| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "FIGHT HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE PARENTING": |
|
|
The Fight for Homosexual Marriage and Parenting, 2004.
Details and support leading to the rationalization of homosexual marriage and parenting.
3,500 words (approx. 14.0 pages), 20 sources, MLA, $ 98.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
An argumentative paper in favor of homosexual marriage. The paper discusses the ways that homosexuals have the same lifestyles as heterosexual couples, just with different focuses. It concludes that if they can marry, then they should also be allowed to be parents.
From the Paper
"The Encarta MSN Dictionary online defines a Homosexual as, ?somebody attracted to the same sex: somebody who is sexually attracted to members of his or her own sex.? (2003) For years the homosexual community has been battling over their rights of marriage and parenting. Some heterosexual members of society are fighting against them in efforts to preserve their own way of life, keeping homosexuals from marrying and restricting them from parenting children. Encarta MSN Dictionary online defines Homophobia as, ?irrational hatred of homosexuality: irrational hatred, disapproval, or fear of homosexuality, homosexual men and lesbians and their culture." (2003) We should allow homosexuals to marry and raise children because other than sexual orientation, there are virtually no differences between homosexuals and heterosexuals."
| |
|
Homosexual Marriage in the US, 2007.
This paper argues in favor of homosexual marriage in the United States.
1,323 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the issue of gay marriage, arguing in favor of its acceptance. The writer explores both sides of this debate, citing religious and moral reasons as the basis for opposition to gay marriages. Additionally cited is the recent Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) passed by Congress. The author believes that if gays are unable to have legally recognized unions, homosexual people will be continually denied rights that all United States citizens rightfully deserve under the Constitution.
From the Paper
"As of now there is no state in the United States that legally recognizes same-sex marriages. The state that is closest to legalizing these marriages is Hawaii. In repute to the possibility of Hawaii's legalization of same-sex marriages, Congress passed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defines marriage as "the legal union between one man and one woman" (NOW). DOMA also allows each state to decide whether or not it will recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states or municipalities within the state (NOW). The debate over this issue is hot all across the country, with people on both sides of the argument standing firm in their beliefs. The issue is working its way through the legal system and the outcome at this point is completely unpredictable. Denying marriage to a specific group of people is unconstitutional and something must be done so that all people in the United States will be legally able to enjoy the benefits of marriage with a spouse of his or her choice."
| |
|
Homosexual Marriages, 2006.
A one-sided look at the 'negative' effects of homosexual marriages.
2,498 words (approx. 10.0 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 75.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this paper the author looks at the negatives aspects as he sees it, of same-sex couples getting together in marriage. He examines the implications of same-sex marriages on society and what it will mean, such as, legitimizing same sexual activity, joint tax benefits and many other day to day issues that will help them. The author looks at all of the negative sides of allowing homosexual marriages and urges the reader to help stop them by taking firm legislative action. He mentions many of the laws that have been passed and, are in the pipeline to prevent homosexual marriages. The paper then goes on to discuss what legalized homosexual marriages would do to the public school system and the societal effects that could result from it in public health education within the school system. In conclusion the author again points out that it is not fair for same sex marriages to reap all of the benefits of regular marriages.
From the Paper
"Legalizing same-sex "marriage" and/or domestic partnerships would in essence normalize homosexuality in the public school system. Why? Compulsory education forces all children to attend school. Public schools require children to take health education courses. If same-sex "marriages" or domestic partnerships were to become a reality; children would be taught in these health classes, as well as in marriage/family elective courses, that homosexual relationships are the equivalent of heterosexual relationships. Because teachers are authority figures, children would be more likely to accept homosexual relationships as normal. Of course, once junior and high schools teach that homosexuality is normal and natural, it's only logical that younger students would be subjected to the same propaganda."
| |
|
Homosexual Marriage, 2002.
An argument for the right of gay couples to be allowed to marry.
5,567 words (approx. 22.3 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 135.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper puts forward the case of homosexual marriage. It discusses the history of sexual desire dating from the days of Plato and the right of every human being to be able to fulfil his sexual desire and live a happy life. It analyzes the concept of marriage in general, examining how in many cases people do not actually marry for love and how homosexual couples may, like heterosexual couples desire to share financial assets and responsibilities. It reviews the legalization of gay marriages around the world and analyzes why in particular America is a sex-ambivalent society, alternately fascinated and repelled by sexuality. It contains an extensive literature review and the author's personal opinions.
