| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "DEVELOPMENT SOCIOLOGY": |
|
|
The Development of Sociology, 2001.
This paper discusses the prevailing sociological themes and major theories in the development of sociology as a scientific discipline.
3,127 words (approx. 12.5 pages), 18 sources, $ 91.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The roots of the development of sociology began in Europe. It is hardly an accident that sociology emerged as a separate field of study in Europe during the nineteenth century. That was a time of turmoil, a period in which the existing social order was being shaken by the growing Industrial Revolution and by violent uprisings against established rulers such as the American and French Revolutions. A need for a systemic analysis of society coupled with acceptance of scientific method resulted in the emergence of sociology. "
| |
|
Sociological Jurisprudence Development, 2008.
The author examines the evolution of sociological jurisprudence in Australia with specific regard to cases relating to legal definitions of sexual status.
1,969 words (approx. 7.9 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this paper, the author contends that jurisprudence is a constantly developing and changing system. Specifically, the author postulates the idea that jurisprudence evolves in direct relation to the effectiveness of rhetorical legal arguments and the ability of counsel to persuade the courts and eventually, society as to the legality, acceptability and morality of controversial issues. Next, the author cites the marriage of Kevin (a post-operative female to male transsexual) and Jennifer (both pseudonyms), where the nature of Kevin's sex and sexual identity was questioned by the Attorney General of New South Wales. The author then goes on to describe the legal processes and arguments that resulted in a change in Australian jurisprudence with regard to sexual identity.
Outline:
Essence of Re Kevin
Rhetorical Analysis
Hermeneutical Analysis
Conclusion
Bibliography
From the Paper
"The issue of what is considered 'normal' and legitimate for human behaviour has long been debated in various arenas. The perceived need to control sex and sexuality is not a new concept. Until relatively recently in western society, Christian morality has had a virtual monopoly on the definition of our sexes and a particularly efficient means of manipulating our expressions of them. To a certain extent this climate of moral management continues, particularly in the more conservative enclaves of society. However these debates and theories have also helped to establish the foundation for the recognition of new identities, in particular the nature of the relationship and sexual identity scrutinized in Re Kevin and the development of a different line of jurisprudence in Australia; a veritable post-colonial moment."
| |
|
Sociology Questions, 2005.
A brief response to four basic questions in sociology.
987 words (approx. 3.9 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses four questions regarding sociology. First is the contrast between Gemeinschaft and Gessellschaft. Second, is a definition of anomie and what condition it may develop. Third, is a discussion of how sociology can be seen as developing from a concern about loss of community. And lastly, is a discussion of how social relationships in modern society differ from those of feudal society.
From the Paper
"German sociologist, Ferdinand Tonnies, introduced Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft as sociological catergories to describe two normal types of human association. Tonnies discussed these terms in his work entitled Gemeinshaft and Gesselschaft, which was first published in 1887. His second edition, printed in 1912, was a success, and these two terms became well known, although often misunderstood, by German intellectuals, prior to 1933 ("Gemeinshaft", 2004)."
| |
|
The Relationship between Sociology and History, 2004.
This paper raises the question of how far history, with its emphasis on the particular and on individual human factors in causation, can work in harmony with sociology.
2,135 words (approx. 8.5 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 66.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper argues that the development of modern historical scholarship away from an emphasis on the individual and towards a recognition of the role of social groups, such as classes and masses and large-scale economic, social, and cultural factors, has brought history and sociology into closer conjunction intellectually and methodologically. The author points out that the strong influence exerted by the academic discipline of sociology upon history during the 1960s was itself very important in bringing about this development in history?s methodological approach. The paper stresses that neither sociology nor history should take over the other discipline, but that there is a strong identity in approach and methodology that must be recognized and indeed welcomed as intellectually vibrant.
From the Paper
"Bernhard J. Stern?s observation of 1949 can be seen as an appeal for sociology to work in harmony with history; specifically, for sociologists to inform their work with an understanding of the value of historical context in providing substance to their discipline. This can be seen as an expression of a long-established critique of sociology, from the perspective of history: that it has a tendency to be abstract, to rely excessively on concepts and methodologies detached from the actual contexts of human interaction, even where the empirical study of social relationships is its starting point. For many sociologists this emphasis on abstract universal principles ? the ?nomothetic? emphasis of sociology ? is precisely the discipline?s strength and provides part of its reason for existing as a distinct discipline. It can be argued that all social science must strike an analytical balance between the general and the particular, and it has been part of sociology?s identity that it has tended to come down on the side of the general."
| |
|
Obstacles to the Right Development, 2005.
