| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "ABRAHAM LINCOLN JEFFERSON DAVIS": |
|
|
Abraham Lincoln And Jefferson Davis, 2002.
Discusses their leadership styles.
3,150 words (approx. 12.6 pages), 11 sources, $ 111.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Discusses their leadership styles. Contends that President Lincoln was a superior leader. Lincoln's possession of traits and qualities needed for success in a crisis such as the American Civil War; a statesman with a clear goal. Jefferson lacking some critical characteristics and attributes, in spite of his intellect and skill as a tactician.
From the Paper
"The Leadership Styles of Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis
Introduction
During the upheaval of the American Civil War, the Union and the Confederacy were lead by two very different men, Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis. History, it is generally recognized, tends to regard "winners" in any contest as superior to those who "lose" the contest. Such a valuation is, more often than not, based on sound and substantial evidence. In the case of Lincoln and Davis, this report will demonstrate that the former was a superior leader possessed of many of the traits and qualities needed for success in a crisis, while the latter (though a remarkable intellect and tactician) lacked some critical characteristics and attributes which could have improved his performance if not the outcome of the War."
| |
|
Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis, 1992.
Compares presidencies of leaders of the North and South in the Civil War, discussing politics, leadership, personalities and flexibility.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 5 sources, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"This paper will compare and contrast the presidencies of Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis. During the American Civil War, Lincoln served as president of the United States, and Davis served as president of the Southern Confederate States. Over the course of the war, Lincoln proved himself to be the better president. This was not simply because the Union won the war, but also because Lincoln was more capable of leading his government and his people. Davis' failures as a leader were partially due to circumstances beyond his control. For example, the war effort in the South was complicated by economic problems, the lack of support from other nations, and the fact that the North had greater military strength. However, it can also be seen that Davis had weaknesses in his personality as well as in his role as a public figure. Specifically, Davis's pride and arrogance ..."
| |
|
The Success and Failure of Jefferson Davis, 2005.
Considers the success of Jefferson Davis prior to the Civil War and his failure as President of the Confederacy.
3,237 words (approx. 12.9 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 93.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper offers an in-depth examination of Jefferson Davis's success as Secretary of War under President Franklin Pierce and as a Senator from Mississippi, protecting slavery. It considers the question of why such a successful politician was a failure as President of the Confederacy. The paper examines a few of his failings as Confederate President, such as the concerns of small farmers and mismanagement of the Confederate Army.
From the Paper
"Jefferson Davis has been viewed historically as both a hero for state's rights and a villain for his role as the first and only President of the Confederate States of America. Prior to the Civil War, Davis attended West Point and served as Secretary of War under President Franklin Pierce. Davis also served a term in the Senate during which he opposed secession and attempted to consolidate a position on states rights that preserved the union. Following his resignation from the Senate after Mississippi's secession, Jefferson Davis served as President of the Confederate States of America, his primary role being the administration of the Confederate Army. Perhaps the most interesting thing we can learn about Jefferson Davis is how he was able to be successful as Secretary of War and Senator, but failed as President of the Confederacy. Of course, Jefferson Davis' duties as President of the Confederacy differed greatly from his prior responsibilities, and unfortunately, he simply lacked the capacity to effectively manage the embattled Confederate government."
| |
|
Lincoln and Jefferson, 2007.
An analysis of Abraham Lincoln and Thomas Jefferson's belief in God and its impact on their presidency.
1,882 words (approx. 7.5 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 60.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes and discusses the core beliefs of President Abraham Lincoln and President Thomas Jefferson. The paper particularly focuses on their belief in God as the one great Creator of mankind and it discusses how these beliefs impacted their presidency. The paper looks at the writings of the two Presidents and shows how their writings supports their beliefs.
From the Paper
"That our founding fathers, including Jefferson, so firmly believed in an Almighty creator who had gifted unto men the unalterable right to govern themselves is quite evident. That Lincoln believed the same way is just as evident in his writings and speeches. The question then becomes, is modern society so far removed from those beliefs that the Constitution is rendered useless? The answer would be an emphatic no. That such a question can even be asked (and answered) is a primary source for a continuing belief in the inspired nature of the Constitution."
| |
|
Forced into Glory : Abraham Lincoln's White Dream, 2001.
