| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "CENSORSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS": |
|
|
Censorship In Our Schools - A Social Dilemma, 2000.
A look at "freedom of speech" and the censorship of books in schools.
2,670 words (approx. 10.7 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 80.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The writer of this paper discusses the censorship of books in schools and how some books are condemned and challenged by schools because of the use of curse words or violence, homosexuality, sex, rebellion, the occult or countless other things. The writer stresses his opinion against censorship in the paper and also his feelings on how it is not only a violation of our freedom of speech, but it infringes on our education and our right to choose what we read.
From the Paper
"Freedom of speech is the cornerstone upon which the United States was founded. So essential is it to our national identity that it is guaranteed by the First Amendment to the Constitution. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. It is essential to democracy. Without it all other rights are diminished to the point where there is no real freedom whatsoever. The freedom to read is a necessary corollary to the freedom of speech; it is also integral to democracy. Yet this most important constitutional liberty is constantly under attack by those who (ironically, often in the name of ?freedom?) would restrict the rights of others to read what they choose - often for the most ridiculous of reasons. This is a matter of great concern to our society."
| |
|
Censorship of High School Newspapers, 2008.
This paper discusses the issue of censorship as it relates to newspapers and reporting within high schools.
1,055 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer notes that censorship in the United States has always been a controversial issue in journalism, television and print media. However, the writer points out, the past two decades have witnessed the growing concern of censorship at the high school level. The writer discusses that journalistic censorship in high school, in many states, has been supported by the Supreme Court, stating that educational institutions are accountable for the information released to the students. The writer maintains that the main issue is the importance of maintaining constitutionality and upholding the right to speak freely about social issues that impact everyone, adults and teenagers alike. The writer concludes that in many cases, allowing high school newspapers to report on issues that impact the young community can increase awareness on the general health of the student body. Further, the writer maintains that while educators feel morally responsible and accountable for the information that students retain, it is their duty to be facilitators of education, rather than editors of information.
From the Paper
"The constitution clearly states, as amended, that minors and adults alike are not to be subject to restriction of the Bill of Rights. Quite simply, censoring one type of journalistic media without monitoring another is a blatant double standard that does ignores the Supreme Courts ruling of the 1969 amendment. While educators argue that high school newspapers are part of the school curriculum and should be monitored and censored, reports indicate that the concepts of journalism taught in the classroom are not related to the real life issues that occur in the community. Controlling a newspaper's content also causes into the question the violation of constitutional liberties, and the notion that a high school newspaper's content is taught as part of a school's curriculum is off-base. Educational institutions are responsible for providing students with the necessary knowledge of fundamentals on a variety of topics. However, the Hazelwood School District vs. Kuhlmeirer clearly shows an attempt to trump the ideas resulting from the application of journalism fundamentals."
| |
|
Public Schools vs. Private Schools, 2005.
A look at the accusation that public schools do not produce graduates capable of living and working successfully in their own culture.
3,100 words (approx. 12.4 pages), 9 sources, APA, $ 90.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper attempts to demonstrate that private schools succeed at preparing graduates to succeed after graduation, whereas public schools do not. The paper puts forth the hypothesis that private schools teach their students to succeed, not because of a great deal of money poured into education, but because the schools are free to teach the curricula they choose and because they prepare students to return to their own cultures and succeed. The paper further hypothesizes that public schools, on the other hand, are not free to teach curricula not aimed at improving standardized test scores, and the successful public school student is not prepared to return to his or her culture in a trade, but to transition out of it into an anachronistic academic culture.
Introduction
Hypothesis
Review of the Literature
Education and Culture
Teaching Dispositions
Outmoded Educational Model
Would Vo-tech be a Better Public School Goal?
Developing the Person Instead of the Mind
Opposition to Change in Public Schools
Alternatives to Public and Private School
Methodology
From the Paper
"There are two, or possibly even three, co-existent educational systems in the United States. The largest of these is the public education system, followed by the private schools and increasingly popular home-schooling. The third system will be mentioned only tangentially, as the real problems with U.S. education are considered to reside in the public schools. In recent decades, there have been various schemes put forth regarding vouchers for families who want to send their children to private schools but cannot afford the fees; none of these has borne fruit. In any case, it is doubtful that the private schools could absorb the numbers of students who would want to attend if vouchers were a reality. The problem with the public schools has been identified by most of the public and by many researchers as one of curriculum."
| |
|
Censorship in High School, 2008.
An analysis of the issues concerning the censoring of articles appearing in a high school newspaper.
903 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 32.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper relates that, while the censoring of articles appearing in a high school newspaper is, no doubt, intended to protect the readers from the gruesome details of reality, whether this protection actually works when these gruesome details are all over television, radio and the Internet, is debatable. The paper acknowledges that the censorship is aimed to reduce the negative impact the cruel reality might have on teenagers, by making them focus on the scholarly features presented in the high school newspaper, but then questions whether this objective is actually achieved. Specifically, the writer of the paper argues that, in fact, censoring articles in the high school newspaper does not protect students and, instead, narrows the minds of both readers and writers by enclosing them in a world free of crime.
