| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "ASIAN ECONOMIC CRISIS": |
|
|
The Asian Economic Crisis, 2005.
Examines and analyzes the Asian economic and currency crisis that rocked the Asian markets in 1997.
2,468 words (approx. 9.9 pages), 7 sources, APA, $ 75.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the causes of the Asian economic crisis in 1997 and traces the roots of the crisis back to the area?s economic growth that started in the early 1990s. The paper explains that, while the crisis is believed to have begun in Thailand, conditions that existed throughout the region contributed to the destabilization of the economies of the other Southeast Asian countries as well.
From the Paper
"Throughout the early 1990s, growth in southeast Asia attracted much foreign capital. However, by 1995 and 1996, Thailand?s current account deficit had grown (from 5.7% in ?93 to 8.5% in ?96 [Pesenti et al., 1998]). When domestic production slowed, this account imbalance represented an even greater percentage, when compared to GDP. Much of the instability in Thailand?s economy was brought about by heavy short-term borrowing that required stringent debt maintenance. A boom in real estate and the Thai stock market attracted foreign speculation that could not be sustained in the face of investor doubts. The Thai government attempted to shore up shaky investor confidence by officially backing the financial institutions that were heavily indebted abroad."
| |
|
The Problems of Project Finance in American Business after the Asian Economic Crisis of 1998, 2000.
A look at the efforts made to recover from the financial crisis.
3,400 words (approx. 13.6 pages), 10 sources, $ 96.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The Future of Project Finance
After taking a battering from spectacular failures due to the Asian economic crisis impact on emerging nations and markets worldwide, project finance is making a cautious, conservative rebound. Private and institutional investors are taking an increasing part in financing domestic and international major infrastructure, power and utility projects through innovative funding structures.
From the paper:
"Limited recourse loans are a well-defined form of borrowing; any transaction that does not include elements unique to this structure does not strictly qualify as project finance. Limited recourse loans were invented in the late 1920s and early 1930s to provide US wildcatters with longer-term production finance. During the 1930s, drilling became deeper and resultant cost higher; more extended financing terms were needed. The improved engineering techniques of the early 1940s provided the ability to forecast the future recovery of oil reserves, and some banks applied these new techniques to justify production loans in excess of the three years? limited term previously applied. Since the project itself was deemed able to support a level of production that would provide for repayment from the project?s cash flow, the creditworthiness of the borrower was irrelevant."
| |
|
Thailand's Economic Crisis, 2005.
This paper discusses Thailand's economic recovery.
1,840 words (approx. 7.4 pages), 5 sources, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains Thailand and its recovery from the 1990s Asian financial crisis. The author presents the situation arising from the Thai government's decision to float the bhat. The paper stresses the relationship between economics and national security.
From the Paper
"On July ..., Thailand experienced an economic shock that impacted a number of distant countries. As Gerald Fry put it, "The decision by the Thai government to float the Thai baht caused a free-fall in the value ...""
| |
|
East Asian Economic Caucus, 1999.
Examines feasibility of proposal to establish EAEC, likely characteristics, effects, goals and functions as compared to two existing Asian economic groups.
3,375 words (approx. 13.5 pages), 22 sources, $ 119.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"THE EAST ASIAN ECONOMIC CAUCUS
Introduction
This research examines the proposal to establish an East Asian Economic Caucus (EAEC). Both the prospects for the formation of the EAEC and the probable effects of the creation of the EAEC are considered. The likely characteristics and functioning of an EAEC also are compared with the characteristics and functioning of both the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Forum.
The EAEC Proposal
The concept of the EAEC was first proposed as a regional consultative forum in 1990 by the Malaysian Prime Minister (East Asian Economic Caucus, 1998). At that time the proposed name of the association.."
| |
|
Asian Economic Development, 2002.
The following paper examines why economists predict that although the crisis in East and Southeast Asia has slowed the rate of development, it is not likely to change the ultimate direction of market evolution.
2,120 words (approx. 8.5 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 66.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the current state of Asian economic development; the principles upon which Asian economic recovery depends, and then compares and contrasts several countries, notably China and Japan, in view of their attitudes, development and potential for economic dominance in the region.
From the Paper
"In 1997, Thailand floated the baht, marking the beginning of a currency crisis that would eventually spread to other parts of Asia and to emerging markets such as Brazil and Russia. In Asia, the outflow of investment was massive. The five hardest hit economies -- South Korea, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines -- saw net capital flows reverse by more than $100 billion in a year. All over Asia, companies went bankrupt, banks loans soured and the number of property repossessions skyrocketed and millions of people lost their jobs. The situation, named the "Asian flu" quickly became the focal point of numerous conferences, editorials and a small library of books as economists and academics debated the causes and the cures."
| |
|
Asian Economic Integration, 1999.
