| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "CATCH 22 ANTI WAR": |
|
|
Catch-22: An Anti-War Novel, 2001.
An analysis of Joseph Heller's novel, "Catch 22".
3,825 words (approx. 15.3 pages), 7 sources, $ 104.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is an analysis of Joseph Heller's anti-war novel, "Catch-22". It begins with a look at the character of the anti-hero Yossarian. Characters are looked at in relation to the novel's themes of power and greed, as well as profit. The use of satire is examined. The paper concludes with the writer's view of what Heller was trying to say in his novel.
From the Paper
"Catch-22 is a novel that entirely takes place at war. Even though the book is filled with comedy, it describes the physical and emotional pain of war. The novel shows us how people are changed by war and how their focuses are changed through different experiences. Catch ? 22 breaks the rules of a standard anti ? war novel, which shocks this statement into the reader. Through different and sudden time changes, the reader is almost tricked to laugh at certain situations that later are revealed to be quite serious and emotional. The reader doesn?t realize what they are laughing at until the novel is completed and Heller?s true vision is revealed. Catch ? 22 is an ?alternative, requiring not only a high order of poetic vision but also a willingness to shock, to challenge, to spit in your audience?s eye, is what goes currently under the label of the Absurd. This encompasses farce, gibberish, surrealism and even that sub-branch of show-business called ?sick humour?.? There are many themes in the novel, which frame the anti-war theme. Greed for power and money and the corruption of soldiers in the novel all tell us how evil war really is. Heller uses satire in order to get the point across from a rather comedic standpoint."
| |
|
"Catch-22" and "The Thin Red Line": Perceptions of War, 2001.
Essay on the American perceptions of war and how it is depicted in the media.
2,182 words (approx. 8.7 pages), 13 sources, $ 68.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay looks at Joseph Heller?s classic novel ?Catch-22? and the 1998 film ?The Thin Red Line?, based on the novel of the same name by James Jones. It demonstrates that both novel and film highlight the sheer idiocy and futility of combat warfare, and concludes that this is now the contemporary American view of World War II and war generally. Paradoxically, however, it also states that, in spite of such a view about past wars, and a widespread opposition to loss of American lives, the US Government continues to be actively involved in conflict around the world with the tacit and even enthusiastic support of a majority of the American people.
From the Paper
"Americans believed their country had fulfilled their duty to their allies and to the western world generally, and had saved the world from unmitigated disaster at the hands of the German, Italian and Japanese war machines. Barely had World War II ended than the Korean Peninsular erupted in all-out war. All too quickly after partition in 1948, the conflict there turned into a major ideological battle between communism and free enterprise. Despite growing disenchantment in the US about war generally, President Truman sent US military forces to South Korea to help United Nations efforts to stop the fighting there following a North Korean attack on South Korea in 1950. Even though the ?adventure? turned into a dreadful misadventure, it ?established a precedent for U.S. intervention to contain Communist expansion.?
| |
|
Joseph Heller's "Catch-22", 2004.
This paper applies the message of Joseph Heller's "Catch-22" to contemporary life.
1,080 words (approx. 4.3 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the title of Heller's novel refers to the contradictions of war itself and inherent contradiction of this code, "Catch-22,' a code of military ethics stating that one does not have to fight if one is crazy, but one is not be crazy if one does not want to fight, suggesting that it is insane to want to die fighting a war. The author applies this code to contemporary military terms, saying that a similar Catch-22 is evident in the rhetoric of leaders who justify the need to stay in Iraq to sustain the peace, even while the American military presence creates more conflict. This paper relates that, in war, the military deprives a person of his or her private language and life, creating its own system of values; in this way, the military is similar to many other spheres of society, which create insular cultures of their own, locking in participants who, once entrapped within a particular system, cannot escape.
From the Paper
"Yoassarin, the paranoid hero of the novel desires to leave service, especially after dealing with the death of one of the men of his unit. He too, he finds, is subject to the Catch-22 clause that to be excused from military duty by reason of insanity, one must be insane enough to want to fight on, rather than to live and opt out of armed conflict. Thus, the central problem of the novel is not only the insanity of war, but also how to opt out of a system that demands a clear yes or no--either one must validate the war and insanely agree to armed combat to be excused, or one must validate the war by continuing to fight on, while sanely refusing and saying that war is death, thereby proving one?s own sanity and proving one?s fitness to fight."
| |
|
Time and ?Catch 22?, 2003.
An examination of the psychology of Joseph Heller's use of time in his book "Catch 22" .