This paper looks at the book by Lerone Bennett "Forced into Glory : Abraham Lincoln's White Dream".
1,000 words (approx. 4.0 pages), 1 source, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In his book "Forced into Glory : Abraham Lincoln's White Dream", Lerone Bennett claims that the glorification of Lincoln by Americans is not totally justified. He claims that Lincoln himself was a racist. In making these statements, an overall study of the issue of racism vs. slavery is discussed in a historical context.
From the paper:
"Lerone Bennett?s book Forced into Glory : Abraham Lincoln's White Dream is designed to make any reader rethink all of her or his preconceptions about Lincoln. American schoolchildren are taught that Lincoln was the savior of our nation, a man so motivated by the highest of ideals in terms of both guaranteeing the continuing union of our states and ending slavery that he willingly put himself into deadly peril.
Bennett suggests that this is not quite an accurate picture, and indeed in some measure he must be right. No one is perfectly self sacrificing, no one perfectly good, no one perfectly wise. Lincoln was flawed as any great man. He was not, however, perhaps as flawed as Bennett makes him out to be."
| |
|
Abraham Lincoln: Man and Myth, 2002.
Discusses the views of author Stephen Oates as expressed in his book, "Abraham Lincoln: The Man Behind The Myths"
1,326 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Stephen Oates, in his book "Abraham Lincoln: The Man Behind the Myths", believes the grandiose dimensions and symbol-building power of the myths people create reveal their deepest longings. The paper discusses Oates' argument that this is especially true of the myths Americans have created about Abraham Lincoln, the powerful figure who presided over the country's greatest trial, the Civil War. The paper shows that Oates' book argues that rather than reflect any actual truths about Lincoln the man and President, the American mythology surrounding Lincoln reflects the spiritual and psychological needs of America's culture. The paper looks at other portrayals of Lincoln as a mythological figure in American literature, such as in the poetry of Walt Whitman.
From the Paper
"Oates argues that mythology carries a different truth than that of historical truth. In the case of Abraham Lincoln, the myth is what Americans wish the man had been rather than what he really was. The Lincoln myth has imbued him with the traits Americans consider their most noble, among them honesty, tolerance, a work ethic, forgiveness, compassion, a clear-sighted vision of right and wrong, and a dedication to God and country (Oates 16). Thus, Oates maintains, the mythological Lincoln "carries the torch of the American dream, a dream of noble idealism, of self-sacrifice and common humanity, of liberty and equality for all" (Oates 16)."
| |
|
Abraham Lincoln, 2006.
A look at the life, history and presidential reign of Abraham Lincoln.
1,630 words (approx. 6.5 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews and discusses Abraham Lincoln. According to the paper, Lincoln may have suffered greatly from depression, or melancholy, during his term of office. The paper reports that some historians believe that his mental illness made him a much stronger person, and a better president.
From the Paper
"In the first stage, the fear is that the misery will never end unless the person ends his or her own life. At Lincoln's worst times, he "resolved the deed to do" (Miller, 2005, p. BW03), and it was necessary to put him in a safe environment without any sharp utensils and a constant watch, as when he committed himself to a doctor's care in 1841. In the second stage, engagement, Lincoln stated, says Shenk, "he was not afraid to die"...but he had "an 'irrepressible desire' to accomplish something while he lived." Although the melancholy did not dissipate at this second stage, it gave Lincoln strength. At one point in the late 1840s, he sang a Scottish song with one of his favorite lines, "Yea, Hope and despondency, pleasure and pain, are mingled together in sun-shine and rain." In the third stage, transcendence, during his mid-40s, the same frailties that had long brought Lincoln so much trouble played a defining role, states Shenk (2005 b, p. 58). The suffering brought him clarity, creativity, conviction and humility to guide the nation."
| |
|
President Abraham Lincoln, 2004.