From the Paper
"Gay couples, elated not to have to hide or to face the stigma of being viewed as sick or criminal, will have a psychological burden lifted from their shoulders. This sort of humane support of other human beings, no matter how different they might be from oneself, should bring a contagious elevation of spirit to any soul that desires to feel at peace in the world. Those who oppose gay marriage, should look closely at their motivation. Is their own sense of masculinity at stake? How can the sexual preferences of others harm them? Do they feel threaten simply because they are not sure of their own convictions about their sexuality or moral beliefs?"
| |
|
Homosexual Marriage, 2006.
An analysis of the factors affecting perceptions on homosexual's right to marry.
4,157 words (approx. 16.6 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 111.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This research paper attempts to show through a survey that Caucasians are more likely to support homosexual's right to marry. It discusses how this tendency of Caucasians to favor laws protecting homosexuals more than African-Americans is most likely to because they have never suffered discrimination to the same extent as African-Americans themselves, and therefore do not feel as threatened by extending such rights as marriage to homosexuals. It analyzes how this relationship is clearly evident again when control variables are introduced.
Outline
Introduction
Literature Review
Data and Methods
Analysis
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Darren W Davis approaches the subject of civil liberties differently. In his article "Exploring Black Political Intolerance" Davis states "racial differences in political tolerance are primarily viewed as a function of racial differences in education and the perceived level of threat passed by various groups" ( Davis (1995) 3) Davis asserts that African Americans do not merit the protection of civil liberties as much as Caucasians not only as a consequence of a lesser education, but also as a combined result of low self esteem and because they feel threatened and fear impugnation. In an ill fated attempt to preserve their own rights, African Americans are willing to deny civil liberties to organizations or people who they perceive to be a threat. "
| |
|
Issue of Homosexual Marriage, 2001.
Discusses social & economic benefits to partners. Arguments for & against same-sex marriage. Legal domestic partnerships vs. traditional marriage.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 5 sources, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The issue to be discussed is whether or not homosexuals should be allowed to marry one another. The main reason why those in the gay community have called for the right to marry is usually not from a desire to be married as such but because of the desire for various social and economic benefits denied to gay people because they cannot marry. For some in the gay community, demands for gay marriage may in fact be a form of challenge to the "straight" community. For those who are truly serious about the issue, however, what is important is the attempt to secure for homosexual partners rights that are taken for granted by heterosexual married couples, such as the right to inheritance, to insurance benefits, for one partner to visit the other in a hospital, and so on. Society to date has deemed marriage to mean more than this and to have at least the..."
| |
|
Ethical View of Homosexual Marriage, 2003.
Argues that the definition of one's sexuality should not decide who that one person might be allowed to marry.
1,431 words (approx. 5.7 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Marriage, meaning the legal binding of two people in a loving agreement, does not say anything about what sexual preference of the two should be. The paper argues that, if the Declaration of Independence says that all men are created equal, then we all have equal rights. It argues that whether one is a man, woman, gay or lesbian is irrelevant; we all have equal rights, and therefore, should all be allowed to marry.
From the Paper
"When... a major employer offers financial benefits for people who participate in deviant behavior, those kinds of people are going to...live and work in the community"(24). Jack Chambers explains that both partners are more likely to believe in the community that helped them be one, by freeing the financial dilemma of health insurance. If the marriage of two homosexual partners were to be legalized, less financial problems would exist which would make today's society healthier. Today's society does not recognize homosexual marriages as binding; many homosexual people have to fight for their love to stay alive."
| |
|
Gay Parenting and Marriage, 2007.
Argues in favor of the right for gays to marry and have families.
1,229 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 9 sources, MLA, $ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper contends that the issues of parenting and marriage should be based on love, responsibility, morals and values. Parents are what start a family and are what keeps a family together. In particular, it argues that neither parenting nor marriage should be banned because of sexual preference and that the Bill of Rights contains an equal protection amendment. Denying marriage to a homosexual couple is no different than denying marriage to an interracial couple.
