| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "CELIBACY SEXUAL DEVIANCE PRIESTS": |
|
|
Celibacy and Sexual Deviance by Priests, 2002.
This paper is a research proposal to prove or disprove the relationship between celibacy and sexual deviancy by priests.
1,630 words (approx. 6.5 pages), 0 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The proposed study describes the actual number of priests who have committed sexual crimes, reconsiders the Catholic Church's mandatory celibacy policy for priests, proves that clergy members who vow celibacy are no more likely than those who do not vow celibacy to commit acts of sexual deviation and evaluates if the Church?s clerical celibacy requirement, causes sexual deviance. The meta-research analyzes the results of various surveys, sexual program evaluations, case studies, research papers and historical sources to present a thorough argument for and against the connection between sexual deviances and celibacy.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Background
Findings
Goals
Specific Aims
Methodology
Research Chronology
Significance
Conclusion
Facilities Available
From the Paper
"Celibacy has been a part of the Catholic Church since the fourth century. The Church remains loyal to this policy today, holding that celibacy allows priests to be more independent and available. Celibacy is also based on the idea that priests should live out the same witness as their brothers in monastic life. However, recent scandals involving priests and sexual misconduct have put pressure on the Church to reconsider its policy of mandatory celibacy. Every time a new sexual deviance case is brought against a clergyman, the issue of celibacy rears its head. Many people believe that if priests were allowed to marry, there would be less of a problem with deviant behavior."
| |
|
Celibacy and Sexual Deviation, 2002.
This paper challenges the proposal that there exists a relationship between celibacy and sexual misconduct.
2,210 words (approx. 8.8 pages), 9 sources, MLA, $ 68.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This research paper explores the claim that celibacy within the clergy results in sexual deviation. The paper begins with an elucidation of the problem within the Catholic Church and an explanation for the propagation of celibacy in Catholic theory. It then goes on to list the three main myths associated with celibacy; namely, that Catholic priests are more likely to become pedophiles than any other group of men, that the celibate state of the priesthood leads to pedophilia and that married clergy would make pedophilia and other forms of sexual misconduct cease to exist. The paper then proceeds to explore both sides of the argument of whether a relationship between celibacy and sexual deviance exists, and in doing so, the writer brings in the opinions of various experts. The paper continues by looking at the treatment of sexual deviance by the Catholic Church and concludes by deducing that there is no connection between celibacy and sexual deviance.
From the Paper
"In today?s society, the Catholic Church is confronted with two important issues regarding sexuality. The first is the scandal of sexual abuse of children by priests, which is a highly publicized issue that it damaging the reputation of the Catholic Church in the United States. The second is the question of whether priest should take a vow of celibacy and remain unmarried."
| |
|
How does Social Control Affect Deviance?, 2006.
A discussion regarding the impact social control has over deviance in terms of the family unit and sexual behavior.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 5 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a look at the determination of how social control affects deviance is complicated by the variety of sociological theories on the question of deviance, and their diverse analyses of the interrelationship between society, social controls and deviance. Given this limitation, this essay critically examines how social controls affect deviance with respect to two interrelated areas: social controls on deviance in the family unit, and social controls on deviant sexual behavior. Within a structural-functional theoretical analysis, it argues that social order affects deviance in complex ways, and ultimately supports social order and can lead to social change.
| |
|
Homosexuality as a Deviance, 2006.
Examines the discrimination against homosexuals under the pretence that homosexuality is a deviance.
1,274 words (approx. 5.1 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Deviance is a behavior that does not conform to social norms, therefore is socially created. Since most people in the United States believe that homosexuality is wrong, society has created homosexuality to be a deviance. This paper argues that since deviance is relative and not absolute to a society, homosexuality is not a universal form of sexual deviance. There are many cultures that accept forms of homosexuality. The Western society is not accepting of it though, and many times this non-accepting view cause discrimination towards homosexuals. Is homosexuality a way for some people to deviate, or is it just the way some people need to live their lives? The paper argues that if it is the way of life for some people, then society has to become accepting towards this lifestyle.
From the Paper
"Instead of keeping their sexuality a secret, they are openly gay at all times. They challenge societal norms in hopes that there will be a change in attitudes. Gay liberationist rose about in the early 1970s, after an event that took place earlier. On June 28, 1969, the police raided Stonewall Inn, a gay hangout. Instead of dispersing as usual, the customers rioted. This incident drew a lot of needed attention to problems of police harassment that homosexuals faced."
| |
|
Deviance, 2002.
