| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "DAY LIFE GREAT LEADER": |
|
|
"A Day in the Life of a Great Leader", 2005.
An interpretive analysis of Baron Claude-Francois De Meneval's book "A Day in the Life of a Great Leader", about Napoleon Bonaparte.
854 words (approx. 3.4 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes De Meneval's book as he describes a day in the life of Napoleon shortly after a return from a trip to Egypt, where he had been interested in spreading his influence. The book is compared to another less literary portrayal of Napoleon, titled "Napoleon: For and Against" by Geyl & Renier, for historic exactness and opposing styles.
From the Paper
"Geyl & Renier prefer to take into consideration other people's accounts of their interaction with Napoleon, which emphasize his public side and knack for working with the people of France. De Meneval's works, though structured as a 'memoir' are just as effective at getting the point across as Geyl & Renier's. Both works overwhelmingly portray Napoleon in a positive light, and tend to ignore any negative historical information that exists about the former leader. "
| |
|
A Great General is Not Necessarily a Great Leader, 2001.
This essay discusses how great generals and great revolutionaries seldom make great leaders.
1,120 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 0 sources, $ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The following essay argues that there is almost always an inevitable switchover of leadership and power when a country shifts from wartime or peacetime. The author makes reference to a number of examples in political history.
From the paper:
?The Vietnam War also provides another powerful example of a changeover in leadership in American History. Perhaps the most obvious domestic casualty of the Vietnam War was President Johnson. Johnson was an architect of civil rights reform, and wished to create a Great Society of social improvement at home. This proved impossible to do while waging the Vietnam War abroad. Not only did Johnson realize it would be impossible to run for re-election, but Johnson's Vice President lost to Richard Nixon, though the latter was thought to have no political future after his defeat by President Kennedy in 1960?.
| |
|
Oprah Winfrey is a Great Leader, 2005.
An essay explaining why celebrity talk-show host and actress Oprah Winfrey is a great leader.
795 words (approx. 3.2 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 28.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The author of this paper explains why she believes that Oprah Winfrey is an example of a great leader. The paper cites examples of Winfrey's efforts to aid other people and how she uses her status and fame to promote causes that she believes in and which benefit others that are less fortunate.
From the Paper
"Oprah Winfrey is an example of what it takes to be a good leader because with almost every one of her endeavors, she is helping others. While Winfrey is probably most well known for her talk show, she has not let her fame or popularity prevent her from doing good things. In fact, she has used her position to help others in ways that many people are unable to do. Providing aid for orphans in Africa, starting an Angel Network, and opening an academy for girls are just a few examples of how Winfrey is a natural leader that can take almost any idea and turn it into something that will benefit others as well as herself. "
| |
|
Great Leaders, 2002.
The author of the paper compares Machiavelli's Alexander VI and Landy & Milkis' Jefferson.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 2 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper shows how former U.S. President Thomas Jefferson does not live up to Niccolo Machiavelli's vision of a great leader.
| |
|
History's Great Leaders, 2007.
Discussion of leaders and the personal characteristics that made them great.
3,096 words (approx. 12.4 pages), 12 sources, APA, $ 90.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines a number of well-known leaders with an special focus on the traits they shared that are necessary in individuals who lead others. The paper further describes their leadership styles, the impact that they had or are having on leaders today, and the kinds of leadership tools that many of them used. This is followed by a brief literature review that addresses leadership and why it is crucial to have strong leaders in the world today. Some of the leaders discussed include General Colin Powell, who lived by the 18 rules of leadership which are listed in the paper. Dr. Martin Luther King's life and leadership role is also described. The paper concludes with a bullet point literature review.
From the Paper
" This is not only good in many instances when nothing happens on a large scale, but it can be very important to individuals that need good leadership for them to understand that a smoothly running business, life, or country usually does not experience large-scale happenings, although sometimes they are necessary when they are for the greater good, as will be seen. Those that crave excitement, danger, and risk-taking all of the time are not generally good candidates for most kinds of leadership because they try to change too many things too quickly and this stops them from stopping and thinking long-term about what it is that they might be affecting by their actions. Good leaders, however, have to be willing to 'make a fuss' when the need arises or when they see something that must be changed and cannot be changed through any other means."
| |
|
Great Irish Leaders and British Political Parties, 2002.
A detailed analysis of Irish history, with an analysis of great figures like Charles Parnell, Daniel O'Connel and Mathew Gladstone.
2,756 words (approx. 11.0 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 82.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines to what extent the mainland Great British political parties were in agreement over Irish political, religious and economic problems in the period 1798-1893. It explains how towards the end of the period, the two parties began to disagree more on Irish issues, as William Gladstone looked to "pacify Ireland" with his conciliatory approach.
From the Paper
"Throughout the period from Wolf Tone's rebellion to the second reform act, the two mainland British political parties attempted to solve the problems of Ireland with a variety of policies. Although there are several areas of policy (such as Home Rule) were the parties disagreed, on other occasions they were singing from similar hymn-sheets. It is therefore less than straightforward to discern to what extent the mainland political parties were in absolute agreement in this period."
| |
|
Great Leaders, 2007.
