| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "DECRIMINALIZATION MARIJUANA": |
|
|
Why Decriminalizing Marijuana is the Right Thing to Do, 2005.
The arguments for and against the decriminalization of marijuana.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 6 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper analyzes the pros and cons of the marijuana decriminalization debate. The paper briefly examines both sides of the argument and concludes that there is compelling evidence arguing against the continued decriminalization of marijuana. Specifically, the paper looks at the resources which can be diverted to more important issues, and also at the way that decriminalizing marijuana could make the difficult tasks of police officers considerably easier. The paper concludes that that marijuana is less problematic than alcohol and over-the-counter drugs and that decriminalization would be beneficial.
From the Paper
"There can be little question that marijuana use has polarized the American in ways that would have been unanticipated even a few years ago. Not least of all, there is a battle ongoing between those who feel the decriminalization of marijuana is simply a step forward and one more means of allocating police resources more efficiently, and those who feel that rampant marijuana use - and certainly its decriminalization - is one more instance of America's moral decay. The following paper will review the arguments against marijuana decriminalization and the arguments in favor of marijuana decriminalization. As should become apparent, there are a number of compelling and trenchant arguments against continuing the prohibition against a drug that causes far less havoc each and every year than do alcohol and/or over-the-counter prescription drugs. With that in mind, it is to a discussion of this thorny issue that this paper now turns."
| |
|
Decriminalizing of Marijuana, 2004.
Presents arguments in favor of the decriminalization of marijuana.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 12 sources, MLA, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the reasons for decriminalization of marijuana, citing studies which show it would not increase use of the drug, and would not lead to the use of hard drugs. It also cites the attitutes of other countries around the world on possession of small amounts of marijuana for personal use.
| |
|
Decriminalizing Marijuana, 1995.
This paper argues for the decriminalization of marijuana on moral, economic and health grounds: History, politics, medical benefits and social impact.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 5 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The topic of decriminalizing some classes of drugs, particularly marijuana, has been turning up in the news again regularly. It had been a topic of considerable political debate when President Jimmy Carter endorsed decriminalization of marijuana in 1977, but the idea quickly lost respectability when President Ronald Reagan renewed the "war on drugs" in 1982. The issue briefly surfaced again a few years ago when former-Surgeon General Jocelyn Elder speculated that the costs of keeping marijuana illegal may far exceed the benefits. This research examines the moral, economic and health costs and benefits associated with criminalizing marijuana use. It argues that de-criminalizing the use of marijuana has merit on all three grounds.
Hemp, the basic plant that is marijuana, was at one time ... "
| |
|
The Decriminalization of Marijuana, 2001.
An essay that reviews the benefits of Canadian decriminalization and/or legalization of marijuana.
1,842 words (approx. 7.4 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 59.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper talks about how it would be beneficial for the Canadian government, as well as the Canadian citizens, if marijuana is legalized or decriminalized. The paper covers issues such as the government's biased opinion towards marijuana, how the amount of people in jail for marijuana use are tying up the legal system as well as legal system funds and how legalization would reduce the amount of drug rings in Canada. The paper also discusses the Marijuana Party of Canada and many of their major points (platforms).
From the Paper
"Weed, pot, trees, grass, ganja, Mary Jane, reefer, chronic, and bud are all slang terms. Slang terms for a drug commonly called marijuana, scientifically referred to as cannabis. This drug has been gaining prominence in the media lately and with good reason simply because it is such a controversial topic with many differing viewpoints. A number of politicians began to question Canada's marijuana laws after Canadian athlete, Ross Rebagliati, temporarily lost his gold medal in Olympic snowboarding when tests revealed the presence of a small amount of marijuana in his body. Indeed, many Canadian citizens were outraged when the International Olympic Committee stripped Rebagliati of his medal simply because he tested positive for the drug (Gage, 2001). After all, some argued, marijuana is not a performance-enhancing drug, so his use of it could not have led to his winning the gold."
| |
|
Decriminalization of Marijuana, 2008.
