| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "EMPLOYEE SAFETY HEALTH WELFARE LAW": |
|
|
Employee Safety, Health and Welfare Law, 2007.
This paper discusses employee safety, health and welfare in the US, focusing on the Occupational Safety and Health Act.
1,080 words (approx. 4.3 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer provides a history and overview of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSHA). The writer points out that this Act covers all American employers and their employees in occupations spanning the range from agriculture to manufacturing. Further, the writer explains that depending on the nature of the industry, OSHA standards may require that employers adopt a variety of practices, means, methods or processes that are deemed reasonably necessary and appropriate to protect workers on the job. The writer concludes that concerns about the new chemicals used in manufacturing, as well as the burgeoning arms manufacturing industry made safety legislation for American workers a pressing national concern.
From the Paper
"For example, compliance with safety standards may include ensuring that employees have been provided with, have been effectively trained on, and use personal protective equipment when required for safety or health. Whenever an employee must wear fire-retardant clothing or secure long hair when working over a kitchen grill, the employer is ensuring that he or she is compliant with OSHA. It is not only employees who are bound by OSHA - employees must also comply with all rules and regulations that apply to their own actions and conduct to ensure their own safety. An employee that refuses to secure his or her hair when working on a machine press is violating the law just as much as an employer that requires his or her employees to wear potentially dangerous clothing."
| |
|
Employee Safety, Health and Welfare Law, 2005.
This paper looks at the history of safety health and welfare laws in the United States.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article the writer studies the history of safety, health and welfare laws in the United States. The writer discusses which of the current laws apply in a specific employment situation.
| |
|
Employee Safety, Health and Welfare Laws, 2007.
A review of the Health Insurance Portability Act (HIPPA), the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and unemployment Compensation.
2,227 words (approx. 8.9 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 69.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper addresses a number of policies and government-mandated regulations that have worked to shape the employment environment. The paper presents information on the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, th Family and Medical Leave Act, and unemployment compensation by which employers must abide.
Outline:
Abstract
Employee Safety, Health, and Welfare Laws
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Family and Medical Leave Act
Unemployment Compensation
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Pre-existing condition refers to any medical condition that has been diagnosed or a condition for which symptoms were prevalent that would have caused the average person to seek medical care. Prior to HIPPA, pre-existing exclusions for coverage were used by many employer group coverage plans and insurance companies to limit the ability of employees to be covered by available policies. "HIPPA limits these exclusions to pre-existing conditions for which medical advice, diagnosis, treatment or care was recommended or received with the six month period ending on one's enrollment date. One's enrollment date is one's first day of coverage, or if there is a waiting period, the first day of one's waiting period; typically, one's date of hire" (Employee Benefits Security Administration, 2004, page or para #). If one's condition does not meet the preceding requirements, one's condition cannot be excluded due to a pre-existing condition. The six-month time frame may be shortened if one is covered under a HMO or as determined by state law. On the other hand, state law is not permitted to increase the six-month period."
| |
|
The Occupational Safety and Health Act, 2006.
This paper reviews and analyzes the legal aspects surrounding the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970.
1,080 words (approx. 4.3 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The writer of this informative paper defines and explains the concerns and goals of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSHA) which is applicable to all employers and their employees in the U.S. as well as the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. This paper analyzes the Federal OSHA standards which are categorized into four main groups comprised of general industry, construction, maritime and agriculture. This paper examines those individuals and industries which are exempt from OSHA's requirements and regulations including self-employed individuals and farms which employ only family members of the actual owner. This paper details the various conditions employers must adhere to when complying with OSHA's standards and regulations. The writer contends that the adherence to the standards may incorporate ensuring that employees are supplied with the necessary safeguards and tools to guarantee their personal safety and health. This paper also delves into the legal rights of both the employer and employee in matters pertaining to OSHA.
From the Paper
"The Federal OSHA standards are categorized into four major groups such as general industry, construction, maritime and agriculture while some standards are particular to just one category others are applicable across industries. The regulation necessitates the employer to grant the employee access to any medical records the employer maintains with regard to that employee, incorporating any records about the exposure of employees to toxic substances. The standard of personal protective equipment requires the employers to extend the employees with personal equipment devised to safeguard them against some hazards. The equipment can extend from safeguarded helmets to avoid head injuries in construction and cargo transportation work, to protect the eyes, safeguard the hearing capabilities etc. The California Legislature enacted the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 in order to ensure the workers safe and healthy working environment for all Californian working men and women."
| |
|
Safety and Health Risks, 2004.
An analysis of safety measures and health risks in the British corporate world.
2,761 words (approx. 11.0 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 82.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper contends that workers? health and safety has become a major issue of debate in the U.K. corporate world because it has been found that, in several cases, occupational injuries occur not due to the negligence of the employees, but more because of inappropriate safety measures in the working environment. The paper discusses the guidelines for ensuring a safe workplace. A number of court cases dealing with workplace injuries are examined in the paper.
