| Papers [316-330] of 4057 :: [Page 22 of 271] | | Go to page : <— 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 —> | |
|
|
Grandparenting Resource Centers, 2007.
An analysis of the benefits of United States bill, Assembly 3014, which aims to establish a 'Grandparenting Resource Center Pilot Program.'
2,800 words (approx. 11.2 pages), 12 sources, MLA, $ 83.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses United States bill, Assembly 3014, and identical Senate 435, which aims to establish a 'Grandparenting Resource Center Pilot Program' to cater to grandparents who are raising their grandchildren. The paper presents the current situation for grandparents caring for their grandchildren and discusses what the new bill hopes to achieve. The paper presents the writer's opinion on the subject.
From the Paper
"The supporting evidence continues to be astounding however, it is evident by the fact that legislation has still not passed in eight years that there are enough people that do not believe that this particular problem has a need strong enough or worthy enough to be considered. There are individuals that believe programs will not be effective. However, this has already been denied by the effectiveness of the Kinship program, which proves that the programs are effective and quite necessary. Therefore, it leads one to wonder if it then becomes a issue of status, considering the fact that most supporting data reports that most homes in which the grand parent is the provider for grandchildren is predominant among minority groups. Regardless the numbers cannot be ignored."
| |
|
All Men Equal?, 2007.
This paper examines hypocrisy and irony present in the Declaration of Independence.
1,324 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses how leaders like Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin are celebrated for their efforts in creating the Declaration of Independence and shaping our ideas about government. The paper reveals, however, that Franklin and Jefferson were both slave holders despite their promotion of democratic ideals. The paper points out seemingly hypocritical statements present in the Declaration and concludes that certain parts of the Declaration could benefit from being clarified and improved.
From the Paper
"A century after the Declaration of Independence, the United States Supreme Court had to interpret the words of the Declaration, in a lawsuit brought by Dred Scott (Burnside, 2005). Scott was a slave who had lived 13 years in a non-slave state. He sued for a declaration that he was a free citizen of the United States. The Court held, by a 7:2 majority, that the words "all men are created equal" did not apply to African Americans. The language of the judgment is a blatant display of the hypocrisy of the Declaration (Bunrside, 2005)."
| |
|
The Right to Privacy, 2007.
This paper explores the extent of Americans' constitutional right to privacy.
2,552 words (approx. 10.2 pages), 7 sources, APA, $ 77.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses how the Bush Administration's terrorist surveillance program, the government's recording of Internet searches and other forms of data collection have all raised basic concerns about the rights possessed by United States citizens. The paper explains that privacy as a legal right and concept is notoriously difficult to define and demonstrates how varying definitions of privacy often arise from what one segment of society views as a moral imperative. The paper brings varied court rulings that show how definitions of privacy in the United States continue to be highly flexible.
From the Paper
"To understand the opposing sides, one must first understand the issue. Privacy as a legal right and precept is notoriously difficult to describe. Even to the lay person, it can mean many different things. Privacy, in the widest sense, might be best understood as the right of an individual to control access to personal information and activities; to prevent others from gaining access to these facts and activities unless there exists some pressing social need for this "personal data" to made public knowledge. As well, privacy could be said to include the freedom from such searches and seizures that might tend to expose this "personal data" - in particular, such searches and seizures as might be conducted without regard to due process of law, and which violate other basic principles and rights established under law."
| |
|
"Gideon's Trumpet", 2007.
An analysis of the theme of defendants' rights to counsel, as discussed in "Gideon's Trumpet" by Anthony Lewis.
975 words (approx. 3.9 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 34.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the primary theme of Anthony Lewis' book "Gideon's Trumpet" and compares it to the outcome of the court-case "Gideon v. Wainwright", upon which the book is based. The paper discusses the rights of defendants in the United States, particularly their right to professional counsel, regardless of ability to pay. The paper also looks briefly at the power of judges in America.
From the Paper
"Justice, and the work of the nine men (today, eight men and one woman) on the court, is not always about the will of the majority of the American people, it is often about the rights of the individual. A case that demonstrates this principle even more vehemently is that of "Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka." In this instance, the school children of Topeka who were Black were denied the right to go to the same schools as their White counterparts, regardless of where they lived, the desires of their Black parents, or where their Black parents paid taxes. The will of the majority of the White residents held sway, until a dedicated band of activists and lawyers gave voice to the desire of the Black community to have equal rights for their children in Topeka."
| |
|
Alcohol, 2007.