Examines what constitutes negative versus positive deviance.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 2 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the differences between positive deviance and negative deviance. Positive deviance transgresses social norms with positive consequences and is not uncommon, although frequently neglected.
| |
|
Deviance Theory and Criminology, 2008.
This paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of deviance theory and its impact on the field of criminology.
1,392 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper relates that although the theory of deviance helps to shed light on some of the reasons people engage in criminal actions, the theory is a social construct and is thus inherently flawed. The paper maintains, that this theory should, therefore, occupy only a minor role in the field of criminology. The paper also asserts that this theory only be employed as a means of interpretation of the criminal mind when there is no possibility that the root cause of deviance may lie within the society and not the individual.
Outline:
Introduction
Strengths
Weaknesses
Deviance and Criminology
From the Paper
"The theory of deviance is not organic. Broadly defined, deviance is behavior that violates the norms of a particular society. Thus, the theory is a creation of society, and a social construct that labels persons within a society as outcasts because they tend to display certain behaviors that society deems reprehensible. Deviance, then, is best understood as an artificial creation, which fits neatly into the realms of academic disciplines such as sociology, anthropology, psychology and social psychology to explain the unexpected actions of individuals. Most of all, the theory helps us to understand the most reprehensible among us: the criminal. "
| |
|
Difference and Deviance: Theories of Crime in Social Systems, 2002.
Considers some of the theories of deviance and criminality, emphasizing the complex work of understanding the relations of any people within a larger society.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 4 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Deviance is socially determined and culturally specific. Because criminal law is determined by the ruling class, deviance is subject to perspectives that represent the desired norms of a dominant class. As such, people who differ from these norms are subject to standards that can identify their differences as criminal. Difference is not deviance; however, this distinction remains difficult to include into the current structure of justice and criminal law.
| |
|
Raceand Ethnicity as Deviance, 2001.
A look into why and how race and ethnicity impact and are impacted by deviance.
7,665 words (approx. 30.7 pages), 11 sources, $ 167.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the way that race and ethnicity contribute to the development of deviance The author argues that race and ethnicity indirectly intertwine in unequal access to social rewards and other various forms of wealth, power, and prestige thereby causing deviance and violence. This paper defines race and ethnicity in the realm of deviance and analyzes why and how individuals and groups discriminate.
From the paper:
"Why is there inequality among men? Where do its causes lie? Can it be reduced or abolished altogether? Do we have to accept it as a necessary element in the structure of human society? Humans are unequal in many ways. They differ in physical features and in mental capacities, talents, strengths, and so on. All of these inequalities are a product of both social learning and genetic inheritance. More importantly, race and ethnicity become entwined in the unequal access to social rewards and other various forms of wealth, power, and prestige."
| |
|
Origins of Deviance, 2004.
A look at the definition of deviance in terms of how it relates to moral and legal norms.
3,375 words (approx. 13.5 pages), 13 sources, APA, $ 119.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a discussion on the origins of deviance. The paper defines deviant behaviors as it relates to moral and/or legal norms, examines theories on deviance and takes a look at some of the causes of deviant behavior. The paper also includes a discussion on different perspectives of deviant behaviors.
From the Paper
"The standard definition of the term deviance is that it is a condition that is markedly different from the norm. However, as noted by Hendershott, this definition is problematic in terms of understanding deviant behaviors. For example, is a man who deviates from the societal norm by wearing pink slacks in any way the same as a man who deviates from the societal norm by molesting children? Given the foregoing, it seems clear that the dictionary definition of deviance is not appropriate or especially..."
| |
|
Sociological Analysis of Deviance, 2002.
The following paper examines ?deviance? from a sociological perspective.
1,375 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the validity and accuracy of the functionalist and conflict perspectives which both adopt an over simplistic approach to a highly complex issue, deviance. The author discusses the way in which the development of Subcultural theory, Feminist theory, and Action theory among others is evidence of the impossibility of adequately addressing the topic of deviance within a single sociological perspective.
From the Paper
?The functionalist perspective?s approach to deviance is based, to a large extent, on Emile Durkheim?s theory of anomie and the subsequent reworking of this concept by Robert Merton, who believed that in societies such as America, where the commonly shared cultural goal is economic success, there will be individuals who are unable to legitimately achieve those goals. This situation, Merton argues, results in a breakdown of the social norms among these ?under-achievers?, who will then use other, illegitimate methods of gaining success.?
| |
|
Deviance and Abortion, 2004.
