serving and protecting the public.
Outline:
Thesis
AT F - A History
Duties and Regulations
Regulations - Societal or Economic
Problem Solving
By the Book
How Are They Doing
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives has been evolving since the late 1700s, when the first Congress enacted a tax on imported spirits to pay for debts incurred during the Revolutionary War. At that time, agents collected taxes through the Department of Treasury. In 1862, by Act of 1, Congress created the Office of Internal Revenue within the Treasury Department. This new office was responsible for collecting taxes on distilled spirits and tobacco products.
Congress added enforcement as a component of the ATF in 1863 when it authorized the addition of three detectives for the purpose of preventing, detecting and punishing tax evaders."
| |
|
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, 2004.
This paper discusses the history and mission of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF).
3,310 words (approx. 13.2 pages), 21 sources, APA, $ 94.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, although the original bureau is 200 years old, in 2003, the ATF was transferred from the Treasury Department to the Justice Department; its name was somewhat changed, with the word ?explosives? being added to make clear one of its major, long-standing fields of expertise. The author points out that the ATF forerunner agency performed a key role in the national movement to abolish the commercial sale of beer, wine, and whiskey under the 18th Amendment of the Constitution, which was approved in 1919. The paper stresses that the backbone of the ATF is the examiners who inspect records of firearms dealers, explosives businesses, and alcohol beverage producers;they substantiate inventories and work to make sure of product veracity.
From the Paper
"The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has over the years been allocated a series of tasks that were not always clearly related, as suggested by its name, and different from the Internal Revenue Service and the Drug Enforcement Agency. This historic setback may have relieved to a substantial level when most of the ATF was moved form the Treasury Department to the Justice Department on January 24, 2003. The ATF was for many years a basic source of federal income, while the comparative significance of this role going after alcohol and tobacco excise taxes weakened with America?s espousal of the income tax. Recently, even the law enforcement part of this relatively small agency had endeavored to cover a great deal of ground. In the arousal of grave bombing events, expert ATF programs were established to give specialist help."
| |
|
Firearms, 2002.
An extensive study of the violent use of firearms in the United States and the second amendment of the American Constitution.
3,580 words (approx. 14.3 pages), 9 sources, MLA, $ 100.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides an in-depth examination the criminal use of guns on American streets and constitutional right to bare arms. It explores the application and defense of the Second Amendment in the 1939 Supreme Court case of the U.S. vs. Miller. The paper argues that gun control only inhabits the legal rights of the innocent to protect themselves and that it has not lowered the crime rates in the United States.
From the Paper
"Every day Americans face the ever-increasing problem of violence. News reports sometimes make it seem as if the streets of America are more like a war zone than home. Teenage gang members murder each other for drug territory, and innocent victims often find themselves caught in the crossfire. However, most recent and most abhorrent, is the fact that our children are killing one another. They are killing with extreme prejudice. Our children are killing, exhibiting little or no remorse for lives they have taken. We cannot ignore the carnage our society endures as a result of criminal behavior of a minority, obviously lacking the basic moral behavior regarding human life. Nevertheless, we must not be misguided in our efforts to address the problem at hand. Since guns are the weapons of destruction in many crimes, gun control is an issue that immediately seems to surface. But to eliminate the right of citizens to own firearms is not a solution."
| |
|
Firearms in Illinois, 2006.
A look at the debate in the state of Illinois over firearm possession and use.
1,071 words (approx. 4.3 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper describes the contentious issue in the state of Illinois regarding firearms, their possession and use and what constitutes the unlawful use of a firearm.
From the Paper
"And what constitutes unlawful use of a firearm? Certainly one of the most common acts associated with gun violence is murder (intent to kill). If a person uses a gun to intentionally kill another human being and no justification (e.g., self-defense), excuse (e.g., insanity), or mitigating circumstance (e.g., sudden heat of passion) is involved, he has acted with malice aforethought ? a social harm prohibited by the offense with either of two mental states: (1) intent to commit the social harm; or (2) recklessness in committing the social harm. As may be observed from this definition, the term ordinarily is not employed in its popular, non-legal sense as meaning "ill-will" or "spite." In this case, the unjustly intent to kill or intent to cause great bodily harm which resulted in a death would impel the unlawfulness of using a gun. Although in 1976 the U.S. Supreme Court reasoned that the death penalty for such murders is constitutional, both the U.S. and state Constitution require that the procedures used to determine who will be executed be fair. The death penalty is not permitted unless the state can prove beyond a reasonable doubt the existence of one or more "aggravating circumstances" ? facts beyond those necessary to prove first-degree murder that "reasonably justify the imposition of the more severe sentence on the defendant compared to others found guilty of murder.""
| |
|
Firearms Ownership, 2002.
