| Papers [1-15] of 4426 :: [Page 1 of 296] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 —> | |
|
|
ChoicePoint Case Study, 2009.
A case study analysis of the internal challenges and data breaches that ChoicePoint has experienced, with recommendations for the future.
2,727 words (approx. 10.9 pages), 20 sources, APA, $ 81.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a casestudy that discusses the systemic challenges that ChoicePoint is facing. The paper specifically discusses the internal challenges and data breaches that the company has experienced. Existing processes and their impact on individual's privacy are analyzed and recommendations are made regarding legislative changes required that will protect individual privacy, yet allow enough latitude for the personal data industry to still respond to the needs of corporate and government customers.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
ChoicePoint's Systemic Challenges
The Personal Data Industry Needs To Change
Privacy Advocates
ChoicePoint's Response to Congress
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Only by completely re-ordering the company's approach to managing data privacy at the process and system level and also making GRC a corporate strategic priority by creating a Chief Governance Officer will ChoicePoint be able to overcome the risk of being massively regulated by congress. Derek Smith needs to get out of the business of selling data to small and medium businesses as well; these transactions are not scalable in a GRC framework as proposed in this paper and the incremental revenue is not worth the risk. Ultimately ChoicePoint will be able to work with congress only by disclosing how errant their processes and systems have become and how they welcome periodic audits of their GRC strategic plans and ISMS initiatives. To be anything less than accountable and willing to disclose is to risk intensive regulation."
| |
|
The Terri Schiavo Case, 2009.
An overview of the legal battles surrounding the Terri Schiavo right to life case.
1,504 words (approx. 6.0 pages), 8 sources, APA, $ 49.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper explains the controversy between Terri Schiavo's husband and parents about what Terri would have wanted in terms of sustaining or ending her life in the vegetative state that she was in and who had the right to speak for her. The paper discusses the most noted court rulings and proceedings regarding this case, that involved the Florida Supreme Court and the U.S. Senate. The paper shows how Florida state and federal courts upheld the Constitution's 14th Amendment to an individual's right to privacy and Florida's laws defining a vegetative state.
From the Paper
"The Terri Schiavo case represents one of the most widely publicized legal battles regarding the right to life. CBC News explains the catalysts of the situation (Indepth: Terri Schiavo, 2005). In 1990, Terri suffered severe brain damage after her heart stopped, interfering with oxygen flow to her brain. Although doctors said that she was in a persistent vegetative state, she was able to breathe on her own and to live with the assistance of a feeding tube. Her husband and legal guardian, Michael Schiavo, and her parents, the Schindlers, disagreed about how the situation should be handled and were involved in a protracted legal dispute beginning in 1998. Michael said his wife has said she would never want to be kept alive if she were is a vegetative state and requested that the courts allow doctors to remove her feeding tube. The Schindlers accused Michael of lying about his wife's wishes and demanded that the feeding tube remain in place. Michael eventually won and Terri Schiavo died in 2005 after her feeding tube was removed."
| |
|
The Federal Anti-Kickback Law, 2009.
Examines the Federal Anti-Kickback Law (42 U.S.C.S. 1320a-7b(b)) as it applies to the writer's possible involvement in a joint venture agreement with another medical group, which has many Medicaid patients.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper describes the Federal Anti-Kickback Law, (42 U.S.C.S. 1320a-7b(b)), which prohibits a person from paying or seeking payment in exchange for referred business that will be reimbursed by a federal health care program, including Medicaid. These violations are a felony and can have severe consequences. However, the law does have several safe harbors. Nonetheless, because the law has been narrowly interpreted in the courts, the writer believes that the proposed arrangement in this joint venture agreement with another medical group appears to possibly violate the Federal Anti-Kickback Law.
From the Paper
"The Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the U.S. Department of Health is in charge of enforcing the Federal Anti-Kickback Law. The OIG has developed regulations to help ensure compliance with the Law, but is also aware that many contemplated arrangements may not fall within the safe harbors, but still would not violate the Law. Therefore, the OIG will provide advisory opinions about specific proposed business arrangements."
| |
|
9/11 and Wiretapping, 2009.
