| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "DIVISION": |
|
|
?The Division of Labor in Society?, 2002.
A review of the book ?The Division of Labor in Society? by Emile Durkheim.
2,629 words (approx. 10.5 pages), 0 sources, MLA, $ 79.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how in his book "The Division of Labor in Society", Emile Durkheim sees society as evolving, as developing over time and how he considers the specific element of solidarity as it was manifested at each stage of development. Division of labor is another specific dimension by which we explain the existence of the kinds and types of social organization in a given society. It shows how Durkheim in his book, explains both the nature of society as well as the meaning of, development of and place of individuality within that structure. It examines how Durkheim's vision of the division of labor is of a naturally occurring reality that becomes a force for social cohesion and solidarity, binding individuals in society more closely together and may imperil individuality as a result.
From the Paper
"In discussing the bond of social solidarity, Durkheim indicates that there are two ideal types of solidarity, one mechanical and the other organic. The bond of solidarity is that which defines a society and its rules and regulations, rules which can be transgressed by the criminal precisely because that solidarity exists and stands as that against which crime is directed and defined. Crime is defined by Durkheim as an "act contrary to strong, well-defined states of common consciousness" (Durkheim 60). He then indicates that it is possible to see what kind of solidarity the penal law symbolizes, and he says that it is clear that social cohesion exists when there is a certain conformity of each individual consciousness to a common type, the psychological type of society. "
| |
|
Cell Division, 1999.
Overview of cell growth and division and the examination of the process in organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
2,475 words (approx. 9.9 pages), 6 sources, $ 87.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
After providing an overview of the process of cell growth and division, this paper examines cell division in the organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Recent research on this organism is reviewed to examine some of the conclusions about the interactions between cell growth and division and the presence of various single and double mutant forms. Such a careful study of cell growth and reproduction in unicellular organisms such as S. cerevisiae has implications for human oncological research.
From the Paper
"Abstract
After providing an overview of the process of cell growth and division, this paper examines cell division in the organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Recent research on this organism is reviewed to examine some of the conclusions about the interactions between cell growth and division and the presence of various single and double mutant forms. Such a careful study of cell growth and reproduction in unicellular organisms such as S. cerevisiae has implications for human oncological research.
Introduction
This paper examines the cell division cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the common brewer's yeast that has long been used as an ..."
| |
|
Causes and Effects of the Division and Labor, 2002.
Compares and contrasts the theories of Marx and Engels regarding the causes and effects of the division of labor with Smith's theories.
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 2 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The basis of Smith's theories about the division of labor in human production rests in his repeated reference to "the natural" effects of production. Marx, on the other hand, understands production as a structure that is premised on social inequalities amongst humans. Where Smith regards "self-interest" as the natural force behind increasing a nation's wealth, Marx regards differences in social class as the source of exploitation in labor. Smith idealizes the division of labor, and Marx & Engels both regard exploitation of social inequality as the basis for divisions in labor.
| |
|
The Division of Labor, 2005.
An essay on the concept of the division of labor from both a theoretical and practical perspective.
1,392 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains what the concept of the division of labor means in terms of its theoretical and practical applications in an industrialized, capitalist society. The paper further explains that such a division of labor makes it impossible to separate an industry fully along the lines of internal divisions of labor, mechanistic and human, from the society which surrounds it.
From the Paper
"It is often the case that a generalized term is often known both by its theoretical and its practical applications, but it sometimes happens that such a term is also known to cover different practical effects when dealing with two different sets of circumstances. When talking about labor and capital, especially the industrialized, mechanistic labor inherent to capitalism, differentiations of application are often made along the lines of human beings and machines, or human beings and the mechanistic work that they are taking part in. The division of labor is mainly thought of by scholars and thinkers as being the whole of two distinct sums: that of the actual mechanized process of separating
and dissociating work as individual parts that lead to a complete whole and that of the effect on the human beings taking part in the dissociated work, in which each person plays an integral, if incomplete, role in the manufacture of a product. "...In one form or another the division of labor has remained the fundamental principle of industrial organization" (Braverman 69). It is a very significant concept concerning both a process and the effects of the process on the workers involved."
| |
|
The Marketplace, Division of Labor, and Modern Culture, 2002.
