| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "FILM FRANKENSTEIN 1931": |
|
|
Film: "Frankenstein" (1931), 2003.
This paper examines cinematic meaning through set design in the film "Mary Shelley's Frankenstein" (1931), directed by James Whale with the set design created by Charles D Hall and Hermann Rosse.
925 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 32.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the set design interacts with all aspects of mis-en-scene, including the lighting of the film, the editing of the scenes, the portrayal of the characters and the movie's overall theme, to further exemplify the meaning of the film. The author points out that, in this "Frankenstein" (1931), the cluttered laboratory that forces top lighting for the close up of Dr. Frankenstein's face, which brings out his cheekbones, helps further the understanding of Dr. Frankenstein's insanity. The paper relates that, during the scene in which the monster comes alive, the backdrop in the tower also seems to come alive creating the theme of life as opposed to the whole set design of the eerie and slimy laboratory, which represents death.
From the Paper
"In this particular film, the set design has a direct correlation with the themes of the movie. Not only does the set design bring out the themes of the movie, but also they help the viewer to bring the themes to a basic level. When the tower is first introduced during the storm, the lighting seen through the perfectly placed windows in the tower help bring out the theme of rage within Dr. Frankenstein. The whole theme of the movie is life and death and acting as god."
| |
|
Film: "Frankenstein" (1931), 2005.
This paper examines the societal aspects of the classic Frankenstein story as presented in the 1931 film production of "Frankenstein", directed by James Whale.
925 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 0 sources, $ 32.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, in the 1931 film production of "Frankenstein", directed by James Whale, religion is a prevailing theme; as the movie begins, a narrator introduces the theme of creation relating that Dr. Frankenstein wants to create a man after his own image. The author points out that the movie portrays a society with a rigid set of behavior, values and roles, such as when evil lurks, women cringe and hide but men conquer over evil. The paper states that the film settings in which the various scenes take place are very clear as to which are good and which are bad, such as the laboratory is portrayed as a dark, ominous place but the wedding of Dr. Frankenstein and Elizabeth is set in a sunny location.
From the Paper
"The servants knew their place, provide food and refreshment to the upper classes, the common class to follow the instructions of those above them, and the upper class to provide the wisdom, bravery, and leadership to confront evil. Occupations played a role in class formation. The farmer and laborer comprised the commoners. Those in government, perceived as the leaders and having the best interest of society in mind, are the upper class. Those occupations involving the medical sciences were elevated, but feared and created suspicion, based on the ignorance of the commoner and the religious values, which were threatened by the doctor's attempts at "playing" God."
| |
|
"Mary Shelley's Frankenstein" ( Kenneth Branagh ) and "Frankenstein" by Mary Shelley, 1995.
This paper compares the film director Kenneth Branagh's and book author Mary Shelley's depictions of "Mary Shelley's Frankenstein" and "Frankenstein" respectively: Characters, relationships, plot, focus, images, pacing and style
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 6 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The recent motion picture version of Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein hews closely to the plot of the novel while failing to capture its essential purpose. The full title of the movie is Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, but the possessive does not mean that this version can be considered mary Shelley's vision. Janet Maslin of the New York Times notes this when she writes that the film will not strike anyone as chiefly Mary Shelley's invention. Its principal architect is Kenneth Branagh. . . [who] takes on the godlike, idealistic young scientist's role while also directing this "Frankenstein" as an overheated romantic fable .
An examination of the book and the film shows where the attitudes ... "
| |
|
"Frankenstein", 2008.
A review of the film "Frankenstein" (1931), directed by James Whale.
1,108 words (approx. 4.4 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper examines the way the film "Frankenstein" treats human relationships. The paper presents the thesis that four key relationships, all involving Dr. Frankenstein, form the central structure of the plot's development and create a multi-faceted, balanced picture of functional as well as destructive relationships. This includes Dr. Frankenstein's relationship with the Monster, with his assistant, Fritz, with his fiancee, Elizabeth and with his old professor, Dr. Waldman.
From the Paper
"Frankenstein is a 1931 film released by Universal Studios and directed by well-known genre director James Whale, who also directed its sequel. It is loosely based upon the original 19th century novel by Mary Shelley and also a later play by Peggy Webling, with the script composed by at least five separate screenwriters ("Frankenstein.") Over the years since its release it has become the most well known of many Frankenstein adaptations and its portrayal of the Monster made Boris Karloff famous as well as establishing the iconic appearance of the Monster for many sequels and pastiches over the years."
| |
|
"Bride of Frankenstein", 2002.