A look at some of the obstacles hindering the economic development of many nations.
2,265 words (approx. 9.1 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 70.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper traces the root of the obstacles blocking economic development of many underdeveloped countries back to the Bretton Woods agreement. The paper argues that as a result of this agreement, many of the war-torn countries that needed to rebuild themselves after World War II were, compared to the industrialized nations, at an automatic disadvantage because of their relatively lower productivity and sometimes non-existent infrastructures. The paper also suggests that this automatic disadvantage has had a lasting legacy and that the U.N. and the international bodies that came out of the Bretton Woods agreement still create obstacles to economic development for less developed nations. The paper also takes a look at the consequences of an imbalance in opportunities for economic development and concludes that in order to close the gap between wealthy and poor nations, a more sociologically and ethically based approach to global governance is required.
Introduction
The Bretton Woods Legacy
All Pigs are Not Equal
Current Contributions to the Rich-Poor Gap of Nations
Consequences of Inequality of Wealth for the "Right to Development"
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Had it not been for the Great Depression (beginning in 1929) and World War II (1939-1945), there might have been no Bretton Woods Conference, no International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (the World Bank) no International Monetary Fund. Nor would there have been, arguably, the current divergence between rich nations and poor, or at least, the gulf might not have been so deep and so well-defined. The "destruction caused by war and the money nations spent fighting it" harmed most of the European and Asian economies, leaving only the United States, among industrialized nations, not in need of rebuilding its infrastructure or its economy (Earth Explorer, 1995). Now, however, it seems there is economic destruction of another kind, founded in an imbalance of payments and opportunity that has resulted in virtual negation of the Right to Development that would appear to be a legitimate claim of any nation."
| |
|
Introduction to Sociology, 2006.
This paper examines the origins of sociology as well as the impact of the industrial revolution which changed the face of the social and physical environment.
1,315 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The writer of this paper defines sociology as the study of society and social institutions. This paper explores the new discipline of sociology which began in the 19th century with the introduction of the industrial revolution in Europe. This paper describes how sociology is applied when studying various interaction patterns in both individual and group settings. The writer also discusses how various aspects of culture impact society.
Outline:
Definitions
The Development of Sociology
The Origins
Early Sociologists
Subject Matter of Sociology
Collective Behavior
Limited Social Interactions
Unclear Social Boundaries
Weak & Unconventional Norms
Culture
Aspects of Culture
Socialization
Social Structure
Social Institutions
Bibliography
From the Paper
"The new discipline of sociology began to merge in the middle of the nineteenth century, in the contest of the sweeping changes the industrial revolution brought to Europe. No social changes in the history had been as wide spread or as far-reaching, as this information which is still taking place in the less developed nations of the world cried out for analysis and explanations. Industrialization threw into turmoil societies that had been relatively stable for centuries. New industries and technologies changed the face of the social and physical environment. Peasants left rural areas and flocked to the towns, where they worked as industrial laborers under appalling conditions."
| |
|
Sociology of Sleep, 2003.
This paper is about sleep as a sociological discipline to be studied and investigated by researchers, as well as students and professors of sociology.
3,150 words (approx. 12.6 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 91.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper investigates sleep as a sociological process. The writer explains the methodology used, including an introduction, a literature review, and results of the findings. It looks at a history of the study of sleep and further examines modern-day literature on the topic. It finds that the sociology of sleep has its roots deeply planted in rational choice theory, in the sense that the human being must make a rational, coherent choice in weighing out the costs and benefits before deciding how much sleep to engage in on a particular occasion.
From the Paper
"When I first decided to investigate sleep as a sociological process for the 2003 Sociological symposium, I had no idea where my research would take me or what I was getting into. I basically conducted my project as a research paper, finding an abundance of information regarding sleep within cultures, but finding an enormous lack of research regarding sleep in the field of sociology. Even studying sleep cross-culturally was a field left mostly up to anthropologists. As I continued to research various cultures and their methods of sleeping, I found there are very deep sociological implications for sleep. Thus my original research question was becoming more of a mystery than a solution: why is sleep not being researched within the field of sociology?"
| |
|
Developmental Studies and Sociology, 2006.
