| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "DECRIMINALIZING MARIJUANA": |
|
|
The Decriminalization of Marijuana, 2001.
An essay that reviews the benefits of Canadian decriminalization and/or legalization of marijuana.
1,842 words (approx. 7.4 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 59.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper talks about how it would be beneficial for the Canadian government, as well as the Canadian citizens, if marijuana is legalized or decriminalized. The paper covers issues such as the government's biased opinion towards marijuana, how the amount of people in jail for marijuana use are tying up the legal system as well as legal system funds and how legalization would reduce the amount of drug rings in Canada. The paper also discusses the Marijuana Party of Canada and many of their major points (platforms).
From the Paper
"Weed, pot, trees, grass, ganja, Mary Jane, reefer, chronic, and bud are all slang terms. Slang terms for a drug commonly called marijuana, scientifically referred to as cannabis. This drug has been gaining prominence in the media lately and with good reason simply because it is such a controversial topic with many differing viewpoints. A number of politicians began to question Canada?s marijuana laws after Canadian athlete, Ross Rebagliati, temporarily lost his gold medal in Olympic snowboarding when tests revealed the presence of a small amount of marijuana in his body. Indeed, many Canadian citizens were outraged when the International Olympic Committee stripped Rebagliati of his medal simply because he tested positive for the drug (Gage, 2001). After all, some argued, marijuana is not a performance-enhancing drug, so his use of it could not have led to his winning the gold."
| |
|
Decriminalization of Marijuana, 2008.
This paper argues for the decriminalization of marijuana in the United States.
1,017 words (approx. 4.1 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper maintains that marijuana laws are costly and ineffective and its decriminalization will allow for a more judicious allocation of funds. The paper argues that decriminalization will undermine the black market and will not precipitate the increased consumption of the narcotic by young people. The paper concludes that the positives of decriminalization certainly outweigh the negatives.
From the Paper
"To begin with, the marijuana laws in America are costly to enforce and inefficacious. For instance, a July 2005 report revealed that federal spending devoted to enforcing criminal sanctions against marijuana use runs to around $4 billion each year - and yet fails to make any perceptible impact upon the country's perception of, or use of, marijuana. What makes the matter more problematic is the fact that the federal government spends more on enforcing marijuana prohibition than it does on policy formulation or on treatment programs (Hemp Information, para.1). Suffice it to say, any laws which are costly and which have little impact upon a perceived problem should be dramatically altered in their scope and application - or struck down entirely."
| |
|
Why Decriminalizing Marijuana is the Right Thing to Do, 2005.
The arguments for and against the decriminalization of marijuana.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 6 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper analyzes the pros and cons of the marijuana decriminalization debate. The paper briefly examines both sides of the argument and concludes that there is compelling evidence arguing against the continued decriminalization of marijuana. Specifically, the paper looks at the resources which can be diverted to more important issues, and also at the way that decriminalizing marijuana could make the difficult tasks of police officers considerably easier. The paper concludes that that marijuana is less problematic than alcohol and over-the-counter drugs and that decriminalization would be beneficial.
From the Paper
"There can be little question that marijuana use has polarized the American in ways that would have been unanticipated even a few years ago. Not least of all, there is a battle ongoing between those who feel the decriminalization of marijuana is simply a step forward and one more means of allocating police resources more efficiently, and those who feel that rampant marijuana use - and certainly its decriminalization - is one more instance of America's moral decay. The following paper will review the arguments against marijuana decriminalization and the arguments in favor of marijuana decriminalization. As should become apparent, there are a number of compelling and trenchant arguments against continuing the prohibition against a drug that causes far less havoc each and every year than do alcohol and/or over-the-counter prescription drugs. With that in mind, it is to a discussion of this thorny issue that this paper now turns."
| |
|
Decriminalization of Marijuana in Canada, 2002.
A discussion on whether or not marijuana should be legalized in Canada.
2,520 words (approx. 10.1 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 76.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper outlines the history of Canadian narcotics legislation as it pertains to marijuana. It then outlines arguments both for and against legalization or decriminalization while assessing the harm or good that this could cause.