Examines how this 1935 film was a perfect sequel to the first 1931 movie, "Frankenstein".
1,175 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 0 sources, $ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The horror film classic "Bride of Frankenstein" (1935), directed by James Whale has become a standard cinematic icon in American popular culture, due in part to its most memorable figure--a stitched-up "bride" with wild, terrified eyes dressed in a floor-length white burial gown and sporting a coiffure created by touching the poles of a galvanic battery. The paper shows that "Bride of Frankenstein", the sequel to Whale's "Frankenstein" (1931), has also become a great favorite with horror film fans and critics throughout the world. The paper shows that this film has often been described as a Gothic masterpiece of the macabre and had been praised for its construction, acting, cinematography, set design and editing, while others have taken note of its comedic stature as one of the first true "camp classics." The paper also examines Whale's ability to create a sequence pattern from both films.
From the Paper
"In the sequence towards the conclusion of Bride of Frankenstein in which Henry and Dr. Praetorius are on the verge of creating life from the dead in the form of the bandaged Elsa Lanchester, many of the conventional film techniques employed in earlier Universal horror films (and many that followed) makes Bride one of the most interesting and fascinating films to "dissect." Through a long shot, the interior of the laboratory opens up and the camera is maneuvered to show the main points of interest then moved into a medium shot with Henry Frankenstein, in a white apron and his back to the camera,
working, intense and nervous over a heart in a container, the heart meant for the body of the "Bride."
| |
|
Victor Frankenstein, 2004.
A discussion of the irrationality of the character of Victor Frankenstein in Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein".
987 words (approx. 3.9 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein" and, in particular, examines the irrational behavior of the protagonist, Victor Frankenstein. It looks at how Victor Frankenstein?s irrational behavior begins with his ambition, and what begins as a healthy curiosity about nature and science turns into an obsession that he cannot control. It analyzes the effect of this irrationality on the other characters in the story and shows how Frankenstein?s irrational behavior leads to the death of four innocent people and, eventually, his own demise.
From the Paper
"The next character to suffer from Frankenstein?s irrational behavior is Justine. She is accused of murder and Frankenstein is still unable to tell what he knows. This scene demonstrates the depth of Frankenstein?s irrational behavior. Even as he hears the judges condemning Justine, all he can do is leave the courtroom ?in agony? (69). This scene is amazing because it demonstrates Frankenstein?s selfish nature. He says, ?The tortures of the accused did not equal mine: she was sustained by innocence, but the fangs of remorse tore my bosom and would not forgo their hold? (69). Even as Justine confesses to a murder she did not commit, Frankenstein is not moved. He admits feeling despair, but not so much as to save the girl?s life."
| |
|
"Frankenstein", 2007.
An analysis of the significance of thunderstorms in "Frankenstein," by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley, as discussed by John Clubbe in his article "The Tempest-toss'd Summer of 1816: Mary Shelley's Frankenstein."
1,032 words (approx. 4.1 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the moody character of Frankenstein in the book "Frankenstein," by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley. The paper then describes the significance of thunderstorm in the book, as discussed by John Clubbe in his article "The Tempest-toss'd Summer of 1816: Mary Shelley's Frankenstein." The paper suggests that Shelley uses thunderstorms to signal doom in three important spots in the novel and then describes these instances.
From the Paper
"John Clubbe's article examines the importance of thunderstorms in Mary Shelley's novel and also in her life, and even in the works of other writes if her time. Clubbe describes the unusual climate in Europe in 1816, looking at its significance and he observes how this was apparent in the works of the writers at that time, especially those around Mary Shelley, who summered at Geneva on the lake. It is no surprise that this phenomenon shows up in her novel and that it symbolized evil. Lightening has been a dramatic voice from heaven in many works and the romantic poets thought it to be a revelation signaling dramatic change. Clubbe thinks every appearance of thunderstorms in Frankenstein have inner significance, and, for Shelley, it signifies what cannot be know, the secrets of the universe. That lightening could both create and destroy life is the central theme surrounding the novel, and that it, and all things in creation, can be used for either good or for evil."
| |
|
"Frankenstein" Compared, 2004.