1,224 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews Joseph Heller's novel "Catch 22", a novel spinning and turning tumultuously on two separate axes in which time becomes distorted and disordered, providing no structure. It examines how the mischievous ?Catch-22?, the unsuspected, beguiling tool of the military?s ?spinning? logic is effective in the way it offers no-win situations to its baffled victims. Yossarian is ensnared by this bureaucratic machine, trapped by the shifting line of reasoning it constructs and in all of his ?insane? and absurd reasonableness, acts as the vehicle for existentialism. It analyzes how the novel?s cyclical time also allows for the recurrence and repetition of phrases and images and how the image of Snowden lying in the back of Yossarian?s plane is continually alluded to and revisited throughout the book.
From the Paper
"Yossarian functions within a similar power dynamic. Men like Cathcart, who dominate and ?enslave? Yossarian, are ?noble.? Both have the capacity to construct a moral reality with regard to themselves. When Cathcart volunteers the men in Yossarian?s squadron to bomb Bologna, ex-P.F.C. Wintergreen tries to explain the ?noble? position to Yossarian?that it?s his job to sacrifice his own life, and that this is the ?right? thing to do. Yossarian counters by claiming, in essence, that the sacrifice of his own life would be too great (Heller 133). Both sides are able to define the situation from their own perspective. "
| |
|
"Catch-22", 2005.
A discussion of Joseph Heller's "Catch-22".
1,587 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In Joseph Heller?s book, "Catch-22", the author has created a broad allegory about the insanity of war. The paper examines this allegory, which is played out in many ways, but in particular, by juxtaposing two characters opposite each other: Yossarian, a squadron commander who is repeatedly frustrated as terrible events repeatedly occur for surreal reasons, and Milo Minderbinder, who is immensely successful at war profiteering and gains great respect for these activities even when his actions are completely unconscionable.
From the Paper
"Several themes are threaded throughout the book. Yossarian is obsessed with issues related to death. Minderbender emphasizes Yossarian?s concerns about being mortal through his near-total lack of concern even though he it participating in a war. The absurdity of bureaucracy in war is demonstrated through both characters. Yossarian demonstrates it by revealing the bureaucratic hypocricies of the war; Minderbinder demonstrates it as he creates his own dishonest bureaucracy to manage his war profiteering business. Finally, Yossarian struggles with issues of right and wrong throughout the book, a concern emphasized by Minderbender?s pattern of choosing how he will act strictly based on what will maximize his profits."
| |
|
Fragmentation in "Catch-22", 2004.
An analysis of the different aspects of fragmentation in language, structure and plot within Joseph Heller's "Catch-22".
1,192 words (approx. 4.8 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how fragmentation permeates every aspect of Joseph Heller's novel "Catch-22". linguistically, thematically and structurally, allowing him to create a wide-ranging satire that never loses sight of its central existentialist focus, Yossarian's powerful desire to survive at all costs. It looks at how Heller employs a variety of techniques to achieve the apparent incoherence of the narrative, fulfilling his satirical and comic aims and how hese include a multitude of characters, the distorted and looping sense of time and the curiously disjoined language. It demonstrates how the multiple plot strands allow Heller to attack a variety of institutions from different angles, how the satire is polyform and how these aspects together create a sense of insanity, reflective of the madness on Pianosa and the horrific madness of the war itself.
From the Paper
"Yossarian?s desire to live provides the central thrust, but there are themes other than death which intertwine and recur throughout the book; primarily Milo?s enterprise and the continual raising of the number of required missions. These themselves are unrelated, adding to the sense of a disjointed whole. This use of fragmentation gives Heller a means to attack two of his main targets; Milo?s ridiculous commerce satirises the western capitalist belief structure, and the missions issue satirises the blind obedience the soldiers, for the most part, show to the military hierarchy."
| |
|
"Catch-22", 2002.
Examines Joseph Heller's moral vision of America in his novel "Catch-22".
1,414 words (approx. 5.7 pages), 1 source, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper shows that in the moral vision of his novel, "Catch-22", Joseph Heller attacks war, bureaucracy and capitalism as the ills of America. The paper also shows that Heller?s model for morality is found within the character of Yossarian, who struggles against these systems, dehumanization and death with logic and individualism.
From the Paper
"The bureaucratic war machine of Catch-22 exemplifies the work of bureaucracy in society. Those high in the chain of command give orders arbitrarily. Rules have no meaningful relation to each other. Catch-22 is found in every report, counter-report, and rule book. Generals and Colonels strive to gain attention in magazines rather than running an efficient war, glorifying themselves, destroying each other in a game for higher rank. Nothing is won except a more deeply embedded illusion of immortality, another step away from the battlefield, where the mortality of man as a reality is in full view. So separated from this reality an agent of bureaucracy dispenses life without a thought of death. As in American society, systems of government and corporation are run bureaucratically. They have no relation to the people they affect. Heller portrays the negative in these affects; war is the outcome, created by men that don?t fight wars but let other fight them instead. As in the social reality of big business in America, control, self-interest, and profit are first in line for executives."
| |
|
Joseph Heller's "Catch-22" and Grace Paley's "The Little Disturbances of Man":, 1994.