Introduction
Marijuana ? A Brief History
The Plant in Canada
Drug Laws
An Examination of Proposed Changes to Canadian Marijuana Laws
Pros And Cons
Decriminalization
Legalization
Maintaining the Status Quo
Legalization or Decriminalization? Personal Reflections
Conclusion
References
From the Paper
"There has been much talk and speculation as of late that Canada is ready to change its marijuana policy. Following the lead of such countries as Spain and England, it appears that Canada has been seriously considering either decriminalizing or legalizing marijuana possession. There are many arguments against and for such a move. Many against a change to marijuana policy feel that undertaking such a step would lead to increased usage, especially among young people. Those in favor feel that changing marijuana policy is a timely idea that will actually lead to decreased usage: marijuana could be treated as a public health issue as opposed to a criminal act, thereby allowing the government to set up health education programs in an attempt to deter its use. This approach has worked for tobacco and alcohol. This paper is going to look at the pros and the cons of a change in Canadian law in terms of its effect on organized crime. The nature and structure of the Canadian marijuana trade will be examined in order to see what benefits, if any a decriminalization or legalization move would provide. Before this can be done, the current drug law must be examined as it pertains to marijuana."
| |
|
Decriminalizing of Marijuana, 2004.
Presents arguments in favor of the decriminalization of marijuana.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 12 sources, MLA, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the reasons for decriminalization of marijuana, citing studies which show it would not increase use of the drug, and would not lead to the use of hard drugs. It also cites the attitutes of other countries around the world on possession of small amounts of marijuana for personal use.
| |
|
Decriminalizing Marijuana, 1995.
This paper argues for the decriminalization of marijuana on moral, economic and health grounds: History, politics, medical benefits and social impact.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 5 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The topic of decriminalizing some classes of drugs, particularly marijuana, has been turning up in the news again regularly. It had been a topic of considerable political debate when President Jimmy Carter endorsed decriminalization of marijuana in 1977, but the idea quickly lost respectability when President Ronald Reagan renewed the "war on drugs" in 1982. The issue briefly surfaced again a few years ago when former-Surgeon General Jocelyn Elder speculated that the costs of keeping marijuana illegal may far exceed the benefits. This research examines the moral, economic and health costs and benefits associated with criminalizing marijuana use. It argues that de-criminalizing the use of marijuana has merit on all three grounds.
Hemp, the basic plant that is marijuana, was at one time ... "
| |
|
Should Marijuana Be Decriminalized?, 2008.
A look at the debate surrounding the decriminalization of marijuana.
1,402 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses the significant economic effects of criminalization and prosecution of marijuana and questions whether the social benefits are worth the costs. The paper takes the position that the economic effect of continuing to criminalize marijuana doesn't make sense. The paper explains that since the costs are so hard to quantify there will likely never be a consensus on this issue. The paper also notes that what is indisputable is that the legal status of marijuana, whether it is criminalized or decriminalized, has a large economic impact on society.
From the Paper
"In recent years many individuals - including some prominent economists - have advocated the decriminalization of marijuana. These proponents argue that the decriminalization of marijuana would, among other things, allow society to divert resources previously used on drug offenders to other more productive issues, reduce the profits of those who deal in illegal drugs, reduce drug related crime, and eliminate the overcrowding of the prison system. Advocates of legalization make an analogy between current day drug policies and Prohibition. During Prohibition, the United States devoted a large amount of resources to fighting the sale and consumption of alcohol, while bootleggers made large amounts of money illegally selling alcohol."
| |
|
Marijuana as Medicine, 2002.
A discussion of the issues concerning the decriminalization of marijuana for medical purposes including anecdotal evidence.
