| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "ANDREW CARNEGIE LEE IACOCCA": |
|
|
Andrew Carnegie & Lee Iacocca, 1996.
Compares entrepreneurs' industrial innovations & labor policies.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 6 sources, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"This research paper discusses the business accomplishments and labor relations of Andrew Carnegie and compares them with a later day industrialist Lee Iacocca (1924- ).
The Industrial Innovations of Carnegie and Iacocca
Carnegie's business career was characterized by his uncanny ability to absorb from others concepts of modern management and apply them to every industry in which he was involved. In the process, he built not only an immense personal fortune but created highly efficient enterprises, including the world's largest and most competitive steel company, the Carnegie Steel Works, which he sold to the combine which organized U.S. Steel for a princely sum. Carnegie arrived in America in 1848, the eldest son of penniless Scottish immigrants. Starting from the..."
| |
|
Andrew Carnegie, 2006.
This paper discusses the life, work and philosophy of industrialist Andrew Carnegie.
2,080 words (approx. 8.3 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 65.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Andrew Carnegie is remembered for two main achievements: The enormous amounts of money he amassed as an industrialist and his giving most of his money away to charity. The author points out that, if Andrew Carnegie had not lived in poverty in the early years of his life, he may not have been so very interested in giving away his money to other people or, if he had not been interested in the written word, he may not have given millions away to public libraries and for free education. The paper stresses Andrew Carnegie's strong contention that giving away one's wealth for the common good was as important as making the wealth in the first place, the giving away must be done personally and it must be done in the right manner.
From the Paper
"It must be noted that Andrew Carnegie considered education as being the veritable 'key' to life, and he was also extremely interested and also committed to the cause of an access to information. It is said that one incident in particular alerted Andrew Carnegie to this important fact, in the libraries of Colonel Anderson in Allegheny City, an incident that seems to have motivated him into donating enormous amounts of funds to the cause of library building all over the United States of America. As a matter of fact, over the doors of the Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh, are carved the words, 'Free to the People', and this shows the spirit and the thoughts of the man."
| |
|
"Andrew Carnegie and the Rise of Big Business".
This paper is a chapter by chapter review of Harold Livesay's biography "Andrew Carnegie and the Rise of Big Business", which traces Carnegie's rise to become the first billionaire of the twentieth century.
755 words (approx. 3.0 pages), 0 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Harold Livesay's "Andrew Carnegie and the Rise of Big Business" thoughtfully traces Carnegie's life from his impoverished immigrant childhood through his ruthless business career, to his becoming the wealthiest man in the world and a noted philanthropist. The author points out that the reader learns of Carnegie's alliance with Rockefeller, Carnegie's massive contribution to the success of the steel industry and his final triumph over his competitors and rivals. The paper presents Carnegie as being hard working, daring, forceful with the ability to master the details of a business very quickly, to make decisions and follow through and to pick gifted associates who reflected his style of management.
From the Paper
"The following chapters (two through five) of Livesay's book delineate Carnegie's apprenticeships, first as a manager, then as a financier, before becoming a "master moneyman." In his early teens, Carnegie worked menial jobs, but was bright and an avid learner, so at the age of seventeen, Tom Scott of the Pennsylvania Railroad hired him as a personal telegrapher and secretary. Carnegie was soon was awarded with greater and greater responsibilities, and by the time he was twenty, he was helping Scott perfect the complicated cost accounting system that Scott devised."
| |
|
Andrew Carnegie's Philanthropy, 2006.
A review of the life and philanthropy of Andrew Carnegie.
5,643 words (approx. 22.6 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 136.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper examines Andrew Carnegie's early life, detailing his rise from bobbin boy in a cotton mill to wealthy industrialist. The paper explains that Carnegie's interest in philanthropy began in 1870, at the age of thirty-five, but that he first publicly set forth his concept of what he termed "scientific philanthropy" in an 1889 essay entitled "Wealth", which succinctly stated his thesis that "The problem of our age is the administration of wealth." The paper shows that reaction to Carnegie's ideas was mixed, and cites examples both from those in favor and those opposed. It shows how Carnegie applied his principles in funding libraries and then moved on to develop the modern philanthropic foundation and organize the business of philanthropy at the turn of the century. The paper discusses his competition with John D. Rockefeller to see who could give the most. The paper analyzes the long-term changes that Carnegie's philanthropy brought about in American culture and society. In conclusion, the writer feels that Carnegie's example is one that should be followed by other persons of great wealth, since prudent and judicious distribution of private wealth is the only way that the free enterprise system can hope to survive for more than a short term in a historical time frame.