From the Paper
"It is clear from the guidelines that every firm is required to perform a thorough risk assessment to determine the potential for health and safety hazards at the workplace and to take appropriate action in this connection. The terms ?suitable? and ?sufficient? imply that employers 'will recognise all foreseeable hazards, assess the risks arising from these measures and identify both the measures needed to control the risks and any other appropriate action necessary to comply with the employer's duties'. (EEC Directive)
The most important characteristic of the standards of workplace safety that are now prevalent in the UK is that they are based on a three-step framework. In other words, all standards including the Management of Safety and Health at Work regulations 1999 are developed using a three-step system. These are a) identification of problems b) assessment of risks and c) risk control. Employers are under a strict legal obligation to examine operational procedures to ensure their compliance with health and safety guidelines and to assess potential risks. Work-related operations are to be carefully reviewed and regularly improved in order to minimize the risk of injuries and fatalities at work. Similar other regularly standards in the UK advocate risk assessment and control method. For example The Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 1988 (COSHH) (UK) requires employers to regular evaluate operational procedures and take appropriate action to assess and control potential risks to healthy and safety of workers."
| |
|
Welfare-to-Work Law, 1999.
Examines the economic and political background, effects and provisions of the Welfare Reform Law of 1996, focusing on the effectiveness and problems of the participation of businesses.
3,600 words (approx. 14.4 pages), 24 sources, $ 127.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Substantive welfare reform was a contentious political issue in the United States from the day of the election of President Clinton in 1992 (Minow & Weissbourd, 1993) through 1996, when a welfare reform law was enacted (Riccio & Hasenfeld, 1996). The issue assumed even greater significance following the election of a Republican majority in the Congress in 1994.
From the Paper
"WELFARE REFORM: BUSINESS PARTICIPATION IN WELFARE-TO-WORK PROGRAMS
Introduction
Substantive welfare reform was a contentious political issue in the United States from the day of the election of President Clinton in 1992 (Minow & Weissbourd, 1993) through 1996, when a welfare reform law was enacted (Riccio & Hasenfeld, 1996). The issue assumed even greater significance following the election of a Republican majority in the Congress in 1994. Both the Democratic Administration and the Republican majority in the Congress favored welfare reform; however, each side has a different set of priorities (Chi, 1997).
The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PL 104-193), more generally known as the ..."
| |
|
Politics, Health and Welfare, 2003.
A look at the influence of political agenda on health & welfare policy.
2,718 words (approx. 10.9 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 81.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses how political agenda can affect policy. It discusses a selection of health and welfare policies that appear to have political motivations before trying to establish the extent to which politics influences policy. The paper focuses on examples in British political and health history.
From the Paper
"Britain is considered to be a liberal-democracy, whereby individuals select to vote for a candidate whose beliefs and values reflect their own (or, due to limited choice, are closest). The party who are seen to represent the majority or have the most votes (these are not necessarily the same thing) are then expected to lead the government forward and to develop policy in accordance with the values set out in their manifesto and in the interests of the public."
| |
|
British Health and Welfare Policy, 2003.
A discussion on how health and welfare policies are influenced by political agendas in Britain.
2,502 words (approx. 10.0 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 76.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyses how Britain is considered to be a liberal-democracy, whereby individuals select to vote for a candidate whose beliefs and values reflect their own and who is expected to lead the government forward and to develop policy in accordance with the values set out in their manifesto and in the interests of the public. It examines a selection of health and welfare policies that appear to have political motivations such as the 1906 Education Act and the 1948 NHS Act in order to establish the extent to which politics influences policy.
From the Paper
"In post-war Britain health care was diverse. It was supplied on a private basis to those who could afford to pay for it and by voluntary organisations for those who couldn?t. There was private insurance, state insurance (for workers) and free care for those with no insurance. There was a wide variety in the quality of care received. The same could be said for the knowledge of the doctors. Their geographical distribution posed further problems due to the fact that most doctors worked in affluent areas as there was money to be made there however, it was in the poor areas that they were needed most. Hospitals were forced to borrow money from the state, as there was an increased demand for their services following the war. As a result, the hospitals were facing the threat of closure."
| |
|
The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 1981.
This paper examines the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSHA): Factual mandates, criticism and problems of funding, enforcement and employer implementation.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 17 sources, $ 79.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The purpose of this research is to examine the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSHA) not only to learn of its factual mandates, but, more importantly, to discover criticism levied against it by business, labor and consumer advocates alike resulting from problems many faced attempting to implement this controversial law.
Approved by Congress on December 29, 1970, OSHA in brief "aims to assure safe and healthful working conditions by ensuring enforcement of standards developed under the Act, by assisting and encouraging states in their efforts to assure such working conditions, and by providing for research, information, education and training in occupational safety and health.".
The employer, under the Act, is responsible for ensuring safe and healthful working conditions, in particular for ... "
| |
|
Public Information Campaign on Cell Phone Safety: Are they a Hazard to our Health?, 2001.