This study compares the worlds described in Joseph Heller's novel "Catch-22" and the stories in Grace Paley's collection "The Little Disturbances of Man": Uses of humor, absurdity, emotional impact, life problems, characterization and gender perspective.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 2 sources, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"This study will examine and compare the worlds described in Joseph Heller's novel "Catch-22" and the stories in Grace Paley's collection "The Little Disturbances of Man". The study will consider the differences and similarities of the problems in both books, their views of society, the authors' outlooks, and other related issues, such as ethnicity, gender, etc.
The most obvious similarity in the two books is the abundant use of humor in the presentation of the problems and the outlooks of the authors. Both Heller and Paley see the absurdity in life. The first lines of both books establish this fact. In heller, we read: "It was love at first sight. The first time Yossarian saw the chaplain he fell madly in love with him".Paley's first story begins: "I was popular in certain circles, says Aunt Rose. I wasn't no thinner then, only more stationary in the ... "
| |
|
?Catch 22?, 2002.
Discusses the theme of the futility of war in Joseph Heller's novel.
1,136 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper examines how, in "Catch 22", Joseph Heller chronicles the pointlessness and ultimate dehumanization of war. While stationed in the fictional Mediterranean island of Pianosa, Air Force soldier John Yossarian participates in several brutal and dangerous operations, where his men give their lives not for their country, but to obtain good aerial pictures of the exploding targets. The paper explains that, disgusted that his life is constantly in danger for nothing, Yossarian vows to survive this pointless war at all costs. He thus spends much of his time faking illness and devising ways to be sent home. The paper also touches on the circular pattern of the novel and gives examples of where they occur.
From the Paper
"Several instances of the circularity of Catch 22 reasoning are found through the struggles of a number of secondary characters. Chaplain Tapmann, for example, struggles to maintain his belief in a just and loving God, despite all indications otherwise. Around him, people die for no reason, and he witnesses how religion -- like war -- is used to further the agendas of officers. Eventually, the chaplain is forced to give up his principles and lie by faking an illness to escape from being beaten. Though he is a man of God, the chaplain nevertheless finds that the results are "wonderful." In a parody of Genesis, Heller writes, "The chaplain had sinned, and it was good.""
| |
|
"Catch 22" and "The Yellow Wallpaper", 2006.
Discusses the protagonists in these novels by Joseph Heller and Charlotte Perkins Gilman.
2,048 words (approx. 8.2 pages), 0 sources, $ 64.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Set in the closing months of World War II, in a fictional American bomber squadron, "Catch-22" by Joseph Heller is the story of a bombardier named Yossarian, who is frantic and furious because he believes hundreds of people are trying to kill him. Charlotte Perkins Gilman's "The Yellow Wallpaper" deals with a woman forced to bed confinement due to a nervous breakdown. This paper examines how the authors manipulate their audience into siding with the protagonists in the novels. It also explores autobiographical elements in the two novels.
From the Paper
"At one level, the story is a horror story, a clinical account of the slow descent of the white middle-class female protagonist/narrator into madness. At the same time, the story directly confronts and dramatises the sexual politics of male/female and husband/wife relationships in a particular socio-cultural setting. The narrator's husband - John, whom some critics see as a representative of a repressive, patriarchal society, is widely regarded as the antagonist in "The Yellow Wallpaper". At the very least, his well-meaning but misguided efforts to enforce Dr. Mitchell's gospel of rest are directly related to his wife's descent into madness. Some may say that his approach reflects upon some male's attempts to protect their own interests in the hierarchy of the time."
| |
|
"Catch-22" (Joseph Heller), 1999.
Analyzes the conversation between Colonel Cathcart and Chaplain in Chapter 19 in the context of bureaucratic madness.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 1 source, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The conversation between Colonel Cathcart and the Chaplain in Chapter 19 of Catch-22 illustrates the theme of bureaucratic mentalities. Colonel Cathcart is the epitome of the bureaucratic mindset. Joseph Heller, the author, emphasizes Colonel Cathcart's selfish motives by presenting him in contrast to the Chaplain, who suffers for others. The episode between Colonel Cathcart and the Chaplain proves that there is always a "catch-22," even for diehard bureaucrats.
