| Papers [1-15] of 74 :: [Page 1 of 5] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 —> | Search results on "CIVILIZATION DISCONTENTS": |
|
|
?Civilization and Its Discontents?, 2002.
A study of how Sigmund Freud's theory of the subconscious is reflected in his work "Civilization and its Discontents"
883 words (approx. 3.5 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how Freud's theories about the mind, repression and aggression, dreams and civilization are reflected in his work, "Civilization and Its Discontents", originally published in 1929-30. The paper shows that the central theme of Freud's work is that without repression of the instincts there would be no civilization. Freud describes how, as human-kind moves historically from cave man to modern times, in order for them to survive in groups and communities, they have to learn to cooperate with each other. The paper describes how this evolving cooperation offers humans securities needed for survival, but it also causes them to repress or bury inside themselves many natural tendencies. This repression creates a tension between the inner self, or the subconscious and the outer world. The paper explains how, in "Civilization and Its Discontents" Freud further develops his theory, demonstrating how the subconscious mind, with it's three divisions - id, ego and super-ego - is in continual conflict, or discontent, with civilized society.
From the Paper
"A main area of repression of instinct that causes one of the strongest conflicts with civilization is sex. According to Freud, man's main purpose in life is to seek happiness and the repression of his sexual instincts, as required by civilization, severely limits his opportunity to find pleasure and satisfaction in sexuality. Civilization demands that man not rush out in cave-man fashion to gratify his sexual instinct wherever and whenever the urge strikes. Rather, monogamous relationships established more for the purpose of propagating the race than for offering sexual pleasure are encouraged, and non-heterosexual urges are strongly discouraged (Freud 60-61)."
| |
|
Sigmund Freud's "Civilization and Its Discontents", 2008.
Analyzes Sigmund Freud's "Civilization and Its Discontents" from the standpoint of Socrates and Jesus Christ.
2,155 words (approx. 8.6 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 67.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper states that, in Sigmund Freud's "Civilization and Its Discontents", Freud contends that the feeling of spirituality or religion is the result of one's ego. The author, who plays the role of Socrates, uses the Socratic method to question Freud's arguments. The paper concludes by questioning how there could be sinfulness if Freud believes that religion is an illusion. The author, in the role of Socrates, relates that "sins" are concepts that religions have invented to make people feel guilty and go to church. The author concludes by analyzing each of the beatitudes of the "Sermon on the Mount" from this psychological position.
Table of Contents:
Socrates Responds to Sigmund Freud's "Civilization and Its Discontents"
Sigmund Freud on the Sermon on the Mount
From the Paper
"But let's move on to Beatitude number four: "Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness for they shall be filled." In my own research I have discovered that a desire for happiness in many hearts and minds is matched by a willingness to do good, to try to accomplish positive things for others. This satisfies the ego, and when the parents of a child instill in that child the values that are unselfish, that person while growing up will have a strong desire to be righteous."
| |
|
?Civilization and Its Discontents?, 2004.
A chapter by chapter analysis of Sigmund Freud's ?Civilization and its Discontents?.
1,889 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 60.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how, in his volume, "Civilization and its Discontents", Sigmund Freud tackles no less than the broad and ambitious concept of man's place in the world. It discusses how Freud looks at culture from his unique psychoanalytical perspective and touches upon a number of important concepts, including aggression, civilization and the individual, organized religion, the death drive and Eros, and the super-ego and conscience. It also looks at how "Civilization and its Discontents" was written a mere decade before the great psychoanalyst's death and how it is, in many ways, an important compilation of many of his most renowned theories on the mind, human nature, and the structure of human society.
From the Paper
"Freud suggests that culture's repression of aggression may ultimately be more damaging than unrestrained aggression, man's natural state. Freud is generally pessimistic about man's ability to maintain civilized life indefinitely. He argues that man's ability to tame the aggressive instinct will determine his ability to live within the boundaries of civilization. However, he argues that man's recently gained ability to destroy each other through modern warfare creates less hope that man will be able to live peacefully. He notes, "Men have gained control over the forces of nature to such an extent that with their help they would have no difficulty in exterminating one another to the last man."
| |
|
"Civilization and its Discontents", 2002.
An analysis of Sigmund Freud's "Civilization and its Discontents".
1,275 words (approx. 5.1 pages), 4 sources, $ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses Freud's book "Civilization and its Discontents", which argues that civilization represses man's basic natural instincts. The paper examines Freud's theory on why violence emanates from the repression that is caused by the guilt of the human conscience.
| |
|
Sigmund Freud's Civilization and its Discontents, 2008.