A biography of the life and presidency of Abraham Lincoln.
1,179 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how there have been few presidents who have made such an impact on the history of the United States as Abraham Lincoln. It looks at Lincoln?s life and presidency to gain a better understanding of the man. It shows how he was a driving force in ending the Civil War, how he came from humble beginnings, and how he never forgot the importance of treating everyone the same. It shows how this attitude earned him the respect of those around him and provided him with a firm foundation for leadership. Although his life was needlessly cut short, his ideas continue to inspire Americans today.
Outline
Introduction
Young Abe
Ambition
Military Experience
Inauguration and Succession
Gettysburg Address
Politics
Private Life
Death of a President
Conclusion
From the Paper
"When Lincoln became President in 1861, he ?lacked serious military experience, especially in contrast to Jefferson Davis, a West Point graduate and Mexican War hero. Lincoln often joked about his brief Army career: four months? service with several rag-tag militia companies in the Black Hawk War (Williams).? Lincoln was known more for his humor than heroism as a captain in the war. This was evidenced when his company was marching ?toward a narrow gate, he forgot the proper command to form his troops in a single column so they could advance. ?Halt!? Lincoln finally shouted. ?This company will break ranks for two minutes and form again on the other side of the gate.? (Williams).? "
| |
|
Abraham Lincoln: The Writer, 2007.
This paper describes Abraham Lincoln as a writer, especially his speeches, "Gettysburg Address" and "A House Divided".
1,730 words (approx. 6.9 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper, after relating the life of Abraham Lincoln, states that he is another Romantic age writer just like Emerson. The author points out that Lincoln's writings uses language as if he were talking to people. The paper stresses that the biggest difference between Lincoln and the other great writers of his day is that Lincoln wrote about politics and his writings still stand today not only as literary works but also as moral guideposts for our country's leaders. The author concludes that both the "Gettysburg Address" and "A House Divided" were delivered relatively quickly for the time period. The paper suggests that Lincoln's writings not only changed the future of American attitudes, but also influenced the style in which written laws would be interpreted.
From the Paper
"Lincoln wrote this speech at the time not to win the election but instead to voice his opinion about slavery at this setting. Clearly, this was not the best time to make such statements that would be considered outlandish. There was a greater purpose though in this speech. D. Fehrenbacher says that instead of wanting to create a new radical stance for the Republican Party, Lincoln simply wanted to prevent the party from giving up its position. This position he was talking about was the fact that if you stopped the spread of slavery you could eliminate it all together with time."
| |
|
Abraham Lincoln: From the Ridiculous to the Sublime, 2006.
This paper describes Abraham Lincoln's upbringing, political career and character.
2,787 words (approx. 11.1 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 83.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper describes Abraham Lincoln's life and legacy. Lincoln's childhood is described as one of hardship, yet Lincoln strove to acquire an education. The paper also highlights Lincoln's rise in politics and his tremendous ambition. Finally, Lincoln's tenure as president is highlighted, and special emphasis is placed on the Civil War.
From the Paper
"Williams notes that Lincoln's most important legacy as a strategist was his establishment of the modern command system: "a Commander-in-Chief (Lincoln) to establish overall strategy, a General-in-Chief (Grant) to implement plans, and a Chief of Staff (Halleck) to relay information" (Williams). Thus, writes Williams, Lincoln, without recognizing his long-range contribution to the nation's modem command system, laid its foundation in 1864 (Williams). Under this new system, a joint product of Lincoln and Congress, Grant was named General-in-Chief, and was charged with the function of planning and directing the movements of all Union Armies, and because he disliked the political atmosphere in Washington, Grant established his headquarters with the field Army and the Eastern Theatre, but did not technically command that Army (Williams). Hallack then received a new office, as Chief of Staff, but not in the sense of today's term (Williams). Hallack was primarily a channel of communication between Lincoln and Grant and between Grant and the 17 departmental commanders under Grant (Williams). Grant possessed in superb degree the ability to think of the war in overall terms, however his grand plan of operations that ended the war was at least partly Lincoln's in concept (Williams). Grant conformed his strategy to Lincoln's known ideas: "hit the Confederacy from all sides with pulverizing blows and make enemy armies, not cities, his main objective" (Williams). Grant submitted the broad outlines of his plan to Lincoln and the President trusting in Grant, approved the design without seeking to know the details (Williams). "
| |
|
Abraham Lincoln, 2002.
