| Papers [346-360] of 4354 :: [Page 24 of 291] | | Go to page : <— 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 —> | |
| Term Paper # 95557 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
|
|
Business Ethics, 2007.
This paper discusses the issue of ethical principles within the business world.
1,206 words (approx. 4.8 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer maintains that the business person must be clear about his ethical principle or philosophy on money matters and this should be the foundation of his business. The writer states that wants can be considered needs and a person can learn and grow up to pursue wants and desires and never get satisfied. The writer then points out that this tendency can dominate a person and spill over to his adult life or business. Further, the writer notes that the pursuit of material acquisition can become the essence of a person's ethical decisions in business. The writer discusses that a person in business may not have to choose between principle and profits by developing the proper perspective or viewpoint regarding money and therefore observe his ethical principle while making fair profits.
From the Paper
"Unprecedented major changes in society have been modifying the way people view the good life and among the forces shaping that view are globalization and the resulting cultural differences, new communication technologies rapidly transmitting information worldwide, the increasing gap between the rich and the poor, and the decreasing autonomy of national governments. More and more people expect business corporations to take the responsibility of addressing current social issues. Findings of studies revealed that there is a place for principles and profits and corporations have become more aware of their social responsibility. More and more businesses see that the key elements to competitiveness are employee productivity and innovation, when employees become most enthusiastic, productive and creative in evolving new ways of doing things. This requires an entirely new vision expressed in a mission statement, which details the values and principles to guide the organization."
| |
|
Marx and Engels, 2007.
This paper examines the philosophical outlooks of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.
2,000 words (approx. 8.0 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the historical and economic influences that spurred Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels to create their philosophical theories and writings. The author elaborates on their innovative perspectives, especially Marx's view of the bourgeoisie oppressing the working class. Several quotes are included to illustrate this point. The paper also cites how Marx and Engels influenced socialist and communist thought as well as why their belief systems were so difficult to fully achieve in society.
From the Paper
"Society, during that era, was composed primarily of individuals who retained the vast proportion of wealth, who Marx called the bourgeoisie, and the workers, whom Marx titled the proletariat. Marx was vehement in his total disdain for the bourgeoisie. The Communist Manifesto states; "The bourgeoisie keeps more and more doing away with the scattered state of the population, of the means of production, and of property. It has agglomerated population, centralized means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands." (Marx 1988 pp 213-214)."
| |
|
Science and Religion, 2007.
This paper discusses science and religion and their attempts at interpreting the origins of the universe.
1,910 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 60.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer points out that the history of human thought from the beginnings up to the modern era betrays an essential and permanent need for interpreting and giving meaning to our world. The writer also notes that both science and religion have attempted different quests and inquiries into the nature of our universe and especially into its origins. The writer maintains that it would be hard for science alone to explain the complex relations between human beings and the universe, or such things as its very need for myths, archetypes and rituals. The writer concludes that the existence of consciousness and of archetypes is but a proof of the fact that the relation between man and the universe justifies the mythical tradition.
From the Paper
"One aspect which is interesting to notice is that there are different stages in the history of thought that bring scientific and religious truth claims closer or increase the gap between them. Neither science nor religion can totally prevail in human thought, so as to give the final answer to the mystery of the universe, and throughout history the well-known religious persecutions of science as heresy prove the struggle that existed at times between these two distinct modes of thought."
"One of the first things that the scientific modes of thinking have in common with the mythical or religious modes, is their main purpose- to interpret or explain the universe and our own existence in it, or to give meaning to the world in order to escape chaos, as Mircea Eliade observed. Mythical structures and symbols could be an indicative of the human fear of chaos. Also, the existence of the sacred in the world has the same function- the world is seen by the religious man as a divine creation, therefore as something ordered, harmonious and meaningful."
| |
|
What Does "Beauty" Mean in Art Today?, 2006.
A discussion regarding the modern concept of beauty in art.
2,174 words (approx. 8.7 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 67.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a look at how Kant defines the concept of beauty in art and how it relates to the art of today. According to the paper, when it comes to the modern concept of beauty in art, there is often a very thin line between beauty and the grotesque. The paper reviews various works of modern art, discussing the beauty of each piece.