An argument in favor of making alcohol consumption illegal in the United States.
1,428 words (approx. 5.7 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper argues that alcohol consumption should be illegal in the United States. It suggest that while it can be argued that alcohol consumption should be a personal choice and that making it illegal would infringe on an individual's right to chose, its harmful effects (on the consumer and those around him) are too great to ignore. The paper begins by providing statistics for alcohol related deaths and then discusses the negative effects of alcohol consumption.
From the Paper
"Of course many will argue that the consumption of alcohol is a personal choice, and to make alcohol illegal would be to violate the individual personal rights and freedoms that are we are supposed to be guaranteed in this country. Though this is an accurate opinion that it is a personal choice to consume alcohol, the risk of the individual harming innocent people around them is far too high to ignore. Preserving the lives of the innocent has been morally and philosophically placed above personal rights especially when the individual who is free to choose then becomes dangerous to those around him. So, in effect, the choice to consume alcohol is not the choice restricted to the individual. As one chooses to imbibe such a dangerous substance, they not only choose to damage their own body and faculties, but they also choose to everyone else's safety and life that he encounters after he has his drink. This is a violation of multiple other personal lives, and so the sheer quantity of those at risk who are not involved should dictate that the choice should be removed from the few who have the control over so many."
| |
|
The Search and Seizure Law, 2007.
This paper discusses the Fourth Amendment and the controversy surrounding vehicle searches and consent to search issues.
2,777 words (approx. 11.1 pages), 14 sources, MLA, $ 82.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses federal and state case law involving the Fourth Amendment. The paper shows how the right to protection from unreasonable search and seizure is not a simple issue, particularly when dealing with the search of vehicles. The paper highlights how there are no consistent laws regarding search and seizure of vehicles; there are differing opinions of various courts on these issues. The paper concludes that motorists will continue to be confused and the rights of American citizens will continue to be in jeopardy.
From the Paper
"When originally drafted, the Fourth Amendment sought to protect the colonists from unreasonable search and seizure in smuggling cases. Prior to the Amendment, the English authorities used writs of assistance, or general warrants that authorized officials to search anything and seize any goods. These writs remained in effect for the lifetime of the king. In 1760, when King George II passed away, these writs were challenged by James Otis on the grounds these writs went against the English constitution (FindLaw, "History."). As a result, when the Amendments to the United States constitution were drafts, a protection of unreasonable search and seizure was included in the rights of the people."
| |
|
Legalization of Drugs, 2007.
This paper examines the pros and cons of legalizing illicit drugs.
2,473 words (approx. 9.9 pages), 9 sources, MLA, $ 75.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses the topic of drug legalization that is a heatedly contested debate. The paper discusses how those in favor of the liegalization of illicit drugs feel that drug laws have not significantly reduced the demand for drugs, but have only served to make the drug problem worse. They show how the illegal status of drugs has encouraged corruption among law enforcement and politicians. The paper also brings the arguments of those opposed to legalizing drugs who argue that it would cause increased drug use and crimes and would be a drain on the American economy.
Outline:
Introduction
Pros of Illicit Drug Legalization
Cons of Illicit Drug Legalization
From the Paper
"Proponents of drug legalization most often begin their debate with the statement that America's drug laws, as they currently stand, are ineffective. Programs such as "Just Say No" and "Zero Tolerance" have been unsuccessful (Linn, Yager & Leake). America, although fighting tenaciously, is losing the War on Drugs, and in fact, current drug policies have actually made the problem worse. A drug free America is simply unrealistic (Eldredge & McCollum). For this reason, they surmise that changes need to be made, and the legalization of the drugs being fought against currently, is one such advocated change, accentuated with the premise that in a truly free society, the government should not be able to regulate what drugs a person can or cannot take (Levinson; Messerli)."
| |
|
Proposition 207 Arizona, 2007.
A discussion of Arizona's Proposition 207.
1,375 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a detailed examination of Arizona's Proposition 207 Private Property Rights Protection Act. The writer explores its elements and the advantages and disadvantages of its passage. The author concludes that Proposition 207 is a measure intended to protect landowners however its outcome remains to be seen.