This paper argues for the decriminalization of marijuana in the United States.
1,017 words (approx. 4.1 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper maintains that marijuana laws are costly and ineffective and its decriminalization will allow for a more judicious allocation of funds. The paper argues that decriminalization will undermine the black market and will not precipitate the increased consumption of the narcotic by young people. The paper concludes that the positives of decriminalization certainly outweigh the negatives.
From the Paper
"To begin with, the marijuana laws in America are costly to enforce and inefficacious. For instance, a July 2005 report revealed that federal spending devoted to enforcing criminal sanctions against marijuana use runs to around $4 billion each year - and yet fails to make any perceptible impact upon the country's perception of, or use of, marijuana. What makes the matter more problematic is the fact that the federal government spends more on enforcing marijuana prohibition than it does on policy formulation or on treatment programs (Hemp Information, para.1). Suffice it to say, any laws which are costly and which have little impact upon a perceived problem should be dramatically altered in their scope and application - or struck down entirely."
| |
|
Decriminalization of Marijuana in Canada, 2002.
A discussion on whether or not marijuana should be legalized in Canada.
2,520 words (approx. 10.1 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 76.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper outlines the history of Canadian narcotics legislation as it pertains to marijuana. It then outlines arguments both for and against legalization or decriminalization while assessing the harm or good that this could cause.
Introduction
Marijuana - A Brief History
The Plant in Canada
Drug Laws
An Examination of Proposed Changes to Canadian Marijuana Laws
Pros And Cons
Decriminalization
Legalization
Maintaining the Status Quo
Legalization or Decriminalization? Personal Reflections
Conclusion
References
From the Paper
"There has been much talk and speculation as of late that Canada is ready to change its marijuana policy. Following the lead of such countries as Spain and England, it appears that Canada has been seriously considering either decriminalizing or legalizing marijuana possession. There are many arguments against and for such a move. Many against a change to marijuana policy feel that undertaking such a step would lead to increased usage, especially among young people. Those in favor feel that changing marijuana policy is a timely idea that will actually lead to decreased usage: marijuana could be treated as a public health issue as opposed to a criminal act, thereby allowing the government to set up health education programs in an attempt to deter its use. This approach has worked for tobacco and alcohol. This paper is going to look at the pros and the cons of a change in Canadian law in terms of its effect on organized crime. The nature and structure of the Canadian marijuana trade will be examined in order to see what benefits, if any a decriminalization or legalization move would provide. Before this can be done, the current drug law must be examined as it pertains to marijuana."
| |
|
Should Marijuana Be Decriminalized?, 2008.
A look at the debate surrounding the decriminalization of marijuana.
1,402 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses the significant economic effects of criminalization and prosecution of marijuana and questions whether the social benefits are worth the costs. The paper takes the position that the economic effect of continuing to criminalize marijuana doesn't make sense. The paper explains that since the costs are so hard to quantify there will likely never be a consensus on this issue. The paper also notes that what is indisputable is that the legal status of marijuana, whether it is criminalized or decriminalized, has a large economic impact on society.
From the Paper
"In recent years many individuals - including some prominent economists - have advocated the decriminalization of marijuana. These proponents argue that the decriminalization of marijuana would, among other things, allow society to divert resources previously used on drug offenders to other more productive issues, reduce the profits of those who deal in illegal drugs, reduce drug related crime, and eliminate the overcrowding of the prison system. Advocates of legalization make an analogy between current day drug policies and Prohibition. During Prohibition, the United States devoted a large amount of resources to fighting the sale and consumption of alcohol, while bootleggers made large amounts of money illegally selling alcohol."
| |
|
Marijuana as Medicine, 2002.
A discussion of the issues concerning the decriminalization of marijuana for medical purposes including anecdotal evidence.
