| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "CHANGING ATTITUDES SEX MARRIAGES": |
|
|
Changing Attitudes Regarding Same-Sex Marriages, 2004.
An examination of the way society's attitudes are changing towards same-sex marriages.
815 words (approx. 3.3 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how this phenomenon has been around for centuries; however, only recently is public opinion warming to the idea. It looks at these changing attitudes by the government, the law makers, religious institutions, and society as a whole.
From the Paper
'However, many state and national agencies still have old-fashioned attitudes toward same-sex marriages. For example, the New Jersey Family Policy Council believes that the institution of marriage would be jeopardized if homosexuals were encouraged to wed. "States do have the right to set limits on who is allowed to marry," said Len Deo, the president of the council. The council ignores the fact that changing times always have brought changing attitudes about marriage."
| |
|
Social Change and Same-Sex Marriage in Canada, 2006.
An examination of same sex marriages and Canadian society.
1,988 words (approx. 8.0 pages), 9 sources, MLA, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the legalization of same-sex marriages in Canada and the shift in society that brought about this change. The paper discusses the negative attitude of Canadian society in the past toward same-sex marriages. The paper also notes that more same sex couples were becoming parents, while increasing numbers of lesbians and gays were coming out of the closet and, as a result, many more non-gay Canadians realized that people they knew - family members, friends, other parents at their children's schools - were gay and lesbian, and due to this became gradually more tolerant. The paper explains that the biggest social change in Canada this century has been the legalization of same sex marriage which happened in June of 2005, when the federal government, led by the Liberal Party under Paul Martin, legalized same-sex marriage for all of Canada.
From the Paper
"For a very long time in Canadian society, the very idea of same-sex marriage would have been preposterous. After all, up until 1967, sex between consenting adults of the same sex was actually illegal. This, it is argued, was absolutely unacceptable in a country that has enshrined equal rights for all adults in its Bill of Rights. However, it seems that this bill was not far-reaching enough, given that the state still saw fit to prescribe appropriate sexual behaviours between consenting adults."
| |
|
Same-Sex Marriages, 2007.
This paper argues that, after examining both sides of the issue, same-sex marriages should not be allowed because they do not fit the criteria for a legal partnership according to the U.S. Constitution.
2,980 words (approx. 11.9 pages), 11 sources, MLA, $ 87.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, despite the various re-definitions of the term "marriage", from a legal standpoint, only "civil unions" or legal marriages offer the full package of federal benefits and protections. The author points out that case law concerning same-sex marriage is contradictory and contains inconsistent rulings from state to state and that the court cannot decide how to apply the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) or even if DOMA is constitutional. The paper concludes that, although progress in certain states had been made to allow for same-sex marriages, a majority of the country still agrees that same-sex marriages go against established moral codes and ethics.
Table of Contents:
Weighing the Facts on Same-Sex Marriage
What's the Big Deal about Federal Recognition?
A Question of Culture
DOMA and Case Law
Rethinking Marriage: An Argument for Same-Sex Marriages
Arguments against Same-Sex Marriage
From the Paper
"Regardless of the logical arguments proposed by those in favor of same sex marriage, homosexuality is considered a sin by many religions. There are many that feel it would weaken family ties and values. They also feel that we would have to take a step backward in society and reexamine issues such as polygamy and other types of marriage, in all fairness. Legal actions of the past several years reflect the sentiment of a majority of the American people. The American people stand clear, same-sex marriage violates the very moral ethics upon which this country was founded."
| |
|
Same Sex Marriages, 2006.
An opinionated discussion against same sex marriages.
2,380 words (approx. 9.5 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 72.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper deals with the same sex marriage issue and analyzes the problems with it. The paper discusses how there is a general move toward the acceptance of gay marriages. It then states reasons why these marriages should not be legitimized or practiced. It is the aim of this opinionated paper to give the reader sound knowledge of the reasons to oppose same sex marriages.
