| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "DEATH PENALTY UNITED STATES": |
|
|
The Death Penalty in the United States, 2006.
An examination of the history of the death penalty in the United States.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 4 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the history of the death penalty in the United States, noting that it demonstrates a society that has been divided on the issue of executing criminals. The paper explains that opponents of the death penalty believe that as long as the process of the state committing executions exists there will be a violation of Constitutional laws intended to prevent cruel and unusual punishment. The paper also discusses the contention of those in favor of the death penalty that the punishment for a criminal act should fit the crime and that there are some crimes that are so horrendous that the death penalty is the only just punishment. Additionally, the paper points out that, although the debate has created periods in the nation's history in which executions have passed through a moratorium, most states in modern society continue to pass laws that provide for state executions, with the rate of modern executions climbing each year.
| |
|
The Death Penalty in the United States, 2002.
This paper critically examines Robert Johnson's arguments in his book, "Death Work: A Study of the Modern Execution Process".
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 1 source, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The book focuses on why the death penalty promotes cruel and unusual punishment, which is not allowed in the United States.
| |
|
The Death Penalty Capital of the United States, 2004.
Examines the prosecution of capital murder cases in Texas.
830 words (approx. 3.3 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the capital murder statutes in the State of Texas. It focuses on what constitutes capital crime cases in Texas. It also examines how the state conducts and administers capital murder cases.
From the Paper
"The state of Texas has the dubious honor of being the death penalty capital of the United States. There are currently 451 offenders on death row in Texas. In 2003 321 executions were implemented in the state (Texas Department of Criminal Justice). These figures ensure that Texas leads all other states in the number of executions performed each year."
| |
|
Death Penalty, 2007.
An analysis of the ethical issues surrounding the administration of the death penalty in the United States.
5,401 words (approx. 21.6 pages), 23 sources, MLA, $ 132.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the debate on the death penalty as more than a moral issue of whether it is ever permissible to intentionally kill, but rather as an ethical debate on how the death penalty is administered in the United States. It suggests that issues surrounding the administration of the death penalty, make a compelling case for abolishing capital punishment as a sentencing option in the United States.
Table of Contents:
Does The Death Penalty Deter Crime - And Do Americans Really Support It?
Arguments On Behalf Of Victims' Families Ring Hollow
The Wrongly Accused: DNA And Other Exonerations
Racism And The Death Penalty
Executing The Mentally And Psychologically Incompetent
Ineffective Counsel
Methods Are Not As Painless As Some Argue
Conclusion
From the Paper
"When celebrities such as Robert Blake or O.J. Simpson are charged with murder, it is not uncommon for millions of dollars to be spent on their defense. While we may not expect such extremes when poor or middle-class people are charged with murder, we would expect that these defendants would at least have competent legal representation. Quite clearly, this is often not the case."
"For example, the state of Florida allocates only $3,500 for a person to defend themselves against murder charges when a private lawyer can not be afforded and a public defender is unavailable (Payne 2006). That is, in fact, much less than what one might expect to pay for a reliable used car, and yet it is all the money that is allocated for people trying to save themselves from execution. Further, the state also caps how much can be spent by the defense on appeal (no such cap exists for the prosecution), resulting in what State Supreme Court Justice Raoul Cantero has referred to as "some of the worst lawyering" he has ever witnessed (Payne 2006)."
| |
|
The Death Penalty, 2007.
This paper argues against the constitutionality of the death penalty in the United States.
2,505 words (approx. 10.0 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 76.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper examines the history of the administration of the death penalty in the United States. The paper contends that it is fraught with racism and only in rare instances has anyone other than a poor person been executed. The paper also argues that there is no evidence that the death penalty deters crime, yet, support for the death penalty in the United States remains strong. The paper shows how, nevertheless, over the last few decades, Supreme Court rulings have consistently demonstrated a slow move toward abolition of the death penalty.