This paper discusses the post-9/11 expansion of government powers in the US and the significance of wiretapping.
2,214 words (approx. 8.9 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 68.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses wiretapping in light of the post-9/11 expansion of government powers in the US. The paper first presents a discussion of the purpose of wiretapping and a brief history of its use in the United States. Next, the paper explores the arguments for and against the extended use of wiretapping to improve law enforcement's understanding of the terrorist situation in the country. The paper maintains that, given all the information discussed in the paper, one can understand the post-9/11 expansion of government through wiretapping.
Outline:
Introduction
Purposes of Wiretapping
Brief History of Wiretapping in the United States
An Exploration of the Arguments Concerning the Government's Expansion of Wiretapping Privileges
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Although their impact on United States history names them as one of the most significant events to occur in decades, the attacks not only affected American history. From fast food joints selling freedom fries to bankrupt airlines who had lost the patronage of frightened customers, nearly every aspect of American life was altered by the colossal events of that day. The government was not excluded. In fact, the events of September 11, 2001 lead to some of the most radical and sweeping national security policy in the recent era. Similarly, these policies have been some of the most controversial since the 1960s Civil Rights era, proposing actions that many believed invaded the privacy of ordinary citizens, violated the constitution, and proved that the government was above the law. This is certainly the opinion of Michael Moore, whose documentary Fahrenheit 911 presented its audience with images of ordinary citizens being persecuted for their negative feelings toward the government."
| |
|
Landlord-Tenant Liability and Duties of Care, 2009.
A case study examination of landlord-tenant liability and duty of care in a case against ABC Apartments.
1,245 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the case of the manager of ABC Apartments misusing the key to one of their apartments by raping a tenant after using a spare key to enter her apartment. The paper describes the facts of the case and looks at landlord-tenant liability and duty of care. The paper then examines causation and the basis of ABC Apartment's liability in the case.
Table of Contents:
Facts
Duty of Care
Causation
Identifying the Basis of ABC Apartment's Liability
From the Paper
"Ordinarily, vicarious liability of employers is predicated on the common law principle of respondeat superior, pursuant to which employers are responsible for harms caused by their employees by virtue of the employer's failure to properly supervise or train them (Halbert & Ingulli 2000). In addition, many states have established precedents imposing an affirmative duty on the part of employers to safeguard their employees, tenants, and the general public from criminal conduct perpetrated by their employees. Minnesota, in particular, has dealt with the same factual circumstances raised by the ABC Apartment case; California and several other states have specific statutes defining additional liability for negligence in hiring and in the retention of employees who are unfit or otherwise unsuitable for their positions. (Feliu & Johnson 2002)."
| |
|
The Right to Refuse Treatment, 2009.
This paper explores the right of mentally ill patients to refuse medical treatment.
1,248 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 11 sources, APA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses incidents of patients engaging in deadly behaviors as a result of refusing to take their medications, but reveals that in current U.S. medical practice, it is unethical and illegal for mentally ill patients to be coerced or forced to undergo treatment. The paper explains that it is the duty of the nurse or health care professional to recognize telltale signs of an impending danger for the sake of his patient and his community's safety. The paper therefore concludes that health care professionals must understand the nature of the patient's illness, and use this knowledge to justify when to give intervention without violating the patient's rights.
From the Paper
"Mental illness is a legitimate disease that is common worldwide. In the United States, over a quarter of the American adult population - one of four adults-- is suffering with a diagnosable disorder every year (National Institute of Mental Health [NIMH], 2008). Some of the common psychiatric disorders are depression, anxiety disorders, and schizophrenia. This implies that approximately 57.7 million Americans are mentally ill. Moreover, it is also known to be a leading cause of disability among 15 to 44 year old individuals in the United States and Canada. These disorders can cause mild to severe disturbances in though and behavior, resulting in the person's inability to perform his daily activities (National Mental Health Illness, 2008)."
| |
|
Real Estate Eminent Domain, 2009.
