| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "ABRAHAM LINCOLN": |
|
|
Abraham Lincoln: Man and Myth, 2002.
Discusses the views of author Stephen Oates as expressed in his book, "Abraham Lincoln: The Man Behind The Myths"
1,326 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Stephen Oates, in his book "Abraham Lincoln: The Man Behind the Myths", believes the grandiose dimensions and symbol-building power of the myths people create reveal their deepest longings. The paper discusses Oates' argument that this is especially true of the myths Americans have created about Abraham Lincoln, the powerful figure who presided over the country's greatest trial, the Civil War. The paper shows that Oates' book argues that rather than reflect any actual truths about Lincoln the man and President, the American mythology surrounding Lincoln reflects the spiritual and psychological needs of America's culture. The paper looks at other portrayals of Lincoln as a mythological figure in American literature, such as in the poetry of Walt Whitman.
From the Paper
"Oates argues that mythology carries a different truth than that of historical truth. In the case of Abraham Lincoln, the myth is what Americans wish the man had been rather than what he really was. The Lincoln myth has imbued him with the traits Americans consider their most noble, among them honesty, tolerance, a work ethic, forgiveness, compassion, a clear-sighted vision of right and wrong, and a dedication to God and country (Oates 16). Thus, Oates maintains, the mythological Lincoln "carries the torch of the American dream, a dream of noble idealism, of self-sacrifice and common humanity, of liberty and equality for all" (Oates 16)."
| |
|
Forced into Glory : Abraham Lincoln's White Dream, 2001.
This paper looks at the book by Lerone Bennett "Forced into Glory : Abraham Lincoln's White Dream".
1,000 words (approx. 4.0 pages), 1 source, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In his book "Forced into Glory : Abraham Lincoln's White Dream", Lerone Bennett claims that the glorification of Lincoln by Americans is not totally justified. He claims that Lincoln himself was a racist. In making these statements, an overall study of the issue of racism vs. slavery is discussed in a historical context.
From the paper:
"Lerone Bennett?s book Forced into Glory : Abraham Lincoln's White Dream is designed to make any reader rethink all of her or his preconceptions about Lincoln. American schoolchildren are taught that Lincoln was the savior of our nation, a man so motivated by the highest of ideals in terms of both guaranteeing the continuing union of our states and ending slavery that he willingly put himself into deadly peril.
Bennett suggests that this is not quite an accurate picture, and indeed in some measure he must be right. No one is perfectly self sacrificing, no one perfectly good, no one perfectly wise. Lincoln was flawed as any great man. He was not, however, perhaps as flawed as Bennett makes him out to be."
| |
|
Abraham Lincoln, 2006.
A look at the political and military career of Abraham Lincoln.
1,412 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how Abraham Lincoln, who abolished slavery once and for all with the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, was not an abolitionist and throughout his political career favored ending slavery by gradual legislative means. It explains that although he was personally against the institution, and supported legislation that prohibited the spread of slavery beyond the boundaries of the states in which it was established, he did not favor abolishing it nationwide.
From the Paper
"Abraham Lincoln was born on February 12, 1809 in Knob Creek, Kentucky but the family moved to Indiana in 1816. The family lived in forest land on what was then the frontier. Their cabin was remote from village or city life, and Lincoln's mother, Nancy Hanks, died of disease along with two of her children in 1818. Throughout his life, Lincoln suffered from depression and moodiness that many historians believe had their roots in this early loss."
| |
|
Abraham Lincoln, 2006.
A review of the life, history and career of American president, Abraham Lincoln.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 6 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper notes that the importance of Abraham Lincoln in American history cannot be overstated, and the mythology that has developed around this figure attests to the esteem in which he is held and the sense that he was one of the greatest American presidents.
From the Paper
"As a rule, Presidents achieve their position based on the historical events over which they presided. George Washington holds a special place as the first president, while Jefferson is remembered for writing the Declaration of Independence, among other actions. Woodrow Wilson presided over World War I, and Franklin D. Roosevelt over World War II. Abraham Lincoln presided over the most divisive period in American history and managed to bring the country back together while also working to make the promise of equality more a reality than it had ever been before. Abraham Lincoln was born in 1809 in Kentucky, and the family later moved to Indiana."
| |
|
Abraham Lincoln and Franklin D. Roosevelt, 2002.
Compares and contrasts the leadership styles of President Abraham Lincoln and President Franklin D. Roosevelt in times of crises.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay compares and contrasts two American presidents, Abraham Lincoln and Franklin D. Roosevelt, who both navigated the U.S. through difficult times. We will focus on their styles of leadership in their respective political crises: the Civil war, and the Great Depression, respectively, in hopes of making some suggestions on the nature of unwavering leadership in the pursuit of national interest.
| |
|
Abraham Lincoln and Leo Tolstoy, 2006.
An analysis of the psychology of famous historical figures, Abraham Lincoln and Leo Tolstoy.