From the Paper
"Ironically, at the beginning of the nineteenth century, the new states that made up the American Republic were among the first jurisdictions in the world to limit the use of the death penalty and to substitute imprisonment for execution (Cottrol 2004). James Madison disapproved of the death penalty, and Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin favored limiting the death penalty to murder and treason, while the Quakers, who were very influential in the Middle Atlantic states, had a reticence concerning the death penalty (Cottrol 2004). In fact, after the Revolution, the Quakers were instrumental in strictly limiting the number of crimes punishable by death in Pennsylvania, thus only murder and treason survived as capital crimes (Cottrol 2004). The main exceptions were the slave states that kept a longer list of capital crimes for slaves and free Negroes, thereby demonstrating the lasting link between social inequality and the use of the death penalty (Cottrol 2004)."
| |
|
Death Penalty: A Research Project, 2008.
This paper presents a research proposal to determine public opinion regarding the death penalty in the United States.
1,243 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 2 sources, APA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses a research project on the death penalty in the United States. The paper explains that the purpose of the study is to gain an accurate picture of consensus opinion regarding the death penalty. The paper further explains that the research project is quantitative in nature, relying on an experimental methodology. The paper states that a random sampling of the U.S. population will be utilized with the telephone directory databases acting as the sampling frame.
Outline:
Abstract
Overview
Type of Research
Implications of Research
Research Design
Sampling Type
Sampling Frame
Data Gathering Technique
Survey Questions
From the Paper
"The death penalty is a contentious issue in the United States. As a rule, Americans recognize its importance as a legal deterrence but beyond this broad recognition of importance it quickly devolves into arguments of moral authority versus ethical constraints regarding humanitarian treatment, among others. In fact, although the Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty is a legal form of punishment, the judiciary across the United States is quite ambiguous about the rationale behind it (Bedau & Cassell, 2004, p.7). Based on these and other observations it is clear that a definitive opinion regarding the death penalty, as it relates to the general public could prove quite useful to future research as well as future legal ramification related to it."
| |
|
Is The Death Penalty Biased?, 2008.
This paper explores whether there are biases in the application of the death penalty in the United States.
1,636 words (approx. 6.5 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper examines the problem of racial bias, gender bias, juveniles and capital punishment and the link between poverty and the death penalty. The paper contends that overall, the death penalty may be a necessary evil in our society, however, until we can be one hundred percent sure it is meted out fairly, a moratorium on the act may be in order.
Outline:
Introduction
Racial Bias and Capital Punishment
Gender as a Factor in Death Penalty Sentencing
Capital Punishment and Juveniles
Poverty and the Death Penalty
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Capital punishment has been administered and accepted in this country for over 200 years, however, some states have now abolished the practice, while others continue with sanctioned executions. In 2000, Governor George Ryan of Illinois suspended executions in that state and "commuted the death sentences of all Illinois death row inmates in 2003" (Wolfers 791). Following Ryan's lead, in 2004, New York's highest court ruled that the state's death penalty statute was unconstitutional. Although prisoners still sit on California's death row, executions in that state are virtually nonexistent, however, executions in Texas continue at an even pace (791). "
| |
|
The Death Penalty, 2004.
An analysis of the death penalty in the United States and the racial bias in the American justice system.
2,385 words (approx. 9.5 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 73.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the controversial topic of the death penalty in the United States. The paper contends the problems that brought about the prevalent racial bias in the American justice system are deeply rooted in our society. The fact is that justice is not blind because no human can ever be completely impartial. A state that endorses killing as a form of punishment must be free of arbitrary preference and error. The paper claims that, hopefully, members of the U.S. government will recognize that capital punishment needs to be formally investigated and that the conclusions reached should forbid its perpetuation.
From the Paper
"The United States is one of only a handful of developed nations that still readily imposes death upon those found guilty of a crime (Kurtis 200). Killing as a function of the state raises a number of moral questions, and makes a number of moral assumptions. Aside from the question as to whether the state is justified in killing at all, is the concern for equal justice for individuals convicted of capital murder. In other words, there is the possibility that certain subsets of the American population are sentenced to death more readily for the same crimes. If sentencing of the death penalty is unfair or biased, it questions the legitimacy of death as a form of justice."
| |
|
Death Penalty and Racism, 2005.
An examination of the issue of the death penalty in the United States and how it divides the nation.