A review of Sigmund Freud's book - "Civilization and its Discontents".
1,877 words (approx. 7.5 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 60.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the work of Sigmund Freud, one of the most influential figures of the twentieth century. In particular, the paper provides an overview of his famous book, "Civilization and its Discontents" in which Freud makes a pertinent and crucial analysis of the development of civilization and its relationship with the individual.
From the Paper
"Freud's argument thus begins with a review of the man's essential purpose in life: every human being pursues what the author had called in his earlier work 'the pleasure principle'. That is to say, every individual strives for his or her personal happiness in life: "What decides the purpose of life is simply the program of the pleasure principle. This principle dominates the operation of the mental apparatus from the start."(Freud, 23) The pleasure principle is as an essential structural aspect of human existence. Nevertheless, the tragedy of human life is precisely the fact that man's happiness does not seem to be a part of the plan of Creation. In fact, it is obvious that full happiness as such cannot be attained; therefore man has to content himself with either merely avoiding unhappiness or with focusing on gaining pleasure in every possible way. Freud then proceeds to enumerate the variegated ways in which the individual strives to divert sufferance. Depending on his typology, the individual will seek alleviation in very different ways. The weaker person will seek seclusion from the world by fending off any relationships she or he might have with other human beings: "Against the suffering which may come upon one from human relationships the readiest safeguard is voluntary isolation, keeping oneself aloof from other people."(Freud, 24) The narcissist will take refuge in the creation of another world, therefore by interesting himself in higher intellectual pleasure such as fantasy and art. Still other individuals will completely reject reality and close themselves in their inner selves, becoming madmen. Another way in which the crude reality is kept at a distance is religion. According to Freud, the latter is probably the most absurd and the least effective way of numbing the sufferance produced by reality. Throughout the book, Freud makes a strong critique of religion as one of the first ideas that has forced civilization on and put a great number of restrictions on the individual."
| |
|
"Civilization and its Discontents", 2002.
A discussion of the main philosophy in Freud's "Civilization and its Discontents".
2,514 words (approx. 10.1 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 76.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores how Freud offers a pessimistic view of human nature and human society in his book. It shows how Freud extends his theory of the individual?s intra-psychic conflicts, such as between ego and id, and between the conscious and the unconscious mind, to the public arena of civil society. In this way, Freud comes to define human civilization as the cause of intense conflict, both between the individuals within the social community and between the individual and society.
From the Paper
"According to Freud, the claims of the individual and the claims of the community are always in conflict and, in order for civilization to exist, ?civilized man has exchanged a portion of his possibilities of happiness for a portion of security? (63). The result, for the individual is the surrendering of most of their instinctual drives and urges for sexual and personal freedom in return for societal protection and security. However, perhaps surprisingly, Freud does not consider sexual privations to be the most acute, but concludes that the renunciation of aggression is the hardest privation of all. In Civilization, and its Discontents, Freud argues that the price for the continued existence of civil society is by a communal renunciation of instinctual gratification, and the associated suffering experienced by the individual through the repression of instinctual urges and personal satisfaction."
| |
|
"Civilization and its Discontents", 2005.
Examines the conflict between necessity and happiness in Sigmund Freud's work.
1,038 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Sigmund Freud addresses in "Civilization and Its Discontents" (1930) the discontents of society. This paper shows how Freud investigates the human psyche, its origins and the forces that govern it, eventually arriving at our very foundations, our inner instincts and their conflict, which will keep us dissatisfied forever. The paper shows that it is after reading Freud's analysis that one begins to feel the hopelessness for the human species that Freud obviously feels, and expresses through his critique of civilization.
From the Paper
"Now we see the central conflict haunting man - the conflict that exists between the necessity to work together and form groups, and our inclination to be aggressive towards fellow man. Freud's frustration over this conflict is obvious in his writing, as he breaks down the reasons humans have never been satisfied with civilization. In the end, it is this conflict between Eros and our aggression that keeps us from living happily and uninhibited with one another."
| |
|
Freud?s "Civilization and its Discontents" and Nietzsche?s "Beyond Good and Evil", 2001.
The following paper examines the way in which Sigmund Freud and Friedrich Nietzsche addressed the concept of human nature and of the society in which human nature was bound.
1,180 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper endeavours to explore the theories behind human nature, the impact of the world that Freud and Nietzsche were living in at the time, religion and approaching utopia through the works "Civilization and its Discontents" by Freud and "Beyond Good and Evil" by Nietzsche.
