| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "ETHICS EUTHANASIA": |
|
|
Ethics of Euthanasia, 2006.
An examination of the ethics of euthanasia using the Jeremy Bentham's principle of utility from 'An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation'.
1,424 words (approx. 5.7 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides a definition of euthanasia, and then relates it to the principle of utility as described in 'An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation' by Jeremy Bentham. The paper then discusses the ethical perspective of euthanasia from the perspective of religion.
Outline:
Introduction
Review and Discussion
Conclusion
From the Paper
"From this point of view, if an action brings them happiness, it possesses utility; by contrast, to the extent that it does not do so is the extent to which it can be viewed as being a constraint to happiness: "By the principle of utility is meant that principle which approves or disapproves of every action whatsoever, according to the tendency which it appears to have to augment or diminish the happiness of the party whose interest is in question: or, what is the same thing in other words, to promote or to oppose that happiness" (p. 12). In reality, then, the steps that could be followed in an application of this principle to the concept of the ethics of euthanasia are not very different from any other setting."
|
| Term Paper # 46260 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
|
|
Christian Ethics, 2005.
This paper discusses three Christian moral issues and their related ethics: Euthanasia, abortion and the saving a child's life by producing a healthy baby in order to assist a dieing older sibling.
3,035 words (approx. 12.1 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper stresses that it is impossible to determine precisely what Christian ethics or morals are on any given issue without a plausible definition of what constitutes a Christian. The author points out that, from this review of the history of Christianity, the religion is practiced in varying formats and with various degrees of adherence to the moral and ethical dictates of the religion; furthermore, one observes that more than likely the "root-cause" for failures to adhere to Christian morals and ethics is a product of the slow-paced evolution of the Christian religion. The paper relates that, as an example of these other ethical issues, most scholars from both sides of the abortion issue feel that the resolution will come in the form of pre-natal research and development because advancements made within this science have already dropped the abortion rates appreciably nationwide.
Table of Contents
Thesis Statement
Why Christianity is in Turmoil
An Important Turning Point in Establishment
The Bible and the Establishment of Morals and Ethics
The Christian Ethics of Euthanasia
A Brave New Set of Ethics
Conclusions
From the Paper
"The Christian ethic concerning physician-assisted suicide is of course spelled out within the "Ten Commandments," of the Old Testament. Quite simply, "Thou shall not kill." On the other hand, down through the decades since the inventions of or development of "pain-relieving," drugs, physicians have been quietly going about the process of Euthanasia where there is no hope for continued productive life - usually labeled "end-stage relief," and their work although secretive in nature has not conjured much debate until the past two decades. Indeed, with the passage of a new "politically correct," law in the Netherlands recently the ethical reaction into the nature of this act has been minimal at best with discussions cropping up from time to time brought on primarily by the Religious Right. For example, the Reverend Billie Graham is one, along with his son Franklin that is quite out-spoken on the issue."
| |
|
Ethics of Physician-Assisted Suicide, 2005.
An examination of the ethical considerations behind euthanasia.
2,451 words (approx. 9.8 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 74.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The moral and constitutional issues surrounding physician-assisted suicide are extensively debated. This paper discusses that, if physician-assisted suicide is to become part of standard medical practice in the United States, there is a need to resolve the difficulties associated with its practical application. It explains that professional societies would need to cooperate to develop practice guidelines for physician-assisted suicide. Individual physicians will need to sort out for themselves what their personal positions will be and how their practice and referrals will be affected. It explains that professional education efforts that address palliative care options and reliable prescribing information would be essential. Physician-assisted suicide is a just and ethical act. It concludes that everyone who is suffering from a terminal illness has right to be free from pain and to die with dignity.
From the Paper
"All persons have a moral right to choose freely what they will do with their lives as long as they inflict no harm on others. This right of free choice includes the right to end one's life when we choose. For most people, the right to end one's life is a right they can easily exercise, but there are many who want to die, but whose disease, handicap, or condition renders them unable to end their lives in a dignified manner. When such people ask for assistance in exercising their right to die, their wishes should be respected. Using egoism, the utilitarian code of ethics, and Thiroux?s system of humanitarian ethics we can see if physician-assisted suicide is either ethical or non-ethical."
| |
|
Euthanasia and Infants, 2002.
A discussion of the ethics of euthanasia for severely defective or disabled infants
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 4 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is on the subject of euthanizing severely defective/disabled infants. The utilitarian ethical theory says that the decision should be for the best of all concerned. What is the best?
| |
|
Religious Perspective on Suicide and Euthanasia, 2005.
A look at the Christian and Buddhist views of the ethics of suicide and euthanasia.