From the Paper
"Nobody doubts the good intentions of high school principals who desire to read in the school newspaper about pleasant events and achievements of students. But when the world around abounds in criminality, the protection through censorship is rather unlikely to have the desired outcome. And even considering that there are teenagers who do not watch television, or which by some miraculous event are unaware of the cruelties going on in the world, reading more pleasant articles in the high school newspaper will serve them no good. For they will one day realize the multitude of negative aspects in the world and will be shocked at their sight. As a result of this line of thoughts, one could mention that by censoring the school newspaper, the high school fails to accomplish its mission of ensuring the transition from childhood to adulthood. "
| |
|
A Comparative Analysis of Public Schools and Private Schools, 2006.
An analysis of public and private schools in Canada.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 0 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how education is one of the most important goods in our society. A person's educational achievements to a large extent determine how their life will be, while the educational system a country fosters determines its economic outcomes to a large extent. The paper further discusses how that in Canada, most education is provided by the government and many people would argue that this is the way it should be, as it is only government that has the resources and expertise to take on this important role
| |
|
School Texts Censorship, 2004.
Written in the form of a letter, this paper argues against the elimination of the texts ?What We Talk About When We Talk About Love?, ?The Lottery?, and ?A&P? from the school curriculum.
1,325 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper addresses a decision of the school board to disallow selected texts from the school reading curriculum. The writer argues against, particularly, the elimination of the texts ?What We Talk About When We Talk About Love?by Raymond Carver; ?The Lottery? by Shirley Jackson; and ?A&P? by John Updike. It agrees that these stories may contain what some persons deem to be ?inappropriate? content in terms of language or references to ethnic groups. However, the writer argues that eliminating these from one school reading list is not going to take any of the problems in the world away. Is it not better that students be made aware of the fact that the world is not a perfect, pristine place? Would we not then be better able to deal with situations in the adult world?
From the Paper
"When the four friends are talking, they come upon the subject, as the title suggests, of love. It soon becomes clear that each has his or her own ideal of love. The former member of seminary, Mel, for example refers to spiritual love (p. 422) as the ultimate definition of this emotion. And this makes sense. It is all-encompassing and always compassionate. Terri, Mel?s girlfriend, has a different idea. She cites her previous boyfriend?s abusive behavior as his particular display of love. She describes a shocking scene of being severely injured physically. The question then is, is it good for kids to learn this kind of thing? Should we not concentrate only on the good aspects of such a high emotion as love? I don?t believe so. If students leave school with an idealized, but unrealistic view of love, the chances of making a success of a relationship are few. It is necessary to be aware of the realities of love and indeed of life."
| |
|
School Censorship, 1996.
Educational, legal, social & religious effects of attempts to censor or remove books from classes & libraries.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 9 sources, $ 79.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"In providing students with a curriculum that reflects the widest possible range of viewpoints, school administrations increasingly find themselves under attack by opponents of intellectual freedom. Although in some cases the opposition is justified, in others it merely reflects a growing trend toward intolerance. With religious fundamentalism taking a prominent role in local, state, and federal politics, school censorship has become an issue that shows no signs of abating.
Censorship is a critical issue because it is closely related to the function of education in society. From the very beginnings of the public school movement in America, school administrators assumed the dual responsibility of instructing students in the prevailing social and economic values of society...
| |
|
Book Censorship, 2005.
This paper argues against book censorship in the public school system.
1,110 words (approx. 4.4 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that freedom of speech, the right to live freely without censorship and freedom of the press, which are all rights protected by the United States Constitution, prevent the censorship of books in the public school system. The author points out that, in the early 1950s, attempts to censor books in the California school system were related to the fear of communism. The paper relates that book censorship interferes with the freedom of the press because potential purchases of books for school libraries and student reading lists actually determine which books are to be printed.
From the Paper
"In Ray Bradbury's "Fahrenheit 451", the author presents an extremely frightening vision of what the world will be like in the future if the nation does not put a halt to any attempt at censorship of books. In this book, the author has fire fighters starting fires for the purpose of burning books. The main characters of the work hide books in the effort to preserve the right to have ideas and thoughts outside of the things that are taught or approved."
| |
|
School Culture and School Safety, 2004.
Examines the existing and significant relationship between school culture and school safety.
32,586 words (approx. 130.3 pages), 101 sources, MLA, $ 249.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This is a quantitative research study that is designed to assess the impact of school culture on school safety and school violence. The paper looks at what schools can do to create proper environments that are conducive to safety and whether there are identifiable behaviors within school culture that contribute to safety. The paper also analyzes the perceptions of teachers and administrators about school culture and order.
From the Paper
"Another important point that is stressed when looking at school culture and safety is the fact that strong leaders generally make an effort to express sincere feelings toward students and their lives, and have a real belief that the students have the potential to become successful and productive adults (Kenworthy & O'Driscoll, 2000). Effective leaders create effective schools that are resilient to violence and other risks and promote resiliency in students."
|
| Term Paper # 51243 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
| Term Paper # 45733 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
|
|
Home Schooling versus Public Schooling, 2006.