Discusses the importance of the marketplace and the division of labor to the creation of modern culture.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Summary: Without the Development of the Marketplace and the Division of Labor, Our Modern Notion of Culture Would Have Been Inconceivable. Culture needs the development of the marketplace and the division of labor, but capitalism can only develop along cultural lines.
| |
|
Gender Division In Canada, 2002.
Explores why there exists such a pronounced gender division in Canada's labour market.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 8 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Contemporary feminists in Canada often point to systemic factors that allow gender division to continue in the Canadian labour market. It seems that women are compromised perhaps in their workplace performances by findings that suggest that they do continue to place greater weight on issues related to the family and their children. The culture of the workplace may have changed in women's favour, generally speaking, but their other roles do obstruct them from being as highly or as well represented in the labour force as they might be. This paper attempts to make the reader understand the causes for the gender division in the Canadian labour market.
| |
|
Cell Division, 2004.
An overview of the process of mitosis and meiosis in cell division.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 2 sources, APA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the various stages and sequence of mitosis and meiosis in cell division and reduction cell division. The paper also explains independent assortment, crossing-over and random fertilization.
From the Paper
"Cell division results in two identical daughter cells, each very similar to the original parent cell. In eukaryotes cell division is carried out in two separate phases, the first phase separates the chromosomes in the nucleus and the second stage known ascytokinesis separates the cytoplasmic organelles between the two daughter cells. Each species has a characteristic number of chromosomes in the nucleus, in the human case in diploid pairs. The somatic cells of the organism contain a full diploid number of chromosomes while the egg sand
| |
|
Division of Labor, 2006.
Explains the importance of the concept of the division of labor.
1,386 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the division of labor is a significant concept which involves both the process itself and the effects of the process on laborers. More specifically, the paper explains that the division of labor is a fundamental theoretical and practical principle that involves the actual process of separating labor into distinct roles which do not let the worker manufacture a completed product, but rather separates the work into dissociated roles which are picked up by different skilled and semi-skilled workers, each completing a part of the process.
From the Paper
"The result and goal of this process is ultimately profit. And it follows that the capitalists running the production operation will use the division of labor to separate their working pools into skilled, highly-paid labor and semi-skilled, low-pay labor. Barbara Garson, realizing this conclusion, calls even the efficiency of the division of labor into question: "The main advantage of the auto assembly line to an employer is not speed but control... the requirement for control over unwilling workers shapes the division of labor at least as much as any straightforward calculation of the most efficient methods." The workers are perhaps thus unwilling because the division of labor has rendered the satisfaction possible and perhaps inherent in making a whole product from its individual parts to a more mechanistic process of manufacture in which one worker is responsible solely for a monotonously repeated process of sub-manufacture in which the worker feels naturally dissociated from the end product of his/her labors."
| |
|
Capitalism and The Division of Labor, 2002.
Discussing the famous economist, Adam Smith's view on capitalism and division of labor.
963 words (approx. 3.9 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 34.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper talks about the role that division of labor plays in capitalism. It focuses on Adam's Smith's view of division of labor and how it fits into our society. The advantages and disadvantges of this practice are listed and analyzed.
From the Paper
"Capitalism, what is Capitalism? It is an economic system, which has been dominant in the western world since the breakup of Feudalism. An economic system in which competing firms produce material use values (anything humans produce for use or sale) as commodities for a society wide competitive market."
| |
|
Division of Labor, 2004.
This paper discusses that the division of labor is a significant concept that involves both the process itself and the effects of the process on laborers.