1,900 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 6 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes the issue of marijuana decriminalization for medical purposes. Starting with a discussion of an upcoming Supreme Court ruling, the author provides an analysis of the case for decriminalization, including a recent book full of anecdotal evidence. The author then discusses how the federal government has taken a hard line against marijuana users and even doctors who prescribe the drug. This no-compromises attitude led to a lawsuit in 1997, in which several prominent doctors and patients sued the Drug Czar and Barry McCaffrey for violating their rights when, under Proposition 215, marijuana could be used in California and Arizona for medical reasons. The doctors claimed that they had been threatened by the DEA for prescribing the drug, while patients had been arrested and faced stiff penalties. The case has gone back and forth several times, while Proposition 215 has been suspended. The outcome is unclear, and the author finished the essay by describing how decriminalization necessitates removing marijuana from "Schedule I" status, which is reserved for dangerous drugs which have no medicinal value.
| |
|
Marijuana for Medical Purposes, 2006.
An argument for decriminalizing marijuana in the American justice system.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 5 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses a study on marijuana that has shown that there are valid medicinal purposes to making this drug legal, and the federal government needs to stop criminalizing medical users. By understanding the sinister motives of the federal government to keep it illegal through criminal profiteering (through excessive and irresponsible funding for private prisons, lumber companies, and police enforcement agencies), one can surely hope that a democratic humanity can overcome their erroneous ways by allowing the sick and suffering access to this highly effective drug.
From the Paper
"The basis of this legal study will be to argue for the currently illegal drug marijuana to be used legally for medicinal purposes. By showing the recent studies that validate the proof for this claim in the medical field, one can surely see how the denial of the American justice system denies pain relief for the sick and suffering. The federal law that criminalizes marijuana is supported by non-empirical evidence, which suggest that lumber companies, police enforcement agencies, and politicians are profiteering off of marijuana as a deviant aspect of American culture. With American citizens seeking valid information to uphold this helpful drug, the law could and should be focused on decriminalization for this drug."
| |
|
The Decriminalization of Prostitution in Toronto, 2008.
An argument in support of the decriminalization of prostitution in Toronto.
2,975 words (approx. 11.9 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 87.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how the decriminalization of prostitution in Toronto may be advantageous for sex workers. It states that although women are supposedly equal in Canada, somehow thousands of Canadian women still end up in sex work - a line of work in which they are at risk of violence, diseases and death. The paper argues that laws meant to protect society actually victimize people who are already at the bottom rung of society - marginalized, poor women - as well as a smaller group of male and transsexual prostitutes, and even some children. Law enforcers and the public frequently launch campaigns aimed at removing sex workers altogether - such as closing brothels and massage parlors. This does not remove sex workers - it merely makes them less safe. The paper concludes that protecting the rights of sex workers and decriminalizing prostitution will help to protect their safety and welfare.
From the Paper
"The lives of sex workers are fraught with risks and threats. For example, by the very nature of their work, they are at risk of contracting a range of sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV, which is usually terminal. One might argue that sex workers should protect themselves by practicing safe sex. However, the reality is that these people are in a very disempowered position in society, and consequently, they are very often not in a position to insist on safe sex practices. A key part of their disempowerment is that they have little recourse to the law. In other words, if they are forced to have unsafe sex, they do not feel safe in laying a charge with the police. This is because their line of work is circumscribed by laws that aim to end prostitution, and therefore they do not feel safe phoning the police. Thus, one of the key reasons why the legal system pertaining to sex work should be changed is that this would facilitate equal rights to police protection for sex workers - who desperately need such protection."
| |
|
Drug Legalization and Decriminalization, 2002.
A look at the issues concerning drug legalization and decriminalization of drug policy in America.
2,900 words (approx. 11.6 pages), 6 sources, $ 106.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will discuss the nature of the legalization of drugs, and the possibilities of decriminalization that have been brought before our nations courts. By understanding what the arguments are for both sides, we can argue for a more balanced approach to the issue of legalization and what this means. In essence, we can rely on creating an argument for drugs to be a good medical source that could be legally created, and also would help to lower levels of criminals that are imprisoned for this offense. By realizing the sides of the argument, we can see how drugs can be brought into the system on a legal basis that would be responsibly used.
| |
|
Decriminalization and Illegal Drug Use, 2006.