Examines definition, purposes, goals, ASEAN model, economic theory, problems and recommendations.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 6 sources, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Examines definition, purposes, goals, ASEAN model, economic theory, problems and recommendations.
From the Paper
"ASIAN ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
There are many conceptual definitions of "economic integration" and the one chosen for this paper is that economic integration occurs when nationalistic concerns of an economy are set aside to integrate the economy more fully into the world economy.
Such a definition implies and confirms that the world has become so global that individual nations can no longer be allowed to maintain independent economic activities without consideration of the impact of those activities on other nations. This attitude was well expressed by Thai Deputy Foreign Minister Sukhumbhand Paribatra at a recent meeting of the annual East Asia Economic Summit: "East Asia and Southeast Asia must reject the temptation to seek individual salvation, because none of us can ..."
| |
|
Asian Pacific Economic Cooperation, 2003.
Discusses the international organization, APEC.
2,925 words (approx. 11.7 pages), 5 sources, $ 103.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Discusses its wide geographic scope, original membership, range of economic-development levels, the broad range of political institutions and conditions represented by APEC members, and its historical background.
From the Paper
"APEC is not one of the better-known international organizations, even though it is enormous in geographical scope, and includes several of the world's leading economies. The very vast..."
| |
|
Asian Economics Compared, 2002.
An analysis of the South Korean and Thailand economies in states of isolation and stagnancy.
1,650 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 4 sources, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will cover two Asian countries and explain the reasons why they have failed in their economic policies and why they are stagnant. South Korea and Thailand will be discussed in relation to the evidence found that supports the reasons why they are isolated and do not have the ability to have functional economies. Historical reference will be brought into the study and will tell why these countries are not faring well on the international market. By analyzing the policies of these two countries, we can argue for the reasons for their demise in isolated and stagnant economies.
| |
|
East Asian Financial Crisis, 2007.
This paper examines the role of the IMF (International Monetary Fund) in South Korea during the East Asian economic crisis.
3,649 words (approx. 14.6 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 101.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses the 1997 East Asian financial crisis, also termed the IMF crisis locally within the region, that saw the downturn of many East Asian and Southeast Asian economies. The paper explains that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) received much of the blame due to its handling of the crisis. The paper focuses on the IMF efforts in South Korea and reveals that the IMF today is moving toward a less restrictive and more realistic system.
Outline:
Introduction
The East Asian Economic Crisis
South Korea
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The South Korean Central Bank was forced to expand its open market operations (OMO) in order to attempt to stabilize its currency. By elevating the amount of OMO in terms of their own securities, Central Banks attempt to control extreme devaluation in times of stress or manage exchange rates in a more stable fashion (Guille 57). For South Korea, contracting the amount of currency through sales of securities was extremely important in controlling the free-fall of the Won during the extent of the crisis."
| |
|
The Asian Financial Crisis, 2007.
This paper presents a political and economic analysis of the Asian financial crisis.
4,757 words (approx. 19.0 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 122.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at a more neglected dimension of the Asian financial crisis: the role of political factors and the role of political-economic interaction in initiating the crisis, determining the depth of the crisis and shaping the recovery from the crisis. The paper explains that the Asian crisis was a global problem of large proportions; countries as far away as the United States felt the burden of the Asian problems with economic issues and political problems. The paper examines how politics played a vital role in the financial crisis due to money, politics and nepotism. The paper concludes that it will take a great deal of time before there is any real trust put into the governments and political systems of many of these countries.
Outline:
Introduction
Economic Determinants of Asian Financial Crises
The Role of Politics in Asian Financial Crises
Post Crises Recovery and Crises Management
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Known as the G-7 several industrialized countries, specific countries have been supplying and controlling the flow of capital funds to third-world countries. These countries are the United States, Canada, France, Great Britain, Germany, Japan, and Australia. Because the G-7 group has such enormous and far-reaching economic strength, it can dictate and control the interest rate that the countries in its group charge to the nations that wish to borrow money. This is very significant for the third-world countries when they borrow money because they have little control over the rate of interest that they pay and they are not able to 'shop around' and find a better rate for their borrowing."
| |
|
Asian Financial Crisis, 2005.
This paper discusses the economic crisis in Asia in 1997-8 in the light of other crashes throughout history, from the prototypical and definitive bubble-and-crash phenomenon to the recent 1989 bubble and crash of the Japanese stock market.