2,000 words (approx. 8.0 pages), 9 sources, APA, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the general divide, as well as proposing support for one particular aspect of this rather general issue, which is that of the racism inherent in the American state execution system, hereafter referred to as 'death row'. This paper explains that, especially in Texas and some other Southern states such as Georgia, but arguably anywhere, minorities are relegated to an inferior social status due to racist out-group thinking in terms of cultural authority; this racism is at work. The writer points out that the over-representation of minorities on death row is worth examining as a symptom of many problems in the system, including those of cleared cases and ones still pending. The functional racism of the death penalty is illustrated in several examples and other issues of concern it raises within legal scholarship.
From the Paper
"The history of the death penalty is long and too complicated to recount in terms of cultural differences throughout human history within the present forum. But the death penalty has been used by societies since ancient times, for various crimes ranging in magnitude and the severity of harm involved. Generally societies that were based on scriptural rules regarding the death penalty for various crimes had their civil codes and
laws. There has been an observed racial divide within the U.S. in terms of death penalty cases since independence, depending largely on the societal implications of a racially oppressive legal culture that was guided by principles of universal human freedom. Other systems have their own histories of racial oppression through unequal colonialist
legal systems."
| |
|
Death Penalty, 2004.
An opinion paper that argues the death penalty is justified and should remain in practice in the United States.
1,587 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The writer of this paper states that the death penalty is justifiable on the grounds of deterrence, retribution, and increasing crime recidivism. This paper discusses whether the death penalty is socially and ethically justified or not. It brings in opinions from the Bible and other sources to argue that the death penalty is acceptable.
From the Paper
"The world finds itself stagnated with ethical debates of social significance. Ever since history began, men have been arguing over what is right and what is wrong. There seems to be no one answer. And in fact, in some cases, such arguments become a matter of life and death. Such, indeed, is the nature of the debate carried on in this paper: the Death Penalty. We will seek to establish whether the death penalty is socially and ethically justified or not. The issue has a history dating back to the Eighteenth Century B.C., but it is not within the confines of the thesis presented hereforth, to delve into as much detail. We will argue and maintain that the death penalty is, indeed, justified."
| |
|
The Death Penalty, 2006.
An analysis of the death penalty: it's history, the pros and cons of using the death penalty and possible alternatives.
2,073 words (approx. 8.3 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 65.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper investigates the issues surrounding the death penalty, or capital punishment. The writer examines the history of the death penalty and current developments in its execution. The paper explores the pros and cons of using capital punishment; available alternatives; different points of views from different sectors in society; and the common issues involved. The paper concludes that although the death penalty may be warranted in certain cases, one must be prepared for the possibility of a wrongful conviction.
Table of Contents:
I. Introduction
II. Capital Punishment: Death Penalty
A. History of Death Penalty
B. The Pros and Cons of Death Penalty
C. Death Penalty Alternatives
D. Cost
E. 4 Issues of the Death Penalty
1. Deterrence
2. Arbitrariness.
3. Retribution
4. Wrongful Convictions
III. Conclusion
From the Paper
"On the other side, it can't always be expected that just because two crimes from different states appear to be the same, the criminals will be punished similarly. The US court found it unconstitutional to mandate death penalty to all who are guilty of 1st degree murder. Hence, each member of the judicial system is entitled to his or her own judgment on a case-to-case basis. Though there may be some people who get away from being punished with death penalty, it does not follow that everyone should then be spared."
| |
|
The Death Penalty, 2004.
This paper discusses issues around the death penalty and concludes that there is little suggestion that the debate surrounding the death penalty will ever be resolved.
2,815 words (approx. 11.3 pages), 7 sources, APA, $ 83.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper states that the difficulty with the debate over the death penalty often adds up to one in which people are arguing about a certain approach to an abstract ethical system and the experiential reality of those involved in and connected to a death-penalty case, which makes the entire issue suffused with an even more impressive and murky layer of complexity than if it were merely an issue of conflicting theories of jurisprudence. The paper points out that, in all of the issues surrounding the death penalty, it is strange how often the issue focuses on the rights of the killer and how infrequently the feelings and thoughts of the victim?s family are considered in any real depth. The paper concludes that the United States has come to hold an increasingly unique stance in relation to the death penalty, as it is one of the few countries that practices capital punishment and, certainly, the one that practices it with the greatest frequency.