Contrasts and compares the fields of scientific sociology and developmental studies.
2,551 words (approx. 10.2 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 77.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the fields of scientific sociology and the broader field of developmental studies, examining both similarities and differences in the two fields. The paper explains that while the worlds of scientific sociological investigation and developmental studies are indeed closely related, the field of scientific sociology has yet to overcome a great deal of its "snobbery," before it can work effectively with the newer and broader field of developmental study.
Table of Contents
Thesis Statements
Comparisons and Contrasts of Sociology and Development
The Scientific Sociological Viewpoint
A Typical Example
The 4 S Society
Conclusions
From the Paper
"The Scientific Sociologist, Psychologists and other professionals in attendance at these various meetings received their "wake-up," calls where this issue was concerned. However, not all agreed that the events of the past quarter-century confirm Mead's precocious reasoning that academic scholars and professional societies have unwisely abdicated public education and cultural leadership to others. Putting it somewhat less politely, academic research relevant to the general public is a challenge that cannot be put off any longer."
| |
|
Sociology Over Psychology, 2002.
An argument for sociology over psychology in dealing with issues such as emotion, intelligence and suicide.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 2 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will discuss why sociology is more important than psychology when it comes to such issues as emotions, suicide and intelligence that can have a diverse affect on society, but more importantly than what psychology can teach. Sociology discusses more solutions within the scope of a society and therefore, can be a better way to handle the systems that are crated in a society to deal with it more effectively. Some examples of studies will be offered to make these points more clear and to show how sociology is a more important angle on the issues. Furthermore, an example of a future study that may applicable to intelligence will be brought forth by myself to try and make an argument for sociology over psychology.
| |
|
The Sociology of Poverty and Welfare, 2005.
A sociological perspective on poverty and welfare, including a sociological definition of poverty, explanations for poverty and welfare, and an evaluation of the explanations.
3,525 words (approx. 14.1 pages), 12 sources, APA, $ 98.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper researches the sociology of poverty and welfare. The paper identifies the conflict and individualistic and cultural perspectives in poverty and welfare, gives a description of six sociological explanations relating to the two identified perspectives of poverty and welfare, and evaluates three of the sociological explanations. Further, this paper gives a description of at least eight sociological studies of welfare and poverty, with at least four representing the different sociological perspectives, as well as four evaluations of the sociological studies. Finally, this paper provides a description of four main constraints, which could affect the work of sociologists in their study of welfare and poverty.
Statement of Thesis
Review of Literature
Summary and Conclusion
From the Paper
"Defining elements in culture are those of language, beliefs, values, norms, behaviors, and material objects that are passed through generation to generation. Further culture can be separated into subgroups of material culture and nonmaterial culture. Components within a culture are inclusive of symbols, gestures, language, values, norms and sanctions, folkways and mores." Those who participate in social research or sociologists place their reliance on three main theoretical frameworks which are symbolic intereactionism which is defined in the focus on languaging and human relationship elements in intimate group settings which gives emphasis to the construction and communication by the individual through use of symbols or micro-analysis. In the thinking of today there is little disagreement that there is not an existence of a definitive in poverty that is "the" end-all in relating the meaning of the existence demonstrating the meaning of poverty. Globalization is new in the theorem arena in relation to reflect on poverty. The studies that are recent in relation to: "globalization, regionalization and their local manifestation in 'globalization' revealed an extraordinary variety of micro-social" causal factors and reasons within the framework of social processes and consequences that are of a broader nature."
| |
|
Sociology and Science, 2006.
This article analyzes the connection between sociology and the scientific method.
1,234 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Sociology studies human behaviour and society. The writer points out that sociology also is a science; it subscribes to the accepted scientific method of the other natural sciences, however there is much debate and contention about the nature of the scientific method and whether it is entirely applicable to sociological discourse. The writer explains the debate and concludes that sociology is a science - but this statement has to take into account the changing view of what science is.