Table of Contents:
Early Life
Carnegie the Philanthropist
Competitive Philanthropy
The Carnegie Legacy
Bibliography
From the Paper
"Carnegie's ideas about the distribution of his vast wealth drew criticism at the time he began his philanthropic activity. However, his ideas are sound and, in retrospect, most of the criticism can be observed to come from those who either did not receive the extent of support that they sought or objected to the restrictions and qualifications placed upon them as beneficiaries. However, he was true to his own ideals. He had ample reason for making the provisions he did, and they have held up to public scrutiny and examination after the fact. Libraries are an acknowledged necessity in today's world, and it is difficult to imagine what the world would be without them. Certainly, they have served as an aid and an impetus to education to the entire population. It may have been a small beginning, considering the extent of his fortune, but it was characteristic of Carnegie to act in ways that are well thought out and methodical. Libraries were his first endeavor, but he never meant them to be his last."
| |
|
Andrew Carnegie, 2002.
This paper is an examination of the legacy of Andrew Carnegie.
2,615 words (approx. 10.5 pages), 10 sources, APA, $ 78.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper details the life of one of the most influential businessmen in U.S. history, Andrew Carnegie. Carnegie's legacy includes many philanthropic endowments which set the tone for his day, but he is also remembered as being one of the greatest robber barons of his day who controlled the giant steel industry. According to this author, Carnegie was an complex individual, who vocally supported unions in public, but in private did everything in his power to stem their power in his many different factories. It is ironic that, in the late 1800s, the first union in America was formed in one of Carnegie's plants and his actions would lead to one of the most violent strikes in history. The resolution of this strike was the reason the introduction of government regulations involving collective bargaining arrangements in labor disputes that still exist today. The author cites several examples where Carnegie's actions did not match his deeds and only served to fuel the fires of discontent among the union members. The author also discusses how despite the fact that many businessmen, like Carnegie supported the concept of monopolies, by the beginning of the twentieth century, things had begun to change.
According to this author, the unions were drawing attention to the worker's needs and rights and as a result, the government began to develop new regulations for businesses which lead to the eventual demise of monopolies. The author concludes with several comments about how Carnegie eventually came to publically acknowledge that the labor unions and shared wealth were a better option for the country.
From the Paper
"Carnegie had created his business empire upon the simple concept that a monopoly is, for the monopolist, the most efficient way to do business. Without competition, the owner can create the most efficient production and delivery system he can without wasting time and money negotiating and competing with others. This was the precept of Carnegie and those like him ? the nation is better off with monopolies. But, the workers, the masses of thousands and millions who filled the factories and mined the ore, who broke their backs and their families for virtually no money, these were the people who brought the reality of the monopoly to the attention of the government. It was the union, and its ability to bring a large voice in the form of unification that could speak as loud as that of the one person at the head of the company. Unions, then, brought about an equalization."
| |
|
Andrew Carnegie, 2002.
The following paper discusses the biography of Andrew Carnegie, an entrepreneur and founder of the American steel Industry, his life, the major influences and significance of his work and the impact of his life on others.
1,020 words (approx. 4.1 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Andrew Carnegie helped build the formidable American steel industry and then sold his steel business and systematically gave his collected fortune away to cultural, educational and scientific institutions for "the improvement of mankind." This paper examines the way in which Carnegie, who was one of the first industrialists to use scientists to research his own business, came to be the wealthiest man of his time, in the world.
From the Paper
"During his final years, Carnegie spent most of his time in endeavors to promote world peace. He built both the Pan American Union building in Washington D.C. and the Hague Peace Palace, in the Netherlands to support international peace. The outbreak of World War I was devastating to him, and he died August 11, 1919 in Lenox, Massachusetts. By the time he died, Carnegie had given away $350,695,653 and had given another $30,000,000 to foundations, pensions and charities. Andrew Carnegie is considered one of the greatest philanthropists in the world and one of the wealthiest men who ever lived (http://www.carnegie.lib.oh.us/andrewcarnegie.htm)."
| |
|
Herbert Spencer vs. Andrew Carnegie, 2007.
A comparison of the theories of Herbert Spencer and Andrew Carnegie regarding their views of social Darwinism.
