| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "CANADIAN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM": |
|
|
Canadian Healthcare System, 2006.
An analysis of the Canadian healthcare system.
4,606 words (approx. 18.4 pages), 17 sources, MLA, $ 119.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper describes and critically analyzes the Canadian healthcare system in terms of J. Frenk's policy framework. It also outlines the key issues influencing health policy in Canada, including politics and the news media, as indicated by research and current surveys.
Outline:
Introduction
Background of Frenk's Policy Framework
Canada's Healthcare Systems
Frenk's Theory of Fairness in Financial Contribution
Healthcare Consumer Studies in Canada
The Relationship Between Economics and Healthcare
Political Factors Influencing Healthcare in Canada
Canadian Perspective According to the News Media
The Increasing Amount of Elderly People in the Canadian
Healthcare System
The Competition in Canada
The Current State of Affairs of Healthcare in Canada
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The current state of affairs in Canada's healthcare systems are not very satisfying, both in the eyes of consumers and healthcare employees. The Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada has reported several intimidating results related to staffing in Canada's healthcare systems, including announcements that Halifax's Capital District health Authority is in need of 175 more nurses to meet the demands in its hospitals. Additionally, there are reports that the same health district authority canceled a successful liver-transplant program because there were no surgeons to perform the operations, with similar tragedies being reported across the country. Goals to improve this area of Canada's healthcare system would be that governments and healthcare employers should change laws, regulations, and employment agreements to better match healthcare practitioners' jobs to their training and that the government should invest in increasing the number of doctors and nurses working in Canada as well. Furthermore, governments should use financial incentives to better distribute healthcare practitioners between and within provinces."
| |
|
A National Healthcare System, 2005.
This paper discusses the ethics of a national healthcare system in the U.S..
6,360 words (approx. 25.4 pages), 37 sources, APA, $ 147.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper asserts that the U.S., being such a rich nation with so many
uninsured individuals, makes national healthcare and national health insurance a major ethical issue: National health insurance is a political idea which must be resolved. The author points out that the proponents of national healthcare tend to emphasize, in different shades of reasoning according to the cost proposed, the argument that the right to free or affordable healthcare is inalienable; whereas, people in opposition state that the current healthcare system barely works; moreover, it worked better before the current move toward affordable healthcare systems such as Medicaid, Medicare and HMOs became widespread. The paper suggests that the present managed care system will most likely be expanded, but there still will be application-based and ethical imperatives about government controlled healthcare programs as supplementary services and their position in a dynamic healthcare economy, which is becoming increasingly privatized.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Pros and Cons of National Healthcare
Socio-Economic and Ethical Issues
Recommendations
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Another way of simplifying the current system which confuses so many with its complexities is to look at the ways in which we as a society define health. Health may be conceptualized either as a state of being free from disease or as a constant striving for physiological, psychological, and spiritual wellness. The former approach is a relatively
narrow one and has as its counterpart in ontology, whereby disease is a specific thing external to the individual which must be warded off. There are approaches that are more holistic in addressing the needs of the whole person. Among other things, rather than seeing disease as the negation of health, this simplified point of view envisions the possibility of living a healthy lifestyle even with a chronic condition like diabetes, high blood pressure, or HIV."
| |
|
The Irish Healthcare System, 2005.
This paper discusses and evaluates the history of the Irish healthcare system.
840 words (approx. 3.4 pages), 13 sources, APA, $ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, unlike the other European healthcare systems, the hospital system is run by the Catholic Church and the physicians work in a highly stratified arrangement, which sufficed when medicine was low tech and ancillary services were not essential; however, today, the necessary transition to a professional systematic supply of services from an appropriate level at affordable cost has not really happened in Ireland. The author states that the medical health insurance schemes could drive reforms, but the absence of competition and their involvement in service provision cause them to not demand change and to pay what existing facilities have negotiated, sometimes with unnecessarily long hospital stays. The paper concludes, based on the Brennan Report (2003) and other authors, that the Irish healthcare system does not work because it is not a system in the true sense of the term.