1,390 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that early political economists considered the division of labor as a fundamental theoretical and practical principle, especially in industrialized, capitalist societies. The author points out that the division of labor involves the actual process of separating labor into distinct roles, which do not let the worker manufacture a completed product, but rather separates the work into dissociated roles that are picked up by different skilled and semi-skilled workers, each completing a part of the process. The paper states that the result and goal of this process is ultimately profit.
From the Paper
"The relation of the division of labor to productivity and efficiency is often explicit. The first condition that must be met, though, is the quantity of the divided parts that are to be produced and assembled by workers. Without an abundance of parts at each individual work-station, the division of labor would be useless, as the product would stop being constructed at any work-area at which materials were not abundant. In this way, the division of labor evinces the same sort of potential problems faced by the individual worker who is unable to complete a project from start to finish due to a lack of materials at any certain point in the process. What is different in the division of labor, then, can be better assayed through the consideration of a successful process than the consideration of a potential problem."
| |
|
Civilization and the Division of Labour, 2005.
A comparison of the views of Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim with regards to the division of labour.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 2 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares the thinking of Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim on the division of labour and social change. It analyzes how each theorist addresses similar social political and economic issues from fundamentally distinct perspectives. The paper demonstrates a critical point of difference between the two thinkers and how that lies in their understanding of the social function of the division of labour and how, in the view of Marx, it leads to social oppression and class conflict, while in the view of the functionalist Durkheim its consequences include individualism and civilization with social solidarity as its function.
| |
|
Buddhism during the Period of Division, 2003.
This essay is based on the rise and appeal of Buddhism in China while Confucianism and Daoism already existed during the Period of Division (220 - 589 A.D).
2,001 words (approx. 8.0 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the appeal of Buddhism in the historical context of the Period of Division. It explains that Buddhism's rise was answering the needs and desires of both the people and the rulers, especially foreign rulers, in a period of instability and in competition with the past dominated by Confucianism and organized Daoism. There is also the dialectic between its new content as a foreign religion and its sinicization, as both can account for its success in China.
From the Paper
"The Period of Division in Chinese history spreads between 220 and 589 A.D. The period is marked by wars, successions of small kingdoms, and great political instability and misery for the people. It is also the period of nomadic invasions. Buddhism exerted a great appeal to the Chinese during this period, became dominant at least in the north, and firmly established itself alongside Confucianism and Daoism as the main religions or schools of thought in China. What are the reasons behind its popularity during this period?"
| |
|
Advertising and the Division of Labour, 2002.
A look at the connection between advertising and the division of labour.
1,650 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 4 sources, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes an ad from a magazine or newspaper representing women and/or men. It analyzes the ad with reference to gender, class, race, rage or other identifications. It provides answers to the following questions: what ideas, stereotypes and messages does the ad project? What are the implications of these women and men as far as the division of labour is concerned within the home and outside?
| |
|
The 10th Mountain Division of the U.S. Army, 2004.
Presents a history of the 10th Mountain Division and its impact on skiing.
1,219 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper demonstrates the history of the elite fighting force of the United States Army known as the 10th Mountain Division, its strengths, and numerous contributions to the skiing industry.
From the Paper
"The 10th Mountain Division is a group of soldiers who train specifically for high-altitude mountain warfare in tough and cold conditions. Using downhill and cross country skiing techniques, these soldiers carry guns, and at least 90 ponds of gear. The force combines military training with a perfected skiing style that makes them able to move easily though difficult terrains, while still maintaining a fighting force."
| |
|
The Division Of Youth And Family Services, 2002.
An evaluation of the usefulness of the Division of Youth and Family Services (DYFS) in protecting abused and neglected children.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 7 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the role of the Division of Youth and Family Services (DYFS), regarding the care and protection of children exposed to abuse and neglect. The paper is an effort to discuss, whether the role of DYFS has been helpful or harmful in safeguarding the children.
|
|
|