An analysis and comparison of Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein or, The Modern Prometheus" (1818) and "Young Frankenstein", the movie (1974).
1,807 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 58.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides a summary and review of the two works, Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein or, The Modern Prometheus" and the movie, "Young Frankenstein,"to highlight their key similarities and differences, followed by a summary of the research in the conclusion. The paper includes a graphic of Mel Brooks's "Monster".
From the Paper
"Nevertheless, the novel clearly demonstrates that even the most wretched human being understands better than anyone - even those who deem themselves intellectually and morally superior - what type of knowledge, experiences and liberties are needed to ensure individual happiness. Life is short, and there is little room for false starts; certainly, there is no room at all for ignorance when there is knowledge to be had, even if it means that people may not be quite as happy as they expected. As a result of Victor Frankenstein's misguided attempts at playing God, the monster's terrible loneliness eventually drives him to seek revenge by murdering Frankenstein's wife, brother, and best friend. Frankenstein dies while trying to find and kill the monster, who disappears into the Arctic at the end of the novel."
| |
|
Robert Walton and Victor Frankenstein, 2008.
A comparison between the characters of Robert Walton and Victor Frankenstein in Mary Shelley's famous novel, "Frankenstein".
1,703 words (approx. 6.8 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses Mary Shelley's famous novel "Frankenstein" and looks at the similarities between the characters, Robert Walton and Victor Frankenstein. The paper relates that the the two primary concerns of the text are the Faustian or Satanic desire for scientific, God-like knowledge, and that of the self or the identity, and how it relates to the others.
From the Paper
"Mary Shelley's famous novel Frankenstein remains one of the most famous horror fictions of all times. Drawing on some of the literature's greatest masterpieces such as Milton's Paradise Lost or Percy Bysshe Shelley's Prometheus Unbound, as well as on the rich Romantic and Gothic traditions to which it belongs, the novel displays a complex system of meanings, allusions and interpolations. Essentially, the text is made up of three autobiographies: that of Robert Walton who writes to his sister in England and tells her about his North Pole expedition, that of Victor Frankenstein, the scientist who manages to create life in the form of a monster and who tells his story to Walton, and that of the monster who tells his story to his creator, Frankenstein. Not accidentally, these three autobiographers resemble each other to the greatest degree. On the one hand, the same desire for knowledge pursues all three of them: Walton is fascinated by the yet unknown lands of the North Pole, Frankenstein is enthralled by the mystery of life itself and the monster is naturally curious about everything surrounding him. The other thing that unites them, this time only Frankenstein and Walton is their common role as animators: while Frankenstein creates new life, intending surely to make a replica of himself, Walton rescues and reanimates Frankenstein, who is also a replica of himself. Thus, the two primary concerns of the text are the Faustian or Satanic desire for scientific, God-like knowledge, and that of the self or the identity, and how it relates to the others."
| |
|
"Frankenstein" and "The Birthmark", 2003.
A comparative analysis of the characters of Alymer and Frankenstein in Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein" and Nathaniel Hawthorne's "The Birthmark".
920 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes two works of literature that explore the destructive fascination for science and nature: Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein" and Nathaniel Hawthorne's "The Birthmark." It discusses the characters of Alymer and Frankenstein, both men of science, and how they are responsible for their fate.
| |
|
Victor Frankenstein, 2003.
An analysis of the character of Victor Frankenstein as an archetypal overreacher in Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein".
1,359 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 0 sources, $ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how Victor Frankenstein in Mary Shelley's novel "Frankenstein" is an archetypal overreacher, which means that he is a perfect example of a person who failed by trying to be clever. It examines how the monster is unnatural because Victor goes too far, breaking the laws of nature and how the monster he unleashes does not cause disruption and destruction. It uses events and quotes from the book to show how this is not totally correct, because what he unleashes is not disruption and destruction, but a process over time.
From the Paper
"What Victor does and what he creates are unnatural. Victor?s undertaking of creating a human is unnatural because it had never been attempted or even thought of before. The secret of creating life, Victor insists, fell into his lap, and he wonders why ?among so many men of genius?[he] alone should be reserved to discover so astonishing a secret.? Unnatural can be described as not in the accordance of accepted standards of behaviour. This means that Victor?s thoughts are so outrageous and unnatural that no other scientist in the same field has not even began to think about creating human beings artificially. What Victor creates in unnatural because, although it is intended to be a human being, it is described as hideous and revolting, because Victor creates some sore of super-human creation."
| |
|
Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein", 2004.