1,900 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 6 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes the issue of marijuana decriminalization for medical purposes. Starting with a discussion of an upcoming Supreme Court ruling, the author provides an analysis of the case for decriminalization, including a recent book full of anecdotal evidence. The author then discusses how the federal government has taken a hard line against marijuana users and even doctors who prescribe the drug. This no-compromises attitude led to a lawsuit in 1997, in which several prominent doctors and patients sued the Drug Czar and Barry McCaffrey for violating their rights when, under Proposition 215, marijuana could be used in California and Arizona for medical reasons. The doctors claimed that they had been threatened by the DEA for prescribing the drug, while patients had been arrested and faced stiff penalties. The case has gone back and forth several times, while Proposition 215 has been suspended. The outcome is unclear, and the author finished the essay by describing how decriminalization necessitates removing marijuana from "Schedule I" status, which is reserved for dangerous drugs which have no medicinal value.
| |
|
Marijuana for Medical Purposes, 2006.
An argument for decriminalizing marijuana in the American justice system.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 5 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses a study on marijuana that has shown that there are valid medicinal purposes to making this drug legal, and the federal government needs to stop criminalizing medical users. By understanding the sinister motives of the federal government to keep it illegal through criminal profiteering (through excessive and irresponsible funding for private prisons, lumber companies, and police enforcement agencies), one can surely hope that a democratic humanity can overcome their erroneous ways by allowing the sick and suffering access to this highly effective drug.
From the Paper
"The basis of this legal study will be to argue for the currently illegal drug marijuana to be used legally for medicinal purposes. By showing the recent studies that validate the proof for this claim in the medical field, one can surely see how the denial of the American justice system denies pain relief for the sick and suffering. The federal law that criminalizes marijuana is supported by non-empirical evidence, which suggest that lumber companies, police enforcement agencies, and politicians are profiteering off of marijuana as a deviant aspect of American culture. With American citizens seeking valid information to uphold this helpful drug, the law could and should be focused on decriminalization for this drug."
| |
|
Decriminalizing Drug Use, 2002.
Looks at the decriminalization of drugs as a possible solution to the war on drugs.
2,650 words (approx. 10.6 pages), 8 sources, $ 97.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the decriminalization of drugs as an avenue to halt the drug problem so prevalent in the United States. Alcohol is brought out as a possible comparison to the drug situation America is facing and how the decriminalization of alcohol did not spell the end of America.
| |
|
Decriminalizing Drugs in America, 2006.
Considers the hypothesis that the decriminalization of drugs in America would ultimately reduce crime and, therefore, improve society.
5,180 words (approx. 20.7 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 129.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper attempts to show that if illegal drug use leads to increased crime, then the decriminalization of drugs would lead to a reduction in crime rates and, therefore, an improvement society. The paper supports this hypothesis through an extensive literature review as well as research conducted by the author in the form of a personal interview and a questionnaire submitted to local students.
Table of Contents
Abstract
Hypothesis
Introduction
Literature Review
Methodology
Results
Discussion
From the Paper
"It is time for America to swallow its pride and admit defeat. The war on drugs has been a losing battle from its inception. But despite this loss, we can move on and we can better society. The problems associated with drugs in America can be solved without a war. The drastic step of legalizing drugs will allow us to finally conquer the problems associated with drug use and crime which have continued to plague our nation despite vast efforts of ineffective reform. The information provided in this paper will serve the purpose of supporting this perspective."
| |
|
Decriminalizing Prostitution, 2002.
A discussion on the decriminalization of vice and sin with a focus on prostitution.
1,900 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 7 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will endeavor to make a case for the support of the decriminalization of vice and sin, in this case via the example of prostitution by looking at it as an ineluctable part of day-to-day life; the reasons are threefold, although further cases in point can certainly be alluded to.
| |
|
Marijuana on College Campuses, 2004.
An overview of the problem of marijuana use and abuse on campuses across America and the debate surrounding the decriminalization of this drug.