This paper examines the issue of drug decriminalization, indicating that it is not a solution to the drug addiction problem.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 8 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper reveals that the decriminalization of drug abuse has not been so successful in other countries. Most Canadians favouring de-criminalization refer to cannabis or their own drug preferences, unaware of thousands of persons trapped in heroin and especially crack cocaine abuse and related criminality. Having laws against drug trafficking helps medical professionals to help the addict who wants to change his or her life, perhaps believing an addiction cannot be overcome. The paper provides comments on harm reduction, the need to help the addict and the ethics of keeping some drug laws in place towards this end.
From the Paper
"Western countries have seen rising addiction to illegal drugs, related crime and overall harm to the public (Allen, 2005). This paper examines the issue of drug decriminalization, noting a number of arguments for and against, indicating that decriminalization is not a solution to the drug addiction problem. In addition to textual research, time was taken to visit two Toronto areas noted for addicts and related criminal activities. This allowed for observation of people whose entire lives are centred on drug abuse as helped to see defects in the arguments of those who recommend decriminalization."
| |
|
Decriminalization of Prostitution, 2004.
A libertarian argument for the decriminalization of prostitution in America.
4,380 words (approx. 17.5 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 115.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how the American public has the choice to continue standing in opposition to reality and trivialize the risks sex workers face or to recognize that, regardless of its reputation or acceptance, it is a viable employment option for a number of people and deserves, at a minimum, protection under the law just as any other profession. It looks at how decriminalization could be the first step in creating a dialogue in understanding what prostitution truthfully entails and why it continues to persevere throughout the ages despite moral and social condemnation.
From the Paper
"Traditional means of handling prostitution in the U.S. demonstrate a preference for lengthening punishments and the use of strong-arm tactics. Prostitution did not receive recognition as a major social concern until after the Civil War when an abolitionist group sought to draw attention to this issue by launching a ?propaganda battle?, which is considered ?largely responsible for the characterization of the prostitute as the ?fallen woman? recruited by ?vice lords? through an extensive white slave traffic? (Jennings 1239). The group?s efforts led to the implementation of the Federal White Slave Act in 1910, which marked the closing of most legitimate brothels and outlawed pandering and soliciting in a majority of the states (Jennings 1239)."
| |
|
The Case for Decriminalization of Drugs, 2006.
A persuasive argument in favor of decriminalizing drug use.
1,320 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper argues that the current war on drugs has been an extremely costly failure for the U.S. According to the author, current anti-drug policy -- which includes the use and sale of controlled substances -- is simply impossible to enforce. The author looks at the cost of the war on drugs, both in terms of lives and dollars that could be saved from switching priorities. Then the paper debates medical statistics, citing that (currently) illegal drugs result in many fewer deaths each year than legal ones, such as alcohol and tobacco. Finally, the paper deconstructs the commonly held belief that marijuana is a gateway drug. The paper concludes with the author's recommendation that drug use be decriminalized.
From the Paper
"The United States has been engaged in a "war on drugs" since the mid-1970s. The reported 59 percent decrease in illegal drug use has been achieved at a cost of an increase of 12,000 percent in the enforcement budget between 1973 and 1993. Attorney General Janet Reno has quoted federal officials as saying that in order for the interdiction of drugs entering the country to be effective, a total of 75 percent would have to be achieved. Since the amount officials claim has been interdicted is only 25 percent, even law enforcement policy makers admit that a successful interdiction program would be cost prohibitive."
| |
|
The Decriminalization of Drugs in America, 2002.
A comprehensive research study including tables, charts, interviews and a literature review of the drug problems in America.
5,220 words (approx. 20.9 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 130.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper shows, through an extensive literature review, as well as research conducted by the author in the form of a personal interview, and a questionnaire submitted to local students, that if illegal drug use leads to increased crime, then the decriminalization of drugs will ultimately reduce crime and will therefore improve society.
From the Paper
"Because drug use is illegal in America, not only are prisons overcrowded with drug offenders but the high prices caused by illegalization result in a massive increase in monetary and even violent crimes. The war on drugs, as it has been practiced for the past four decades has done nothing to reduce these problems, and has in fact increased them. Thus it is becoming progressively more evident that the victory for this war will take far too long, cost way too much money and have far too many victims."
|
|
|