From the Paper
"The painting represents a bird and a heart, each placed on halves of a paper. The thing that first draws the attention of the viewer is the strong nuance of red that dominates the painting. Indeed, even the two shapes (the bird and the heart) are not actually sketched out as a shape, but are defined by the contrast in color between the nuances of red. It is quite an impression and perhaps another approach towards the concept of modern beauty, insisting on suggestion and inspiration rather than on exactly drawing lines and representing shapes. Given the fact that the message of the painting is barely implied by the elements forming it, as by it is by the title, everything is left to the own introspection of the viewer. "
| |
|
'The Blue Hotel', 2006.
A review of 'The Blue Hotel' by Stephen Crane.
1,395 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 0 sources, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a look at Stephen Crane's novel, 'The Blue Hotel'. According to the paper, 'The Blue Hotel' is a portrayal of cause and effect or consequences of one's actions. The paper discusses how the book is a vivid and clear example of humanity's unkindness to fellowmen or reluctance to stand for what is right or what is good.
From the Paper
"Yet, despite all the negative view about man one should not negate the duality or dualism - like the Yin and the Yang. In every existence, there is always the positive and the negative. Crane's pessimistic view of man can be likened to the Legalists of Old China's view wherein they look at humanity as basically evil but can be restructured to attain goodness. The way to rid man of evil is to show him the good ways. In contrast still in the Chinese philosophy, Confucianism is the opposite of Legalism for this philosophy believes that man is by nature good and only the external forces affecting him makes him evil. With all the dreary seen in the world, man still lives up to the term humanity since there is still a lot of goodness seen around - acts of charity, kindness and compassion abound - that there is really no wont in any of these but it just so happens that the controversy brought about by evil deeds becomes more apparent because of sensationalism and media hype."
| |
|
Pericles, Plato and Aristotle, 2007.
This paper discusses how Plato and Aristotle's interpretations of Athenian democracy differed widely from that of Pericles.
1,822 words (approx. 7.3 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 58.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper looks at Pericles' endorsement of classical democracy as opposed to Plato and Aristotle's condemnation of democratic society. The paper discusses how Plato and Aristotle embrace some form of monarchy as the best possible organization of society and explains how they justify this in very different manners. The paper relates that people today are likely to find Pericles' idealistic vision of democracy appealing, while still recognizing that Plato and Aristotle's lines of reasoning retain some merit.
From the Paper
"Although the organization of the Greek city state of Athens is often idealized in modern culture as being the birthplace of democracy, the truth is that many major figures in Greek history objected to the Greek form of government. Classical democracy, as it is known, was perhaps most eloquently endorsed by Pericles in his "Funeral Oration," and documented by Thucydides. Yet perhaps the two most influential figures in Greek history, Plato and Aristotle, viewed democracy as an unjust or corruptible way to run a society. Whereas Plato objected to democracy upon largely theoretical grounds arising from his conception of justice, Aristotle believed that justice was not the only concern in forming a society but that practical stability was also a key requirement."
| |
|
The Genealogy of Morals, 2007.
A discussion of Friedrich Nietzsche's work "The Genealogy of Morals" which evaluates the value of moral judgments according to a genealogical method.
1,534 words (approx. 6.1 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Nietzsche's work, "The Genealogy of Morals", questions and evaluates the value of moral judgments according to a genealogical method, which in turn investigates the origins and meanings of various moral concepts. The paper further explains that "The Genealogy of Morals" discusses ascetic ideals or asceticism, a force that dominates modern thinking and life, and that Nietzsche views this as the expression of a weak and sick will that is unable to cope with its own struggle against itself.
From the Paper
"The ascetic priest, Nietzsche writes, is the person who modifies the direction of resentment. While every suffering person instinctively look for the cause or agent of his suffering. The ascetic priest seeks living persons on whom he can unload his feelings in order to obtain relief from his mountains of resentment, revenge and similar torments. It his instinct to strike back as a merely reactive and protective measure or reflex .He needs them for emotional release and he must pretend utterly in order to produce it. He passes his guilt and vileness to others, assaults their past and present, look for what is dark and painful in these in indicating what needs to be healed. Finding cause, he blames it on others and thus keeps them forever bound to their guilt and to their need for his control (Nietzsche)."
| |
|
Hegel and Aristotle, 2007.
This paper compares the philosophical outlooks of Aristotle and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.