This paper looks at the lives of Sir Winston Churchill, Dwight D. Eisenhower and Ulysses S. Grant.
1,443 words (approx. 5.8 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses how Sir Winston Churchill, Dwight D. Eisenhower and Ulysses S. Grant made lasting impressions on the United States and Western civilization. The paper contends that these leaders stand out as exemplary examples, due to their powerful and influential leadership styles and their ability to alter the face of history under often extreme political, social and cultural conditions. The paper discusses each of these personalities separately and presents a literature review of recommended reading.
Outline:
Introduction
Sir Winston Churchill
Dwight D. Eisenhower
Ulysses S. Grant
Literature Review
From the Paper
"As the war raged on in Europe in 1945, Sir Winston Churchill, then Prime Minister of England, urged Josef Stalin, the Communist leader of the Soviet Union, to join him and President Franklin Roosevelt at a conference to discuss their common goal to defeat Nazi Germany. Yet Stalin refused to leave Russia which prompted Churchill to recommend that the conference be held in Yalta in the Russian Crimea. Stalin quickly agreed and as these three national leaders came together, they soon agreed to discuss four primary areas of concern--the immediate future of Germany following an Allied victory, post-war political arrangements in eastern Europe, the entry of the Soviet Union into the war against Japan in the Pacific and the details of the United Nations Charter."
| |
|
Attila the Hun: Biography of a Great Leader, 1999.
A profile of Attila the Hun and his battles.
2,380 words (approx. 9.5 pages), 10 sources, $ 72.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the effectiveness of Attila the Hun as a leader, discussing the battles he masterminded and his charismatic personality.
From the Paper
"Barbarian is defined as, "a rude, coarse or brutal person"(Funk & Wagnalls 50). When one hears the name, Attila the Hun, one tends to think of him in such a negative way. Contrary to this popular belief, Attila the Hun was not a barbarian, but one of history's great leaders. The Hun kingdom was in modern-day Hungry. The Huns were a Turkish-speaking nomadic people. Attila and his brother Belda succeeded their uncle as leaders of the Huns in 434 A.D. Attila was in the junior role, until his brother's death 12 years later. It is often said that Attila murdered Belda to obtain the throne. When Attila became leader he found a rusty old sword; he said it was the sword of Mars. The empire which he inherited was dependent on tribute, without it, the Huns could not survive. Attila brought about a turn of events for his people. To ensure the survival of his people, in 447 AD, Attila launched an invasion of Eastern Europe. Attila created an empire that reached from the Black Sea to Germany. He was known in the west as ?The Scourge of God'. . Compared to the leaders who had ruled before him, he was aggressive, ambitious, shrewd, intelligent, charismatic, and arrogant. Attila showed his great leadership by his army of magnificent proportions. It is thought to have been the largest army of the late fifth century. Attila also showed his leadership abilities by his motivational speaking. Attila was able to speak to his soldiers before battle, inspiring them to fight even harder. Finally, Attila revealed himself as a great leader in his ability to be a military strategist. The battle of Chalons, in which Attila fought, was one of the most decisive battles in history. One of the most important factors in Attila being a great leader was his army."
| |
|
"The Great Gatsby" and "The Day of the Locusts", 2006.
A comparison of Nathaniel West's "The Day of the Locusts" and Francis Scott Fitzgerald's "The Great Gatsby".
1,102 words (approx. 4.4 pages), 0 sources, $ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares Fitzgerald's "The Great Gatsby" and West's "The Day of the Locusts". It explains that one of the most interesting similarities concerns the main female character in each novel. Both Daisy and Faye Greener are materialistic and shallow people who are concerned only with outward appearances, and who hence end up living superficial lives that do not provide them with any real satisfaction.
From the Paper
"Gatsby's love, or perhaps obsession would be a more accurate word, is extremely materialistic, and is interested only in getting money. As a result, she would not look at Gatsby when she had the chance, and instead married Tom, who was very wealthy. However, Tom is not a good person; he cheats on her and treats her abusively. It is Gatsby she really loves, but by the time she realizes this it is too late. So much time has past that it is virtually impossible to be together, and even if it were, when she learns that his wealth comes from less than legitimate enterprises, she cannot overcome her social pretensions."
| |
|
Peter the Great, Modernism and the Great Northern War, 2002.
A review of the history of Russia's Imperial Czar, "Peter the Great" (Peter Naryshkin Alexis) and the significance of the events that took place during the Great Northern War.
1,650 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 4 sources, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay considers the influences of Modernism during the reign of Czar Peter I, specifically in the changes made to civil life, and military structures. Most effective and enduring of these changes was the development of a naval force, one that can be recognized as the central influence of the Russians during the Great Northern War.
| |
|
Armistice Day - Veteran's Day, 2002.
This paper discusses the history of Armistice Day that began after WWI.