Table of Contents:
Abstract
Introduction
Same Sex Marriage
References
From the Paper
"A family's primary focus is on the nurturing and development of children. Same sex marriages are denying the children their right to have a father and a mother. Changing the definition of marriage and including same sex marriage same can have far-reaching changes that can influence the development of children. By changing the definition of marriage and including same sex marriage in that, one is changing the family dynamics and societal structures as well. Firstly same sex couples cannot have any children together as it is biologically impossible. What females can do is that they can either opt to adopt a child or go for test tube babies. If they do undergo in-vitro fertilization, they must use the sperms of the male. What more obvious a hint can nature give them that same sex marriage is not a part or plan of nature. The males in a same sex marriage have no option but to adopt a child. During the upbringing and nurturing of a child, both maternal and paternal care is required. He needs the love of a father as much as the love of a mother and there is no way that an adopted child can be given the love of a father as well as a mother. Only the love of two fathers can be given or two mothers and the love of two fathers or two mothers do not equal the love of a mother and a father."
| |
|
Same-Sex Marriages, 2004.
This paper discusses the media and political issues regarding same-sex marriages.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer examines media and political issues surrounding same-sex marriages. The writer discusses President Bush's belief that same sex marriages would be harmful to society. The writer examines President Bush's support for a Constitutional Amendment banning same sex marriage. The writer also discusses the response of the media in this regard.
From the Paper
"United States President George Bush endorsed a constitutional amendment that would restrict marriage to two people of the opposite sex. In making the endorsement, Bush stated that the union of a man and a woman is the most enduring human institution honored and encouraged in all cultures and by every religious faith. Perhaps more importantly however Bush also stated that heterosexual marriage cannot be severed from its cultural religious and natural roots without weakening the good influence of society."
| |
|
Same-sex Marriages, 2007.
A discussion on the legal acceptance of same-sex marriages.
1,007 words (approx. 4.0 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper introduces the topic of same-sex marriage. It continues to discuss the official laws of New York State vs. the "law of the people" relating to same-sex marriage. It explains that the law of the people does indeed exist and often supercedes the laws of a state or nation. It analyzes the bitter battle going on in the U.S. today regarding same-sex marriage and the law. The author concludes with a personal subjective opinion on the matter.
From the Paper
"In some cases, same-sex partners marry even if the law does not condone their union in their state. Recently, a Presbyterian minister faces a trial by her church because she officiated over same-sex unions. Historically, it has been religious organizations, particularly the Catholic Church, who have been so valiantly opposed to same-sex marriage. Another author notes, "The most outspoken and consistently negative response to proposals that the state recognize same-sex marriage has come from the Catholic Church" (Pope). However, the Catholic Church does not rule over all the people, and in general, society has become more accepting of gays in the past few decades. Thus, archaic laws may remain on the books, but the law of the people may swing to support gay marriage in the near future."
| |
|
Same-Sex Marriages, 2006.
A discussion regarding the controversial issue of same-sex marriage.
752 words (approx. 3.0 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a look at same-sex marriage and the opposition this controversial subject is receiving. According to the paper, Massachusetts is the only state that allows same-sex marriage. The paper argues that opposition to same-sex marriages must be overcome by developing new definitions of marriage and by dispelling stereotypes that impede change.
From the Paper
"Opponents of same-sex marriage fear gay parenting for many reasons. Many believe that the family structure that helps the child the most is a family headed by two biological parents. One rationale given is that children need same-sex role models to teach them how to behave as a man or as a woman (Knight). Opponents of same-sex marriage also claim that children raised by homosexuals are more dissatisfied with their own gender, suffer a greater rate of molestation within the family, and have homosexual experiences more often (Knight). Indirectly, opponents go on to say that gay marriage will encourage teens who are unsure of their sexuality to become victims of suicide, depression, drug abuse, and sexually transmitted diseases (Benne and McDermott, 2004). "
| |
|
Same Sex Marriages, 2006.