From the Paper
"In "Reserve Marriage for Heterosexuals", the author Bruce Fein argues that ["Marriage is an institution between one man and one woman and same-sex couples aren't the optimum environment in which to raise children."] Just based on their sexuality, gay parents are seen as unfavorable. He feels that children of lesbian and gay parents do not grow up the "same" as children of heterosexual parents. The concern
usually revolves around the issue that the children will also grow up to become lesbian or gay themselves (105). In most cultures, children are raised to take on specific roles associated with their biological sex very early in life. "
| |
|
Effects of Homosexual Parents on Children, 2005.
A paper discussing some of the concerns expressed regarding the psycho-social development of children raised by homosexual parents.
1,996 words (approx. 8.0 pages), 15 sources, APA, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a look at each of the psycho-social aspects of development in children and discusses whether these developmental aspects are negatively impacted when a child is raised by gay or lesbian parents. The paper concludes from the literature reviewed that children raised by homosexual parents develop emotionally, socially, and psychologically, in much the same way as children raised by heterosexual parents.
Children of Lesbian and Gay Parents
Sexual Identity
Other Aspects of Personal Development
Social Relationships
Attitudes toward Gay and Lesbian Adoptions
From the Paper
"In studies of children ranging in age from 5 to 14, results of projective testing and related interview procedures have revealed normal development of gender identity among children of lesbian mothers. More direct assessment techniques to assess gender identity have been used with the same result; all children in this study reported that they were happy with their gender, and that they had no wish to be a member of the opposite sex. There was no evidence in any of the studies of gender identity difficulties among children of lesbian mothers."
| |
|
Homosexual Parents, 2002.
An argumentative paper for the acceptance of homosexual parents in adoption.
1,479 words (approx. 5.9 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the current situation in which homosexual couples wishing to adopt a child are discriminated against. The writer argues against this practice, stating that one's sexual morality should not take away from one's ability to be a good parent; and that this should be the major criteria for deciding who is fit to adopt.
From the Paper
"A home. Two loving parents or at least one loving parent. Two or even one heart filled with unconditional love for a child. Surely this is something that every child should expect to come home to? Of course, not every child born in America today enjoys this luxury. But it is an ideal that every adoption and social service agency should aspire to create. Thus, homosexual parents and homosexual individuals should be allowed to adopt children. Currently, some states, such as Florida, bar gay adoption. Recently, a family overseen by two gay men was broken up by Florida?s department of social services, because the law would not allow the couple to formally adopt the. (?Riveted to Rosie? Gay Parent Magazine, March Online Edition) Other states, such as California, do not prohibit gay adoption outright. However, although ?a gay or lesbian couple is not legally barred from adopting a child? simply because of sexual orientation and ?it is still more difficult, as a practical matter, for gay and lesbian couples to adopt than for married couples.? (Guerlin & Glima, Chapter 1) Both legal and informal discrimination must cease. An individual?s sexuality is not of paramount importance in his or her ability to provide a stable home life. Furthermore, an individual?s fitness as a parent should be the primary criteria considered in the adoption process, not his or her morality outside of parental fitness. Lastly, good homes are too scarce for some children in today?s adoption market, particularly for older, ailing, or less physically desirable children, to eliminate potential parents because of their sexuality."
| |
|
The Legalization of Gay Marriage in the United States The Legalization of Gay Marriage in the United States, 2006.
A discussion regarding the controversial issue of same sex marriage in the USA.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 0 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the long debated issue of gay marriage in the United States. This paper reports how proponents of the issue contend that same sex marriage is not about gay rights but about human rights. It further discusses how these individuals believe that gays in modern society have long been subjected to inequalities and a lack of support from the social order. The opponents of the gay marriage issue refer to a stereotypical framework for gays in general that suggests that gays are evil and dangerous to children.
| |
|
Family Law and Gay/Lesbian Marriage, 2004.
Discusses the controversial topic of homosexual marriages and whether the government has the right to regulate such unions.
2,374 words (approx. 9.5 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 72.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the controversial topic of what constitutes a marriage and what unions between partners are worthy of the state and federal government?s institutional protection. The paper looks at how this applies to gay marriages and then presents legal arguments and looks at social and private values that support the individual's right to a homosexual marriage.