1,750 words (approx. 7.0 pages), 7 sources, APA, $ 56.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The use of marijuana on college campuses is one of the most contentious issues facing the academic world today. Marijuana is widely used within American society, despite widespread anti-drug lobbies and prevention campaigns. This paper shows that the effects of marijuana have been said to include effects on memory, negative social effects and health effects like cancer, immune damage, and respiratory problems. Additionally, anti-marijuana groups often point to marijuana as a "gateway" drug and note that marijuana use can potentially be dangerous while driving. The paper shows, however, in contrast, many scientists contend that marijuana is largely misunderstood and may have many positive medical uses. Given this debate, it becomes difficult to determine how marijuana use should be regulated or prevented, especially given the stunning inability of current approaches to stop the growth of marijuana use among young people. The paper shows that decriminalization of the drug is one likely candidate, coupled with stiff penalties for driving under the influence of marijuana or selling marijuana to children. The complexities of the political, social, and scientific aspects of this debate ensure that the problem of marijuana use on college campuses will not be easily solved.
From the Paper
"Many scientists and drug experts argue that marijuana is a deeply misunderstood drug. In fact, Rosenthal, Kubby, and Newhart argue that marijuana is "one of the most benign substances known to man." They suggest that the current criminalization of marijuana came from needlessly worried parents and liquor and pharmaceutical companies that were worried about losing market share. They argue that most of the evidence against marijuana is either misinterpreted or false. Further, they argue that the government's anti-drug policy is driven by political and social reasoning, rather than any strong scientific evidence of the dangers of marijuana use (Rosenthal, Kubby, and Newhart). Further, Earleywine and Marlatt provide some convincing evidence that marijuana use does not impair the grade of college students who use the drugs."
| |
|
Legalization of Marijuana, 2007.
This paper looks at the argument over the legalization of marijuana, with an emphasis in support of legalization and decriminalization.
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Following the introduction in the paper, which explains why prohibition of marijuana in the US has been a failure, the writer presents a brief description of the history of marijuana and looks at its use in different cultures. The writer explains why marijuana is harmless and argues that marijuana should be legalized or at least decriminalized. After mentioning a few of many convincing reasons to legalize marijuana, the writer explains why one should and how one could move beyond the failure of prohibition. In addition, the writer suggests ways to take action in the fight to legalize marijuana.
From the Paper
"The first recorded incident of the discovery of marijuana was made by Herodotus, a Greek historian, who recorded its psychedelic effects during his travels through northern Europe in 430 BC. A study of scriptural texts even shows that Jesus was almost certainly a cannabis user and an early proponent of the medicinal properties of the drug. In AD 1563, Queen Elizabeth I ordered landowners with 60 acres or more to grow cannabis or face a fine, and cannabis was not outlawed in Britain until 1928. Marijuana was first outlawed in the US in 1937, at which time over 3,000 doctors were prosecuted for illegally prescribing cannabis-derived medicines. Rallies and protests for the legalization of marijuana have continued to exist ever since it was prohibited in every country that outlawed it."
"Despite marijuana's legal status, it is still openly used in many countries, and it is used differently among many different cultures. Most people are aware of marijuana's legality in Amsterdam, which has made that country famous and recognized for one thing only."
| |
|
Legalizing Marijuana, 2004.
This paper argues in favor of the legalization of marijuana.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper serves as an evaluative essay that advocates decriminalizing marijuana use and possession. The writer discusses such legalization of marijuana from the utility, virtue and justice perspectives. The writer examines the state versus the individual in this regard. The costs involved in prohibiting marijuana are also explored in this article.
From the Paper
"British philosopher, John Stuart Mill proclaimed more than a century and a half ago that the state has no right interfering in individual behavior that might harm the individual, but bring no harm to others. Over himself over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign. Despite Mill's liberal view, the conservative approach to marijuana control, disregards such philosophy spending billions of dollars per year to enforce the prohibition of marijuana. Such an approach causes high levels of economic and social costs that are ... "
|
|
|