Outline:
Introduction
What It Is
The Cons
The Pros
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The second element of land use and government action that Proposition 207 deals with is the area of regulations. In the past, if the government suddenly decided to declare a certain bird or tree or flower as protected, and that flower appeared on someone's land, that person was prohibited from the development of the land that the protected element was located on. What this means is before the passage of 207 if the government suddenly decided that a rose was protected, and land had natural roses growing on it the land could not be sold or developed as the owners would be government ordered to set aside that land as a natural preserve."
| |
|
Administrative Law, 2007.
An analysis of the findings in the case of "Michael Hegarty and Joseph Hoff v. the Township of Old Bridge Ethics Board, Division of Local Government Services and Department of Community Affairs".
1,126 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the case of "Michael Hegarty and Joseph Hoff v. the Township of Old Bridge Ethics Board, Division of Local Government Services and Department of Community Affairs". It discusses the history of the make-up of the boards, the background of the case and the ruling which found that the Local Ethics Board had violated the petitioners' rights to due process.
From the Paper
"Hoff argued that the proceedings against him were unconstitutional. He made this claim based on the fact that the Ethics Board was created with an ordinance that requires three of its members to be clergymen, thus not allowing for the separation of church and state as so required by the first amendment. He further stated that not enough members were present to vote on the issue in the first place. The Ethics Board countered, stating that neither the Township of Old Bridge nor any independent local authority may permit the hiring of a former member of that authority for compensation. Three quarters of the Ethics Board were present for the meeting, which the board felt to be adequate. The Ethics Board also pointed out that only the New Jersey Superior Court has jurisdiction to resolve this issue, not an ALJ or the Local Finance Board."
| |
|
Civil Liberties Post September 11th, 2007.
An analysis of the changes in civil liberties of American citizens and non-citizens post the September 11, 2001 terror attacks.
1,950 words (approx. 7.8 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses threats to civil liberties in the United States following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The paper explains that these threats fall into three broad categories: secrecy, erosion of checks and balances, and circumventing long-standing personal privacy protections. The paper discusses the reasons for these changes and how they are affecting American citizens.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Secrecy
Erosion of Basic Checks and Balances
Privacy
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The last major threat to civil liberties, since the advent of September 11th, is the reduction of privacy in America. Privacy is one of the most valued of civil liberties for Americans. When asked if they'd be willing to allow the monitoring of telephone and e-mail conversations as a means of increasing national security against terrorism, only 34 percent of respondents were willing to give up this civil liberty (Davis & Silver). The ACLU clearly points out that the blurring of the lines between traditional separation of criminal investigation and intelligence gathering has seriously eroded the public's right to privacy. This is a backwards leap from the progress the country has made over the last four to five decades, when the FBI used programs such as COINTELPRO to harass civil rights leaders and anti-war groups ("Threats to Civil Liberties")."
| |
|
McDonald's Advertising, 2007.
A discussion of the possible techniques to protect children from being targeted by advertising, particularly by McDonald's.
2,447 words (approx. 9.8 pages), 22 sources, APA, $ 74.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses advertising that targets children, particularly that which is harmful to them, such as fast food. It particularly discusses the advertising techniques of McDonald's. The paper asserts that government regulation is the best solution to protect children from advertisers because businesses have no incentive to do so and because parents are not in a position to control the problem.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Advertising and Children
McDonald's Role in Advertising to Children
Social Implications
Economic Implications
Political Implications
Analysis and Conclusion
From the Paper
"Government regulation is the only option that will protect children from advertisers. The government already regulates the advertising of products such as cigarettes and alcohol that have proven to have negative health consequences. Because of the rise in obesity and diabetes, fast food should not be an exception. At a minimum, the government should place the same restrictions on fast food advertising as its does for alcohol and cigarette advertising. This may not be a panacea, but at least it would be a step in the right direction. As fast food businesses realize they are not immune to government regulation, they will be more likely to curb their unethical conduct to avoid even further restrictions."
| |
|
Natural Law and America's Legal System, 2007.
An analysis of how natural law impacts the legal system in the United States.
1,156 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents an examination of how natural law impacts the American legal system. The paper provides a general overview of natural law and then explores how natural law applies to the current legal system in the United States. It argues that the natural law helps to drive the current system and describes how this is true.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Natural Law
Natural Law and the American Legal System
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Natural law in its most simple form, is the unwritten law of mankind. It is a concept of principle morals and values that are, or at least should be shared by all of mankind because of the central goodness of their concept. (Horowitz, 2000)"
"Natural law is therefore distinguished from -- and provides a standard for -- positive law, the formal legal enactments of a particular society (Dolhenty, 2004)."