From the Paper
"What makes a marriage, in the eyes of society and the eyes of the law? As this paper is being written, President George W. Bush has called for a constitutional amendment upholding the idea that marriage is an institutional bond that can exist only between a man and a woman. Somewhat belying his claim that this idea is purely legal in its nature, however, is his stress that a constitutional amendment is required to sustain this principle on a federal level. Bush is essentially attempting to pass judgment to all of the state legislatures of the land, forcing them to comply with upholding a singular and specific ideal regarding what constitutes a marriage. This goes against some of the past, predominant legal strictures of this nation, which has left defining and limiting marriage to states and communities, rather than to the nation as a whole. However, setting unified standards regarding marriage on a national level, in Bush?s defense, is not without precedent. (Loving v. Virginia, Arleen, 48-49)"
| |
|
Same Sex Marriage from a Legal and Social Perspective, 2007.
This paper looks at same-sex marriage and homosexual rights in Canada from a legal and social perspective.
1,300 words (approx. 5.2 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer deals with the contemporary debate over the legal and social acceptance of homosexual couples. The paper maintains that, from legal perspective, the acceptance of homosexual couples is supported under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, as well as the case of "M. v. H". The writer concludes that, protected legally under sections 2 and 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, homosexuals are legally accepted as part of society; with equal rights as heterosexuals. The writer maintains that, if some find homosexuality to be a problem, they must still realize that homophobia, hate crimes, and overall discrimination is not the solution.
From the Paper
"Canada is well known for being a 'tossed salad', rather than a melting pot of cultures like the United States. This is due to its acceptance of different cultures and promotion of cultural diversity. In such a diverse society it is difficult to create laws that are pleasing to all. Pluralism in Canada does not cease at culture alone, but also includes religion and sexual orientation. Homosexuality has become a rising issue in society and should be accepted in the same manner as cultural and religious diversity. Unfortunately, this is not the case. From a social standpoint, homosexuality may be found morally corrupt for those with certain ethical and religious principles. Contrarily, it may be found as a new form of self-expression and freedom for those who wish to condone or practice it. From a legal standpoint, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the freedom of association, as well as the freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression."
| |
|
Gay Marriage, 2006.
This paper looks at the tradition of marriage and examines the argument regarding gay marriage.
975 words (approx. 3.9 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 34.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The writer of this article claims that as one of the thorniest issues on the American political scorecard since the abortion debate, homosexual marriage is drawing the attention of philosophers, journalists, legal analysts and psychologists. The writer argues in favor of gay marriage and discusses the legal and behavioral rights position in this regard. The writer contends that gay marriage is not the contentious issue that it seems when placed in the perspective of civil rights, and maintains that any attempt to argue against gay marriage is inherently biased.
From the Paper
"Renowned psychologist Erik Erikson describes the human life cycle in terms of stages of psycho-social development. His theories can lend insight into the debate over gay marriage and can show why homosexual romance and marriage are no different from heterosexual romance and marriage. The stage at which most human beings get married is the stage that Erikson calls early and young adulthood. Indeed, in most human cultures, marriages occur during this chronological life stage. The quest for intimacy has been crystallized in fairy tales, in which the princess (it's usually a princess) finally discovers her prince charming. The two live happily ever after. However, no known fairy tale describes a homosexual union. The absence of homosexual unions in fairy tales and in other forms of cultural discourse should in no case be a reason to exclude gays from the marriage institution. Contrary to what Schulman has to say, traditions are not always valid or valuable."
| |
|
Gay and Lesbian Parenting, 2002.
A study on the issue of homosexual parenting.
3,070 words (approx. 12.3 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines various opinions regarding the topic of gay and lesbian parenting. It illustrates clearly that gays and lesbian parents are mentally and emotionally stable enough to provide their children with love, support and attention that they require for success in all areas of life. The commons myths are addressed in this paper and are dispelled as being groundless in fact. This paper also discusses several court rulings concerning this issue.
From the Paper
"The Courts in the United States have tried repeatedly to provide children with a family setting which is recognized by American Family Law. Even the societal changes, which are currently taking place in family structures, the society itself and the legal system of our country have failed to see beyond the myths and misconceptions associated with alternative family structure. Millions of gays and lesbians are now trying to become parents through adoption, insemination and surrogate procedures. No matter which method is finally chosen, it has been repeatedly proven by researchers and pediatric professionals that gay couples are absolutely capable of providing love, support and moral values required for healthy mental and emotional development of children. "
|
|
|