A discussion of a case of eminent domain in Los Angeles, California.
2,570 words (approx. 10.3 pages), 8 sources, APA, $ 77.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper focuses on a legal case from which an eminent domain event occurred in Los Angeles, California. The paper points out the inherent ethical dilemmas which arise in eminent domain cases and therefore concludes that eminent domain, while necessary, is also fraught with ethical problems. The paper offers the recommendation that all U.S. states conduct further research in this area.
Outline:
Objective of the Study
Background of the Study
The Issue
Los Angeles: Cases of Eminent Domain
Summary of Review
Ethical Dilemmas
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Eminent Domain is defined as the power held by a government, either federal, state, country or city and to include school and hospital district and other agency to secure private land for public use and this may be with or even without the permission or approval of the owner of the property. It is provided in the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution that 'private property [may not] be taken for public use without just compensation.' Added by the Fourteenth Amendment is the requirement of 'just compensation' when property is taken and involves a condemnation which includes a public need declaration, next followed by an appraisal, offer and negotiation. In the event the individual whose property is taken is not satisfied they may sue the government agency and have a court determine what is 'just' compensation."
| |
|
Considerations in Juvenile Justice, 2009.
An examination of two articles regarding juvenile justice - "Juveniles and the Death Penalty," by L. Cothern and "Serious Habitual Offender Comprehensive Action Program (SHOCAP)" by M. Medaris.
1,669 words (approx. 6.7 pages), 2 sources, APA, $ 54.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses juvenile justice philosophy. It focuses on considerations for the enforcement of criminal laws upon juvenile offenders and the way these considerations have evolved over the years. It specifically examines two articles - "Juveniles and the Death Penalty," by L. Cothern and "Serious Habitual Offender Comprehensive Action Program (SHOCAP)" by M. Medaris.
From the Paper
"The program is very obviously intended to answer public fear rather that provide rehabilitative services for juvenile offenders that have entered the system more than once and likely on a sliding scale from relatively minor to very serious criminal offences. Though Medaris does outline, if very briefly, the research that was utilized to establish the need for such a program and the intention of collaborative communication between services is essential and necessary for the appropriate application of juvenile justice the program is a clear indication of the changing mentality of the juvenile justice system. Which is clearly in line with public sentiment regarding perceptions of public safety (or in this case lack of safety) rather than the need to intervene early enough and effectively enough not to have to identify so many Serious Habitual Offenders or SHOs, as the article labels them but to provide adequate rehabilitation alternatives that alter the perceived accelerated pattern of offences they are arrested and convicted of."
| |
|
Fighting Money Laundering, 2009.
A look at the difficulties in fighting money laundering in Lebanon.
1,131 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 7 sources, APA, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper explains the three stages of money laundering and looks at the reporting requirements for Lebanon's the Banque du Liban. The paper shows how the Lebanese case is difficult because of the traditions of banking secrecy; an investigator would have to work through Lebanese law and bureaucracy to obtain the information he or she needs. The paper emphasizes that combating money laundering in a way that aids American and international interests requires the maintenance of a healthy respect for Lebanese institutions and customs.
Outline:
The Stages of Money Laundering
Reporting Requirements in Lebanon
From the Paper
"Money Laundering has long been a major problem in fighting crime, in particular the kind of crime controlled by syndicates or unscrupulous businesses. Long associated with drugs, prostitution, and assorted "vices;" money laundering has taken on new importance in an age of global terrorism. Laundered funds can be used to finance a host of illicit operations from the purchase of deadly arms and weapons of mass destruction, to the setting up of terrorist or insurgent networks. Money laundering can be defined as, "the process by which one conceals the existence, illegal source, or illegal application of income, and disguises that income to make it appear legitimate." The Financial Action Task Force, an intergovernmental agency of the comprised of various member states and international bodies possesses its own methodology for discovering whether, in fact, an instance of money laundering has occurred. In 1990, the FATF introduced a set of Forty Recommendations that set the standard for investigation of international money laundering, the regulations being revised in 1996 and again in 2003."
| |
|
Deafness and Hearing Impairment, 2009.