A research study to determine the correlation between gun ownership and beliefs of others.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 4 sources, $ 79.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
A research study to determine the corrleation between gun ownership and beliefs of others. Impact of subcultures on ownership of guns for protection. Methodological problems of various studies. Research design. Hypotheses. Definitions. Results. Concludes that a positive correlation exists between incorporation of the beliefs of others into an individual's belief system.
From the Paper
"Introduction
The literature on firearms ownership is filled with methodological problems and results in limited knowledge. While Lizotte and Bordua (1980) attempted to overcome these problems with their own study, analysis of their findings demonstrated a limitation regarding ownership of guns for protection, due to their definition of socialization and subculture.
Problem
Previous research on the topic of firearm ownership has studied the issue from a social perspective, identifying it as a social problem as opposed to a behavior due to a socialization process. It is also noted that studies regarding the use of firearms for sports is lacking as is literature regarding the ownership of guns for protection ..."
| |
|
Firearm Injuries in the United States, 2002.
A look at the incidence and costs of firearm injuries in the United States as well as recommendations to curb gun violence.
3,650 words (approx. 14.6 pages), 19 sources, $ 133.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses firearms injuries in terms of demographics, population, race, and ethnicity factors. Information concerning fatal-vs-non-fatal injuries and the costs to society of firearms violence, such as hospitalization, rehabilitation, and psychiatric counseling are also included. The paper concludes with thoughts concerning future prevention of gun violence. .
| |
|
Effective Handgun Regulation, 2002.
This paper discusses the disputes surrounding governmental regulation of firearms due to accidental deaths.
755 words (approx. 3.0 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Clearly, the issue of death by firearms and proposals for actions to reduce the frequency of such deaths is an important social issue to all members of American society. The writer looks at the proposals in the United States for actions to reduce accidental deaths by and adolescent use of firearms.
From the Paper
"Most observers agree that access to handguns should be severely restricted for adolescents. Proposals to effects such restricted access, however, invariably involve regulation on the access to, security of, and use of handguns that affects adults in American society as well as adolescents. Most jurisdictions in the United States already have in place regulations designed to preclude the purchase of handguns or the unsupervised use of hand guns by adolescents. These regulations, however, obviously are ineffective as means of controlling the access to handguns by adolescents. Therefore, most proposals to correct this social problem involve the imposition of additional controls on the acquisition, security, and use of handguns by adults as a means of providing a more effective means of controlling adolescent access to handguns. It is at this point that such proposals run headlong into the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution and the powerful gun lobby in the United States."
| |
|
Texas and Washington Criminal Laws, 1995.
This paper compares Texas and Washington criminal laws on controlled substances, driving under influence and possession of firearms by felons and aliens.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 11 sources, MLA, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares the criminal codes of the states of Texas and Washington with regard to certain subjects. The first part discusses the laws relating to controlled substances. The second part looks at some criminal aspects of intoxication, particularly with regard to driving under the influence. The third part examines the laws concerning the possession of firearms by felons and aliens.
From the Paper
"Texas has divided controlled substances into four Penalty Groups (Health and Safety, 481.102 - 481.105) The substances in Penalty Group 1 carry the heaviest penalties; those in Groups 3 and 4 carry the lightest penalties. The penalties themselves vary with the amount of the controlled substance found in the defendant's possession and the intent of the defendant (to manufacture and/or deliver or simply to possess). For example, an offense involving the manufacture or delivery of less than one gram of a Penalty Group 1 substance is a state jail felony; if the offense involves the manufacture or delivery of more than 400 grams, the offense is punishable by 15 years to life in prison ( 481.112)."
| |
|
Gun Control, 2005.
This paper argues that the virtually unlimited freedom to possess firearms is creating tragedy and chaos in the U.S. society.
2,030 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 64.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents many examples of deaths, including by school children, caused by easy access to guns and states that the crimes, accidental deaths and suicides are additional problems created by these guns. The author points out that the U.S. was founded with the use of guns as illustrated by frontier history where guns were the primary tool for defense and law enforcement; therefore, the mindset of Americans is set firmly to accept the presence of guns. The paper stresses that, while enacting tougher gun restrictions will not solve the entire problem, it should be a part of the multi-level approach taken to reduce violence in the society because as long as anyone who wants to buy guns can do so and buy as many as they like as often as they like with virtually no restrictions, there cannot be a meaningful attempt at reducing violence.