From the Paper
"Sociology as a discipline is part of the scientific examination and understanding of human behavior and society. In this sense, and as a science, it attempts to "... discover the causes and effects that arise in social relations among persons and in the intercommunication and interaction among persons and groups." ( Sociology) As a scientific enterprise sociology also includes within its parameters the "... the study of the customs, structures, and institutions that emerge from interaction, of the forces that hold together and weaken them, and of the effects that participation in groups and organizations have on the behaviour and character of persons." ( ibid) Sociology therefore subscribes to the accepted scientific method of the other natural sciences. However there is much debate and contention about the nature of the scientific method and whether it is entirely applicable to sociological discourse."
| |
|
What is Sociology?, 2004.
A look at some methodological approaches to sociology social theory.
919 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 32.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is concerned with synopsis of the concept of sociology, its etymological meaning and definition. It briefly highlights the process through which sociology emerged as an academic discipline. Finally, the debate originated by different sociological perspectives is analysed in order to provide a much broader view of the role played by sociology on a day-to-day basis.
From the Paper
"For instance, the word ?Sociology? derives from the combination of the Latin socius (meaning companion) and the Greek logos (meaning the study of). So the word literally means the study of companionship, or social relations. ( Cuff, 1980)Many will define Sociology as the study of society, but nevertheless it can constitute a great challenge to understand what it really means. This is because it requires the individual to analyse this subject in greater depth by suspending all his or her personal views about their surroundings. Thus being a detached observer and develop the ability to look underneath the ?surface? is a compulsory requirement."
| |
|
Durkheim and Sociology, 2005.
An examination of the contribution that Emile Durkheim made to the field of sociology.
1,600 words (approx. 6.4 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 52.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Sociology is an extremely important field of study that has dramatically changed the world in which we live. This paper looks at how Emile Durkheim played a major role in shaping sociology and its theories. The discussion provides an overview of the theorist and his work and focuses on the evaluation of the validity of the theories of sociology.
From the Paper
"A book entitled Emile Durkheim, 1858-1917: A Collection of Essays, with Translations and a Bibliography describes the socialist and his theories. Durkheim was born April 13, 1958 in ?pinal, France. Epinal is located in the Vosges region of Vosges. (Durkheim, ?mile) Thought and intellectual capabilities came to him easily as his ancestors were rabbinical scholars; in fact, Emile was supposed to become a Rabbi and continue this tradition. (Durkheim, ?mile) There is very little known about his parents; the book reports that he rarely spoke about his parents. One of his most influential teachers was a Catholic woman and while under her tutorage he studied a mystical form of Catholicism. However, the book explains that Durkheim was actually agnostic."
| |
|
The History of Sociology, 2001.
This paper traces the history of the development of the study of Sociology and examines the works of its founders , including Marx, Durkheim and Weber.
1,450 words (approx. 5.8 pages), 6 sources, $ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides a complete overview of the development of the science of sociology. It focuses on three major players - Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim and Max Weber and their influence on the early stages of the science. It shows how they they helped form the basis for the three general perspectives in sociology: conflict theory, functionalism, and interactionism.
From the paper:
"It was Auguste Comte (1789-1857) who coined the term ?sociology.? He believed this new science should study the question of ?how is society possible?? (Bartek/Mullin14) He based his own science on the idea that society is composed of individuals in the same way as a line is composed of points. The focus must be on observations of society and the collections of those individuals. Because of Comte?s work, other sociologists began to study the changes in society."
| |
|
The Emergence of Sociology, 2002.
A look at the argument that the appearance of sociology in the nineteenth century was a result of social forces prevailing at the time.
2,051 words (approx. 8.2 pages), 11 sources, MLA, $ 64.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Many sociologists argue that the appearance of sociology in the 19th century was the result of social forces prevailing at the time. The French and Industrial revolutions together with Enlightenment are said to have influenced the emergence of the discipline. It examines how the impact of these events, the inception of sociology into academia and comparison between traditional structuralism and post modernism reveal how social forces have changed sociology post World War Two. The conclusion is a brief summary which reflects that sociologists argue that the discipline emerged in the nineteenth century as a result of social upheaval largely because it came into being as a means of analysing and explaining those social forces.
From the Paper
The claim that sociology emerged in the 19th century as a result of social forces prevailing at the time can be explored by assessing the influence that the historical events, which occurred prior too and shortly after that century, had on the emergence of sociology. The events in question are the French and Industrial revolutions and Enlightenment. These historical events prompted sociologists and layman alike to question or challenge the economic, political and social arrangements of their time. In part, sociology emanated through the need for understanding the disarray that preceded these events (Berger, 1970:55).
|
|
|