Colonel Cathcart is a man blinded by irrational ambition. His desire is to make general, and he plots to accomplish this by calling attention to his own deeds: "He was complacent and insecure, daring in the administrative stratagems he employed to bring himself to the attention of his superiors and craven in his concern that his schemes might all backfire" (197). Colonel..."
| |
|
Anti-Everything, 2002.
Discusses Joseph Heller's satire of the military, medical establishment and big business in "Catch-22".
1,240 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 2 sources, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses Joseph Heller's satire of the institutions that run and support the war (i.e.: the military establishment, the medical institution, and big business) in "Catch-22." The author looks at the bureaucracy and absurd tactics of military hierarchy during World War II.
From the Paper
"Pogo once said: we have met the enemy and it is us. This sums up Joseph Heller's entire message, in his novel, Catch-22. He satirizes entire American ideologies and values. The most targeted was the military institution, during World War II. Heller also criticized Capitalist big business, and portrayed it as a leech that profits off of the hardships of the war. Finally, the medical establishment is severely satirized, against the traditional view of doctors, for acting presumptuous and lacking compassion for the ill. There was only one catch;and that was catch-22. "
| |
|
The Satire of Coppola, 2001.
This paper compares the methods of satirizing war and the military used in "Apocalypse Now", "Catch-22", and "Dr. Strangelove", with "Apocalypse Now" as the primary text.
1,915 words (approx. 7.7 pages), 3 sources, $ 61.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how Francis Coppola?s movie, "Apocalypse Now", satirizes war and the military. The author focuses on comparing how the satire in "Apocalypse Now" is serious in nature, and thus more deeply impacting than humorous satires such as "Catch-22" and "Dr. Strangelove" both of which are quoted and compared in the paper.
From the Paper
?Apocalypse Now uses its main plotline to exhibit the hypocrisies present in the United States Military. Willard?s mission to kill Colonel Kurtz for murder is a perfect example. Willard comments on the charge against Kurtz by saying that, ?Charging a man for murder in this place is like handing out speeding tickets at the Indy 500.? (Copolla) When Willard narrates this line, the audience is forced to open their eyes to the ridiculously immoral reality of his task.?
| |
|
The Nature of Death in Life, 2002.
A discussion of the theme of death in the novels "Lolita" by Vladimir Nabokov and "Catch-22" by Joseph Heller.
1,275 words (approx. 5.1 pages), 2 sources, $ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper shows how death stands as a continuous presence in the two books, serving as a motivator, a metaphor, a threat, and a theme all at the same time. The paper gives a brief summary of "Lolita" and explains that it portrays American culture as a denial of death. It shows how the main character is an aging man trying to return to youth and in so doing so trying to escape death. The paper then summarizes "Catch-22", and details how the characters are surrounded by death and the threat of death at all times. It shows how the characters are haunted by the image of death. The paper then compares the two novels showing that death is both a threat and a way out in both stories.
From the Paper
"The entire structure of the army in war becomes a metaphor for life, with death always hanging over everyone, and with no way of escaping it. Numerous characters die in the course of the novel, some in seemingly normal ways during wartime, hit by enemy fire, and others in inexplicable ways, like Clevinger, who just flies into a cloud and disappears. Doc Daneeka becomes a living metaphor for what has happened to everyone--he is made "dead" by a bureaucracy that can make a man seem to die by writing it in a report. He is truly a dead man among the living, just as they are all living men constantly among the dead."
| |
|
Victorian Philosophical Anti-Rationalism, 2005.
A look at the anti-practical, anti-utilitarian philosophy of Matthew Arnold, John Henry Newman, and Walter Pater.
1,237 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the writings and critiques of anti-utilitarian and anti-practical philosophers Arnold, Newman, and Pater. The paper explains, compares, and analyzes each philosopher's arguments against the pragmatism and utilitarianism of the Victorian age and explains why Matthew Arnold's critique of utilitarianism was the most scathing of all.
From the Paper
"The Victorian era in England gave birth to Jeremy Bentham?s utilitarian philosophy of social governance, to the scientific philosophy of Darwinism, and to the application of scientific principles to social philosophy in the form of Social Darwinism. Perhaps this scientific and methodical era, an era that oversaw the full flowering of the Industrial Revolution?s stress upon machinery into the transformation into the human body and mind as a machine-like worker drone, inevitably spawned a kind of counter-revolutionary philosophy and ethos for the age?namely the idea and ideals that cohered and evolved over the course of the Oxford Movement, the Pre-Raphaelite and Aesthetic movement, and finally coalesced into the austere vision of the poet and philosopher Matthew Arnold."
|
|
|