This paper examines the controversial issue of same sex marriages while focusing on the religious and legal implications.
1,173 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 8 sources, APA, $ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the recently passed law in Massachusetts permitting same sex marriages. This paper delves into the basic laws as interpreted in Massachusetts and now a precedent for other states to follow which offers an easy solution to the "heterosexuals only" problem. This paper analyzes the issues now facing same sex couples regarding certain rights and recognition previously accorded to heterosexual couples, including tax relief, hospital visits and real estate purchases. This paper also discusses the various religious views on same sex marriages.
From the Paper
"We need to confront the real issues, therefore, which may have little if anything to do with sex, or "love" (whatever that definition may be) but with recognition of certain rights, the same as heterosexual couples now have, both in terms of tax relief, will right of survivorship, even hospital visits, real estate purchases, and so on. While more and more states, Texas and Nebraska being two, have "legally" had same sex marriages banned by means of an actual constitutional amendment, or the plans for one, in some cases it seems the states, in their zeal, may have gone too far. "On May 12, U.S. District Court Judge Joseph Bataillon of Lincoln, Neb., struck down Nebraska's constitutional amendment that banned same-sex marriage. Bataillon's ruling in Citizens for Equal Protection v. Bruningdeals in part with the plaintiffs' argument that the amendment deprives same-sex couples of First Amendment rights, creating 'a significant barrier to the plaintiffs' right to petition or to participate in the political process."
| |
|
Same-Sex Marriages, 2001.
Presents arguments in favor of the legalization of same-sex marriages.
1,470 words (approx. 5.9 pages), 8 sources, $ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is an argumentative essay promoting the legalization of same-sex marriages. The author focuses on the legal aspects of same sex marriages arguing for the legal rights such as insurance and parental status that need to be enforced.
From the Paper
"The proposed legalization of same-sex marriages is one of the most significant, yet controversial issues facing America today. Same-sex marriages, also known as Civil Unions, should be legalalized in every state in the United States. Right now, in the United States, same-sex couples do not receive the same benefits and legal rights that married couples take for granted. These benefits include cheaper health insurance rates, life insurance benefits, funeral leave of absence from work, legal parental status with a partner?s child, and significant tax reductions."
| |
|
Same-Sex Marriages, 2003.
A discussion on the pros and cons of same-sex marriages.
1,380 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper considers both sides of the argument for and against same-sex marriage. The author looks at traditional marriage and how it has changed over recent years. The paper examines the conservative views of traditional marriage, that of the Church, and discusses reasons why same-sex marriages would devalue traditional marriage.
From the Paper
"With a recent lifting of the ban of the right to same-sex marriages in Massachusetts, sociologist, Kersti Yllo, says that same-sex marriage recognizes the basic humanity of each of us, but that it will definitely threaten traditional marriage and even change ..."
| |
|
Same Sex Marriages, 1999.
An examination of the issue of same-sex marriages.
2,360 words (approx. 9.4 pages), 10 sources, $ 72.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper lists arguments both for and against same-sex marriages. The author discusses the different schools of thought that both support and argue against same sex marriage and concludes with a personal opinion about the issue.
From the Paper
?I now pronounce you husband and husband,? the priest might say. ?You may kiss the groom.? This sounds a bit odd, doesn?t it? This could be an excerpt from the ceremony of a same-sex marriage. Although they are not currently lawful in the United States, gay and lesbian activists are presently campaigning both in and out of the courtroom for same-sex marriages to be declared legal. However, there are several schools of thought that either support or oppose this issue."
| |
|
Same-Sex Marriages, 2004.
This paper discusses the history of same-sex marriages and their impact on society as seen through the courts.
2,555 words (approx. 10.2 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 77.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that same-sex unions used to get people thrown in jail, but, as society became more tolerant of same-sex couples, so did the legal system. The author states that the first case of same-sex marriage was tried in the District of Columbia where the court ruled that D.C. had the right to refuse a marriage license to same-sex couples. The paper points out that the trend in the courtroom mirrors the trends in society to accept same-sex couples as the committed partners, a status they want to be recognized.