A comparison of home schools and public schools in the United States, the pros and cons.
1,861 words (approx. 7.4 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 59.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper shows the balance between the negative and positive aspects of public schools. Similarly, it reflects that home schooling provides an ideal atmosphere for a child under close supervision but has certain limitations too.The biggest advantage the home schools offer is the protection from the violence, sex, drugs and other social ills that is now a common phenomenon in the public schools. The public schools may be infested with serious problems, but they are still indispensable to the intellectual, emotional and psychological growth of young minds. The intellectual growth at homes and social grooming at public schools are shown to be equally important. Both these options provided are shown to provide endless opportunities to learn and grow.
From the Paper
"Education is most important facet of any society. Educated youth is an asset which contributes to progress, development and evolution of civilization. Human beings are naturally blessed with enormous potentials. Education is the knowledge of putting one's potentials to maximum use. When we think of education, the first thing which comes to our minds is the educational institution or the school. Since centuries, the most common form of getting formal education is through Public Schools. However, it has been observed that in last two to three decades, the Public School education is going down the slope. There are numerous questions raised as to the quality of education being imparted and the illicit extra-curricular activities the students are indulging while attending Public Schools. Parents are now getting apprehensive of sending their children to Public Schools and are forced to think of safe alternatives."
| |
|
Three New York City Area High Schools, 2005.
This paper compares three very different high schools in the New York City area: Stuyvesant High School, Columbus High School and North Valley Stream High School.
2,330 words (approx. 9.3 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Stuyvesant High School is an honor's program school located in downtown Manhattan, Columbus High School is an "inner-city" school located in the north-east side of the Bronx and North Valley Stream High School is a wealthier suburban school in Nassau County, Long Island New York. The author points out that Stuyvesant School is similar to one of the oldest public schools in the country Boston Latin in terms of population, test scores, neighborhood and number of students who go on to higher education (94%); both require admission testing, are considered a school for intellectually gifted children and have no special education facilities. The paper deduces that money, parental encouragement and class-consciousness can over come some lack of motivation and lack of academic talent, which are the greatest predictors of a successful high school career. Many charts and tables.
From the Paper
"The difference in the number of Reagents diplomas issued between Stuyvesant and Columbus High School's is significantly high. Stuyvesant High has a 98 percent average of Reagents diploma ratio whereas Columbus has a 13.5 percent average. What this tells us is although this is a highly ethnicized inner city school with little money and fewer teachers per student, that 13% of the students were able to achieve diplomas with honors despite negative peer pressure, and other situations. Despite all the drawbacks at Columbus High School, they had a higher ratio of honor's graduates than similar schools although a lower ratio of honors for schools in the area."
| |
|
Charter Schools, 2005.
A discussion about the alternative to public schooling--charter schooling.
3,145 words (approx. 12.6 pages), 12 sources, MLA, $ 91.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains the history of charter schools, how charter schools are funded, the reasons that make charter schools a popular alternative to public schooling and analyzes the pros and cons of charter schools. Lastly, it examines a state that is currently running numerous successful charter schools and predicts the future of charter schools. Paper includes a one-page outline.
From the Paper
"The charter school movement began when reformers from St. Paul and Scarsdale, Philadelphia, Arlington, Virginia, and the states of New York and Virginia began setting up experiment to seek better alternative public schools for students and parents (Nathan 500). The name "charter schools" originated in the 1970s when New England educator, Ray Budde, suggested that a small group of teachers be given a 'charter' or contract by their local school board to explore new approaches to the standardized public school system (500). The former president of the American Federation of Teachers, Albert Shanker, took the idea and suggested that the local school board could charter an entire school if the union and teachers agreed (CANEC and PRI). This contract for charter schools' goals, programs, method of measuring success and operational procedures is signed between the operators, local school district, and the county board of education of the state (CCSA). In many states, at the end of each term, usually five-years, the school board reviews the schools to ensure that the educational achievements of their students are met before granting another term of charter."
| |
|
Computer Technology in Schools, 2005.
A look at computer technology in schools, with a focus on schools in the U.K.
1,278 words (approx. 5.1 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses that most schools use a variety of hardware and software to support teaching and learning and explains how these can be used effectively in the classroom with a focus on schools in the U.K. and the literacy curriculum. The study discovers practical use of hardware and software in the classroom as an instructional tool or support.
From the Paper
"The preparation of teachers for their teaching career and for the environment of an 'information society" requires that educational institutions be "in the know" in relation to technological models and their uses. It was found in research that "teachers do not feel adequately prepared to integrate technology into their teaching." (Colon, et al, 1995; Office of Technology and Assessment, OTA, 1995 as cited by Gonzales & Thompson, 1998) The Office of Technology and Assessment states that according to the study conducted "technology is not a central part of the experience in learning provided to students who are receiving education and plan to teach even though it is vital in the education, preparation and training of teachers in today's classroom an education environment."
|
|
|