A discussion of the connection between deviance and abortion.
2,154 words (approx. 8.6 pages), 9 sources, MLA, $ 67.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper focuses on why abortion is considered a deviant behavior and what role labeling theory has in this connection. The paper begins by trying to understand exactly what deviance is and how sociologists define the term. The paper shows how deviance is usually a form of anti-social, problematic behavior, and, therefore, abortion could be seen as such a thing.
From the Paper
"When the word Deviance is mentioned somewhere, we automatically assume that some abnormal or eccentric behavioral pattern is under discussion. This is because majority of researchers and sociologists link deviance with socially unacceptable activities and thought pattern. For this reason, most of us use deviance as an essential tool to separate the right and acceptable behavior from its evil counterparts. But the truth is that deviance doesn?t exist in its negative form only, there are certain positive shades to it, which can only be understood if we delve deeper into this subject. Thus the most important thing is to first focus on the way sociologists have defined deviance because this will help us understand why deviance is not always problematic even if most of the activities that fall under its umbrella bear visible signs of non-conformity."
| |
|
Deviance and Criminology, 2002.
A discussion on the relationship between crime and deviance.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 1 source, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper relates deviance to criminology and how some theories support deviance in the human society.
| |
|
Deviance, 2006.
A look at various philosophers' thoughts on deviance.
1,254 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 14 sources, MLA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the opinions of Plato, Aristotle, Michael Foucault and John Stuart Mill on the issues of deviance. It discusses how deviant behavior is defined as that behavior which strays from what is deemed normative in a society and that formal and informal social controls attempt to minimize deviance.
From the Paper
"Aristotle wrote the seminal philosophical work on ethics entitled just that: Nicomachean Ethics. It is the bible of ethicists and the bane of many college freshmen. The principal idea with which Aristotle begins is that there are differences of opinion about what is best for humans, and that prior to making further philosophical inquiry, we must first establish the answer to the question, "what is ethics?" Aristotle insists that ethics is not merely a theoretical disciple. Rather, he explains that it has great practical application. It is then that he states that the search for the good is a search for the highest good."
| |
|
Sexual Deviance, 2005.
This paper defines and discusses the subject of sexual deviance.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at sexual deviance. Firstly, the writer provides a definition of the term. The writer then looks at who takes part in sexual deviance. In this essay, the writer examines what sociological theories portray in this regard. The scope and diversity of the problem is also discussed. The writer explores statistics on prevalence and checks to see if this is a problem that can be solved.
From the Paper
"Deviance is behavior that some people in a society find offensive and incites disapproval, punishment, condemnation or hostility. Long Deviance is more than just behavior, it involves a moral judgment as well. It is impossible to isolate certain behaviors and call them deviant because deviance is a relative term defined by the society the time and the place. There is nothing that is absolutely condemned by all societies. Biological theories of deviance are of no use because no consistent evidence that supports the belief that social ... "
| |
|
Crime and Deviance, 2002.
This paper analyzes and examines crime and deviance with an emphasis on the multitude of invaluable contributions made to criminology by a group of sociologists known as the ?Chicago School?.
870 words (approx. 3.5 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The following paper discusses theories of criminal punishment, which are the framework for theories involving criminal deviance. The writer comments on ?Chicago School?s? focus on the social and environmental aspects of criminality (i.e., poverty, poor education, limited opportunities). The paper also evaluates another vital contribution of the Chicago School which are the theories relating to criminal behavior: differential association (i.e., crime as learned behavior), strain theory (i.e., blocks in opportunity structures), labeling theory (i.e., stigmatization creates further criminality), and techniques of neutralization (i.e., guilt minimization).
From the Paper
?Various theories have been advanced to justify or explain the goals of criminal punishment, including deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, restoration, and retribution. Sometimes punishment advances more than one of these goals. However, a punishment may promote one goal and conflict with another.Supporters of deterrence believe that if punishment is imposed upon a person who has committed a crime, the pain inflicted will dissuade the offender (specific deterrence) and others (general deterrence) from either repeating the crime or from committing similar crimes. Incapacitation deprives offenders of the ability or opportunity to commit further crimes that harm society. Rehabilitation seeks to prevent future criminal behavior by providing offenders with the education and treatment necessary to eliminate criminal tendencies, as well as the skills to become productive members of society.?
|
|
|