1,039 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the concept of social Darwinism. It specifically discusses the philosophies of social Darwinism theorists, Herbert Spencer and Andrew Carnegie with regard to their views of social Darwinism. The paper details each of their theories and then compares them, particularly with regard to how they view the amassing of wealth.
From the Paper
"Carnegie stresses that the Gospel of Wealth is one that makes the amasser of such wealth completely and totally responsible for what he has created. After minimal accommodations to ensure that your most unprotected descendants are supported through your life and death, where he stresses helping wives and daughters the most and giving little if any nominal support to sons, who hold the social responsibility and ability of creating their own wealth in life and are often simply corrupted by freely given inheritance, the cream of the crop must dispense his surplus wealth himself, while he lives, on good works. The best possible social action of the successful Social Darwinist is to give what you have amassed through the wisdom that you have gained building said fortune. Spencer and Carnegie do not outright disagree, in the natural order determining the success and progress of man in these two works yet, Carnegie caries the idea to an extreme, making it the responsibility of those who have risen to the top to offer such opportunities to the new generation of people, who through natural selection will succeed the present. (Carnegie, 1889) (Spencer, 1857)"
| |
|
Andrew Carnegie, 1991.
This paper examines the life and career of 19th Century American entrepreneur, Andrew Carnegie, focusing on his early life and how he rose to power.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 4 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"This study will examine the life of Andrew Carnegie, concentrating on his early life and how he rose to power.
The first obvious conclusion to be drawn from the life of Andrew Carnegie is that he was a man of monumental contradictions.
For example, an article in the North American Review of June, 1889, entitled "The Gospel of Wealth," written by Carnegie himself, praised "the concentration of business, industrial and commercial, in the hands of the few, and the law of competition between these, as being not only beneficial, but essential to the progress of the race" . This declaration in praise of cut-throat capitalism and economic inequality seems to befit a man "whose industrial empire, which was soon to be recapitalized at 320 million ... "
| |
|
Andrew Carnegie and the Growth of the Railroads, 1990.
Scottish immigrant Andrew Carnegie took advantage of the synergistic relationship between the nascent steel and rail industries to build an empire, besting along the way fellow business giants Rockefeller and Morgan.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 6 sources, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
Introduction
"The development of the railroads was a key element in the expansion of the United States and in the economic well-being of the nation during the nineteenth century and into the twentieth century. The railroad was a transportation and communication marvel compared to anything that had existed previously. It crossed the territories of the nation and made it possible to travel from one end of the country to the other or to send mail and goods along the same routes. The development of the railroads was itself a matter of business expansion on a grand scale, starting with small lines and ending with vast networks of tracks which nurtured cities and towns all along their length. In terms of business history, the development of the railroads was not only the first big business venture in America but also..."
| |
|
Lee Iacocca, 2007.
A commemorative speech praising Lee Iacocca, president of Ford and then of Chrysler.
1,223 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses Lee Iacocca's far-reaching vision at Ford that made Ford the number one car manufacturer in America in the 1980s. The paper shows how Iacocca then caused Chrysler, a bankrupt company, to prosper once again. The paper details his early life and his many achievements. The paper relates that Iacocca retired in the early 1990s, but maintains that another Iacocca is needed, a man or woman with his same faith, same energy, same willingness to break the mold and the same eye for emerging market and technological trends.
Outline:
Introduction
Early Life
Ford Success
Chrysler
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Toyota dominates the American market. Gas prices are soaring. There is a crisis in the Middle East of epic proportions. The worldwide demand for American cars has curled up and died and even American consumers are turning in droves to fuel-efficient Japanese models. An accurate portrait of the America automobile market today? Perhaps, but I'm talking about America in the early 1980s. Thanks to the inspired leadership of Lee Iacocca, Chrysler skyrocketed to the forefront of the auto industry once again, when industry analysts were writing the company's obituary."
| |
|
Lee Iacocca, 2006.
A discussion regarding Lee Iacocca, the person said to have saved the Chrysler Corporation.
1,538 words (approx. 6.2 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a look at the Chrysler Corporation and the imperative role that Lee Iacocca played in saving the company from total ruin. According to the paper, Iacocca took a then virtually bankrupt Chrysler, and turned it into the multibillion dollar corporation it is today.