2,371 words (approx. 9.5 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 72.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines and compares the standards and moral guidelines of the Christian and Buddhist faiths regarding suicide and euthanasia, and then demonstrates how the modern, secular, and moral stand on these issues is founded on these same guidelines.
From the Paper
"Within this work several sources will demonstrate the tenets of the similarities and differences of the ethical view of both Christina and Buddhist on suicide. Within the Encyclopedia of Religion there is a basic overview of the standards of faiths upon issues regarding the taking of ones life. The Buddhist view will be farther examined through the work of Damien Keown, who details three examples of suicide in the Pali Canon of the Buddhist faith, and Carl Becker, who writes extensively on the issue of suicide and euthanasia from the Buddhist perspective. Additionally selected works by and about the famous church father Augustine will demonstrate the Christian ethic on suicide."
| |
|
Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide, 2006.
An analysis of ethical issues in euthanasia and assisted suicide.
3,227 words (approx. 12.9 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 93.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The primary objective of this paper is not to discuss whether euthanasia and assisted suicide is right or wrong but to analyze the ethical issues involved. It attempts to show how ethical issues are integral to the practice of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide and how the implementation of ethical values should be within the ambit of the prevailing law so as to avoid conflict with the prevailing laws of the particular country.
From the Paper
"The action of a person taking an overdose of medicines or pulling out the tube providing life sustaining intravenous fluids is termed as assisted suicide. Euthanasia can be either voluntary or non-voluntary. It becomes voluntary when a competent person expresses his wish to be helped to die for a reason based on his perception. If the patient is unable or competent enough to state his desire to die, then such euthanasia is said to be non-voluntary. If the act of non-voluntary euthanasia is performed against the patient's wishes, then it is involuntary euthanasia and such an event is viewed as murder under the ambit of law."
| |
|
Ethics, 2005.
An analysis of a paper on ethics by James Rachels entitled "Active and Passive Euthanasia".
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 0 sources, APA, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is an analysis of the paper, "Active and Passive Euthanasia", by James Rachels, published about 30 years ago in which the question of the morality of all forms of euthanasia was examined. The paper presents a critique of the theme, style, language choice, contents, conclusions and strength of Rachels' paper.
From the Paper
"In his essay "Active and Passive Euthanasia", James Rachels explains that the traditional distinction between active and passive euthanasia requires critical analysis. The conventional doctrine is that there an important moral difference between the two that must be carefully examined. Rachels writes that the distinction between active and passive euthanasia is thought to be critical for medical ethics. This idea can be challenged in a number of ways. One is that active euthanasia is in many cases more humane than passive euthanasia. Another is that this idea rests on..."
| |
|
Ethics in Decision Making, 2002.
Discusses the basic ethical rules to be considered in the decision-making process, focusing on physician-assisted suicide.
1,019 words (approx. 4.1 pages), 2 sources, APA, $ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
There are several ground rules that should be considered in the decision-making process, when ethics are concerned. Ethics operate according to a certain set of moral criteria acceptable to society at a given time or in a given place. The paper shows that ethics or morals dictate how we as human beings should conduct our lives. They determine the standards of right or wrong actions in terms of the truly human life. A further aspect of ethics is admitting where society?s ethics fall short in terms of concerns that are minimized or ignored. The paper explains that the ultimate consideration in a decision-making process is not primarily one of religious or legal importance, but of social and human importance. The paper uses euthanasia as an example of using ethics in a decision-making process.
From the Paper
"The most pressing issue appears to be dignity. The argument is that people should have the right to die with dignity, which presumably is not the case if they are, for example, kept alive by machines. There is, however, an opposite point of view stating that death with the aid of a physician is not guaranteed to be dignified. Others approach the issue from a philosophical point of view, saying that meeting death with dignity is the natural result of living life with dignity. This then separates the issue entirely from the way in which a person dies. When all factors are taken into account, the conclusion is that a dignified death requires more than simply a legal right. A dignified death would require a large amount of courage and faith from a number of involved persons."
| |
|
Euthanasia, 2004.
A discussion of how euthanasia is not a violation of ethics or morally wrong.
1,986 words (approx. 7.9 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how the very purpose of life is to build individual consciousness and how the question of a first principle arises on the current premise of ethics surrounding the debate on the ethicality of euthanasia. It looks at how opponents to euthanasia have viewed most, if not all, their arguments from the moralistic perspective that there is an intrinsic value to human life and, therefore, it needs to be preserved until death occurs naturally. It attempts, therefore, to focus on the real ethical issues revolving around euthanasia and evaluate them against a commonly held view as to what constitutes a moral judgment.