2,719 words (approx. 10.9 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 81.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses how the actions, decisions, and words great men and women are intimately related to the psychology of these individuals. The paper proposes that by analyzing the lives of these individuals--their writings, biographies, actions, and what other people had to say about them--it may be possible to reconstruct some of the basic psychological underpinnings that characterize the great figures of world history. The paper firstly examines the psychology of Abraham Lincoln, president of the United States during the Civil War, and then analyzes Leo Tolstoy, the Russian author. The writer proposes that while at first we might expect that the only thing these two could share in common was a common lifespan in the 19th century, it becomes evident that the psychological natures of these men shared many character traits.
From the Paper
"Interestingly enough, Abraham Lincoln is not the only important historical figure that possessed this internal conflict of self-doubt and conflict between internal psychology and action. Though he lived half a world away and was born an aristocrat in Russian society, the psychological conflict and development of Leo Tolstoy bears some striking similarities to that of Abraham Lincoln. As mentioned, Tolstoy was born an aristocrat of the highest order in Russian society. The early death of his parents combined with his social status kept him largely isolated from other people during his development as an adolescent and young man."
| |
|
Richard Cory and Abraham Lincoln, 2007.
A review of the poem, "Richard Cory" by Edwin Arlington Robinson, drawing comparisons between Richard Cory and Abraham Lincoln.
997 words (approx. 4.0 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper introduces, discusses and analyzes the poem "Richard Cory" by Edwin Arlington Robinson. Specifically, the paper compares and contrasts Abraham Lincoln with Richard Cory in the poem. According to the paper, these are two very different men, but they share some common elements.
From the Paper
"Why did Richard Cory kill himself? The poem does not really answer this, but the poet insinuates that Cory seems to have everything, but it is not enough to make him happy. He is "rich as a king," but that is not the only thing that matters in life, as this poem shows. Happiness comes from contentment and satisfaction with your life and what you do. It seems that Lincoln was probably happy. He was doing an important job, and he had a family that loved him. He never had a lot of money, but he seems as if he was content with his life. In this, he was different than Cory. He would not have chosen to end his life the way Cory did, because he was content, and because he had important responsibilities. Maybe Cory was unhappy because his life was empty, and he did not have important responsibilities, and that would be a big difference between Cory and Lincoln. Lincoln was a success and he worked hard. Cory did not have to work, and he did not seem to have anything to motivate him or make him proud. Lincoln did, and so he had a reason for living, while Cory did not."
| |
|
Abraham Lincoln, 2006.
A look at the life, history and presidential reign of Abraham Lincoln.
1,630 words (approx. 6.5 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews and discusses Abraham Lincoln. According to the paper, Lincoln may have suffered greatly from depression, or melancholy, during his term of office. The paper reports that some historians believe that his mental illness made him a much stronger person, and a better president.
From the Paper
"In the first stage, the fear is that the misery will never end unless the person ends his or her own life. At Lincoln's worst times, he "resolved the deed to do" (Miller, 2005, p. BW03), and it was necessary to put him in a safe environment without any sharp utensils and a constant watch, as when he committed himself to a doctor's care in 1841. In the second stage, engagement, Lincoln stated, says Shenk, "he was not afraid to die"...but he had "an 'irrepressible desire' to accomplish something while he lived." Although the melancholy did not dissipate at this second stage, it gave Lincoln strength. At one point in the late 1840s, he sang a Scottish song with one of his favorite lines, "Yea, Hope and despondency, pleasure and pain, are mingled together in sun-shine and rain." In the third stage, transcendence, during his mid-40s, the same frailties that had long brought Lincoln so much trouble played a defining role, states Shenk (2005 b, p. 58). The suffering brought him clarity, creativity, conviction and humility to guide the nation."
| |
|
President Abraham Lincoln, 2004.
A biography of the life and presidency of Abraham Lincoln.
1,179 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how there have been few presidents who have made such an impact on the history of the United States as Abraham Lincoln. It looks at Lincoln?s life and presidency to gain a better understanding of the man. It shows how he was a driving force in ending the Civil War, how he came from humble beginnings, and how he never forgot the importance of treating everyone the same. It shows how this attitude earned him the respect of those around him and provided him with a firm foundation for leadership. Although his life was needlessly cut short, his ideas continue to inspire Americans today.
Outline
Introduction
Young Abe
Ambition
Military Experience
Inauguration and Succession
Gettysburg Address
Politics
Private Life
Death of a President
Conclusion
From the Paper
"When Lincoln became President in 1861, he ?lacked serious military experience, especially in contrast to Jefferson Davis, a West Point graduate and Mexican War hero. Lincoln often joked about his brief Army career: four months? service with several rag-tag militia companies in the Black Hawk War (Williams).? Lincoln was known more for his humor than heroism as a captain in the war. This was evidenced when his company was marching ?toward a narrow gate, he forgot the proper command to form his troops in a single column so they could advance. ?Halt!? Lincoln finally shouted. ?This company will break ranks for two minutes and form again on the other side of the gate.? (Williams).? "
| |
|
Abraham Lincoln, 2002.
A critical analysis of Abraham Lincoln's wartime leadership.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the wartime leadership of Abraham Lincoln, discusses to what degree he deserves his reputation, and analyzes where Lincoln should be praised and where he should be criticized.
| |
|
Abraham Lincoln, 2002.