From the Paper
"Regarding human nature, Freud was reticent in purporting that we are inherently sinful, but rather that we come in this world full of Id. This wild, instinctive foundation is the basis upon which the infrastructure of the human psyche is erected. We are born into a dangerous world and we endeavor to evade pain and secure pleasure. Freud perceives the Id as a product of our evolutionary progress as Darwin outlined it (e.g. natural selection needs a conflict to ensue for staying alive as well as reproduction). So Freud?s assessment of human nature is rather cynical, we are fundamentally egotistical self-justifying pursuers of hedonistic satisfactions, which comprises aggression and sex."
| |
|
"A Room of One's Own", 2007.
A comparison of the ideas of Frederick Nietzsche's "Beyond Good and Evil" and Sigmund Freud's "Civilization and its Discontents" to Virginia Woolf's "A Room of One's Own."
1,850 words (approx. 7.4 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 59.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses Virginia Woolf's 1929 persuasive essay and meditative fantasy called "A Room of One's Own." Particularly, the paper attempts to compare Woolf's views with those of Frederick Nietzsche in "Beyond Good and Evil" and Sigmund Freud in "Civilization and its Discontents." It then discusses which of these philosophers would have been more likely to agree with the views that Woolf expressed in her work.
From the Paper
"However, despite his highly sexualized view of any relations between men and women, one might first think that Freud would have at least some support for a part of Woolf's essay, given his belief in the benefits of civilization. Woolf, although she espouses individual self-empowerment as innate in both men and women, does not take as dim a view of all civilization as Nietzsche. This is reflected in Woolf's belief in the benefits of modern education, but also her statement that one of civilization's benefits is that it gives women a life beyond the toils of childrearing that would have afflicted Judith Shakespeare, had she attempted to take her brother Will's path. Civilization can lift all individuals, but particularly women, over the stresses of primitive, brute, physical life and society."
| |
|
Human Nature, 2002.
A review of "Civilization and its Discontents", "Heart of Darkness" and "The Marx-Engels Reader".
1,498 words (approx. 6.0 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 49.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the issue of human nature, as seen in three different works: Sigmund Freud's "Civilization and Its Discontents", Joseph Conrad's "Heart of Darkness", and Karl Marx's "The Marx-Engels Reader". The paper offers all three as they present differing views of human nature, yet together they argue that whatever freedom human beings possess is either nullified or dangerously threatened by forces much greater and more powerful than the individual human being. The writer believes that all three see aspects of the irrational (the subconscious, imperialism, historical materialism) as the enemy of human freedom, sanity and goodness.
From the Paper
"In this social context, the psychoanalyst's role can be seen as a means of discovering the roots of the individual's traumas in order to free him to act consciously and responsibly, to help that individual to learn to adapt successfully to society and to the problems society presents, and to act more effectively with and within the institutions of society. Without social institutions controlling the individual who is ruled otherwise by unconscious forces beyond his knowledge and his control, that individual will respond mechanically and without real freedom to social conflict."
| |
|
Freud and Camus on Humanity and Redemption, 2008.
A comparative analysis between Sigmund Freud's text "Civilization and Its Discontents" and Albert Camus' theater production "The Plague".
1,200 words (approx. 4.8 pages), 2 sources, APA, $ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts the views regarding humanity and redemption expressed in Sigmund Freud's text "Civilization and Its Discontents" and in Albert Camus' play "The Plague". Although darkened by a sense of apocalyptic despair following the horrors of World War II, which directly preceded the publication of "The Plague", the paper finds Camus' view of humanity ultimately optimistic. In contrast, the paper finds Freud's discussion to be of a far more insidious nature, inclining the notion that man's life is an ongoing battle between good and evil in which both impulses share equal sway. Thus, the paper postures that Freud's response to the above declaration might be that which there is to despise in man is of equal importance in understanding who he is as that which there is of him to admire. The paper concludes that, despite this difference, both Freud and Camus agree that man's life is steeped in suffering, from which he must constantly protect himself. Moreover, these texts are paired in their suggestion that the real triumph of human life is finding ways to overcome vanity, suffering, and the evils of our fellow man, in order to achieve redemption.
From the Paper
"Freud only at one juncture can be said to hint at an approval of the idea expressed at the resolution Camus' play, when he indicates that the very existence of the emphasis on striving against the natural disposition toward evil is an indication that in some capacity, man is a creature worthy of admiration. He expresses the view that in resisting the thrust of the wicked, "each of us will be well advised, on some suitable occasion, to make a low bow to the deeply moral nature of mankind." (Freud, 80) To this end, he raises the idea only insofar as the endorsement of that which might be seen as morally recommendable behavior will be reflected in those taught to appreciate its principles and inherent rewards."
| |
|
Freud and Nietzsche: Super-egos and Idols, 2000.