From the Paper
"While there is certainly some validity in this argument, there also needs to be cognition of the fact that there is individual choice involved in exercising the right to determine whether or not he or she would like to go through such an experiential state. Nowhere in metaethics is there any implication of Divine enforcement of such consciousness on individuals. Rather there is an emphasis on individual effort towards higher and higher states of consciousness. It would also be of relevance here, to note that the theological view of the individual right to determine the time of death has varied down the ages."
| |
|
Physician-Assisted Suicide, 2002.
An examination the ethics surrounding euthanasia, especially with the help of the individual's personal physician.
922 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 32.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In a 1997 issue of Medical Economics it was reported that the Florida Supreme Court had ruled against physician-assisted suicide in a decision overturning a trial judge?s finding, giving AIDS patient Charles E. Hall the right to die as he wished. According to the Florida court, his intention to commit suicide through medical intervention was against the state?s policy to preserve life. This paper examines the legal ethics surrounding physician-assisted euthanasia and shows that the laws of most states in America are based on the Judeo-Christian concept that suicide is a moral evil. The paper ultimately argues that suicide assisted by the patient's personal physician should be legalized.
From the Paper
"While there is a focus on the right to life, there is also what is considered to be a ?negative right? which is the right not to have bodily injury or pain inflicted on oneself. Clearly, some medical procedures are painful in and of themselves, but when even this does not provide even short-term benefit, other options should be available without repercussion, should it be necessary to function as an agent of simple compassion to alleviate the pain of living and the fear of dying. There are few as capable of doing that as an individual?s physician, who should be entrusted to the care of the body, understanding that death is truly a viable part of life, and that choices impacting self should be the exclusive right of the individual."
| |
|
Euthanasia, 2002.
An exploration of the topic of euthanasia focusing on the ethical, moral and legal ramifications.
1,503 words (approx. 6.0 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 49.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a discussion to identify the distinction between the morality - or the inherent rightness or wrongfulness of an act - and ethics - the set of standards or codes of practice that proceed from definitions and determinations of wrongfulness and rightness. The paper uses the case of euthanasia, where not only are ethics and morality an issue, but the law is also involved. After reviewing the basis for ethics and morality and its impact on lawmaking in America, the writer firmly believes what emerges from this discussion is the belief that voluntary euthanasia sought by a competent, rational, mature adult who has exhausted all medical remedies should be permitted.
From the Paper
"Spong (2000) suggests that one way of framing the question of whether or not euthanasia is morally and ethically viable is to differentiate between what he calls ?active? and ?passive? euthanasia. In the case of the former, a physician or other actor would deliberately undertake steps to end the life of a suffering individual. Administration of medication, or even the mere participation in preparing a patient to self-administer a medication that has the potential to end life, is an active form of euthanasia. Passive euthanasia, on the other hand, would be allowing a patient to die by withholding treatment, food, life-support technologies at the patient?s request."
|
| Term Paper # 72578 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
|
|
Euthanasia Allowed, 2005.
This paper contends that euthanasia should be decriminalized for ethical reasons.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 2 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper argues that euthanasia should be decriminalized. The paper is written from an ethical point of view. The writer explains that the argument is based on weighing the ethics of permitting death within the medical establishment, or the ethics of limiting personal freedom and responsibility. The paper concludes that in the end, the right to choose must be given greater importance than the moral concerns of only one contingent of society.
From the Paper
"To be sure, euthanasia represents one of the most complex and heavily debated issues in modern, Western society. With recent high-profile examples like the Terri Schiavo case in Florida or the failed attempts by the Bush administration to outlaw euthanasia in Oregon, the topic seems to be at the forefront of cultural development. When we consider the ethics of the matter, it is important to weigh the moral cost of death against the moral cost of restricting freedom. This paper will argue that euthanasia should be decriminalized because it is the final example of the importance of freedom and the right to choose."
| |
|
Euthanasia, 2007.
A discussion of the ethical dilemmas facing doctors and nurses when discussing euthanasia.
1,452 words (approx. 5.8 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the ethical issue of euthanasia and particularly, the way that it impacts the nursing profession. The paper defines euthanasia and then goes on to describe the different forms of euthanasia and the differing ethical issues that exist for each one. The paper also discusses the moral dilemma for doctors who are required, on the one hand, to follow the patients's will and on the other hand, are required to treat and to attempt to cure.
From the Paper
"The involuntary euthanasia is the third and most cruel form of killing. In Nazi Germany the state decided to dispose off its retarded, handicapped and mentally ill under the T-4 Euthanasia Program. The persons being subjected to involuntary euthanasia fully appreciated their handicap, although severely ill or deformed, they did not want to die. This form is unacceptable in any society. Even in the post war Germany, the involuntary euthanasia practice during the Nazi period is recognized as inhuman and now the preferred word for euthanasia is 'Sterbhilfe' (help in dying)."
|
|
|