This paper discusses the role of women in Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein".
960 words (approx. 3.8 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 34.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that without the roles of Elizabeth Frankenstein and Justine, "Frankenstein" would simply be another Gothic novel written by a young and precocious girl, Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley, in early 19th century England. The author points out that Elizabeth, and not Victor's mother, expresses all of the compassion of the Frankenstein family, a trait quite familiar in many English families of the early 19th century. The paper concludes that Elizabeth and Justine are pivotal characters who tend to move the plot forward and serve as symbols of femininity set against the decadence of Victor Frankenstein and the monster he created, quite differently from other well-known, English, romantic novels of the time.
From the Paper
"In Chapter Six, in a letter written to Victor by Elizabeth, we are introduced to Justine Moritz who like Elizabeth is taken into the Frankenstein family as one of its own. Elizabeth tells Victor in this letter that Justine, "thus received in our family, learned the duties of a servant, a condition which, in our fortunate country (being Switzerland), does not include the idea of ignorance and a sacrifice of the dignity of a human being" (50). With this, Elizabeth is saying that Justine is a much like a maid in the Frankenstein household but has also been somewhat educated and is treated with respect and admiration."
| |
|
Mary Shelley?s ?Frankenstein?, 2002.
This paper compares the relationship of the two main characters in Mary Shelley?s ?Frankenstein?: Dr. Victor Frankenstein and the monster he creates.
1,325 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper explains that, although he is successful in bringing Frankenstein to life, one of the doctor?s biggest mistakes in his attempt to create a living being is that he fails to nurture it as a parent would for his own child. The author sees Victor, the narrator of the story, as the main character, even though Shelley embeds many life lessons in the ethical issues that the monster faces. The author sympathizes far more with the monster because he was born a sweet, caring creature, but ended up tortured by rejection.
From the Paper
"Shelley?s ideas of love are revealed through the tale of the doctor and the monster. Shelley asserts that a parents? love alone is not enough for a child?s healthy development. According to Shelley, love must be coupled with discipline and guidance. Without human interaction and guidance, Frankenstein was unable to develop into a healthy creature. In the beginning of the story, Frankenstein?s actions are motivated by love."
| |
|
Race and Society in Early American Film, 2002.
An assessment of racism in "Cimarron" (1931), "Birth of the Nation" (1915) and "Within Our Gates" (1920).
1,650 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Films that were made prior to the Civil Rights Era tend to display the views of the day within them, not simply the status of race in the time represented within such works. This paper assesses the concepts of race relations as are presented in the films "Cimarron" (Wesley Ruggles; 1931), "Birth of the Nation" (D.W. Griffith; 1915), and" Within Our Gates" (Oscar Micherux; 1920).
| |
|
Lack of Father Figure in "Frankenstein", 2005.
This paper analyzes Mary Shelley's Frankenstein's mistakes when dealing with his creation, including his lack of parental instincts and neglect of responsibility.
2,230 words (approx. 8.9 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 69.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Throughout this paper specific quotes are noted in order to analyze Frankenstein's mistakes throughout the story. It shows how Victor Frankenstein neglects any responsibilities regarding his creation and by denying him love, an education and a companion in society, Victor retains the blame for the monster's crimes. Although the monster did physically commit the crimes he is accused of, he would not have become violent if Victor had nurtured him. The analysis of Frankenstein is based on the Penguin Classics addition of "Frankenstein", using the edition published in 1992.
From the Paper
"In the novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley tells a gripping tale of unimaginable events in which a number of dead body parts are brought to life through one man's obsession with knowledge and science. Victor Frankenstein becomes engrossed with the idea of bringing life to an inanimate object, but never realizes the obligations he will have to the monster. Although Victor initially dedicates a large portion of his life to creating his masterpiece, he spends more of his life fearing and fighting his monster. Victor appears to disregard any responsibility he has for his creation and only feels guilt in unleashing such a monster, rather than guilt in abandoning the monster. Instead of taking liability for the being he has brought to life, Victor deserts the individual and indirectly transforms the innocent creature into a monster. Victor neglects any responsibilities regarding his creation and by denying him love, an education, and a companion in society, Victor retains the blame for the monster's crimes."
|
|
|