3,369 words (approx. 13.5 pages), 10 sources, APA, $ 95.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the origins and rituals surrounding Armistice Day, or as it is better known, Veteran's Day. The author explains how Armistice Day began after WWI and was treated as a holiday and since it was created, many different rituals are carried out. The paper refers to many sources describing the changes in the way Americans celebrated Veteran's Day after WWI to the present.
From the Paper
"At 11 a. m. on November 11, 1918, the imperial German army radioed to the world that it had signed the Allied unconditional terms of surrender, and had agreed to the laying down of arms. The guns of the Great War became silent, and were replaced by outbursts of joy across the nation. It was finally over, over there. In 1995, New York City commemorated this event with 500,000 cheering, flag-waving spectators lining the roads. With thundering drums punctuating nostalgic Glenn Miller swing music, tens of thousands of proud American warriors marched out of the past and up Fifth Avenue in New York's largest Veterans Day Parade since the end of World War II. This 1995 parade was a victory of sorts due to the fact that, in recent years, Veterans Day observations have become, as Robert McFadden says, "desultory at best, with spectators often limited to passers-by walking their dogs or heading out for a quart of milk." This parade was evidence of a revival in veteran appreciation, and a renewal of Veterans Day as a much-celebrated American holiday. But while this parade can be used to model a renewal in ceremony and enthusiasm, the true meaning of Veterans Day, or Armistice Day as it was originally called, has been lost through name changes and changes in those it is supposed to honor."
| |
|
The Great Gatsby and The Great Carraway, 2002.
An analysis of the character of Nick Carraway in "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 1 source, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This three-page paper presents a discussion and character analysis about one of the characters in "The Great Gatsby". The author of this paper describes Nick Carraway to us and we are taken through a journey in which we explore his mind and motives for his actions throughout the story. We are also treated to a discussion about the type of person Carraway is.
| |
|
The Great-or-Not-so-Great Gatsby, 2003.
This paper provides an analysis of F. Scott Fitzgerald's "The Great Gatsby", discussing whether or not this is a good book.
3,708 words (approx. 14.8 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 102.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer notes that almost without exception, literary critics point to Fitzgerald's 1925 novel, "The Great Gatsby" as a brilliant contribution and one of the key books of the 20th century. However, the writer points out that a few other brave souls have had the courage to venture the opinion that it was not a good book and was certainly not deserving of the accolades heaped upon it over the years. Further, the writer notes that other observers suggest the author drank too much and too often and that, as a result, Fitzgerald failed to achieve the level of respect he deserved. To determine who is right, this paper provides an overview of F. Scott Fitzgerald's work as well as what the admirers and the critics have to say. A summary of the research and salient findings are provided in the conclusion.
Outline:
Introduction
Review and Discussion
Conclusion
From the Paper
"However, by 1937 he had come managed to become a scriptwriter in Hollywood where he met and fell in love with Sheilah Graham, a well-known Hollywood gossip columnist. Fitzgerald lived the rest of his life with Graham, except for occasional binges when he became bitter and violent. Mizener notes that on occasion, Fitzgerald would visit Zelda or his daughter Scottie (who entered Vassar College in 1938.)"
"According to Bruccoli's biography, Fitzgerald experienced problems being accorded a full measure of respect during his early career because his reputation as a drinker reinforced the perception of him as an irresponsible writer."
| |
|
A Path to Greatness: Alexander the Great, 2002.
The conquests and strategies of Alexander the Great after the fall of Sparta and Athens at the end of the Peloponnesian Wars.
1,500 words (approx. 6.0 pages), 5 sources, $ 49.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper deals with the politics and reasons of Alexander the Greats? conquests. The author covers the effects on the conquered population, major clashes and military structuring during his conquests.
From the Paper:
"With the conclusion of the Peloponnesian War, Greek city-states never forgot that they were Greeks. But the Spartans, Athenians Thebans, and others were weakened to the point where Phillip II of Macedonia could influence them from the north. In the wake of their brutal civil war between the Greeks, their fierce, contentious independence made the Macedonian?s the unlikely conqueror to the Greeks, who were caught off guard. Phillip II set himself up as a protector of Greece . He had formed the cities into a league that in light of the Greek?s disregard for conquest. This action served to help Phillip II?s son Alexander to put together the biggest empire yet."
| |
|
Alexander the Great Deserved the Title "Great", 2001.
This paper follows the life and times of Alexander the Great in an attempt to prove his greatness.
1,365 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 9 sources, $ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The author wrestles with Alexander the Greats' inclinations towards both good and evil in an attempt to show that he deserved the title: "Great". By comparing and contrasting, she is able to build a case that he was, indeed, as his name implies, 'Great'. With some interesting quotes from people that knew Alexander the Great personally.
From the Paper
"Alexander the Great was a charismatic person who won the heart of the people he ruled throughout his short reign. He led them to victory against their enemies and had a generous nature. There was another side to Alexander though; he could be cruel, irrational and was known for his drunken rages. Despite his faults, Alexander?s conquests, achievements and personal traits made him worthy of the title, ?the Great.? "
|
|
|