This paper explores how the deaf and hearing impaired face limitations in their employment.
1,930 words (approx. 7.7 pages), 14 sources, APA, $ 61.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses the incidence of deafness and its classification as a disability. The paper then reveals statistics on the increasing unemployment rate for the deaf that shows how, although European countries have passed laws and policies to ensure equal opportunities, discrimination against the hearing impaired is still rampant. The paper discusses a solution that is being popularly advocated, that would allow the deaf to use sign language in the workplace. The paper concludes that, providing employment, which generates income and self-respect, is the key issue for the full integration of all people with disabilities, particularly the deaf.
From the Paper
"According to the World Health Organization, deafness is defined as the complete loss of the ability to hear from one or both ears (WHO, 2008). An individual may have primarily been born with this disability, being unable to hear sound ever since he was born. Factors that may affect a person's development in the prenatal or postnatal stages may affect hearing. While the fetus grows in the mother's womb, a malformation may occur in the auditory apparatus (Online Encyclopedia, 2008). A mother who acquires measles during the time of pregnancy may result in a permanent disability of the child. Postnatally, deafness may result from an event that may likewise permanently damage the ears. Deafness may be caused by complications such as acquiring an infectious disease, intake of ototoxic drugs, or exposure to noise that is beyond tolerance. Hearing impairment is the partial loss of hearing ability from one or both ears."
| |
|
Routine Activities Theory and Gun Control, 2009.
This paper uses the routine activities theory to explain differences in gun-related crime rates between the United States and the United Kingdom
2,390 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 14 sources, APA, $ 73.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer notes that the United Kingdom and the United States share a common history, language and heritage, but the similarities end there when it comes to gun control and ownership. The writer points out that in the U.S., gun ownership is a fundamental constitutional right guaranteed by the Second Amendment, while by contrast, no such guarantees exist in the United Kingdom because there is no constitution per se to begin with and gun ownership remains highly regulated and restricted. The writer uses the routine activities theory to identify and explain any differences in gun-related crime rates between the United States and the United Kingdom. This study uses an exploratory review of the relevant peer-reviewed, scholarly and governmental literature to develop the statistical data and empirical observations needed to achieve this purpose. Delivering this comprehensive review as well as a summary of the research, salient findings and recommendations is the final goal of the proposed study. The paper includes a color chart and a description of Geert Hofstede's Five Cultural Dimensions.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Statement of the Problem
Purpose of Study and Hypothesis
Importance of Study
Rationale of Study
Overview of Study
Preliminary Review of Related Literature
Methodology
Discussion of Expected Results
Limitations of Study
Conclusion
From the Paper
"While comparable levels of gun-related crimes do not exist in the United Kingdom, British citizens also do not enjoy the same level of gun ownership rights as their American counterparts which conceivably adversely affects their ability to defend themselves, their families and their property. Identifying a balanced approach to gun ownership and regulation, then, represents a timely enterprise and is the focus of the study proposed herein.
"Rationale of Study.
Because gun-related crimes can reasonably be expected to be higher in those countries where gun ownership is a highly prized right, it just makes sense that the United States will experience a higher incidence of gun-related crimes than other countries without such a fundamental right to bear arms."
| |
|
Finance Company Sales Tax Applicability, 2009.
A case study examination of the status of a finance company in terms of retrieving loans if the debt is later deemed uncollectable.
789 words (approx. 3.2 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 28.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents the case of a Michigan finance company that financed consumer purchases of automobiles from affiliated dealers, including the cost of sales tax. The paper examines whether the finance company is entitled to a refund of the sales tax paid if the debt is later deemed to be uncollectable.