A review of Abraham Lincoln's first inaugural address.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 1 source, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is written on Abraham Lincoln's First Inaugural Address. There is an introduction, summary, analysis, and conclusion. Lincoln states his viewpoint on slavery and the separation of the Southern states. He pleads for the Southern states to not start bloodshed or a civil war.
| |
|
Abraham Lincoln: A President Under Fire, 2001.
A look at the problems faced by Abraham Lincoln, first American President.
2,529 words (approx. 10.1 pages), 8 sources, APA, $ 76.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper goes over the challenges that Abraham Lincoln faced during his presidency, as well as the sources of these challenges. Topics covered include the various elements of the Civil War Crisis, his suspension of the writ of habeas corpus, his issuing of the emancipation proclamation, and many others. This is an in-depth analysis of Lincoln's presidency, from several points of view.
From the Paper
"Today, it seems unfathomable that Abraham Lincoln be considered anything besides a great war leader and one of the greatest presidents in the history of the United States of America. While he was in office, however, many Americans, both from the North and the South did not share this opinion. During his presidency, Lincoln acquired many enemies and made a number of decisions that made him a target of great hostility. No matter what measures Lincoln took, ultimately, he was criticized. If he leaned one way, he would be chastised by one group, and if he leaned the other way, harsh words would reign down upon him from another sector of society. Basically, Lincoln found himself in a no win situation."
| |
|
Abraham Lincoln: From the Ridiculous to the Sublime, 2006.
This paper describes Abraham Lincoln's upbringing, political career and character.
2,787 words (approx. 11.1 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 83.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper describes Abraham Lincoln's life and legacy. Lincoln's childhood is described as one of hardship, yet Lincoln strove to acquire an education. The paper also highlights Lincoln's rise in politics and his tremendous ambition. Finally, Lincoln's tenure as president is highlighted, and special emphasis is placed on the Civil War.
From the Paper
"Williams notes that Lincoln's most important legacy as a strategist was his establishment of the modern command system: "a Commander-in-Chief (Lincoln) to establish overall strategy, a General-in-Chief (Grant) to implement plans, and a Chief of Staff (Halleck) to relay information" (Williams). Thus, writes Williams, Lincoln, without recognizing his long-range contribution to the nation's modem command system, laid its foundation in 1864 (Williams). Under this new system, a joint product of Lincoln and Congress, Grant was named General-in-Chief, and was charged with the function of planning and directing the movements of all Union Armies, and because he disliked the political atmosphere in Washington, Grant established his headquarters with the field Army and the Eastern Theatre, but did not technically command that Army (Williams). Hallack then received a new office, as Chief of Staff, but not in the sense of today's term (Williams). Hallack was primarily a channel of communication between Lincoln and Grant and between Grant and the 17 departmental commanders under Grant (Williams). Grant possessed in superb degree the ability to think of the war in overall terms, however his grand plan of operations that ended the war was at least partly Lincoln's in concept (Williams). Grant conformed his strategy to Lincoln's known ideas: "hit the Confederacy from all sides with pulverizing blows and make enemy armies, not cities, his main objective" (Williams). Grant submitted the broad outlines of his plan to Lincoln and the President trusting in Grant, approved the design without seeking to know the details (Williams). "
| |
|
Abraham Lincoln: The Writer, 2007.
This paper describes Abraham Lincoln as a writer, especially his speeches, "Gettysburg Address" and "A House Divided".
1,730 words (approx. 6.9 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper, after relating the life of Abraham Lincoln, states that he is another Romantic age writer just like Emerson. The author points out that Lincoln's writings uses language as if he were talking to people. The paper stresses that the biggest difference between Lincoln and the other great writers of his day is that Lincoln wrote about politics and his writings still stand today not only as literary works but also as moral guideposts for our country's leaders. The author concludes that both the "Gettysburg Address" and "A House Divided" were delivered relatively quickly for the time period. The paper suggests that Lincoln's writings not only changed the future of American attitudes, but also influenced the style in which written laws would be interpreted.
From the Paper
"Lincoln wrote this speech at the time not to win the election but instead to voice his opinion about slavery at this setting. Clearly, this was not the best time to make such statements that would be considered outlandish. There was a greater purpose though in this speech. D. Fehrenbacher says that instead of wanting to create a new radical stance for the Republican Party, Lincoln simply wanted to prevent the party from giving up its position. This position he was talking about was the fact that if you stopped the spread of slavery you could eliminate it all together with time."
| |
|
"Abraham Lincoln and a New Birth of Freedom", 2002.
This paper is a book review of "Abraham Lincoln and a New Birth of Freedom" by Howard Jones.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 1 source, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the thesis of the book that Lincoln had to struggle with both domestic and foreign policy in the Civil War. The author believes the book is a strong work, particularly in the way it focuses on foreign policy to demonstrate how Lincoln was forced to issue the Emancipation Proclamation not only to free the slaves but also to prevent foreign intervention (by the French and British) on behalf of the South. The reviewer applauds Jones' treatment of this little-known aspect of the Civil War which allows the work to be fresh and informative, providing new light on a topic which has been covered heavily by historians.
|
|
|