A comparison of the main viewpoints of Friedrich Nietzsche in "Twilight of the Idols" and Sigmund Freud in "Civilization and Its Discontents".
1,537 words (approx. 6.1 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the works of philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Sigmund Freud (""Twilight of the Idols" and "Civilization and Its Discontents" respectively). It outlines and compares their views on science, religion, nature, the individual and society. The paper also focuses on the subject of instincts/passions vs. reason.
From the Paper
"In the midst of so much confusion, so many contrasting affirmations, opinions and perspectives, what conclusions can be drawn? What lasting truths can one hold on to? Sigmund Freud, in his Civilization and Its Discontents, and Friedrich Nietzsche, in Twilight of the Idols, offer a good summary of many of their views. Freud and Nietzsche, both complex men of enormous egos, share many of the same ideas on the topics of science, religion, the individual and society, with the exception of a few minor differences."
| |
|
Philosophies behind a peculiar conception, 2008.
A discussion about what a person strives for in his lifetime based on an analysis of Sigmund Freud's "Civilization and its Discontents".
2,857 words (approx. 11.4 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 84.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses Sigmund Freud's thoughts on a number of issues ranging from the individual to society, from the psyche to civilization and further relates a number of issues that surrounds the relationship between man and society. In particular, the paper attempts to shed light on a number of issues discussed in Freud's "Civilization and its Discontents," and provide the author's claims on the same issues. The author does this by by first presenting Freud's assumptions and claims, and second, by either critiquing or affirming such claims. The paper then proceeds in a point-by-point analysis of the author's claims.
Outline:
Purpose of Life:The Pleasure Principle
On the Illusion and Imagination
Civilization and Aggression
From the Paper
"Freud proceeded by saying that unhappiness is sufferings. He traced the causes of this sufferings and arrived at the proposition that there are three (3) sources of unhappiness to man's life, first is the body, second is the external world, and third the from relations to others (2002). The first pertains to the sufferings and pain brought by our body, this includes sickness and the physical pain that we endure. The second is the sufferings brought about by the external world, and the third is the one we acquire in relating to other people. "
| |
|
"Globalization and its Discontents", 2005.
A book review of "Globalization and Its Discontents" by Joseph Stiglitz's.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 5 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper is a critical review of Joseph Stiglitz's book "Globalization and Its Discontents" (2002). The text represents a critical overview of one of the most controversial and complex issues today: the increasing globalization of business in the form of financial and trading markets and the weaknesses of nation-states in this new economic paradigm. The paper explains what globalization means in practice. The main argument of the paper, however, is that the text is is flawed by the the fact that the author was one of the defining players of US economic policy during a critical period and cannot be unbiased.
From the Paper
"The object of this book review is Joseph Stiglitz' Globalization and its Discontents (2002). This text represents a critical overview of one of the most controversial and complex issues of our time: the increasing globalization of business in the form of financial and trading markets, and the weaknesses of nation states in this new economic paradigm. Given that this is a critical review, it will be argued that Stiglitz' text, for all of its valuable insights into the processes of globalization, is flawed in one key respect. Although the author presents a range of critiques of globalization that, as will be seen, are supported by other critics, the fact that he was one of the defining players of US economic policy during a critical period.."
| |
|
"Globalization and its Discontents", 2007.
A review of the book "Globalization and its Discontents" by Joseph Stiglitz.
1,536 words (approx. 6.1 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews and discusses Joseph Stiglitz's book "Globalization and its Discontents". According to the paper, the book provides a lot of information on what is considered to be the new global economy from one who considers himself an expert observer. The paper further reports that the book provides a very provocative look at the global society and how it is increasing.
From the Paper
"Stiglitz makes other arguments throughout his book and it is important to discuss some of them briefly here or at least point them out, as they could be important for discussion in the future as globalization continues to move forward. One of the things that Stiglitz does when it comes to be internationalization of economics is to compare the United States and other countries. It does not seem accurate for Stiglitz to compare these, however, because the social structures and the economic structures of many countries are so very different. It is true that they are all experiencing globalization, but the experiences had by those in other countries and by those in the United States will be very different both socially and economically and therefore there does not seem to be any direct comparison that is able to be made. "
|
|
|