From the Paper
"Pre-1970?s society kept a tight rein on homosexual issues and couples remained quietly in the closet for fear of losing their jobs, their families and their support. Once the 1970?s began to accept more open lifestyles the homosexual issue began to come out of the closet as well. In 1973 the nation saw the second court case regarding the rights of homosexual couples when a lesbian couple argued they had been deprived of three constitutional rights with the state?s refusal to allow them to marry. Their claim was the refusal interfered with their right to practice their religious faith which mandated marriage to live together, the right to marry, and the right to associate."
| |
|
"The Fundamental Argument for Same-Sex Marriage", 2005.
An argument in favor of same-sex marriages, based on the article, "The Fundamental Argument for Same-Sex Marriage," by Ralph Wedgwood.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 2 sources, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews the article "The Fundamental Argument for Same-Sex Marriage," by Ralph Wedgwood. The paper discusses the arguments in the article in favor of same-sex marriage. It analyzes the history of same-sex marriages and looks at the efforts to lobby the government to legitimize these marriages as equal rights.
From the Paper
"A Critical Review of "The Fundamental Argument for Same-Sex Marriage," by Ralph Wedgwood Same-sex relationships have been part of human life for thousands of years. During those years, people in those relationships have sought some kind of legitimacy for them. Recently, efforts have been made to gain both legal and societal acceptance of same-sex marriages. These efforts have been made largely in the political arena, with various groups lobbying for what they term as equal rights under the law. Ralph Wedgwood addresses the objections that accompany this argument in his article, "The Fundamental Argument for Same-Sex Marriage." "
| |
|
Same-Sex Marriages, 2002.
A discussion of the implications of same-sex marriages.
1,957 words (approx. 7.8 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how same-sex marriage has never been allowed in law or religious doctrine and how some see a law as a threat to religious freedom and others see it as a threat to the definition of marriage and so to the family in society. It examines three possible solutions for the issue of gay marriage, to not allow gay marriage and to keep the current laws regarding the meaning of marriage and of spousal rights, to allow gay marriage, which would automatically bring gay marriages into alignment with existing laws on spousal rights and to prohibit gay marriage but to allow a form of domestic partnership agreement which would not be a marriage but which would bring spousal rights to gay couples. The implications of these options are evaluated as well as current legal issues facing gay couples.
From the Paper
"Some of the arguments for same-sex marriage are intended to counter directly arguments against same-sex marriage. One argument against is that marriage is for procreation. The argument for same-sex marriage is that this is no different than a childless couple, though no one is saying such a couple should not be married or that they should not have the legal benefits of marriage. This is a logical counter to the aforementioned argument, though it does fail to indicate that there is still a difference--heterosexual marriage carries with it the possibility of procreation while same-sex marriage does not (Stengel 52)."
| |
|
Same-Sex Marriages, 2005.
A look at the debate on the legalization of same-sex marriages.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 2 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses whether same sex marriages be legalized. It looks at how few other current issues have elicited such ire and passion from the public and how few of those opinions are moderate or reasonable.
From the Paper
"Should same sex marriages be legalized? Few other current issues have elicited such ire and passion from the public. It seems that not only does everyone have an opinion on the matter, but that few of those opinions are moderate or reasonable. On the one hand, social conservatives argue that permitting gay marriages makes a mockery of the institution of marriage, already in so-called troubled waters at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Extreme conservatives are also highly opposed to any legal sanction of homosexuality. On the other hand, liberal activists believe that homosexual couples should be afforded the same protections and privileges under the law that heterosexual couples receive. These individuals, such as the prosecutors who argued before the Canadian Supreme Court last year, believe that such a law should be supported in the interest of social justice (Castillo)."
|
|
|