From the Paper
"Indeed, some critics claim that they the argument that families witnessing the execution of death penalty subjects is in fact not beneficial in the least, and that, rather than helping to deal with the stress, it is just as likely to cause damaging psychological effects that may create long-term problems, such as post-traumatic stress disorder. Indeed, one critic of this process conducted a study of 21 journalists who were allowed to witness a public execution in 1994 and discovered that it had severely damaging results on their psyches."
| |
|
The Death Penalty, 2007.
An argument against the use of the death penalty in the United States.
1,992 words (approx. 8.0 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper presents the arguments against the use of the death penalty. The paper shows how innocent people could be put to death for crimes they did not commit. The paper looks at the arguments for the use of the death penalty but refutes them as baseless. The paper strongly contends that the execution of criminals in the United States is socially unjust and morally wrong.
Outline:
A Short History of the Death Penalty
Arguments Against the Use of the Death Penalty
Arguments for the Use of the Death Penalty
From the Paper
"Putting people to death as a punishment for their crimes is not a new or unique idea. In fact, it has been a common practice throughout the world since ancient times. Jesus Christ died on the cross for his "crime" of Christianity. In early America, individuals were shot for committing treason, and lynching as a form of punishment was common, especially in the Old West. However, in modern times, many people have come to see the inhumanity of the Death Penalty as a punishment, and have begun to speak against it. In America, this began as early as the 18th century, and the Supreme Court banned the use of the Death Penalty from 1972 until 1976 in the U.S. However, public support seemed to indicate the American people wanted the Death Penalty, and the Supreme Court reinstated it in 1976, and it has been controversial and debated ever since."
| |
|
The Death Penalty, 2002.
This paper discusses that the death penalty is not an effective deterrent.
2,265 words (approx. 9.1 pages), 4 sources, $ 70.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents many arguments in opposition to the death penalty as a deterrent. The author asks if in fact the death penalty does serve as a deterrent, why do the many Western countries that have abolished the death penalty have lower murder rates than jurisdictions in the United States that still considers it a viable punishment. The author believes that while the death penalty may serve as a retribution, there is little sociological evidence to support that someone is deterred more by the prospect of being executed than the prospect of a life sentence without possibility of parole.
Table of Contents
Effectiveness of the Death Penalty as a Deterrent to Criminal Homicide
Pros and Cons of Death Penalty
Cost of Life Sentence without Parole vs. the Death Penalty
Recidivism
States That Impose the Death Penalty and Form of Execution
Retribution, the Family and Society
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The effectiveness of the death penalty as a deterrent depends on the degree to which the average criminal actually weighs the consequences of his behavior prior to acting. Criminal homicide is loosely divided into categories based upon level of intention. To the extent that criminal homicide is unintentional or in the heat of passion, the criminal does not weigh consequences at all; and so the criminal would not be deterred by the death penalty. To the extent that criminal homicide is intentional or premeditated, a number of psychological mindsets are possible beforehand. The criminal might assume he will get away with it (and therefore, he does not need to worry about possible punishments). Or, the criminal might think he will get caught."
| |
|
The Death Penalty, 2005.
An argument for the abolishment of the death penalty in the United States.
2,475 words (approx. 9.9 pages), 11 sources, $ 97.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is about the death penalty and how the death penalty should be abolished in the United States. The paper argues that the death penalty is unfair and handed down arbitrarily to lower economic non-white groups. The paper poses many philosophical questions about the justice system and attempts to answer some of them.
From the Paper
"Outline The death penalty should be abolished in the United States as it is a barbaric practice that is dehumanizing, is not an effective deterrent to crime and is parceled out unequally and arbitrarily as according to race, geographic location and economic status. Summary One subject of many heated debates is the United States' practice of the death penalty. The United States is the only country of its kind that still utilizes capital punishment--the institutionalized killing of certain prisoners. The topic is multi-faceted, as it brings up many theoretical questions, such as: What is the purpose of jail and justice? How do we treat people? To what category do we place criminals? These types of questions should be a threat to the system itself. The death penalty is a practice which should not be utilized in the United States for several reasons. "
|
|
|