Outline:
Abstract
The Foundations of Chrysler's Turnaround
Chrysler in the Modern World
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Lastly, Iacocca greatly improved upon Chrysler's reputation for poor manufacturing quality which in essence affected auto sales and warranty costs. Two men were hired by Iacocca to improve manufacturing quality--Richard A. Vining, a graduate of the Chrysler Institute of Engineering, and Richard E. Dauch, the manufacturing executive at GM and Volkswagen of America. These two men, along with Iacocca's inventiveness, "reinstituted tighter quality control standards for parts and components and assured that all new Chrysler products would be of much higher quality than all previous models" (Wyden, 1987, 236). Also, Iacocca made some drastic changes in Chrysler's advertising program by replacing its two former ad agencies with Kenyon and Eckhardt, based in New York, which "changed the focus of Chrysler's advertising and made Iacocca the company pitchman which embodied the true basis for Chrysler's comeback from the brink of destruction" (Wyden, 1987, 238)."
| |
|
Lee Iacocca, 2005.
Examines the leadership qualities and achievements of Lee Iacocca, president of Ford Motor Company and later, Chrysler.
2,132 words (approx. 8.5 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 66.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a biography of Lee Iacocca, who worked himself up from the life of the poor son of Italian immigrants to one of the most successful business leaders in the world today and who has held the prestigious position of president in two of the biggest motor companies in the world. The paper then looks at Iacocca's role as a leader and his ideas, which made him such a successful communicator and team leader.
Paper Outline
Introduction
Major Accomplishments
Role as a Leader
Conclusion
Bibliography
From the Paper
"Following a pattern of common sense, Iacocca has stressed again and again the need for effective communication, stating that as a leader, one has to be able to talk to and motivate everyone involved in the project or company. For Iacocca, this has often meant being able to ?blend in? in any situation: ?He had to do a sales presentation in the
South, and even though these are the friendliest people anywhere, they tend to be cautious with outsiders. Rather than introduce himself as Lee Iacocca, he stated that his first name was Iacocca, and his family name was Lee. He no longer seemed to be an outsider, but one of the good ole boys? (Swinfin, 1998). Throughout his leadership experience, Iacocca has been praised for being able to build a bridge of communication between executives and labor. The keys to his management style appear to be quick and effective decision-making, and the ability to take risks."
| |
|
Lee Iacocca & Auto Industry, 1997.
Examines leadership style & marketing strategies of chairman of Chrysler Corp. & his impact on the industry. Politics, competition, federal bail-out, successes & failures.
4,950 words (approx. 19.8 pages), 31 sources, $ 135.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"IACOCCA, CHRYSLER, AND THE AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY
Introduction
This research analyzes the leadership style of the former Chrysler Corporation CEO Lee Iacocca, the competitive forces that shaped the automobile manufacturing industry during Iacocca?s tenure at Chrysler, and the marketing strategies followed by Chrysler under Iacocca?s leadership. The findings of this research are presented in two major sections. The initial section deals with Iacocca?s leadership style, while the second section covers both the competitive forces that shaped the automobile manufacturing industry during Iacocca?s tenure at Chrysler, and the marketing strategies followed by Chrysler under Iacocca?s leadership."
| |
|
Carnegie and the Development of Libraries, 2002.
Andrew Carnegie and his philosophy as it effected the establishment of libraries.
4,650 words (approx. 18.6 pages), 8 sources, $ 169.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
A nineteen-page essay on the development of libraries in the late nineteenth century and the impact of the money and philosophy of Andrew Carnegie.
| |
|
Benjamin Franklin and Dale Carnegie, 1999.
Compares the effects of their individual childhoods, lives and eras on their philosophies and writings.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 4 sources, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This study will compare and contrast the American authors Benjamin Franklin and Dale Carnegie from a biographical standpoint. The study will take the position that literature is the expression of a unique individual and can best be understood through a study of the author's life, the physical and emotional circumstances under which the work was written.
From the Paper
"This study will compare and contrast the American authors Benjamin Franklin and Dale Carnegie from a biographical standpoint. The study will take the position that literature is the expression of a unique individual and can best be understood through a study of the author's life, the physical and emotional circumstances under which the work was written. In the case of Franklin and Carnegie, this biographical context proves most helpful in understanding their written works.
Both Franklin and Carnegie wrote their most important works at crucial periods in the evolution of the nation, and one can argue with reason that those works were shaped by their times. Specifically, Franklin wrote at the beginning of the experiment of nationhood, and his work reflects those dynamic, confident and experimental times. Carnegie, on the other hand, was heavily ..."
|
|
|