A critical analysis of Abraham Lincoln's wartime leadership.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the wartime leadership of Abraham Lincoln, discusses to what degree he deserves his reputation, and analyzes where Lincoln should be praised and where he should be criticized.
| |
|
Abraham Lincoln, 2002.
A review of Abraham Lincoln's first inaugural address.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 1 source, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is written on Abraham Lincoln's First Inaugural Address. There is an introduction, summary, analysis, and conclusion. Lincoln states his viewpoint on slavery and the separation of the Southern states. He pleads for the Southern states to not start bloodshed or a civil war.
| |
|
Abraham Lincoln: A President Under Fire, 2001.
A look at the problems faced by Abraham Lincoln, first American President.
2,529 words (approx. 10.1 pages), 8 sources, APA, $ 76.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper goes over the challenges that Abraham Lincoln faced during his presidency, as well as the sources of these challenges. Topics covered include the various elements of the Civil War Crisis, his suspension of the writ of habeas corpus, his issuing of the emancipation proclamation, and many others. This is an in-depth analysis of Lincoln's presidency, from several points of view.
From the Paper
"Today, it seems unfathomable that Abraham Lincoln be considered anything besides a great war leader and one of the greatest presidents in the history of the United States of America. While he was in office, however, many Americans, both from the North and the South did not share this opinion. During his presidency, Lincoln acquired many enemies and made a number of decisions that made him a target of great hostility. No matter what measures Lincoln took, ultimately, he was criticized. If he leaned one way, he would be chastised by one group, and if he leaned the other way, harsh words would reign down upon him from another sector of society. Basically, Lincoln found himself in a no win situation."
| |
|
Abraham Lincoln and Franklin D. Roosevelt, 2002.
Compares and contrasts the leadership styles of President Abraham Lincoln and President Franklin D. Roosevelt in times of crises.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay compares and contrasts two American presidents, Abraham Lincoln and Franklin D. Roosevelt, who both navigated the U.S. through difficult times. We will focus on their styles of leadership in their respective political crises: the Civil war, and the Great Depression, respectively, in hopes of making some suggestions on the nature of unwavering leadership in the pursuit of national interest.
| |
|
Abraham Lincoln and Leo Tolstoy, 2006.
An analysis of the psychology of famous historical figures, Abraham Lincoln and Leo Tolstoy.
2,719 words (approx. 10.9 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 81.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses how the actions, decisions, and words great men and women are intimately related to the psychology of these individuals. The paper proposes that by analyzing the lives of these individuals--their writings, biographies, actions, and what other people had to say about them--it may be possible to reconstruct some of the basic psychological underpinnings that characterize the great figures of world history. The paper firstly examines the psychology of Abraham Lincoln, president of the United States during the Civil War, and then analyzes Leo Tolstoy, the Russian author. The writer proposes that while at first we might expect that the only thing these two could share in common was a common lifespan in the 19th century, it becomes evident that the psychological natures of these men shared many character traits.
From the Paper
"Interestingly enough, Abraham Lincoln is not the only important historical figure that possessed this internal conflict of self-doubt and conflict between internal psychology and action. Though he lived half a world away and was born an aristocrat in Russian society, the psychological conflict and development of Leo Tolstoy bears some striking similarities to that of Abraham Lincoln. As mentioned, Tolstoy was born an aristocrat of the highest order in Russian society. The early death of his parents combined with his social status kept him largely isolated from other people during his development as an adolescent and young man."
|
|
|