From the Paper
"The training capacity for the doctors was set many years ago: Clearly not enough doctors graduating to replace existing staff without heavy external recruitment Is cost-management a part of medical education? Does it make sense to recruit medical students on Leaving Certificate points alone and have high drop-out rates after graduation? UL and UCD propose to recruit more graduates to become doctors as post-graduates. The problem with this proposal is that the students will have to pay higher fees (about E7,000 per annum)."
| |
|
Baylor Healthcare Systems, 2006.
This paper discusses the management functions using Baylor Healthcare Systems as an example.
1,280 words (approx. 5.1 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, to meet the new and ongoing healthcare environment challenges of new technologies, standards and patient and staffing demands, Baylor Healthcare System is continually implementing the methods of management---planning, organizing, leading and controlling. The author points out that, to assist Baylor in meeting patient expectations as well as risk management issues, Baylor hires consultants to review health-care practices in an effort to deliver health-care services in a manner that is conducive to the needs of the patient. The paper relates that because controlling is monitoring progress of employees as well as the organization, the progress of employees' use of technical equipment is monitored on a regular basis and procedures are set up to evaluate the performance of all employees involved with patient care.
From the Paper
"In society today, the health-care facility cannot succeed without incorporating into its strategy the astonishing technologies that exist and continue to evolve. For example, CT scanning technology is another form of technology that continues to evolve within the Baylor Health Care System. With the advancement of CT scanning, "Baylor can offer many patients a considerably quicker, less risky and less expensive way to obtain images of the heart and arteries "The CT scanning technology allows physicians to detect blockage in heart arteries before symptoms develop." The new CT scanning system is a plus for Baylor and its patients."
| |
|
Evolution of the U.S. Healthcare System, 2002.
The paper traces the evolution of the healthcare system in the U.S. over the last century and the structural changes that have occurred in the delivery of services.
1,630 words (approx. 6.5 pages), 14 sources, MLA, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper looks at the dramatic developments in the provision of medical services over the last hundred years, and provides reasons for many of the changes. The paper then analyzes the evolution of the three institutions that make up the healthcare system, health plans, hospitals and physicians.
From the Paper
"The most significant development of the time was that doctors were allowed to charge patients in hospitals a fee for the care that they received. Prior to that time physicians performed the work for free. Compensation for physicians was a milestone in the medical world at that time and ultimately physicians would become some of the highest paid professionals in the country. (?Healthcare Crisis: Healthcare crisis?)"
| |
|
Australian Healthcare System, 2005.
This paper discuses that, in the Australian healthcare system, health and illness are largely determined by socio-economic factors.
2,675 words (approx. 10.7 pages), 7 sources, APA, $ 80.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that a plethora of qualitative research studies clearly show that the Australian health system has never met the needs of men and women who are poor and far more likely to suffer from health issue because of their social status. The author explains that poor housing conditions, exposure to excessive climates, disease, unclean air, soil and water and occupational risks exacerbate an already high level of environmental health risks for the poor. The paper relates that this group is faced with a lack of social support from the healthcare industry, little to no health insurance and other social systems problems.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Equity
Racism with Socio-Economic Concerns
Mental Health
Using the System
Conclusion
From the Paper
"One aspect of healthcare that is often overlooked in regard to socio-economic conditions is the diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders. "Findings from a new study from Australia suggest that mental disorders and suicide attempts are caused by social factors. There is a need for social and economic responses beyond provision of mental health services." Findings by the British Journal of Psychiatry and a 1997 Australian survey of mental health and wellbeing demonstrated that socio-economic status was a major problem in mental disorders as well as attempted suicide risk. The poor were very likely to have associated mental disorders that include depression and anxiety disorders."
| |
|
The Role of Privacy in Healthcare Information Systems Technology, 2001.
This paper examines today's new Healthcare Information Systems Technology and how they affect the patient's privacy.