1,078 words (approx. 4.3 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this paper, the writer draws comparisons between the philosophies of Aristotle and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, an 18th century German philosopher. The paper describes these men as seeing the process of human thought as linked to history and politics. Additionally, the paper explains that Aristotle and Hegel viewed human thought itself as a process which involved a system of logic. The author argues that Aristotle's beliefs perhaps laid the groundwork for the much later ideas of Hegel, and the influence of both men's philosophies on thought, logic, and politics influenced people and schools of thought for years after their deaths.
From the Paper
"Aristotle believed in the power of experience and the observation of the world around us. His work in the field of logic outlasted his time period and he even named the field of study. Aristotle "systematized logic, working out which forms of inference were valid and which invalid--in other words, what really does follow from what, and what only appears to but doesn't really; and he gave all these different forms of inference names. For two thousand years the study of logic was to mean the study of Aristotle's logic" (Magee 34). This concept of a logical study of the world was taken up by Hegel in the 18th and 19th centuries. Like Aristotle, he believed in a logical progression of change and development toward reality and self-awareness. "He saw everything as having developed. Everything that exists is the outcome of a process; and therefore, he thought, understanding in any broad area of reality always involves understanding a process of change" (Magee 159). Hegel was known to be among the most systematic of the philosophers in the period of "German idealism" and "attempted, throughout his published writings as well as in his lectures, to elaborate a comprehensive and systematic ontology from a 'logical' starting point" (Redding 1)."
| |
|
War in Iraq, 2007.
This paper examines various views of conflict theory and applies them to the war in Iraq.
1,700 words (approx. 6.8 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer concentrates research efforts on whether there are specific theorists and theories that could be applied to the current Iraq war and perhaps help others to understand it better. The writer first looks at the issue from the point of view that there are theorists, both classical and modern, who have strong views on war. The writer explains that this is largely due to conflict theory, which is that life is largely characterized more by conflict than it is by consensus. Those who uphold this theory have different ways of looking at it and the purpose of this paper is to look at classical theorists such as Karl Marx and Max Weber, as well as modern theorists such as Ralph Dahrendorf and Lewis Coser. The different views they have of conflict theory is then applied to the war in Iraq.
From the Paper
"The United States went to work in Iraq to try to remove Hussein from power, but also to help the Iraqi people understand that this type of treatment is not necessary. There may be people in the United States that are treated this way, but in general the government does not treat the United States citizens in anything like the way Hussein treated his people. Most of the people in Iraq were too afraid to rise up against Hussein, for fear of terrible punishment. Because of this, the United States troops could not get a great deal of help at first, but as the war went on and it began to look as though the United States would win, the Iraqi citizens begin to offer a helping hand. They were beginning to realize that they were finally actually going to be free."
"Another conflict theorist, Max Weber, did not go along with the theories of Karl Marx. He believed that there was more than just a ruling class and a normal class of people. Instead of two classes, he believed that there were four, and that they were determined by power, social status, and class."
| |
|
Idealism, 2006.
A discussion regarding idealism, in both philosophical and real terms, such as education.
2,374 words (approx. 9.5 pages), 12 sources, APA, $ 72.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores and briefly analyzes the philosophical stance of idealism. The paper then goes on to deal with the reaction and response to this stance from the point of view of the relevance of idealism in education and the effect that it can have in terms of personal experience and the social milieu.
From the Paper
"As is evident for the above discussion, the philosophy of idealism has many important implications for the modern word and in particular for education and teaching. In the first instance idealism offers a view of reality that goes beyond or transcends the mundane and everyday reality. In Platonic terms, idealism suggests that there are ideal forms or models of reality to which we aspire and these ideals act as objectives that direct our actions and thoughts in everyday life. In education there are ideals that have often been noted as being desirable. For example, the ideal of excellence in education refers to the intention of excelling or attaining the best or optimum educational standards and achievements. To attain excellence there must be higher and ideal standards. Another idealistic notion that is common in modern education is the ideal of "educating the whole child". This refers to the view that the student should receive an overall education that includes and integrates the various facets of his or her personality and potential. The central idea is that the child should be educated in terms of all the different aspects of mind and body. This view is described as, "...mutually reinforcing qualities of a fully functioning mind and body." (Dustin, Hibbler, Mckenney & Blitzer, 2004) These ideal are positive aspects that may or may not be practical in every sense but are goals or ideals that are important for the development and advancement of education. "
| |
|
Kant versus Hume, 2007.
This paper argues in favor of Immanuel Kant's philosophical outlook over that of David Hume.