A discussion of the health and safety issues related to cell phone usage.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the potential health and safety issues brought about by cell phone usage. The dangers of cell phone usage while operating an automobile, as well as the suspected connection to increased brain cancer are discussed. The feasibility of bringing about a change societal behavior related to the use of cell phones, in light of social and cultural norms that have developed, is addressed.
From the Paper
"Both a topic of constant debate and an issue of great social and commercial prevalence is that of cellular phone safety. Though a significant gray area still exists at the heart of this controversy, some researchers have indicated that cell phone use could potentially be hazardous to a user's health, either due to excessive implementation or utilization under particularly unaccommodating circumstances. As cell phone use increases, as it has drastically over recent years, health and safety concerns are becoming more audible. However, under the pretenses of the social and cultural model, a major health campaign to curb inappropriate or excessive cell phone use would carry the heavy burden of overhauling what have become social and cultural norms and standards."
| |
|
Occupational Safety and the Health Act of 1970, 1994.
An examination of the law protecting workers in workplace. Includes provisions, social welfare aspects, objectives, costs and effectiveness.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 7 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"OSHA
This paper will discuss the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. The first part of the paper will describe the most important provisions of the Act. The second part of the paper will discuss the social welfare issues the legislation responded to. The third part of the paper will examine the impact of the law on the social welfare concerns of the community. The fourth part of the paper will evaluate the success of the legislation in accomplishing the goals set out for it. The fifth part of the paper will make some recommendations concerning certain issues which merit further attention.
The Occupational Safety and Health Act was signed into law on April 28, 1971. Its stated aim was "to assure safe and healthful working conditions for working men and women." It directed the Secretary of ..."
| |
|
Occupational Safety & Health Act of 1970, 1996.
History & evolution of law & its effects on workplace safety. Legislative struggle, labor-business conflict, implementation, enforcement, inspections, weaknesses, reform, more. Outline.
4,950 words (approx. 19.8 pages), 15 sources, $ 135.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) has undergone significant changes since its enactment in 1970. These changes have come about partly because the OSH Act has operated under numerous presidential administrations, each with a distinctive view about the direction of policy. In addition, resource availability, political pressure from both the private and public sectors, Congressional action, court decisions, and evaluation from the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) have all led to legislative and administrative changes. As a result, OSHA has had a difficult time in balancing the mandate of its mission with competing interests.
The legislation that developed into the OSH Act built on the previous efforts of numerous groups. Occupational safety did not become a political issue until the 1960s. The issue evolved from..."
| |
|
Occupational Safety And Health Administration ( OSHA ), 2002.
Impact of OSHA on the homebuilding industry.
2,025 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 6 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Impact of OSHA on the homebuilding industry. Safety requirements. Construction standards for the industry. OSHA's role as a "partner" with home building companies, analyzing all safety procedures. Fines for non-compliance. Management requirements and purpose of dealing with OSHA. Need for a safety plan for building projects that meet OSHA code.
From the Paper
"The act of building a single unit dwelling for any company is a time consuming as well as equipment and materials consuming activity. Both of these broad areas must be micromanaged to achieve maximum efficiency that always translates into maximum profits. To ensure that the management of both time and materials is not done with any jeopardy to human safety, the United States has created an office with great responsibility and great power -- the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Of course, OSHA?s primary responsibility is the health and safety of all workers in all career fields, but most experts agree that there a..."
| |
|
Occupational Safety & Health Act of 1970, 1997.
Examined in terms of origins, provisions, background, worker protection, litigation, need for reform, weaknesses, penalties, inspections and enforcement.
2,700 words (approx. 10.8 pages), 11 sources, $ 95.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
" The OSH (Occupational Safety and Health) Act of 1970 empowered the Secretary of Labor and OSHA (Occupation Health and Safety Administration), the federal agency created to administer the act, to establish and enforce standards guaranteeing the health and safety of all covered workers. The act covers every employer whose business affects interstate commerce. Exempted in the 1970 act were federal, state, and local government agencies. Also exempted are self-employed persons, family owned and operated farms, religious groups that do not employ workers for secular purposes, and working conditions regulated by other federal agencies under other federal statutes. The fact that municipal employees are not covered by Federal OSHA is an oversight that should be corrected.
The OSH Act has undergone significant changes since its.."
| |
|
Occupational Safety & Health Administration, 1997.
Examines the history, changing goals, criticism, powers, reform, accomplishments and the future.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 5 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Introduction
The federal government has several agencies dedicated to protecting the rights and welfare of workers; some of these agencies protect wages and salaries while others investigate unfair dismissal. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), created in 1970, seeks to protect workers from unsafe job conditions. That the federal government should be involved in this aspect of the lives of its citizens is not surprising given the involvement that the government has with regard to employment and jobs in general. The federal government sets the minimum wage, administers Social Security (which is the only pension many workers will receive) and serves as an advocate for workers in other situations. This research examines how and why OSHA was created, what its role has been during its quarter century of existence, some.."
|
|
|