6,450 words (approx. 25.8 pages), 12 sources, MLA, $ 149.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses privacy and today's growing information systems technology in all fields, specifically on healthcare. Computerization of health care information, while offering new, viable opportunities to improve and streamline the health care delivery system, the author finds, also presents new challenges to individual privacy interests in personal health care data. He feels that technical and organizational capabilities to secure and maintain confidentiality in data must work in tandem with legislation to preserve those privacy interests while making appropriate information available for approved uses.
From the Paper
"Concerns over the privacy and security of electronic health information fall into two general categories: concerns about inappropriate releases of information from individual organizations; and concerns about the systemic flows of information throughout the health care and related industries. Inappropriate releases from organizations could result either from authorized users who intentionally or unintentionally access or disseminate information in violation of organizational policy, or from outsiders who break into an organization's computer system. The second category--systemic concerns--refers to the open disclosure of patient-identifiable health information to parties that may act against the interests of the specific patient or may otherwise be perceived as invading a patient's privacy. These concerns arise from the many flows of data across the health care system, between and among providers, payers, and secondary users, with or without the knowledge of the patient. These two categories of concerns are conceptually quite different requiring different interventions or countermeasures (?For the Record,? 1997, 54)."
| |
|
Healthcare Information Systems, 2002.
The paper looks at the growing role of Information Systems in the U.S. Healthcare Industry.
2,059 words (approx. 8.2 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 64.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper analyzes the way that that information systems are changing the healthcare industry. The paper discusses the different information needs of the various stakeholders in the industry-- medical staff, patients and healthcare professionals. It also examines the risks introduced by information systems into the healthcare system, creating issues of security, privacy, and confidentiality.
From the Paper
"Stakeholders in the U.S. healthcare system include private and public purchasers of health plans, physicians, hospitals, clinics, health plans, consumers, and public health programs. Each stakeholder wants quick access to information for a variety of reasons. Private and public purchasers need to decide which health plans to offer their employees and want to ensure that they are getting the best value for their premium dollar. Physicians need to be informed about advances in medicine so that they can provide information to patients about the latest treatment alternatives. Health plans need to manage enrollees effectively, monitor contracts with providers and healthcare facilities and make financial decisions. Consumers must select health plans, doctors, and other health professionals that will meet their needs. Public health programs are responsible for ensuring that the health of the population is maintained and for tracking progress toward established community health goals."
| |
|
Healthcare HR and IT Systems, 2005.
A discussion regarding IT systems that drive and manage human resources in the healthcare industry.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 4 sources, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the various roles that IT plays in the healthcare industry with particular attention towards the core IT role in human resources. IT is identified in the paper, as a key driver in generating cost-savings while also vital to implementing and executing on the organization, overall mission and strategy. This paper examines human resource in an outsourced capacity as well as an application facilitated capacity internal to the organization. The final comment of this paper, is directed at the role IT plays in quality management which is generally integrated into a human resources functional department.
From the Paper
"While information technology (IT) is vital across the full spectrum of the healthcare and managed healthcare industries, IT is arguably most important in the human resources (HR) component of the core IT applications within the healthcare industry. The reasons such an argument can be made vary, however, primarily it relates to the fact that HR in its entirety (department, total payroll and associated costs) is one of the largest expenses in any organization but especially in healthcare. Any application or strategy, IT related or not, that reduces HR expenditure and increases HR efficiency in part or in sum, allows great cost savings across the organization and increases shareholder value."
| |
|
The Role of Privacy in Healthcare Information Systems Technology, 2001.
An analysis of how the development of information systems in health care poses a new challenge for the protection of privacy.
6,600 words (approx. 26.4 pages), 14 sources, MLA, $ 151.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This extensive study explores how computerization of health care information, while offering new, viable opportunities to improve and streamline the health care delivery system, also presents new challenges to individual privacy interests in personal health care data. It also shows that technical and organizational capabilities to secure and maintain confidentiality in data, must work in tandem with legislation to preserve those privacy interests while making appropriate information available for approved uses.