From the Paper
"Other countries do not compare to the United States when gun legislation is compared to crimes using guns. Switzerland is a country where crime is virtually unknown, yet most Swiss males are required by law to keep in their homes what amounts to a portable, personal machine gun. In Israel, the armed forces are similar to those in Switzerland. Israelis keep their military weapons, including army-issue Uzis, in their closets. Yet street crime in Israel is very low by American standards. England has fewer guns and much less crime than the United States, and the police do not even carry guns."
| |
|
Gun Control, 6.
Shows why the control of firearms is necessary in the United States.
1,617 words (approx. 6.5 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 52.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In researching the subject of gun control and legislation to stop the incidence of violent crime, as well as accidental killings with a fire-arm, there exist opinions and statistics on both sides of the argument. The paper argues, however, that no matter how serious gun rights adherents are in their cries that citizens' rights are violated, gun control is necessary.
Paper Outline:
Why Gun Control is Necessary
Gun Control Laws
Kids and Guns
Conclusion
References
From the Paper
"It is important to understand that the legislators of various states as well as the U.S. Congress are working on restricting the unauthorized use and sale and maintenance of arms, not to bar any from being sold and owned. When the NRA and its members (and they are not all rednecks and the types found in the movie Deliverance) refuse to understand is that restriction does not mean a total ban, only proper and legal means of keeping guns from the hands of those who cannot and will not use them properly. There is a vast moral gulf between killing a deer (however much some even consider that a sin) and mowing down clerks in a convenience store or guards at a bank or murdering a spouse."
|
| Term Paper # 28219 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
|
|
Gun Control Laws, 1990.
This paper discusses gun control laws: Firearms, accessibility by the general public, the rising rate of armed robberies, aggravated assault and homicides, gun control solutions and pro and con.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 6 sources, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
""A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security o a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." -- Second Amendment to the Constitution
The words of the Second Amendment, written two centuries ago, lie close to the heart of one of the most divisive issues in contemporary American public life: gun control. On the one hand, gunfire claims a constant, daily toll of American lives, from suicide and accidents even more than from violent crime. Every year or so, a mass murderer, often armed with one or more semiautomatic military-type assault weapons, mows down a dozen or so victims. On the other hand, gun ownership is a core value to millions of Americans, and perhaps a majority of all American ... "
| |
|
National Rifle Association, 1995.
This paper discusses social and political significance of the National Rifle Association: Membership, tactics, goals, propaganda, hatred of ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms) and impact on elections.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 6 sources, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The National Rifle Association (NRA) is in the midst of a disturbing transition from soft-core gun advocacy to hard-core radicalism. The organization's traditional programs such as hunting, marksmanship, and safety have taken a back seat in recent years as the NRA seeks to increase membership by broadening its appeal to the segment of society that perceives the federal government as a threat to its Second Amendment rights. Despite criticism that NRA rhetoric is contributing to the proliferation of paramilitary group violence in the United States, the gun lobby refuses to compromise its relentless opposition to gun control in any form.
The NRA, established in 1871, boasts an estimated 3.5 million members, its highest membership in history. The organization's early members were ex-military men, National ... "
| |
|
In Support of Gun Control, 2002.
A paper which argues in support of firearm regulations since the infiltration of guns into the seedier criminal underworld has created a situation that police cannot begin to contain.
1,416 words (approx. 5.7 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses both sides of the gun control debate but ultimately argues that stricter regulations will help the situation in the United States. It argues that with the proposed gun control plan, proponents say much of the senseless violence would cease immediately; however, opponents to the restriction contend that the bad element of society will always find a way to acquire firearms whether they are banned or not. The paper shows that one only has to listen to the news broadcasts or view the headlines of any newspaper across the country to comprehend how guns are directly related to a majority of violent crimes committed on today's world. It shows how it is clear to see that by eliminating the source of violence, the crime will be substantially eliminated, as well.
From the Paper
"Without question, the ability to obtain firearms will continue to encourage potential criminals to carry out their assaults. Studies have found that there is a portion of the felonious society who would not otherwise commit the crime without the safety net of a handgun. The very essence of having a gun is one of empowerment for the person using it to commit a violent act (Kleck, 1997). Support for the gun control proposal does not equate to a banning of all firearms; rather, it represents society taking the necessary and overdue steps toward regaining control of escalating crime -- crime that, in most instances, utilizes handguns to carry out the act."
|
|
|