One example of this is the belief that killing is wrong. There are few humans or societies on earth that would disagree with the basic tenet that the murder of another person without reason is wrong. (Green, 2005) It takes a loved one from a family, it removes financial support from children, it takes someone out of society that may have moved on to contribute great things and if one is Christian, then the act of murder is something that God does not allow. It is not up to man to determine who lives or dies, it is God's choice and to kill is to try and play God."
| |
|
Nevada Athletic Commission, 2006.
An audit report on the Nevada Athletic Commission.
1,030 words (approx. 4.1 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper serves as an audit report of the Nevada Athletic Commission. According to the paper, the Nevada Athletic Commission (NSAC), first established in 1941, is a five-member body appointed by the State Governor for a three year term. It reports that the role of the NSAC is to regulate all contests and exhibitions of unarmed combat within the state of Nevada. This is accomplished through the issuance of licenses to hold contests or exhibitions where an admission fee is charged, and to contestants, promoters, boxers, seconds, ring officials, managers, and matchmakers who participate in a professional contest or exhibition.
Outline:
Brief Description of Nevada Athletic Commission
The Findings of the Audit Report
Why was the Audit Requested?
Who was this Audit Reported to?
From the Paper
"Due to lack of adequate guidance in the Commission's regulations and procedures, the process of computing and collecting the promoters' event fees has become overly complex. The complexity has resulted in the fees not being always computed correctly. For example, the report found that when determining event fees, regulations allow promoters to exclude complimentary tickets totaling up to 4% of the seating capacity, but the procedures in place do not provide sufficient guidance on how the exemption is to be applied. This leaves room for errors, inconsistency, and inaccurate calculation of the payable fee. As a result, some promoters paid more than the required amount while some others paid less. In one instance, the Commission had allocated the exemption to the most expensive seats, thus reducing the amount paid for an event; in other instances, two promoters did not get the complimentary tickets exemption for not having provided sufficient detail, while two others who had provided the same level of detail were allowed the exemption. The auditors, therefore, recommended a standard fee reporting form."
| |
|
The Son of Sam, 2007.
This paper discusses the murderer David Berkowitz, know as the Son of Sam, and the crimes that made him famous.
1,520 words (approx. 6.1 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that David Berkowitz, who, during the 1970s in New York, murdered six innocent people and severely injured many other victims, experienced a troubled childhood and early adult life. The author points out that, at his recent parole hearing in 2002, he sent a letter to the Governor stating that he did not wish to have parole granted because he did not deserve to spend a single day free after the pain and suffering he had caused many families during what he says now was the work of the devil. The paper relates that the Son of Sam Law was enacted to prevent any future violent offenders from profiting after they commit such heinous crimes.
From the Paper
"Even as a small child Berkowitz was not a social person. He preferred to stay to himself and, as he grew older, he was physically much larger than other children his age, which he later reported made him significantly uncomfortable. He became a bully and spent much of his childhood picking on other children and taking their money from them. He was called hyperactive, which was the term used for ADHD in those days, and he was prone to have violent outbursts with little or no warning."
| |
|
Restorative Justice, 2006.
A review and discussion regarding restorative justice.
1,346 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews and discusses the concept of restorative justice. According to the paper, restorative justice is an approach towards providing justice that concentrates on removing harm caused by an action, holding the offender responsible for the personal action, and providing the victims with an opportunity to identify the crime and criminal.
Outline:
Introduction
Restorative System and Mainstream Judicial Laws
Restorative System: Fundamentals
Restorative System: Serving Society Better
Conclusion
From the Paper
"There are certain clauses in the Restorative law that recognizes the need to adopt different and partially tougher course of action if the offender is not found cooperative. However the law demands that the course of action should be experimented, and evaluated on the grounds that if they are reasonable, restorative, and respectful. The offenders should comply by the standards of safety, values, ethics, responsibility, accountability and civility. The offenders should be exposed to the same nature of crime experienced by the victims, and should be provided with the chance of learning empathy. Such an offender should be provided with opportunities to be productive member of society. The participation of the offender into social and community affairs should be well received and acknowledged. The offender should be equipped with the values and fundamentals required to be productive member of the society."
|
|
|