From the Paper
"Concerns over the privacy and security of electronic health information fall into two general categories: concerns about inappropriate releases of information from individual organizations; and concerns about the systemic flows of information throughout the health care and related industries. Inappropriate releases from organizations could result either from authorized users who intentionally or unintentionally access or disseminate information in violation of organizational policy, or from outsiders who break into an organization's computer system. The second category--systemic concerns--refers to the open disclosure of patient-identifiable health information to parties that may act against the interests of the specific patient or may otherwise be perceived as invading a patient's privacy. These concerns arise from the many flows of data across the health care system, between and among providers, payers, and secondary users, with or without the knowledge of the patient. These two categories of concerns are conceptually quite different requiring different interventions or countermeasures (?For the Record,? 1997, 54). "
| |
|
Integrated Delivery Systems (IDS) for Healthcare, 2004.
This paper discusses an organizational model for reducing the cost of healthcare delivery: Integrated Delivery Systems (IDS).
2,035 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 64.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that three factors led to the development of the Integrated Delivery Systems (IDS) model: A greater interplay between all the players in health care delivery, increased influence of business health groups, and the movement away from "bean counting" to risk management, early detection, and demand prevention. The author points out that Integrated Delivery Systems, no matter their specifics, are primarily for one purpose: To connect users to the information they need to do their job in the health care delivery system as quickly as possible. The paper stresses that the IDS is the best model for leaping the chasm between the ideal medical world of the clinical sector of health care and the ideal financial world of the administrative and operational sector of health care.
Table of Contents
Background
Development
Qualitative Impact of IDS
Economic Impact of IDS
The Future
From the Paper
"Shortly after these changes began, ?inclusive? delivery models got underway, with early ones being physician-hospital organizations (PHOs) and integrated delivery networks (IDNs); arguably the coexistence of these led to the development of IDSs capable of operating within the four structures another researcher had identified, by 1996, as the evolving types of IDSs. These four models were HMOs, joint ventures such as Columbia/HCA, federations of community hospitals and a ?hub and spoke? arrangement bring large medical centers and nearby community hospitals into sync."
| |
|
The Future Direction of PPS Systems in Healthcare, 2005.
A review of Medicare's PPS system in relation to patient convenience and office efficiency.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 23 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper focuses on issues surrounding Medicare's PPS system. Topics covered in this paper are: medical economics and finances, and regulatory problems. The focus of this paper is on the excessively frequent regulatory changes in addition to the numerous structural overhauls to the system and the corresponding issues that providers have to deal with, usually just opting to write off limited claim amounts as opposed to spend time and energy on resolving them.
From the Paper
"Medicare's Prospect Payment System (PPS) is a system established by Medicare to pre-authorize services based on service and provider type in order to expedite services to Medicare recipients, negating the need for approval for services and ostensibly increasing delivery time to the patient. PPS has been around for inpatient services since the 1980s; however, the Out-Patient Prospect Payment System (OPPS) has only been active for five years and is modified on a continual basis. All services paid under this system are classified into groups called APCs (Crishock, 2005). The services provided in each APC are similar clinically and in terms of the required resources. A payment rate is established for each APC."
| |
|
Healthcare in Canada, the USA and the U.K., 2005.
A comparison of American, Canadian and British healthcare systems.
1,874 words (approx. 7.5 pages), 15 sources, APA, $ 59.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Healthcare reform has been a topic of debate for many years in America. Often, American politicians look to their neighbors to the north and ally across the Atlantic for both inspiration and warning of what healthcare could become. This paper provides an overview of American, Canadian and British healthcare systems. It details the pros and cons for each system and, in the end, discusses which is most effective for its citizens, as well as which system is most common throughout the world.