2,208 words (approx. 8.8 pages), 0 sources, MLA, $ 68.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the philosophical outlooks of Immanuel Kant and David Hume, with the author concluding that Kant's perspective is preferable. Kant's opinion on how one gains knowledge is contrasted with Hume's. Both perspectives on the contribution of experience to knowledge and the role of the "self" and a personal "world" are also considered.
Outline:
Introduction
Exposition
Conclusion
From the Paper
"In his principal book entitled, "The Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals," Kant explains why only the categorical imperative is the valid standard of moral obligation (Abbott 2006, Richards 2006, McCormick 2006). He limits his discussion to specific willful actions in moral situations or conditions, where the will is, or should be, influenced only by reason or rational considerations, rather than by subjective or emotional considerations, such as laziness, convenience, or advantage . He writes that morality involves what actions are necessary and that concept comes only from reason or rational considerations. These rational considerations must, in turn, be a "single principle of obligation (Richards)." It must also be stated as a command and has no reference to, or weighed against, the consequences of the action. Kant then says that only the categorical imperative fulfills all these conditions (Richards, Abbott, McCormick)."
| |
|
Plato, 2007.
This paper examines "The Trial and Death of Socrates: Four Dialogues" by Plato.
827 words (approx. 3.3 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer analyzes Plato's work "The Trial and Death of Socrates: Four Dialogues". The writer maintains that the examination uncovered that this work emphasizes the strength of character that Plato possessed. The writer explains that this work discusses the final day of Socrates. The writer then looks at the four dialogues: "Euthyphro", "The Apology", "Crito" and "Phaedo". The writer concludes that whether or not one agreed with his actions is irrelevant to the truth in which he lived; even if one believes that it was a misguided truth.
Outline:
Introduction
"The Trial and Death of Socrates: Four Dialogues"
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Also in this dialogue Euthyphro reveals that his father has been accused of murder and Euthyphro believes that his father is guilty and should be punished. Euthyphro's beliefs about his father, causes Socrates to engage in a conversation about piety."
"The Apology dialogue is documentation of the trial of Socrates and the three speeches he made in his own defense. This aspect of the work is often viewed as the most poetic as Socrates actually shocks many of his listeners by honoring the law and standing in his own truth. He did this although many still wanted him to escape the prison and save his own life."
| |
|
Lunar Effects on Behavior, 2006.
A discussion regarding the influence of the moon on the earth.
1,084 words (approx. 4.3 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a look at the influence of the moon on the earth and how it has fascinated mankind throughout history. According to the paper, prior to the present scientific age the moon was considered to have strange and occult powers that could influence human behavior and events in a multitude of different ways.
From the Paper
"The question therefore arises as to why certain behaviors have been ascribed to the phases and changes of the moon. The answer to this question in fact reveals the falsity of many lunar myths. One answer is that these myths have their origins in ancient folklore and legends that have been continued in various forms to the present time. For example, the myth about the way that the moon can influence human birth rates can be traced back to the ancient Assyrian and Babylonian beliefs which state that, "A woman is fertile according to the moon." (Carroll R. T. 2005) These views are therefore based on unsubstantiated and pre-scientific opinions of the world and nature and can therefore be seen in the same context as the belief that the world was flat and not round. "
| |
|
The International Order, 2007.
A research paper on whether the international order is an increasingly liberal one.
2,430 words (approx. 9.7 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 74.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper examines whether the international order is an increasingly liberal one. The paper further examines how this liberalization of the international order, that has grown in recent years, is based on the classic liberal model of freedom, individual rights, fair government, and prosperity. In closing, the researcher argues that pure liberalism is what the world is embracing, and what needs to continue for the good of the international order, given the perilous nature of the modern world.
Table Of Contents:
Abstract
Problem Statement
Research Methods
Preliminary Findings
Chapter 1:
Introduction
Statement Of The Thesis
Purpose Of The Study
Importance Of The Study
Chapter 2
Review Of Related Literature
Introduction
Issues Discussed In The Literature
Chapter 3:
Summary
Conclusions
Closing Thoughts
Bibliography
From the Paper
"The problem that was uncovered in the course of the research is that the classic definition of what it means to be liberal, which is to say what the early liberal thinkers intended and envisioned for the future of the liberal movement, is not was subsequently became the daily liberal model that was injected into the international order. Rather, the liberal profile and manifesto, so to speak, became distorted and misrepresented with the passage of time and the manipulation of the liberal model by activists, common citizens, and world governments."
|
|
|