Table of Contents:
Facts
Issue
Reasoning
Analysis
Conclusion
From the Paper
"In Daimler Chrysler Services North America LLC v. Department of Treasury, Michigan Court of Appeals, No. 264323 (2006), the Court was called upon to address a similar issue. The creditor, Daimler Chrysler, overpaid tax revenue to the treasury for motor vehicles sold to consumers by its affiliated dealers and sought relief under the bad-debt provision of the General Sales Tax, which allowed taxpayers to recover overpayment when expected sales proceeds were not received. The trial court determined that Daimler Chrysler was not a taxpayer, and determined that there was no nexus between the bad debt and the retail sales of the automobiles by the dealers. The Court disagreed with the trial court's decision and held that Daimler Chrysler was a taxpayer under the bad-debt provision, that there was a nexus between Daimler Chrysler's pad debt and the retail sales, and that Daimler Chrysler could recover under the bad-debt provision."
| |
|
Major League Baseball, 2009.
Looks at the history of the antitrust exemption granted by Congress to major league baseball (MLB).
1,590 words (approx. 6.4 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 52.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, even though it has obvious characteristics that would characterize another industry as a monopoly, the U.S. Congress has granted major league baseball (MLB) an antitrust exemption. However, there have been challenges to this MLB exemption that would open the baseball industry to greater competition. The author examines the standing reasoning behind this antitrust exemption, analyzes some of the major challenges to the exemption and discusses the overall implications and ramifications for this industry and any industry. In conclusion, the paper points out that other sports have persisted despite not having antitrust exemptions, so there is little reason to expect that baseball could not adapt as well.
Table of Contents:
Major League Baseball's Status
Challenges to the Antitrust Exemption
Industry Ramifications and Conclusions
From the Paper
"In 1953, the Supreme Court was granted a chance to correct the anomalous decision that was made in 1922 that granted baseball exemption from antitrust suits. The case was Toolson vs. The New York Yankees. In the case, George Toolson was reassigned from a minor league team to another team. The reserve clause, still in effect at that time, was used by the league as the means to forcibly transfer Toolson. Toolson, apparently, did not want to make the move. He believed that the reserve clause interfered with his ability to manage his own career, a point that was not incorrect."
| |
|
Gun Control in New York, 2009.
A look at the Supreme Court's stand on gun control in the "Heller" case and its implications for New York.
777 words (approx. 3.1 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper outlines the gun control debate and reveals New York's administrative laws that operate as a ban on private gun ownership. The paper then discusses the "Heller" case that ruled that bans, such as those in the District of Columbia, violate the Second Amendment. The paper analyzes the implications of this case for New York City.
Outline:
Introduction
Gun Control in New York City
Implications of Heller
From the Paper
"Gun control has been a very controversial issue in American society since the enactment of state and local restrictions against gun ownership by private citizens. According to proponents of private gun ownership, the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution specifically guarantees the rights of citizens to bear arms. Conversely, gun control regulation advocates maintain that the only right granted by the Second Amendment is the right of individual states to maintain armed militias, such as state national guards and police forces."
| |
|
Gun Ban Saves Lives!, 2009.
An argument for the implementation of a gun ban across the entire U.S.
1,280 words (approx. 5.1 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper refers to studies that suggest that handguns actually cause more problems, deaths, and accidents than they solve and contends, therefore, that the Supreme Court made the wrong decision when it overturned the Washington D.C. gun ban. The paper believes that a handgun ban is necessary for the safety and well-being of ordinary citizens, in particular children, those suffering from suicidal tendencies, and those who accidentally misuse guns. The paper also asserts that a gun ban would end the illegal handgun market.
From the Paper
"On June 26, in a monumental 5-4 decision, the US Supreme court overturned the Washington DC gun ban, citing that the "right to bear arms" phrase of the second amendment applies to more than just militia (Davies 2008). The decision came just one day after five died from gun wounds in Kentucky after a mentally disturbed man opened fire at his place of employment, eventually killing himself as well as the others (Davies 2008), and just after a recent study by the CDC stated that 55% of gun deaths can be considered suicides (MSNBC 2008). Although opposition to the banning of handguns suggests that the practice is unconstitutional in regards to the second amendment, proponents to the bans suggest that guns were only intended for the use stated in the amendment--a militia."
|
|
|