Paper Outline:
Abstract
Introduction
American Healthcare System (Overview, Pros, Cons)
Canadian Healthcare System (Overview, Pros, Cons)
British Healthcare System (Overview, Pros, Cons)
Which System Provides the Best Care for its Citizens?
Which System is Most Adopted by Other Countries?
References
From the Paper
"Great Britain's National Health Service (NHS) is a publicly funded healthcare system that was created by Clement Attlee's labor government, in 1948 ("NHS history", n.d.). The NHS provides most of the healthcare services for citizens in the UK, which includes general practitioner services, emergency services, long-term healthcare, and dentistry. The NHS not only pays for healthcare expenses, but it also employs the doctors and nurses that provide these services, as well as runs the hospitals and clinics, which is in stark contrast to most of Continental Europe ("National Health Service", 2005)."
| |
|
Improving Healthcare in a Healthcare Facility, 2006.
Describes a system for improving the patient incident reporting system in a typical tertiary healthcare facility.
2,249 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 16 sources, APA, $ 69.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the patient incident reporting system at a hospital and explains that the present system, which is designed to track patient incidents such as falls, patient abuse and medication errors, as well as provide a means of implementing corrective action, is highly labor-intensive and cumbersome. The paper then proceeds to identify and describe six different initiatives that would improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the current patient incident reporting system.
Table of Contents
Initiative No. 1. Use Existing Hospital Information
System for Patient Incident Reporting for JCAHO
Quality Assurance Tracking Purposes
Initiative No. 2. Installation of Hospital-Wide Patient
Records Database
Initiative No. 3. Use Existing IT Systems to Trend
Adverse Patient Incidents for Inclusion in Hospital-Wide
Quality Assurance Reports
Initiative No. 4. Applying Existing Information Systems
for Improved Inventory Control
Initiative No. 5. Implement Interactive Menu-Processing
System for Inpatients
Initiative No. 6. Improve Hospital and Grounds Security
by Using IT-Based Web Camera Applications
From the Paper
"The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) has already mandated that all accredited healthcare facilities have in place a means of tracking patient incidents such as falls, patient abuse, and medication errors and to provide a means of implementing corrective action when deficiencies are identified (Bryan & O'Connell 23). Although our hospital does in fact have such a patient incident reporting system in place, it is a highly labor-intensive paper form-based approach that requires copying and hand-delivery to the Office of Quality Assurance; furthermore, this paper-based system is easily transferable to the existing hospital-wide information system intranet. In this regard, the proposed online replacement should replicate the existing patient incident reporting system as closely as possible to ensure staff acceptance of this alternative (Auerbach, Beckerman, Cohen, Goldstein, Quitkin & Rock 134)."
| |
|
United States and Canada's Healthcare, 2007.
This paper compares the healthcare systems of the United States, which is privately funded, and Canada, which is funded by the federal government.
1,750 words (approx. 7.0 pages), 9 sources, APA, $ 56.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the healthcare systems of the United States and Canada were once both privately funded but now have an immense difference in the structure and cost of healthcare services. The author points out that the Canadian structure is available to all citizens whereas, in the U.S., accessibility is a major problem. The paper relates that the U.S. has more advanced technology as compared to Canada, which is a weakness of Canadian healthcare. The author stresses that healthcare services in the U.S. have been known to be superior because patients, who have access, can be seen immediately and surgical procedures need only a short wait; whereas, in Canada, many residents wait a long time for services, minor surgeries and regular checkups. The paper concludes that, overall, Canada has accomplished a balance between quality, cost efficiency and technology. The paper includes graphs.
From the Paper
"The high price of healthcare has been an ongoing crisis and has affected many Americans. Many Americans work at full-time jobs but still do not have access to health insurance because of the immense cost. Some companies offer to cover a percentage of healthcare insurance, but the employee still has to pay a large portion of out of pocket-expenses. Any citizen that owns their own business has no other choice but to pay full price for healthcare. The crisis of healthcare has had major effects on many American families. With no health coverage, one could only imagine the stress of the medical bills ..."
|
|
|