1,740 words (approx. 7.0 pages), 2 sources, APA, $ 56.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, generally, the cause of the crisis can be narrowed down to government and banking financial policies at the time of the crisis, which were trying to develop foreign exchange currency strength in the face of insurmountable internal weaknesses. The author points out that the effects of the economic problems of the troubled Asian countries adversely affected the whole world, especially the United States and Japan. The paper stresses that it is very hard it to predict the financial future in terms of economic crisis, no matter how obvious the signs seem in retrospect.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Causes of Crisis
Effect on World Economy
Solutions
Conclusion
From the Paper
"As mentioned, the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98 can be compared in many ways to the 1989 Japanese Stock Market situation, which in turn bore some similarities to the 1929 crash in America, in that banks did not respond appropriately and raised interest rates or kept them the same instead of cutting them, in the fear that decreasing interest would only feed more speculation. The result was similarly a disaster. The banks of Japan essentially burst the speculative bubble themselves after increasing deregulation along with a dearth of experience had created new paradigms for them with which they were not prepared to deal."
| |
|
The South East Asian Currency Crisis, 2002.
This study probes at the causes and likely consequences of the ongoing Southeast Asian crisis that began in the second quarter of 1997.
1,775 words (approx. 7.1 pages), 5 sources, $ 66.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Though the situation is still unfolding and surely will continue to for many years to come it can confidently be said that this is the worst economic crisis the world has experienced since the Great Depression of the 1930s. Until very recently, most analysts had confined the crisis to Indonesia, South Korea, Malaysia, and Thailand. Some obdurate analysts even continue to suggest that the Asian 'miracle' is still far from over! These, and many other predictions that the crisis would result in only a short, sharp downturn with almost no impact on the major capitalist countries, have all proved to be wrong. Severe economic crisis in Japan along with economic slowdown in China, currency lows in Canada, South Africa, Mexico and many other countries, and the finale of the stumbling American economy, do clearly suggest that the crisis is endemic to the entire global system. This is an ugly and painful realization, but it is indeed reality. Not only does it seem that the Asian miracle is surely over, but that the burgeoning global economy is headed for a drastic slowdown.
| |
|
The Asian Financial Crisis of 1997, 2006.
A review of the impact of the Asian financial crisis on the economies of the world.
3,375 words (approx. 13.5 pages), 5 sources, $ 133.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews the Asian Financial Crisis of 1997, thought to have marked a dramatic end to a period of unprecedented economic growth among newly industrializing nations of East Asia. Analysis of the crisis indicates that the revelation of its origins in the hidden and often corrupt relationships between government banks and enterprises of many of these economies has fostered a lack of confidence in the health and transparency of these economies. According to this paper, the lack of confidence has been with the fading of the immediate economic shocks of the Crisis the most lasting impact of this event.
From the Paper
| |
|
The Asian Financial Crisis, 2008.
This paper analyzes the Asian financial crisis by comparing the economies of South Korea and Malaysia.
2,745 words (approx. 11.0 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 82.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, because investors lost confidence, the Asian financial crisis was not just a domestic problem but rather spread to other parts of the, world especially Third World countries. The author posits that the recovery from the crisis was dependent on the macro economy prior to the crisis within each country. The paper relates that South Korea and Malaysia have different internal structures, were at different levels of development before the crisis and have different survival rates with very different 'after crisis' scenarios. The author points out that the crisis in Malaysia was more of a currency crisis, which had spillover effects within other sectors of the macro economy; however, South Korea faced more of a banking crisis. The paper discuses the role of the International Monetary Fund, the government's role in each region and the Asian Monetary Fund to present a policy outline for preventing future crises.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
A Historical Debate
Asian Financial Crisis: A Closer Look at South Korea and Malaysia
Role of the IMF
Figure 1: Malaysia's and South Korean Unemployment Worsened by IMF Policies
Asian Monetary Fund: Policies and Procedures for Future Crises.
Figure 2: Economic Growth, the Main Aim of the AMF: Implications for Asia
From the Paper
"There were a lot of issues that caused the financial crisis. Mainly, investors lost confidence in the Asian market and started to remove capital from South Korea and Malaysia. The onset of the loss of confidence by investors began when the economies, such as Mexico had crises that preceded the Asian crisis. Similarly, the United States was increasing interest rates during the period to lower inflation as part of its monetary policy. Investors prefer to invest in the United States versus Asia, since the former is considered less risky."
| |
|
The Financial Crisis in East Asian Economies, 2006.
An analysis of the East Asian financial crisis of 1997-1998 and whether the crisis is really over.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 3 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the East Asian financial crisis of 1997-1998 and how it represented not only a shock to the regional economies of East Asia but, in a larger context, a blow to the confidence of global financial markets in the fundamental structural soundness of East Asian economies. The paper points out that the East Asian economies that were at the center of the crisis - in particular, Thailand and South Korea - were also among those being most highly praised for their market liberalization and fiscal prudence during the regional economic boom of the 1990s. This, in particular, represented troubling concerns for the global economic community in terms of the validity and trustworthiness of assessments of East Asian economies. With this in mind, this paper considers whether it is safe to assume that the crisis is truly over.
|
|
|
